Notebookcheck Logo
The Mac Mini M4 Pro

Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro 评测小巧节俭的台式电脑,性能一流,升级费用昂贵

价格不菲的强者

Apple Mac Mini M4 配备了全新的 M4 Pro 处理器,在小巧的机身内提供了令人印象深刻的性能和能效。在这次评测中,我们对配备 M4 Pro SoC、64 GB 内存和 2-TB SSD 的 Mac Mini 进行了近距离观察,其价格约为 2,600 美元。
Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Mini PC Desktop Apple ARM Thunderbolt

评语:性能卓越、价格不菲的 Mac Mini M4 Pro

配备Apple M4 Pro (12 核) SoC 的 Mac Mini 显示了迷你 PC 的强大功能和多用途性。Apple这款基于 ARM 的最新处理器集卓越的计算能力、惊人的能效和创新的架构于一身,使其成为同类台式电脑中的佼佼者。我们已经在基本型号的 Apple Mac Mini M4.其强大的处理器与性能极强的Apple M4 Pro 16 核 GPU 相辅相成,比 AMD 和 Intel 的著名 iGPU 更胜一筹。

高达 64 GB 的统一内存和每秒 7.6 GB 的超快固态硬盘保证了即使是要求苛刻的多任务和数据密集型应用程序也能顺利处理。不过,按照Apple 的惯例,其统一内存是永久焊接在一起的,无法升级。因此,用户在配置设备时应选择足够的容量,以确保为未来做好准备。电脑的固态硬盘可以更换,但Apple 安装了专有模块,这也会在配置过程中迅速抬高价格。

它的另一大亮点是安静高效的散热。由于风扇不会经常启动,而且运行速度较低,因此 Mac Mini 即使在一般负载下也能保持几乎无声。同时,M4 Pro 能耗极低,非常适合连续使用。配备 M4 Pro 的 Mac Mini 是一款令人印象深刻的迷你电脑,在外观和技术上都远远领先于市场上的大多数其他迷你电脑。除了内置电源装置外,它还配备了扬声器,其音质令人印象深刻。

任何熟悉 Mac 的人都能轻松驾驭该系统。计划从 Windows 环境转到 macOS 的用户应事先仔细考虑系统的用途。许多知名程序在 macOS 上无法使用,因此你必须寻找替代程序。不过,这并不一定是坏事,因为经过专门优化的应用程序通常能更高效、更稳定地运行。

Pros

+ 外壳小巧
+ 完美的制造质量
+ 超快、高效的 M4 Pro SoC
+ 雷电 5 和 Wi-Fi 6E
+ 支持多达三个外接显示器
+ 平均负载下保持静音
+ 64 GB 内存(统一内存)
+ 2-TB SSD

Cons

- 没有维护选项
- 内存和固态硬盘升级费用高昂
- 电源按钮的位置不实用
- 保修期只有 1 年
- 价格昂贵

价格和供应情况

您可以直接从Apple 购买新款 Mac Mini M4 Pro,我们的测试机型售价为 2599 美元。.

另一款配备普通 M4 SoC 的 Mac Mini 目前在亚马逊的报价为 744 美元

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Height
Display
1.
87.2%
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) ⎘
Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU ⎘
64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $569.00
Apple 2024 Mac Mini Desktop ...
2. $1,998.99
Apple 2024 Mac Mini Desktop ...
3. $2,199.96
Apple 2024 Mac Mini Desktop ...
List Price: 2811€
729 g50 mmx
2.
84.7%
Apple Mac Mini M4
Apple Mac Mini M4
Apple M4 (10 cores) ⎘
Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $569.00
Apple 2024 Mac Mini Desktop ...
2. $2,199.96
Apple 2024 Mac Mini Desktop ...
3. $1,998.99
Apple 2024 Mac Mini Desktop ...
List Price: 699€
648 g50 mmx
3.
80.8%
Aoostar GEM12
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $399.95
AOOSTAR GEM12 AMD R9 6900HX ...
2. $499.00
AOOSTAR GEM12 Mini PC, AMD R...
3. $409.00
AOOSTAR GEM12 8845HS Mini PC...
List Price: 649 US-Dollar
653 g60 mmx
4.
76.7%
Minisforum MS-A1
Minisforum MS-A1
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $909.90
MINISFORUM MS-A1 Mini Workst...
2. $255.99
MINISFORUM MS-A1 Mini Workst...
3. $255.90
MINISFORUM MS-A1 Mini Workst...
List Price: 829 EUR
1.7 kg48 mmx
5.
75.3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $1,000.00
ASUS NUC 14 Pro+ Full System...
2. $909.00
ASUS NUC 14 Pro AI Mini Pc, ...
3. $779.00
ASUS NUC 14 Pro AI Mini Comp...
List Price: 1250 EUR
622 g41 mmx
6.
78.4%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $899.00
GEEKOM AX8 Pro Ai Mini PC,AM...
2. $899.00
GEEKOM A8 AI Mini PC, AMD Ry...
3. $519.00
GEEKOM AX8 Pro Ai Mini PC,AM...
List Price: 999 EUR
548 g37 mmx

在了解了 Mac Mini M4 的基本配置后 Mac Mini M4处理器的基本配置之后,现在我们要关注的是基于 M4 Pro 的更强大的机型,它拥有 12 个内核,另外还配备了同样强大的Apple M4 Pro 16 核 GPU。Apple 对这款微型电脑进行了全面的重新设计,现在它比以往任何时候都更加小巧轻便。新的基本型号配备了 M4 SoC、16 GB 内存和 256 GB 固态硬盘,MRSP 售价为 599 美元,而我们的测试样品(M4 Pro,12 个 CPU 内核、64 GB 内存和 2 TB 存储空间)售价高达 2,600 美元。不过,这绝不是最高配置。在最高配置下,你可以轻松花上 4699 美元(M4 Pro,14 个 CPU 内核,64 GB 内存,8 TB 存储空间,10 Gbit/s 以太网)购买该设备。

规格

Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
Processor
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) 12 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, 40 W PL2 / Short Burst, 40 W PL1 / Sustained
Graphics adapter
Memory
64 GB 
, LPDDR5X-8533, unified
Storage
Apple SSD AP2048Z, 2048 GB 
, 1900 GB free
Connections
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 3 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 3 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo
Networking
10/100/1000 LAN Card (10/100/1000MBit/s), Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 50 x 127 x 127
Operating System
Apple macOS 15 Sequoia
Additional features
12 Months Warranty
Weight
729 g
Price
2811 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

机箱 - Mac Mini 比许多其他迷你 PC 更为小巧

无论配置如何,Mac Mini 2024 始终使用相同的机箱。它的占地面积为 12.7 x 12.7 厘米,相对于其性能而言非常小巧。从外观上看,Mac Mini 更像是一台Apple 电视机。由于高度增加了 5 厘米,这款迷你电脑变得略微厚了一些,但这并不影响其外观。作为Apple 的典型代表,它的制造质量非常出色,电源装置也集成在设备中。与入门级配置相比,M4 Pro 机型略重一些。

尽管 Mac Mini 2024 体积小巧,但散热良好,可确保安静运行。其永恒的设计和深思熟虑的结构使其成为适用于各种应用的多功能选择。不过,你必须习惯电源按钮的位置,它位于设备的底部。大多数Apple 用户可能很少真正关闭他们的设备,因此Apple 的决定确实有点合理。使用适当的工具可以从底部打开机箱。取下大风扇后,就能看到专有的固态硬盘模块。理论上,可以更换存储设备。Apple 将在多大程度上提供相应的升级服务,我们拭目以待。而内存则是永久焊接在一起的,无法更换或升级。

Mac Mini M4 Pro
Mac Mini M4 Pro
Mac Mini M4 Pro
Mac Mini M4 Pro
Mac Mini M4 Pro
Mac Mini M4 Pro
Mac Mini M4 Pro

尺寸比较

189.5 mm 186 mm 48 mm 1.7 kg197 mm 197 mm 36 mm 1.2 kg130 mm 130 mm 60 mm 653 g144 mm 112 mm 41 mm 622 g127 mm 127 mm 50 mm 729 g117 mm 112 mm 37 mm 548 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - Thunderbolt 5,速度高达 120 Gbit/s

Mac Mini M4 Pro 拥有现代化的多功能连接选项,确保了灵活性和易用性。正面有两个 USB-C 端口:非常适合快速访问,例如连接外部存储媒体或移动设备。背面还有三个 Thunderbolt 5 端口:这些端口可实现超快数据传输,连接外部存储解决方案,并支持多达两个 60 Hz 的 6K 显示器。它还配有一个 HDMI 端口和一个千兆以太网端口。Mac Mini 可以选择配备万兆以太网,以实现更快的网络连接。

与当前的 MacBook Pro 机型一样,它的 Wi-Fi 模块支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3,但不支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准。在我们使用华硕参考路由器进行的测试中,它的速度和稳定性都非常出色,无可挑剔。

正面:2 个 USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(10 Gbit/s)、状态 LED、3.5 毫米音频(图片:Apple)
正面:2 个 USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(10 Gbit/s)、状态 LED、3.5 毫米音频(图片:Apple)
背面:电源线、千兆以太网、HDMI 2.1、3 个 USB-C Thunderbolt 5(120 Gbit/s,DisplayPort Alt 模式 1.4)(图片:Apple)
背面:电源线、千兆以太网、HDMI 2.1、3 个 USB-C Thunderbolt 5(120 Gbit/s,DisplayPort Alt 模式 1.4)(图片:Apple)
通过雷电 4 检查威刚 SE920 的性能
通过雷电 4 检查威刚 SE920 的性能
Connectivity - USB 3.x / USB4 / TB - AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
3809 MB/s
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3245.45 MB/s
Khadas Mind 2
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
3165.4 MB/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (1611 - 3809, n=7, last 2 years)
2970 MB/s
Geekom GT1 Mega
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
1611.37 MB/s
Networking
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1651 (min: 1571) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1434 (min: 1391) MBit/s ∼80%
Apple Mac Mini M4
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1755 (min: 1638) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1676 (min: 1640) MBit/s ∼100%
Aoostar GEM12
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
iperf3 receive AXE11000
740 (min: 676) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
736 (min: 369) MBit/s ∼44%
Minisforum MS-A1
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1749 (min: 1702) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1597 (min: 1554) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
941 (min: 873) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
855 (min: 438) MBit/s ∼51%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1446 (min: 1321) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1223 (min: 1160) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
951 (min: 926) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
707 (min: 666) MBit/s ∼42%
Geekom AX8 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1657 (min: 1619) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1800 (min: 1737) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
979 (min: 962) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
966 (min: 921) MBit/s ∼58%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1432 (1391-1454)
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1651 (1571-1689)

可持续性

Apple 在 Mac 的产品页面上,有大量关于可持续发展的内容。除了广泛介绍 Mac Mini 主要使用的可回收材料外,还谈到了围绕其生产的整个话题。简而言之,我们可以将其生产归类为气候中和产品。 设备的超长使用寿命和长期的产品更新供应也对此做出了积极贡献。Apple

性能 -Apple M4 Pro(12 核),64 GB 内存

即使是配备 M4 芯片和 16GB 内存的基本机型,在我们的测试中也取得了优异的成绩。不过,如果你想要 64GB 内存,那就必须选择 M4 Pro 芯片。作为中间步骤,Apple 还提供配备 24 或 32 GB 内存的 M4 Pro 机型。固态硬盘则至少为 512 GB。

测试条件

配备 M4 Pro SoC 的 Mac Mini 没有任何能源配置文件,只有我们熟悉的省电模式。

处理器 - M4 Pro,12 个 CPU 内核

M4 SoC 是一种全新的 SoC,已安装在当前的 MacBook Pro 14 机型中。我们的测试样本包含一个 12 核 SoC,旨在提高效率和多核性能。配备 12 个内核的 M4 Pro 可为办公程序、网页浏览和视频流等日常任务提供出色的性能。即使同时运行多个应用程序,系统也能保持流畅。与Apple Mac Mini M4 的基本配置相比,其性能再次大幅提升。不过,这种性能提升仅限于多核基准测试,尽管其单核性能几乎相同。

配备 12 个内核的 M4 Pro 是一款多功能处理器,具有强大的多核性能和良好的能效。它非常适合需要在日常使用和要求更高的任务中都能可靠工作的全能系统。Apple ,尤其是在能效方面,它依然是无与伦比的。此外,Apple M4 Pro(12 核)在空闲模式和负载情况下所需功耗极低。在运行 Cinebench R23 Multi 时,系统平均耗电量仅为 60 瓦。

Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
1455 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
1435 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
1403 Points -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
991 Points -32%
Minisforum MS-A1
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
986 Points -32%
Apple Mac Mini M4
Apple M4 (10 cores)
958 Points -34%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
933 Points -36%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
852 Points -41%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
Apple M3
712 Points -51%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU
MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU, Apple M3
601 Points -59%
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Apple Mac Mini M4
Apple M4 (10 cores)
177 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
176 Points +1%
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
174 Points
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU
MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU, Apple M3
141 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
Apple M3
140 Points -20%
Minisforum MS-A1
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
109 Points -37%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
107 Points -39%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
107 Points -39%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
107 Points -39%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
20617 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
20458 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
20385 Points -1%
Apple Mac Mini M4
Apple M4 (10 cores)
15072 Points -27%
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
14863 Points -28%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13848 Points -33%
Minisforum MS-A1
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
13741 Points -33%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
13318 Points -35%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
13162 Points -36%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU
MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU, Apple M3
11992 Points -42%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
Apple M3
11966 Points -42%
Apple Mac Mini M2
Apple M2
10034 Points -51%
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
3928 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
3844 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
3837 Points -2%
Apple Mac Mini M4
Apple M4 (10 cores)
3838 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
Apple M3
3099 Points -21%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU
MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU, Apple M3
3054 Points -22%
Minisforum MS-A1
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
2711 Points -31%
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
2692 Points -31%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2667 Points -32%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
2651 Points -33%
Apple Mac Mini M2
Apple M2
2650 Points -33%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2465 Points -37%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
19844 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
18569 Points -6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
17615 Points -11%
Minisforum MS-A1
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
17128 Points -14%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
16130 Points -19%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
15516 Points -22%
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
14738 Points -26%
Apple Mac Mini M4
Apple M4 (10 cores)
13845 Points -30%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
Apple M3
10454 Points -47%
Apple Mac Mini M2
Apple M2
8772 Points -56%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Apple Mac Mini M4
Apple M4 (10 cores)
2269 Points +1%
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2254 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2172 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
Apple M3
1904 Points -16%
Minisforum MS-A1
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
1817 Points -19%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
1808 Points -20%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1783 Points -21%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1764 Points -22%
Apple Mac Studio 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
1662 Points -26%
Apple Mac Mini M2
Apple M2
1638 Points -27%
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.5 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
306 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2720 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
153.03 fps
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5074 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
557 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2254 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
19844 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1455 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
174 Points
Help

系统性能

配备 M4 Pro(12 个内核)的 Mac Mini 在小巧的机身内提供了令人印象深刻的性能。在 64GB 快速统一内存和写入速度达 7.4GB/s 的固态硬盘的支持下,这款迷你电脑可完美胜任苛刻的任务、流畅的多任务处理、软件开发和 4K 视频编辑。

其集成的 GPU 多达 16 个内核,可确保为创意应用程序和经过 Metal 优化的游戏提供出色的图形性能。得益于硬件与 macOS 的紧密结合,系统运行效率极高,即使在重负载情况下也能保持安静。Mac Mini M4 Pro 在基准测试中表现优异,能耗极低,是专业用户和高要求用户的理想之选。由于集成了神经引擎,它还支持Apple Intelligence--尽管新的 iPhone 同步功能在某些国家还不能使用。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark / Overall
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
2159 Points
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
2051 Points -5%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1939 Points -10%
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1902 Points -12%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
1865 Points -14%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1713 Points -21%
CrossMark / Productivity
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
1990 Points
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
1924 Points -3%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1872 Points -6%
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1812 Points -9%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
1786 Points -10%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1591 Points -20%
CrossMark / Creativity
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
2610 Points
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
2392 Points -8%
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2095 Points -20%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
2057 Points -21%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2040 Points -22%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1984 Points -24%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1849 Points +18%
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1646 Points +5%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
1583 Points +1%
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
1568 Points 0%
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
1561 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1378 Points -12%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
557 Points
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
478 Points -14%
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
336 Points -40%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
309 Points -45%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
300 Points -46%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
268 Points -52%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
364 Points
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
334 Points -8%
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
271 Points -26%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
267 Points -27%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
256 Points -30%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
248 Points -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
528 ms * -107%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
517 ms * -103%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
506 ms * -98%
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
486 ms * -91%
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
262 ms * -3%
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
255.1 ms *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

非晶盘标记
非晶盘标记

Mac Mini M4 Pro 拥有超快的大容量存储设备,可实现无缝工作。它配备了专有的 PCIe 固态硬盘,根据所选配置,容量从 256 GB 到 2 TB 不等。如果在系统中使用Apple M4 Pro 芯片,则至少可获得 512 GB 的存储空间。如果想获得更大的存储空间,你还得掏腰包。Apple ,如果你想要我们测试样品中的 2 TB 机型,则需要支付 600 美元的附加费。Mac Mini M4 甚至可以配备最大 8 TB 的存储空间。不过,你需要为该机型支付 2,400 美元的附加费。固态硬盘的性能没有什么可抱怨的。我们的测试设备在连续读取和写入数据方面都取得了优异的成绩。

Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB Read
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
5381 MB/s
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
5060.9 MB/s -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z
3028 MB/s -44%
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
1326.6 MB/s -75%
5GB Write
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
6713 MB/s
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
6242.8 MB/s -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z
3426 MB/s -49%
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
1927.7 MB/s -71%

图形卡

Mac Mini M4 Pro 的图形处理性能因所安装的 SoC 而异。我们测试的版本配备了Apple M4 Pro 16 核 GPU。如果再加 200 美元,你就可以获得Apple M4 Pro 20 核 GPU 和性能稍强的处理器,从而获得更好的性能值。在我们的测试中,它可以轻松击败目前 AMD 或英特尔的 iGPU 性能。即使是 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑也不在话下。

Mac Mini M4 并不是我们纯游戏的首选。很多游戏无法在 macOS 上运行,这极大地限制了你的选择。由于 Mac Mini M4 与 macOS 和 Metal API 紧密集成,硬件得到了最佳利用。使用该接口的游戏通常运行良好,Apple M4 Pro 16 核 GPU 的性能足以显示高至最高细节的游戏。由于上述限制,不建议将 Mac Mini M4 用作游戏电脑。华硕 华硕 ROG NUC 14作为游戏电脑的替代产品值得肯定。

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
7254 Points +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
6739 Points +2%
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
6624 Points
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
3989 Points -40%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
3510 Points -47%
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 9 288V
3406 Points -49%
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3211 Points -52%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3026 Points -54%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2806 Points -58%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
2756 Points -58%
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2677 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-84-100
2467 Points -63%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
16143 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (9394 - 16529, n=9)
13655 Points -15%
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
9636 Points -40%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
8286 Points -49%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
7623 Points -53%
Apple Mac Mini M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0512Z
6987 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-84-100
6978 Points -57%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU
M3 8-Core GPU, M3
6968 Points -57%
Geekbench 6.3 / GPU OpenCL
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  (60815 - 86892, n=19)
78550 Points +30%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
60506 Points 0%
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
60234 Points
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43082 Points -28%
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
42088 Points -30%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
38759 Points -36%
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
37898 Points -37%
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
31965 Points -47%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
30470 Points -49%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
30345 Points -50%
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 9 288V
30092 Points -50%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
30015 Points -50%
Apple Mac Mini M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0512Z
27880 Points -54%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU
M3 8-Core GPU, M3
25825 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-84-100
23854 Points -60%
Geekbench 6.3 / GPU Metal
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
99055 Points +1%
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
97610 Points
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
57948 Points -41%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
47699 Points -51%
Apple Mac Mini M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0512Z
45946 Points -53%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
104.2 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
103.3 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
90 fps -14%
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
63.1 fps -39%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
52.6 fps -50%
Apple Mac Mini M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0512Z
48 fps -54%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU
M3 8-Core GPU, M3
44.5 fps -57%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
39.7 fps -62%
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 9 288V
28.5 fps -73%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
238.2 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
234.5 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
208 fps -13%
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
144 fps -40%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
120 fps -50%
Apple Mac Mini M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0512Z
107.9 fps -55%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 8C GPU
M3 8-Core GPU, M3
101.7 fps -57%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
84.6 fps -64%
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 9 288V
66.1 fps -72%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
504.2 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
501.5 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
  ()
470 fps -7%
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
301.6 fps -40%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
260 fps -48%
Apple Mac Mini M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0512Z
232 fps -54%
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 9 288V
133.9 fps -73%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
51 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
50.3 (43min - 55max) fps -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z
31.6 fps -38%
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
30.7 (24.7min, 24.9P0.1, 26.6P1 - 37.1max) fps -40%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
29.6 fps -42%
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 9 288V
27.8 fps -45%
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
26 (13.8min, 14.3P0.1, 22.5P1 - 88.8max) fps -49%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
24.6 (16.4min, 17P0.1, 19.1P1 - 48.3max) fps -52%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
24.4 (8.81min, 15.2P0.1, 19.3P1 - 51.9max) fps -52%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
24.4 (8.14min, 11.8P0.1, 15.7P1 - 98.9max) fps -52%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
19 fps -63%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-84-100
19 fps -63%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
35.7 (29min - 47max) fps +2%
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
35.1 fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 9 288V
30.1 (24.4min - 39.5max) fps -14%
Minisforum EliteMini AI370
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
28.4 (23.6min - 36.3max) fps -19%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
27 (22.4min - 34.9max) fps -23%
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
23.4 (19.7min - 29.4max) fps -33%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
23.3 (19.6min - 28.9max) fps -34%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
22 (18.9min - 26max) fps -37%
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
21.7 (18.2min - 28.6max) fps -38%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z
20.4 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-84-100
16.6 (12.9min - 23.2max) fps -53%
Total War Pharaoh - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
55.2 fps +11%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
54.4 fps +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
51.4 (42min - 60max) fps +3%
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
49.9 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z
39.9 fps -20%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
35 fps -30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
78 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
76 (56min - 142max) fps -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z
41 fps -47%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
33.9 fps -57%
Apple Mac Mini M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0512Z
32 fps -59%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
32 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-84-100
23 fps -71%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
32 fps
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
31.6 (7.61min, 16.4P0.1, 19.1P1 - 141.4max) fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 9 288V
29 fps
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
24 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-84-100
22 fps
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 198 99 89 78 51 26
Borderlands 3 (2019) 92.9 70.2 53.8 39.9 31.6 17.6
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 84 71 53 51 36 18
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 53.5 47.5 39.8 35.1
Total War Pharaoh (2023) 64.8 53.5 49.3 49.9 46.2 23

排放与能源 - 节俭、安静

噪音排放

Mac Mini 的噪音排放是节能设计和优化冷却之间出色互动的一个令人印象深刻的例子。由于采用了节俭的 M4 处理器,该设备在空转和部分负载时产生的废热极少,因此噪音极低。虽然风扇一直在转,但设备在长距离运行时几乎没有噪音。我们的报告中没有反映出这一点,但在读取数据时,至少始终保持 1000 转/分钟的转速。在负载情况下,Mac Mini 的声音清晰可闻,最高可达 46.1 dB(A)。不过,值得庆幸的是,我们没有发现任何令人不快的呼呼声。

Noise Level

Idle
25.1 / 25.1 / 25.1 dB(A)
Load
25.1 / 46.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25.1 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.942.745.241.140.841.942.92546.939.843.941.44141.146.93146.137.439.538.339.436.846.14034.529.326.127.62928.234.55035.134.431.328.228.530.535.16334.730.129.425.526.327.534.78033.525.125.923.522.624.833.510030.422.822.322.522.223.230.412528.115.816.417.516.419.528.116030.716.716.418.615.516.930.720031.413.913.115.314.314.231.425033.212.112.61513.113.633.231534.710.510.512.81312.234.740036.711.311.712.113.51236.750038.111.710.510.511.411.238.163034.110.611.610.111.711.334.180031.810.311.711.610.911.731.8100033.810.71212.111.311.633.8125034.911.211.211.211.311.134.9160031.711.210.911.311.21131.7200030.611.811.711.811.511.730.6250035.612.412.412.312.212.535.6315038.21313.112.9131338.2400036.713.713.613.813.713.536.7500029.414.214.114.21414.129.4630026.914.714.514.614.614.526.9800023.614.814.614.614.714.823.61000021.114.914.814.914.81521.11250022.71514.614.714.614.722.71600018.81714.915.31614.618.8SPL46.125.125.125.225.125.146.1N5.50.60.60.60.60.65.5median 31.7median 13median 13.1median 13.8median 13.5median 13.5median 31.7Delta3.91.91.61.91.823.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseApple Mac Mini M4 Pro
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro (12 cores), M4 Pro 16-Core GPU
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU
Aoostar GEM12
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
Minisforum MS-A1
Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon 780M
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
Geekom AX8 Pro
R9 8945H, Radeon 780M
Apple Mac Mini M2
M2, M2 10-Core GPU
Noise
5%
-8%
-27%
-22%
-21%
8%
off / environment *
25.1
24.1
4%
24.3
3%
24.8
1%
24.6
2%
24.9
1%
24.7
2%
Idle Minimum *
25.1
24.1
4%
27.5
-10%
33.9
-35%
24.7
2%
24.9
1%
24.7
2%
Idle Average *
25.1
24.1
4%
27.6
-10%
34
-35%
29.6
-18%
24.9
1%
24.7
2%
Idle Maximum *
25.1
24.1
4%
27.6
-10%
34
-35%
29.8
-19%
24.9
1%
24.7
2%
Load Average *
25.1
24.1
4%
36
-43%
41.1
-64%
45.7
-82%
50.1
-100%
24.7
2%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
35.1
30.3
14%
35.4
-1%
42.2
-20%
47.7
-36%
50
-42%
Load Maximum *
46.1
45.1
2%
38.2
17%
46.2
-0%
47.4
-3%
50.2
-9%
29.4
36%
Witcher 3 ultra *
35.4

* ... smaller is better

温度

我们测试样品的表面温度略高于基本型号。即便如此,我们在测试过程中仍无法发现任何关键热点。不过,在底部,风扇出风口的区域发热明显。在顶部,由于采用了金属外壳,热量分布非常均匀。M4 SoC 的温度明显更高,很容易超过 100 °C。尽管如此,风扇仍有足够的活动空间,这意味着Apple 故意允许达到这样的温度。

表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底部)
表面温度应力测试(底部)
Max. Load
 35.6 °C35.9 °C35.8 °C 
 34.7 °C36.2 °C35.1 °C 
 35.6 °C35.3 °C35.8 °C 
Maximum: 36.2 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
38.8 °C42.7 °C41.7 °C
32.6 °C28.1 °C27.9 °C
28.4 °C25 °C25.6 °C
Maximum: 42.7 °C
Average: 32.3 °C
Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.

发言人

Mac Mini 有一个内置扬声器,专为基本音频任务而设计。它能提供清晰但基本的音质,足以满足系统通知、视频通话和偶尔聆听音乐或视频的需要。对于要求更高的音频应用,Mac Mini 提供了众多扩展选项。有线扬声器或耳机可通过 3.5 毫米插孔连接。蓝牙可实现与外部音频设备的无线连接,而 HDMI 端口可将音频传输到带集成扬声器的显示器或家庭影院系统。集成扬声器可满足基本要求,但不能替代高品质的外部音频解决方案。为了获得更好的声音体验,我们建议使用外置扬声器或耳机。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.741.943.72541.241.141.2314036.8404030.728.230.75028.230.528.26329.227.529.28024.424.824.410036.423.236.412547.319.547.31605716.95720065.514.265.525065.213.665.231563.112.263.140062.81262.850063.911.263.963062.511.362.580061.411.761.4100058.511.658.5125067.511.167.5160065.31165.3200070.511.770.5250074.712.574.7315074.91374.9400073.213.573.2500073.414.173.4630070.314.570.3800071.514.871.51000070.11570.1125006814.7681600056.914.656.9SPL83.125.183.1N54.90.654.9median 65.3median 13.5median 65.3Delta5.525.536.640.938.341.332.535.634.836.533.632.830.330.725.626.623.428.320.838.120.444.122.347.723.850.616.754.814.948.113.143.313.55912.566.512.869.611.163.410.363.410.265.110.662.210.664.5116411.171.311.66811.566.811.56811.565.810.760.224.778.30.641.2median 11.6median 63.438.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple Mac Mini M4 ProApple Mac Mini M2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 26%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple Mac Mini M2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 26%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

耗电量

空闲时,Mac Mini 只需要 2.5 至 2.8 瓦,与同类产品相比非常节俭。即使在待机模式或关机状态下,它的耗电值也很低,无可厚非。游戏时,我们测得的功耗约为 70 瓦,与压力测试开始时的功耗相同。由于 SoC 功耗较高,与新款 Mac Mini 的基本配置相比,我们的测试样本降低了一些效率。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.58 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.54 / 2.59 / 2.79 Watt
Load midlight 31.4 / 70.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro (12 cores), M4 Pro 16-Core GPU
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU
Aoostar GEM12
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
Minisforum MS-A1
Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon 780M
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
Geekom AX8 Pro
R9 8945H, Radeon 780M
Apple Mac Mini M2
M2, M2 10-Core GPU
Average Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
Average of class Mini PC
 
Power Consumption
11%
-186%
-221%
-140%
-287%
14%
-70%
-239%
Idle Minimum *
2.54
2.6
-2%
8.2
-223%
8.8
-246%
4.2
-65%
14
-451%
2.2
13%
2.57 ?(2.54 - 2.6, n=2)
-1%
Idle Average *
2.59
10
-286%
12.6
-386%
7.2
-178%
15.9
-514%
7.2 ?(2.59 - 11.8, n=2)
-178%
Idle Maximum *
2.79
2.7
3%
14.6
-423%
14
-402%
13
-366%
19.5
-599%
2.6
7%
7.5 ?(2.79 - 12.2, n=2)
-169%
Load Average *
31.4
31.5
-0%
73.9
-135%
93.2
-197%
68.5
-118%
76.4
-143%
28.7
9%
31.4 ?()
-0%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
71.4
39.6
45%
79.9
-12%
102.1
-43%
74.1
-4%
54.3
24%
Load Maximum *
70.1
62.5
11%
95.3
-36%
105.4
-50%
144.9
-107%
99.1
-41%
51.5
27%

* ... smaller is better

Efficiency overview

Performance Rating - Percent
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
100 pt
Apple Mac Mini M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0512Z
88.1 pt
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
79.6 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
41.9 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
35.9 pt
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
34.1 pt
Power Consumption
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
418 Points per Watt +27%
Apple Mac Mini M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0512Z
372 Points per Watt +13%
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
330 Points per Watt
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
219 Points per Watt -34%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
187.8 Points per Watt -43%
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
177.7 Points per Watt -46%
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Apple Mac Mini M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0256Z
186 Points per Watt +25%
Apple Mac Mini M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0512Z
162.2 Points per Watt +9%
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, M4 Pro (12 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
149.3 Points per Watt
Geekom AX8 Pro
Radeon 780M, R9 8945H, Acer N7000
58.3 Points per Watt -61%
Asus NUC 14 Pro+
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
50 Points per Watt -67%
Minisforum MS-A1
Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
47.8 Points per Watt -68%

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro M4 Pro (12 cores), M4 Pro 16-Core GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.59 (2.54-2.79)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10 (9.28-14.3)
Minisforum MS-A1 Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø11.9 (10-14)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.26 (4.91-13.1)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø15.9 (14.3-19.4)
Apple Mac Mini M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.44 (1.049-3.69)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø79.6 (76-85.2)
Apple Mac Mini M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø28.7 (28.1-29.2)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø84.4 (83.6-85.1)
Minisforum MS-A1 Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø104.6 (102.1-105.4)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø114.7 (100.9-144.9)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø89.4 (87.8-94.6)
Apple Mac Mini M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø45 (39.3-49.3)
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro M4 Pro (12 cores), M4 Pro 16-Core GPU; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø71.4 (69.3-74)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø79.9 (75.5-83.5)
Minisforum MS-A1 Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø102.1 (95.2-102.9)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø74.1 (62.4-78.7)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø54.3 (43.7-67.1)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø73.9 (55.4-87)
Minisforum MS-A1 Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø93.2 (78.1-104.5)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø68.5 (60-97.6)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø76.5 (55.7-96.2)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø83.6 (80.7-95.3)
Minisforum MS-A1 Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø103.7 (101.7-104.1)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø104.2 (91.4-142.7)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø75.9 (72.6-96)
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro M4 Pro (12 cores), M4 Pro 16-Core GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø67.9 (66.9-69.2)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø82.1 (74.2-89.2)
Minisforum MS-A1 Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø98 (96.6-98.9)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø118.5 (109.4-137.5)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø70.3 (63.2-83)
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro M4 Pro (12 cores), M4 Pro 16-Core GPU; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø15.1 (14.4-26.5)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø34 (31.1-57.1)
Minisforum MS-A1 Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø38 (36.3-60.3)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø35.3 (25.6-81.6)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31 (25.6-51.4)
Apple Mac Mini M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø10.1 (9.65-12.9)
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro M4 Pro (12 cores), M4 Pro 16-Core GPU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø60.1 (58.6-70.1)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.3 (72.3-87.5)
Minisforum MS-A1 Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø96.4 (95.9-98.4)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø93.8 (87.6-109.2)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø70.9 (66.8-89.8)
Apple Mac Mini M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø23.6 (22.9-24.7)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø83.1 (79.2-88.5)
Minisforum MS-A1 Ryzen 7 8700G, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø102.5 (98.7-104.2)
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø56.6 (55.1-70.1)
Geekom AX8 Pro R9 8945H, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø85.7 (73.1-99.9)

Notebookcheck 总评分

配备 M4 Pro 的 Mac Mini 是一款功能强大、高能效、超静音的迷你电脑。它具有令人印象深刻的 CPU 和 GPU 性能、超快的大容量存储以及与 macOS 的无缝集成,是创意专业人士和要求苛刻的用户的理想之选。它的低噪音和紧凑型设计使其成为安静工作环境的完美选择。

Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro - 01/13/2025 v8
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Connectivity
64 / 81 → 79%
Weight
75%
Games Performance
75 / 80 → 94%
Application Performance
93 / 92 → 100%
Temperature
91%
Noise
88%
Audio
79%
Average
74%
87%
Mini PC - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
100%
Materials
50%
Packaging
100%
Power Use
90.9%
Repairability
0%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 65.1%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro 评测小巧节俭的台式电脑,性能一流,升级费用昂贵
Sebastian Bade, 2025-01-15 (Update: 2025-01-15)