Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarApple iPhone SE 智能手机简短评测
Apple iPhone SE (iPhone Series)
Processor
Apple A9 2 x 1.85 GHz, Cyclone 3
Graphics adapter
Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Core: 450 MHz
Memory
2048 MB
, LPDDR4
Display
4.00 inch 16:9, 1136 x 640 pixel 326 PPI, 10点触控, IPS, Retina, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB
, 54.9 GB free
Weight
113 g, Power Supply: 47 g
Price
489 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 603 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 579.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.75 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 603 cd/m²
Contrast: 685:1 (Black: 0.88 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.74% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.13% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
| Apple iPhone SE A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 5c SGX543MP3, A6, 16 GB iNAND Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -3% | -6% | 2% | -1% | -63% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 603 | 552 -8% | 583 -3% | 386 -36% | 350 -42% | 547 -9% | 572 -5% |
| Brightness | 579 | 549 -5% | 560 -3% | 394 -32% | 351 -39% | 532 -8% | 537 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 87 -6% | 91 -2% | 88 -5% | 98 5% | 94 1% | 87 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.88 | 0.39 56% | 0.46 48% | 0.54 39% | 0.66 25% | ||
| Contrast | 685 | 1415 107% | 1267 85% | 1013 48% | 867 27% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 3.4 -89% | 3.55 -97% | 1.11 38% | 2.04 -13% | 7.37 -309% | 2.64 -47% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.5 | 3.35 4% | 3.25 7% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 4.16 -81% | 3.88 -69% | 1.34 42% | 1.63 29% | 8.39 -265% | 2.97 -29% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.12 104% | 2.07 106% | 2.28 96% | 2.48 89% |
| CCT | 6955 93% | 7288 89% | 7280 89% | 6441 101% | 6391 102% | 9074 72% | 7170 91% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.13 | 62.18 0% | 59.05 -5% | 86.86 40% | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96.74 | 95.93 -1% | 92.8 -4% | 99.35 3% | 99.9865 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Compact | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| Apple iPhone 5c | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Compact | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| Apple iPhone 5c | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Compact | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Compact | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Compact | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| Apple iPhone 5c | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Compact | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| Apple iPhone 5c | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Compact | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Compact | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Apple iPhone 5c | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Compact | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 6S | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 Compact | |
| Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0 / 0.11 Watt |
| Idle |  0.54 / 1.26 / 1.4 Watt |
| Load |
2.45 / 6.46 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple iPhone SE A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 5S PowerVR G6430, A7, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Apple iPhone 5c SGX543MP3, A6, 16 GB iNAND Flash | Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 12% | -6% | 23% | -38% | -11% | -18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.54 | 0.6 -11% | 0.5 7% | 0.4 26% | 0.6 -11% | 0.96 -78% | 0.68 -26% |
| Idle Average * | 1.26 | 0.8 37% | 1.6 -27% | 1 21% | 1.4 -11% | 1.39 -10% | 1.02 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.4 | 1.6 -14% | 1.9 -36% | 1.3 7% | 1.7 -21% | 1.45 -4% | 1.14 19% |
| Load Average * | 2.45 | 2.3 6% | 2.5 -2% | 2.2 10% | 5.3 -116% | 2.65 -8% | 4.73 -93% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.46 | 3.8 41% | 4.8 26% | 3.3 49% | 8.4 -30% | 3.51 46% | 7.16 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Apple iPhone SE A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Apple iPhone 5c SGX543MP3, A6, 16 GB iNAND Flash | Sony Xperia Z5 Compact Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -13% | -1% | -16% | 7% | 36% | 11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1274 | 1510 19% | 1655 30% | 1130 -11% | 2249 77% | 1978 55% | 1810 42% |
| H.264 | 759 | 699 -8% | 714 -6% | 525 -31% | 863 14% | 892 18% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 673 | 492 -27% | 513 -24% | 440 -35% | 628 -7% | 456 -32% | |
| Load | 207 | 137 -34% | 197 -5% | 165 -20% | 242 17% | 376 82% | 242 17% |
| WiFi | 862 |
Pros
+ 考究的机身
+ 轻盈紧凑
+ 超高性能
+ 明亮的屏幕色彩准确
+ 使用体验流畅
+ 许多可选的配件
+ 出色的信号接收
+ 准确的GPS定位
+ 优秀的扬声器
+ 不错的相机
+ 出色的实际使用续航时间
Cons
- 黑值较高
- NFC仅支持Apple支付
- 麦克风效果较差
- 不支持防尘防水
- 玻璃表面容易碎裂
- 存储空间不可扩展
- 集成电池无法更换
Apple依然热衷于设计紧凑的智能手机，尽管最新一代的机型尺寸都增长不少。iPhone SE（Special Edition，特别版）溯流而上采用了现在已近销声匿迹的4寸屏幕。不仅是小孩会喜欢它，所有喜欢这种小巧尺寸而选择越来越少的用户可能都会感到眼前一亮。
iPhone SE和iPhone 6S在许多方面都很相似，在性能、4K视频拍摄以及电池续航上都超过了目前依然在销售的iPhone 6或6 Plus。它的续航甚至超过了iPhone 6S，和iPhone 6S Plus接近。高速通信模组，优秀的屏幕，不错的相机和优秀的软件系统也都是iPhone SE的优势。
如果你正在寻找一台紧凑而性能好不缩水的智能手机，iPhone SE可能是个很好的选择。不过这台设备可能对预算有限或喜欢户外运动的用户来说有些过于昂贵以及脆弱。
它不耐磨的表面、脆弱的玻璃材质和缺少三防可能对户外爱好者来说会造成不少问题。不过用户可以在网上找到不少为这些目的考虑的配件，但iPhone SE和前代产品相似，更适合室内使用而不是作为冒险的设备。你无法扩展存储空间或者更换电池。
如果你不喜欢Apple，可能iPhone SE无法说服你，不过它仍然是一款优质、强劲、紧凑而轻盈的智能手机。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Apple iPhone SE
- 09/27/2019 v7 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
