Apple Mac Mini M2 2023 评测-- M2 在台式机中释放能量Apple
Apple MacBook Pro 正在推出新的 Mac Mini 处理器，包括新的 M2 SoC 和更强大的 M2 Pro 版本，目前在 MacBook Pro 笔记本电脑上有售。这大大提高了设备的性能，但价格可能过于昂贵。配备 M2 SoC（具有 10 个 GPU 内核的更强大版本）、8 GB 内存和 256 GB 固态硬盘的标准配置售价为 760 美元，而配备 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘的 M2 Pro 版本售价为 1660 美元。由于内存和固态硬盘升级需要额外费用，普通 M2 机型的价格可能略低于 2380 美元（24 GB 内存、2 TB 固态硬盘），而 M2 Pro 替代机型的价格可能超过 6000 美元（32 GB 内存、8 TB 固态硬盘）。我们的测试机是标准 2 机型，升级了 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘，价格升至 1266 美元（当前市场价值约为 1350 美元）。Apple
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Apple Mac Mini M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 36 mm | x | ||
| 83.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 558 g | 37 mm | x | ||
| 81.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 i5-13500H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 604 g | 55 mm | x | ||
| 82.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 666 g | 52.3 mm | x | ||
| 81.8 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 239 g | 43 mm | x |
外壳与连接
小型 Mac Mini 的方形外壳与圆角设计没有任何变化。 小型 Mac Mini 的尺寸不到 20 x 20 厘米（约 7.9 英寸），当然不是最紧凑的迷你 PC，但它只有 3.6 厘米（约 1.4 英寸）高。 将 Mac Mini 放在桌面上显示器的下方是非常合理的。其设计与Apple 的其他产品系列相匹配，而且由于采用了铝制外壳，该设备的质量也令人难以置信。 重量约为 1.2 千克（约 2.7 磅），其中包括电源供应器。不过，由于所有端口都位于背面，因此这种设计也需要做出一定的妥协，这使得快速访问硬盘等外部设备变得更加困难。
在连接性方面，M2 SoC 与 MacBook Air 或 MacBook Pro 13 相比有一些优势，因为它有两个支持 Thunderbolt 4 的 USB-C 端口。 Mac Mini M2 最多可支持两台外接显示器；M2 Pro 最多可容纳三台外接显示器，有四个 Thunderbolt 4 接口，最大分辨率更高。
缺乏维护和升级选项是 Mac Mini 的一个显著缺点。不过，至少可以通过外置硬盘轻松增加硬盘容量。
在无线局域网模块方面，Mac Mini M2 比其前代产品和当前的 MacBook Air 机型有所升级，因为这款台式机使用了 MacBook Pro 机型（14 和 16）的硬件，并提供了现代的 Wi-Fi 6E 网络和蓝牙 5.3。与华硕路由器连接后，传输速率非常出色。在测试过程中，我们也没有遇到信号质量问题。
| Networking | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件
Mac Mini M2 配备了Apple 的最新操作系统 macOS 13 (Ventura)，以及令人惊叹的软件集。其中还包括完整的 Office 套件以及可用于创建和编辑视频的 iMovie。同时，几乎所有的基本软件都有专门针对Apple'M1/M2 SoC 的版本，而旧版应用程序（针对英特尔 Mac）的仿真效果也相当不错。
性能 - 全功率Apple M2
处理器
Apple M2 已因其他Apple 设备（如最新的 MacBook Air 机型）而广为人知。四个快速性能内核和四个效率内核的基本配置与之前的 M1 SoC 类似，但 M2 SoC 的单个内核可以以更高的速度运行。从本质上讲，Mac mini M2 与 MacBook Pro 13 M2 不相上下，明显优于 MacBook Air 机型。不过，这在正常使用时并不明显，Mac 的 CPU 性能也没有明显优势。
在与 Windows 竞争对手进行比较时，请记住我们的一些基准测试必须在 macOS 上运行，这对性能影响不大。 在 M2 Mac 上运行的 Cinebench R23 和 Geekbench 的测试效果更好。这表明 AMD 和英特尔芯片的整体性能更高，但功耗更大。你也可以阅读我们对Apple M2 的全面检查，以了解大量的效率比较。我们还把当前的 MacBook Pro 14 放进了对比中，这样你就可以看到可选的 M2 Pro SoC 的性能如何。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro -1! | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 | |
| Average of class Mini PC | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Average Apple M2 | |
| Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) -1! | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (155 - 846, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Average Apple M2 (216 - 446, n=5) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (68 - 315, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Average Apple M2 (222 - 229, n=5) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average Apple M2 (549 - 713, n=5) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (99 - 3860, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
目前的 Mac Mini，就像已经测试过的配备Apple M2 SoC 的 MacBook 机型一样，是日常使用中反应极为灵敏的小工具。配备 M2 Pro SoC 的更昂贵机型，就像配备 M1 处理器的老款 Mac Mini 一样，对日常工作影响不大。
测试设备在模拟基准测试（尤其是浏览器基准测试）和 CrossMark 测试中表现出色。最后，测试结果与Apple 的其他 M2 设备相当。
Jetstream 2: Total Score
Octane V2: Total Score
Speedometer 2.0: Result
WebXPRT 4: Overall
WebXPRT 3: Overall
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test: 12:1 8K Metal | 12:1 8K CPU
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1437 - 1585, n=8) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (340 - 2194, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (412 - 2038, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1319 - 1441, n=8) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1765 - 1967, n=8) | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Average of class Mini PC (282 - 2590, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| Average of class Mini PC (333 - 2205, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1008 - 1182, n=8) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
| Average of class Mini PC (122.1 - 357, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (220 - 257, n=8) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
| Octane V2 / Total Score | |
| Average of class Mini PC (75776 - 113823, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (72484 - 78736, n=8) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
| Average of class Mini PC (424 - 774, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (437 - 445, n=9) | |
| Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (223 - 256, n=7) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| Average of class Mini PC (67.1 - 334, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (342 - 387, n=7) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (89.2 - 478, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 | |
| Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (59 - 85, n=4) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (59 - 76, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Average of class Mini PC (26 - 44, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (24 - 26, n=4) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
存储设备
AP0512Z 使用的是 MacBook Air 上著名的 512 GB 固态硬盘，通过 PCIe 3.0 x4 连接。传输速率非常出色，显然充分利用了 PCIe 连接。与 MacBook Air 类似，配备 256GB SSD 的 Mac Mini M2 入门级版本很可能只使用一个存储芯片，导致传输速率比我们的 512GB 系统下降约 50%，正如我们在测试 MacBook Air 时观察到的那样；在我们看来，这种数据传输速率的下降不太可能给用户带来重大不便。
经过初始设置后，512GB 机型的用户可以访问大约 469 GB 的数据。
图形适配器
Apple M2 SoC 基本上有两个版本，只有 GPU 内核数量不同。小型 MacBook Air 的 CPU 在基本配置中只有 8 个 GPU 内核，而 Mac Mini 的芯片效率更高，有 10 个 GPU 内核。与其他Apple 产品一样，iGPU 的最大允许功率为 12 瓦，而且性能完全稳定。
M2 GPU 的结果符合预期，10 核型号也明显快于英特尔的 Iris Xe Graphics G7 和 AMD 目前的 Radeon 780M。由于目前仍无法记录国内游戏的 FPS 曲线，为了便于比较，我们继续以内置基准的模拟游戏测试为基础。
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (205 - 237, n=2) | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (4 - 926, n=22, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average of class Mini PC (160 - 7856, n=117, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (540 - 645, n=3) | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
| Total War: Three Kingdoms | |
| 1920x1080 Medium (incl textures) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
| 1920x1080 High (incl textures) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra (incl textures) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 102 | 40 | 36 | 32 |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 138 | 45.3 | 29.5 | 21.3 |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 73 | 36 | 28 | 17.6 |
排放与能源
系统噪音
虽然 Mac Mini 有风扇，但你很少能听到它的声音。即使在 CPU 或 GPU 满载的情况下，你也只能感觉到风扇出口处的空气流动。只有当 CPU 和 GPU 同时满载时，风扇转速才会缓慢上升，大约两分钟后，噪音水平达到最大值 29.7 dB(A)。但这只是 "嘶嘶 "的声音，绝不会造成干扰。在这方面，Mac Mini 比其更小巧的竞争对手更具优势，因为后者的噪音往往要大得多。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.7 / 24.7 / 24.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 24.7 / 29.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A) | ||
| Apple Mac Mini M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0512Z | Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-13500H, Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0 | Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0) | Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Kingston OM3PGP4512Q | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -26% | -26% | -26% | -23% | |
| off / environment * | 24.7 | 25.2 -2% | 25.1 -2% | 29.7 -20% | 29.7 -20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 28.1 -14% | 27.8 -13% | 31.7 -28% | 30.8 -25% |
| Idle Average * | 24.7 | 28.2 -14% | 27.8 -13% | 31.7 -28% | 30.8 -25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.7 | 28.3 -15% | 27.9 -13% | 31.7 -28% | 31 -26% |
| Load Average * | 24.7 | 42 -70% | 38.9 -57% | 32.8 -33% | 31.2 -26% |
| Load Maximum * | 29.4 | 42.1 -43% | 45.8 -56% | 35.2 -20% | 33.6 -14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.8 | 32.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
与笔记本电脑相比，台式电脑的表面温度当然是次要的，因为没有直接接触。不过，在一小时的压力测试中，Mac Mini M2 的顶部最高温度约为 37 °C（98.6 °F），完全没有问题，即使在后风扇出风口，我们也只测得约 42 °C（107.6 °F）。
在压力测试中的表现更耐人寻味，因为在这里可以看到主动散热，与两款 MacBook Air 不同的是，Mac Mini 的 M2 SoC 在综合负载下必须迅速降低功耗，而它的性能却完全保持稳定。我们没有带风扇的 MacBook Pro 13 M2 的具体数据，但在测试过程中，我们测得的功率为 28 瓦，略低于下图。
发言人
Mac Mini M2 仍提供一个扬声器，尽管与高品质多媒体笔记本电脑相比逊色不少，但也并非不实用。如果你对音效要求不高，只是偶尔看看 YouTube 视频，扬声器应该没问题。
Apple Mac Mini M2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 40%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
M2 SoC 功耗出色，空闲模式下最大功耗为 2.6 瓦。在负载情况下，功耗略高于旧款 Mac Mini M1，但与配备 Ryzen 7 6800U 的 EM680 不相上下。而其他竞争对手在负载情况下则需要更多的电力。
| Off / Standby | 0.07 / 0.23 Watt |
| Idle | 2.2 / / 2.6 Watt |
| Load |
28.7 / 51.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple Mac Mini M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0512Z | Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Minisforum Venus Series NPB5 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-13500H, Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0 | Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0) | Minisforum Mercury Series EM680 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Kingston OM3PGP4512Q | Apple Mac Mini Late 2020 Entry (M1, 8GB) M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -180% | -268% | -164% | -92% | -27% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.2 | 7 -218% | 8.4 -282% | 4.6 -109% | 7 -218% | 4.2 -91% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.6 | 11.8 -354% | 14.5 -458% | 10.6 -308% | 7.2 -177% | 4.4 -69% |
| Load Average * | 28.7 | 45 -57% | 70 -144% | 72.5 -153% | 20 30% | 19.9 31% |
| Load Maximum * | 51.5 | 97.2 -89% | 149 -189% | 94.6 -84% | 52.1 -1% | 40.2 22% |
| Idle Average * | 9.2 | 11.3 | 6 | 7.2 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 95.7 | |||||
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 19.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption with external monitor
Pros
Cons
评价：配备高品质外壳的高效迷你台式机
新款 Mac Mini M2 是一次耐人寻味的更新，因为Apple 不仅更新了处理器，还为这款小巧的台式机提供了 Thunderbolt 4 和 Wi-Fi 6E。这也使 Mac Mini 与当前的 MacBook Air 机型区分开来，并与更昂贵的 MacBook Pro 机型（14 和 16 英寸）并驾齐驱。
Apple 与 M1 SoC 相比，性能有所提高，但功耗也有所降低。Windows 竞争对手的纯 CPU 性能通常略高，但Apple 在 GPU 方面具有明显优势，整体效率也高出许多。
由于采用了新的 M2 处理器、Thunderbolt 4 和 Wi-Fi 6E，最新的Apple Mac Mini 与之前的 M1 机型相比是一次成功的升级。不过，Apple ，要想获得更多内存或固态硬盘存储空间，仍需加价，而且这款小小的台式机缺乏维护选择。
如果你需要更高的性能，Mac Mini 现在也配备了 M2 Pro SoC，不过价格很快就会变得非常昂贵。 基本上，更大内存和固态硬盘容量的溢价过高，但外置硬盘可以轻松连接。当然，对于台式电脑来说，缺乏维护选择是一个明显的劣势，英特尔 NUC 13 Pro 和 Minisforum UM790 等竞争对手的表现显然更胜一筹。如果你不介意这一点，你就会得到一台高质量、高效率的迷你台式电脑，它具有丰富的软件功能，而且几乎总是无声运行。
价格和供应情况
测试配置的 Mac Mini M2在美国亚马逊的售价为 989 美元。Apple ，基本型号（8 GB 内存、256 GB 固态硬盘）的售价为 599 美元。仅供参考。
Apple Mac Mini M2
- 08/31/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
