Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarApple iPad Air (2019) 平板电脑评测
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 515 cd/m²
Contrast: 1256:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5" | Apple iPad Air 2 2014 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Apple iPad 6 2018 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5" | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -27% | 6% | 9% | -112% | -12% | |
| Brightness middle | 515 | 423 -18% | 530 3% | 634 23% | 384 -25% | 474 -8% |
| Brightness | 483 | 427 -12% | 513 6% | 625 29% | 360 -25% | 477 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 92 2% | 92 2% | 87 -3% | 84 -7% | 91 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.61 -49% | 0.61 -49% | 0.39 5% | 0.8 -95% | |
| Contrast | 1256 | 693 -45% | 869 -31% | 1626 29% | 480 -62% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 2.86 -79% | 1.2 25% | 1.9 -19% | 6.83 -327% | 2.5 -56% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.4 | 3.2 27% | 3.9 11% | 12.7 -189% | 5.8 -32% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 2.37 15% | 1 64% | 2.8 -0% | 7.5 -168% | 2.1 25% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.43 91% | 2.28 96% | 2.26 97% | 2.199 100% | 2.08 106% |
| CCT | 6944 94% | 6941 94% | 6588 99% | 7027 93% | 8544 76% | 6281 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 | |
| Average Apple A12 Bionic (302955 - 370545, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score | |
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 | |
| Average Apple A12 Bionic (2407 - 2873, n=6) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
| Average of class Tablet (309 - 3806, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average Apple A12 Bionic (108.4 - 123.8, n=4) | |
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average Apple A12 Bionic (155 - 166, n=6) | |
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average Apple A12 Bionic (123 - 139, n=4) | |
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (IOS 12.1.1) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average Apple A12 Bionic (41367 - 43280, n=6) | |
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 (Safari 9.0 Mobile) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0) | |
| Apple iPad Air 2 2014 (Safari 9.0 Mobile) | |
| Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Average Apple A12 Bionic (603 - 653, n=6) | |
* ... smaller is better
PUBG Mobile
Dead Trigger 2
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Apple iPad Air 3 2019 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.01 / 0.16 Watt |
| Idle |  2.18 / 6.4 / 6.43 Watt |
| Load |
7.48 / 10.65 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 8134 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 8134 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 7300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 7500 mAh | Apple iPad Air 2 2014 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 6% | -27% | 32% | -19% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.18 | 1.44 34% | 2.2 -1% | 1.76 19% | 3.3 -51% | 1.2 45% |
| Idle Average * | 6.4 | 6.12 4% | 7.8 -22% | 4.22 34% | 4.2 34% | 5.1 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.43 | 6.14 5% | 7.9 -23% | 4.25 34% | 7 -9% | 5.4 16% |
| Load Average * | 7.48 | 8.55 -14% | 12.6 -68% | 4.52 40% | 10.4 -39% | 7.9 -6% |
| Load Maximum * | 10.65 | 10.62 -0% | 12.8 -20% | 7.35 31% | 13.8 -30% | 11.1 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
| Apple iPad Air 3 2019 8134 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 8134 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 7300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 7500 mAh | Apple iPad Air 2 2014 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 4% | -9% | -8% | -8% | -9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1501 | 2036 36% | 1227 -18% | 1254 -16% | 1364 -9% | |
| H.264 | 684 | 629 -8% | 735 7% | 629 -8% | 562 -18% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 738 | 693 -6% | 714 -3% | 495 -33% | 670 -9% | |
| Load | 214 | 199 -7% | 185 -14% | 245 14% | 220 3% | 212 -1% |
| WiFi | 630 |
Pros
Cons
Verdict - The iPad Air as an artificial stopgap
虽然Apple iPad Air（2019）位于iPad Pro 11和iPad（2018）之间，但它在价格方面直接与当前的高端Android平板电脑竞争。与入门级iPad相比，它提供更大，完全层压的屏幕，更多存储空间，并且它具有更强大的SoC，价格也高了1500元。
在技术方面，Apple推出了另一款没有任何真正缺点的优质平板电脑，并采用了前几年就被证明不错的技术。然而，对于用户而言，模型的组合变得更难以掌握，由于同时存在多代Pencil，这变得更加困难。
Apple iPad Air（2019）将现代SoC与成熟的技术相结合。
这台平板电脑的主要缺陷可能是附带的配件太少，配件价格太高以及较长的充电时间。然而，这在日常操作中几乎不重要。凭借低入门级价格，Touch ID及其音频端口，iPad Air仍然是一款极具吸引力的产品。
Apple iPad Air 3 2019
- 09/16/2019 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
