欧乐风Armor 5智能手机评测
Ulefone Armor 5 (Armor Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T 8 x 2.3 - 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Memory
4 GB
Display
5.85 inch 18.9:9, 1512 x 720 pixel 286 PPI, 电容屏, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB
, 55 GB free
Weight
228 g, Power Supply: 65 g
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
Ulefone Armor 5; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø100.9 (37-120)
Ulefone Armor 5; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø102.2 (42-118)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 487 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 471.6 cd/m² Minimum: 28.05 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 487 cd/m²
Contrast: 706:1 (Black: 0.69 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 9.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
| Ulefone Armor 5 IPS, 1512x720, 5.9" | Blackview BV5800 Pro IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Poptel P9000 Max LCD IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Doogee S55 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Crosscall Action-X3 IPS, 1280x800, 5" | Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 21% | 12% | 6% | 26% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 487 | 587 21% | 406 -17% | 573 18% | 417 -14% | 445 -9% |
| Brightness | 472 | 571 21% | 397 -16% | 568 20% | 425 -10% | 437 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 90 -2% | 90 -2% | 85 -8% | 91 -1% | 88 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.69 | 0.33 52% | 0.38 45% | 0.91 -32% | 0.29 58% | 0.67 3% |
| Contrast | 706 | 1779 152% | 1068 51% | 630 -11% | 1438 104% | 664 -6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 9.3 -31% | 6.7 6% | 6.96 2% | 7.12 -0% | 6.5 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.8 | 17.9 -13% | 13.8 13% | 12.14 23% | 10.19 36% | 10.6 33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.7 | 12.6 -30% | 8.5 12% | 6.3 35% | 6.1 37% | 7.2 26% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.14 103% | 2.21 100% | 1.87 118% | 2.687 82% | 2.53 87% |
| CCT | 8096 80% | 11049 59% | 8858 73% | 7606 85% | 7687 85% | 8274 79% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 63.3 Hz | ≤ 1 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 63.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 63.3 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Geekbench 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v7 | AnTuTu v6 | BaseMark OS II | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (787 - 920, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (3504 - 4262, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (2707 - 3246, n=4) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (5909 - 6846, n=8) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (20 - 36, n=7) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (21 - 24, n=7) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (10 - 22, n=7) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (10 - 11, n=7) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (6.2 - 16, n=7) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (6.5 - 7.2, n=7) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (54192 - 95559, n=8) | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (54201 - 73836, n=8) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (242 - 242, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (17.9 - 25.9, n=7) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58) | |
| Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68) | |
| Doogee S55 (Chrome 67) | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68) | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (3051 - 4987, n=8) | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 (Chrome 70) | |
| Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68) | |
| Doogee S55 (Chrome 67) | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58) | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (11352 - 23714, n=8) | |
| Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68) | |
| Doogee S55 (Chrome 67) | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68) | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 (Chrome 70) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Ulefone Armor 5 | Blackview BV5800 Pro | Poptel P9000 Max | Doogee S55 | Crosscall Action-X3 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -49% | -29% | -41% | -25% | -42% | 0% | 704% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 296.5 | 236 -20% | 269.4 -9% | 268.1 -10% | 264.7 -11% | 181.6 -39% | 274 ? -8% | 1847 ? 523% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 245.8 | 86.6 -65% | 129.6 -47% | 97.1 -60% | 139.3 -43% | 73.6 -70% | 176.2 ? -28% | 1436 ? 484% |
| Random Read 4KB | 60.9 | 13.97 -77% | 35.1 -42% | 28.86 -53% | 47 -23% | 21.8 -64% | 59.4 ? -2% | 277 ? 355% |
| Random Write 4KB | 19.81 | 9.43 -52% | 11.23 -43% | 13.17 -34% | 8.4 -58% | 11.9 -40% | 32 ? 62% | 308 ? 1455% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 80.1 ? | 80.6 ? 1% | 72.9 ? -9% | 73.7 -8% | 84.1 ? 5% | 69 ? -14% | 77.4 ? -3% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 71.7 ? | 14.67 ? -80% | 53.2 ? -26% | 14.11 -80% | 56.2 ? -22% | 55.7 ? -22% | 58.3 ? -19% |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Ulefone Armor 5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Crosscall Action-X3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.02 / 0.27 Watt |
| Idle |  1.08 / 2.51 / 2.53 Watt |
| Load |
4.28 / 6.73 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Ulefone Armor 5 5000 mAh | Blackview BV5800 Pro 5580 mAh | Poptel P9000 Max 9000 mAh | Doogee S55 5500 mAh | Crosscall Action-X3 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 2800 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -5% | 27% | -91% | -6% | 25% | 15% | -1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.08 | 0.87 19% | 0.92 15% | 2.3 -113% | 1.1 -2% | 0.56 48% | 0.873 ? 19% | 0.893 ? 17% |
| Idle Average * | 2.51 | 1.64 35% | 1.9 24% | 3.5 -39% | 1.9 24% | 1.57 37% | 2.08 ? 17% | 1.449 ? 42% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.53 | 1.68 34% | 2.19 13% | 5.9 -133% | 2.9 -15% | 1.68 34% | 2.18 ? 14% | 1.608 ? 36% |
| Load Average * | 4.28 | 5.79 -35% | 3.1 28% | 8.7 -103% | 4.8 -12% | 4.6 -7% | 3.88 ? 9% | 6.5 ? -52% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.73 | 11.85 -76% | 3.12 54% | 11.2 -66% | 8.4 -25% | 5.92 12% | 5.58 ? 17% | 9.87 ? -47% |
* ... smaller is better
| Ulefone Armor 5 5000 mAh | Blackview BV5800 Pro 5580 mAh | Poptel P9000 Max 9000 mAh | Doogee S55 5500 mAh | Crosscall Action-X3 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 2800 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 603 | 780 29% | 1346 123% | 844 40% | 843 40% | 668 11% |
Pros
+ 优秀且可靠的外壳
+ 防水外壳覆盖了接口
+ 配件齐全
+ 系统性能优秀
Cons
- 续航不如预期
- 只支持USB 2.0
- 机身厚重
总结-一台坚固耐用的专业户外手机：
欧乐风Armor 5在我们的测试中表现不错，是一台强大的户外智能手机。它的相机只适合在有良好光照的环境下拍几张快照，尽管如此，它的相机水平还是高于同类竞品。其引人注目的外形设计注定了它不是一台商务手机。
“作为一台手机，欧乐风Armor 5更适合那些能够欣赏它的外观且需要其承受恶劣的工作环境的买家。”
IP68认证证明了这台手机防水防尘外壳的实力，它在恶劣环境下的可靠性给我们留下了深刻的印象。不过，买家千万不要被它5000毫安的大电池所迷惑，它的表现可能不如你的预期。尽管如此，这台手机的续航还是好于同类平均的，并且未来的软件更新可能会完善这一点。
Ulefone Armor 5
- 10/29/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
