Apple Mac Mini Late 2020的回顾。最实惠的M1也让人信服
在Apple M1,在我们对MacBook Air 和MacBook Pro 13 的评论中已经显示了它的优势,现在我们看看Apple Mac Mini。除了配备八核GPU的M1之外,入门级配置还配备了8GB的内存,以及256GB的SSD。
它的价格约为800欧元(约合944美元),是Apple"更实惠的产品之一,这使它领先于带有M1的Apple 笔记本电脑,至少在这方面。
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
v (old) | 09 / 2021 | Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) M1, M1 8-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 36 mm | x | ||
91.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2020 | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1, M1 7-Core GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
91.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2021 | Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) M1, M1 8-Core GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
91.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2020 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1, M1 8-Core GPU | 1.4 kg | 15.6 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
v (old) | Intel NUC11PAQi7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 647 g | 56 mm | x | |||
v (old) | Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T R5 3550H, Vega 8 | 843 g | 39 mm | x |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接性 - 带有M1的Mac Mini有两个Thunderbolt端口
Mac Mini采用了我们已经从其前辈那里熟悉的一体式设计,因此其形状和尺寸没有变化。与采用太空灰的英特尔机型相比,M1 Mac Mini再次采用了银色。
在连接性方面,可以发现进一步的差异。M1型号只有两个Thunderbolt 3端口,而不是英特尔型号中原来的四个。
网络连接可以通过无线局域网或使用RJ45端口的电缆来建立。后者支持高达10Gb/s,需要额外收费,而入门级配置提供千兆位LAN(1Gb/s)。
使用我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器,传输数据的速度平均为661 Mb/s,接收数据的速度为706 Mb/s。这与其他M1设备相当。
端口配置
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Average Apple AirPort Extreme M1 (552 - 661, n=2) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Average Apple AirPort Extreme M1 (672 - 706, n=2) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry |
性能 - 可与MacBook Pro媲美
通过M1 ,Apple ,在Mac Mini中也使用了其自主研发的SoC,它也将GPU和RAM与CPU一起集成在一个芯片中。转向底层ARM架构确保了与iOS应用程序的兼容性。然而,尚未被移植的x86应用程序必须被模拟,这可能导致此类程序的性能降低。
处理器
Apple M1是一个拥有八个内核的SoC,这些内核分为四个快速的Firestorm内核,时钟频率高达3.2 GHz,以及四个省电的Icestorm内核,速度高达2.1 GHz。虽然后者在给系统带来低负荷的应用中运行,但所有八个核心也可以同时使用。
在我们的Cinebench R15耐力测试中,Mac Mini中主动冷却的M1达到了Apple MacBook Pro 13 的水平,而且它还能在长时间内稳定地保持。与Intel Core i7-1165G7 ,Intel NUC11PAQi7 相比,这里提供的性能高出约10%。
Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test
Mac Mini 2020入门版显示的结果与MacBook Pro 13 与M1在个别测试中也是类似。与Intel Core i7-1165G7的距离又在10%左右。只有在Geekbench多核测试中,M1的领先优势明显,超过50%。
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Desktop (1595 - 2353, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Average Apple M1 (1496 - 1520, n=6) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Desktop (277 - 42705, n=20, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Average Apple M1 (7409 - 7830, n=6) | |
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Desktop (451 - 902, n=17, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Average Apple M1 (401 - 406, n=4) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Desktop (2024 - 16722, n=17, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Average Apple M1 (1863 - 2109, n=4) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Desktop (831 - 6588, n=22, last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Average Apple M1 (1020 - 1087, n=4) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T | |
Average Apple M1 (412 - 710, n=2) | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Average of class Desktop (77 - 564, n=19, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Desktop (1649 - 2559, n=17, last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) | |
Average Apple M1 (1710 - 1745, n=9) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Desktop (4734 - 26186, n=17, last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) | |
Average Apple M1 (7034 - 7710, n=9) | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能和SSD
只有浏览器基准测试可用于评估Apple Mac Mini的系统性能。在这些基准测试中,小型Mac经常可以将自己置于我们测试领域的顶端,证明它的性能非常好。在日常使用中,系统启动很快,而且总是立即作出反应,没有不必要的延迟。
内置的固态硬盘也显示出非常高的写入和读取率,这与我们审查过的其他M1设备的存储结果一致。
Jetstream 2: Total Score
Octane V2: Total Score
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
WebXPRT 3: Overall
Speedometer 2.0: Result
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test: 5GB Read | 5GB Write
JetStream 1.1 / Total Score | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (402 - 436, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) |
Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (175.4 - 184.3, n=6) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) |
Octane V2 / Total Score | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (62055 - 66974, n=6) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (446 - 516, n=6) | |
Average of class Desktop (377 - 612, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Desktop (261 - 409, n=17, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (216 - 293, n=6) | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T |
Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (209 - 255, n=6) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) |
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test / 5GB Read | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (2728 - 2870, n=4) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) |
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test / 5GB Write | |
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) | |
Average Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU (2194 - 2895, n=4) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) |
* ... smaller is better
图形卡
Apple 在Mac Mini中使用了带有八核GPU的M1,结果性能又与MacBook Pro 13 持平或略高于后者。Geekbench结果还显示,图形性能比Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ,Intel Core i7-1165G7,Intel NUC11PAQi7 。
这也使得带有M1的Apple Mac Mini适合要求更高的图形应用。
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Metal Score 5.1 | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Average Apple M1 8-Core GPU () | |
OpenCL Score 5.1 | |
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
Average Apple M1 8-Core GPU () | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Beelink GTR35 II-G-16512D00W64PRO-1T |
游戏性能
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 64 | 45 | 43 | 38 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 100.1 | 32.2 | 20.3 | 15 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 52.5 | 32.5 | 19.03 |
Emissions and energy - Frugal and silent
噪声排放
配备M1的Mac Mini配备了一个风扇,但它在任何时候都听不见,即使在负载情况下也是如此。这意味着,Apple"的迷你PC可以无声地运行。
温度
根据我们的测量,Mac Mini的表面只发热到一个适度的程度。最高温度为35.7°C(~96°F),Apple'的迷你电脑从不发热,因此,可以随时触摸,没有任何问题。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 25 to 47 °C for the class Desktop.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.7 °C / 85 F.
演讲者
Apple ,在Mac Mini中安装了一个内部扬声器。它的音量达到中等水平,并提供以高音为主的声谱。总的来说,它更适合于发出系统事件的信号,它不应该被用于再现媒体内容。
Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 25% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 46%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源消耗
我们的测量结果表明,Mac Mini在负载情况下的耗电量可高达40.2瓦特。然而,这是一个绝对的峰值,在日常使用中很少达到,即使在密集的负载下也是如此。负载下的平均耗电量约为20瓦。在我们的空闲情况下,最高达到4.4瓦。
根据Apple ,内部电源可以消耗高达150瓦,这是一个足够高的容量。
Off / Standby | 0.12 / 0.6 Watt |
Idle | 4.2 / / 4.4 Watt |
Load |
19.9 / 40.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / Stress test
Pros
Cons
结论--M1的性能符合入门级价格
如前所述,Mac Mini最适合与自己的或已有的配件一起使用。M1的性能非常好,几乎可以与MacBook Pro ,在此基础上再加上。MacOS和本地可用的应用程序运行流畅,提供了一个非常好的整体性能。
Apple Mac Mini提供了MacBook Pro的性能,而价格仅是MacBook Pro的一半多一点。
对于那些不在ARM上原生运行的应用程序来说,情况就有点不同了。这些程序可能会出现界面不流畅和偶尔崩溃的情况,最终,这里唯一的解决办法是等待原生版本。你必须测试急需的x86应用程序的运行情况,但总的来说,这里的性能也不错。
与其他迷你电脑直接相比,如 英特尔NUC11PAQi7,Apple 带M1的Mac Mini总是被证明是更好的模型。只是它的结构现在比竞争对手的略大。
价格和可用性
在撰写本文时,你可以在以下网站找到我们测试配置中的Apple Mac Mini 亚马逊售价659美元(优惠40美元)。