Apple MacBook Pro 13 (2016年末, 2 GHz i5, 无Touch Bar) 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10 (Klaus I211) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (Klaus I211) | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D (jseb) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB (Klaus I211) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
Intel NUC5i5RYH (Klaus I211) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10 (Klaus I211) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (Klaus I211) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D (jseb) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB (Klaus I211) | |
Intel NUC5i5RYH (Klaus I211) |
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 600 cd/m²
Contrast: 1053:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
77% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 APPA034, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 APPA02A, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 Sharp SHP144A, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Sharp SHP142F (LQ125T1JW02), , 2560x1440, 12.5" | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Apple APP9CF0, , 1440x900, 13.3" | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz APPA027, , 2304x1440, 12" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -19% | -23% | -17% | -50% | -19% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.1 | 65.9 -32% | 62.8 -35% | 68.7 -29% | 40.1 -59% | 66.8 -31% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 97 -3% | 89.4 -10% | 95.8 -4% | 59.8 -40% | 95.4 -4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.7 | 67.4 -22% | 64.6 -25% | 69.9 -19% | 41.51 -52% | 68 -22% |
Response Times | 26% | 29% | 27% | |||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47.2 ? | 43.6 ? 8% | 37 ? 22% | 41.2 ? 13% | ||
Response Time Black / White * | 51.6 ? | 29.2 ? 43% | 33.4 ? 35% | 30.4 ? 41% | ||
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | |||||
Screen | -9% | -44% | -49% | -58% | -10% | |
Brightness middle | 600 | 361 -40% | 396.2 -34% | 402 -33% | 329 -45% | 387 -35% |
Brightness | 564 | 342 -39% | 357 -37% | 382 -32% | 310 -45% | 358 -37% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 81 -9% | 84 -6% | 88 -1% | 82 -8% | 88 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.361 37% | 0.266 53% | 0.45 21% | 0.405 29% | 0.47 18% |
Contrast | 1053 | 1000 -5% | 1489 41% | 893 -15% | 812 -23% | 823 -22% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.82 -21% | 3.9 -160% | 3.6 -140% | 3.96 -164% | 1.6 -7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.9 | 3.26 -12% | 7.58 -161% | 7.5 -159% | 7.51 -159% | 4 -38% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.8 10% | 4.16 -108% | 4.3 -115% | 3.51 -76% | 1 50% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.49 88% | 2.31 95% | 2.1 105% | 3.83 57% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6855 95% | 6417 101% | 6514 100% | 6572 99% | 6711 97% | 6680 97% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 77 | 61.9 -20% | 57.5 -25% | 62.3 -19% | 38.4 -50% | 61.6 -20% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 96.9 5% | 88.7 -4% | 95.7 4% | 59.8 -35% | 82.2 -11% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
-12% | -14% /
-31% | -12% /
-32% | -54% /
-56% | -1% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
51.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 43.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.6 ms rise | |
↘ 25.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3280 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4205 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3853 points | |
Help |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 Apple SSD AP0256 | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 Apple SSD SM0128G | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Apple SSD SD0256F | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256 | Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -1% | 9% | 117% | 140% | -21% | 112% | |
Read Seq | 1345 | 1403 4% | 1352 1% | 1214 -10% | 1178 -12% | 754 -44% | 1131 -16% |
Write Seq | 1320 | 657 -50% | 1111 -16% | 655 -50% | 305.4 -77% | 638 -52% | 311.4 -76% |
Read 512 | 831 | 810 -3% | 880 6% | 1019 23% | 638 -23% | 616 -26% | 685 -18% |
Write 512 | 1486 | 648 -56% | 1023 -31% | 445.7 -70% | 305.7 -79% | 678 -54% | 276.3 -81% |
Read 4k | 31.68 | 20.95 -34% | 21.93 -31% | 35.55 12% | 38.54 22% | 14.6 -54% | 39.63 25% |
Write 4k | 11.02 | 32.43 194% | 30.94 181% | 130 1080% | 153.4 1292% | 20.5 86% | 133.9 1115% |
Read 4k QD32 | 533 | 343.6 -36% | 339.5 -36% | 537 1% | 614 15% | 464 -13% | 399.7 -25% |
Write 4k QD32 | 362 | 254.4 -30% | 342.9 -5% | 173.8 -52% | 302.7 -16% | 315 -13% | 245.6 -32% |
AS SSD | 7% | 10% | 80% | 116% | -12% | 92% | |
Seq Read | 2275 | 1233 -46% | 1212 -47% | 1346 -41% | 1332 -41% | 1056 -54% | 1323 -42% |
Seq Write | 1435 | 616 -57% | 1001 -30% | 586 -59% | 283.6 -80% | 651 -55% | 235.3 -84% |
4K Read | 13.3 | 20.6 55% | 19.16 44% | 31.64 138% | 35.2 165% | 16.4 23% | 35.4 166% |
4K Write | 15.4 | 30.2 96% | 23.73 54% | 95.6 521% | 127.2 726% | 22.1 44% | 108.3 603% |
4K-64 Read | 904 | 891 -1% | 1140 26% | 655 -28% | 891 -1% | 509 -44% | 767 -15% |
4K-64 Write | 417 | 221.2 -47% | 338.9 -19% | 205.6 -51% | 256.9 -38% | 283 -32% | 186.3 -55% |
Access Time Read * | 0.288 | 0.141 51% | 0.171 41% | 0.065 77% | 0.06 79% | 0.186 35% | 0.088 69% |
Access Time Write * | 0.123 | 0.155 | 0.033 | 0.03 | 0.035 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
3% | 10% /
9% | 99% /
99% | 128% /
129% | -17% /
-17% | 102% /
102% |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 | |
Acer Aspire V3-372-57CW | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK | |
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 | |
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U | |
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 40.3 | 11.6 | ||
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 42 | 35.4 | 22.1 | |
Dirt Rally (2015) | 149 | 36.8 | 18.7 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 20.5 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 59.8 | 46.9 | 29.2 | 34.6 |
World of Warships (2015) | 73.3 | 33.5 | ||
Fallout 4 (2015) | 23.2 | |||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 24 small graphical problems (wrong clouds) | 16 small graphical problems (wrong clouds) | ||
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 23 | 12 | ||
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 13.3 | |||
Doom (2016) | 31.5 | |||
Overwatch (2016) | 68 | 47.6 | 21.3 | |
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 35 | 20.5 | ||
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 16.7 | |||
FIFA 17 (2016) | 61 small graphical problems | 72 small graphical problems | 0 small graphical problems | |
Mafia 3 (2016) | 11.3 | |||
Battlefield 1 (2016) | 43.4 | 25.3 | 12.6 | |
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 112 | 76 | 30.6 | 19.1 |
Titanfall 2 (2016) | 55.3 | 38.6 | 14.3 | |
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 30 | 27.3 | ||
Dishonored 2 (2016) | 17.3 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.17 / 0.6 Watt |
Idle | 3 / 8.9 / 8.9 Watt |
Load |
43.4 / 42.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 6360U, Iris Graphics 540, 54 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 5650U, HD Graphics 6000, 54 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 6650U, Iris Graphics 540, 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 38 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE 6600U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -18% | 29% | 0% | -51% | -31% | -48% | |
Reader / Idle | 2557 | 1572 -39% | 654 -74% | 899 -65% | 833 -67% | ||
H.264 | 620 | 619 0% | 547 -12% | 397 -36% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 686 | 620 -10% | 554 -19% | 526 -23% | 293 -57% | 427 -38% | 340 -50% |
Load | 101 | 97 -4% | 208 106% | 137 36% | 79 -22% | 111 10% | 62 -39% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
在我们上手Apple饱受赞誉的Touch Bar之前,不妨先测试一下新一代MacBook Pro 13的入门机型,它已经可以通过零售渠道购买了。同时,它将会逐渐替代售价较低的Air机型的位置。不过,它1699欧元(约12391人民币)的定价绝不算便宜,不过在硬件配置上它确实得到了一定提升,这是我们在一些初步测试之后的感受。
它的屏幕亮度达到了前所未有的水平,在测试中表现出色。在硬件性能上它并没有从15瓦Skylake架构处理器升级中得到太多改进,不过我们仍然需要等待它在能耗和显卡表现的测试结果才能定论。和我们预想相近的是,Apple为MacBook Pro 13也带来了MacBook 12的顶级扬声器音响效果。
到现在为止我们没有发现任何问题。不过如果它的风扇没有不均匀噪音的话,我们对它的评价将会更高。目前我们猜测这可能是这台测试机在运输过程中收到撞击造成的个别现象。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。