宏碁 Aspire E5-553G-109A 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A
Brand: Acer

竞争力有限。 尽管有一些好的方面：SSD和足够的CPU性能；我们仍不能习惯于宏碁基于AMD的多媒体新方案。它不像其竞争对手英特尔一样，可以有效和可靠地工作。特别是，可视角度不佳的次级TN面板显示器，将可能只能满足那些不那么苛求的用户。

Sven Kloevekorn, ✓ Manuel Masiero (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 02/17/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Laptop / Notebook Windows Bristol Ridge / Stoney Ridge

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A (Aspire E5 Series)

Processor

AMD A12-9700P 4 x 2.5 - 3.4 GHz, Bristol Ridge

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon R8 M445DX - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1020 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, DDR3/DDR4, 16.101.1201.1007, AMD Enduro

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4, 1866 MHz, 双通道, 两个都被占用

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Chi Mei CMN15C4 / N156HGE-EAB, TN LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

AMD CZ FCH

Storage

Liteonit CV3-8D128, 128 GB

, + 1 x Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1 TB

Soundcard

AMD Kabini - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 音频输入输出二合一, 3.5mm 插口, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Optical drive

Slimtype DVD A DA8AESH

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 382 x 256

Battery

40 Wh, 2800 mAh Lithium-Ion, 4 cells

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 1.3 MP HD (720p), 30 FPS

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: no, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.4 kg, Power Supply: 207 g

Price

629 EUR

Links

Acer homepage
Acer notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Medion Akoya P6670 Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK DIN A4 ❌

Left side: Kensington lock, air outlet, USB 3.1 Type-C, Ethernet (folds out), VGA, HDMI, 2 x USB 3.0

Right side: audio in/out, USB 2.0, DVD drive, power

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A	57.3 MB/s
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D	52.6 MB/s -8%
Medion Akoya P6670	21.8 MB/s -62%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK	16.7 MB/s -71%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A	83.2 MB/s
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D	80.9 MB/s -3%
Medion Akoya P6670	27.3 MB/s -67%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK	26.3 MB/s -68%

Networking
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	333 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	346 MBit/s


198 cd/m²	228 cd/m²	212 cd/m²
188 cd/m²	224 cd/m²	196 cd/m²
171 cd/m²	205 cd/m²	184 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Chi Mei CMN15C4 / N156HGE-EAB tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 228 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 200.7 cd/m² Minimum: 17.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 75 %
Center on Battery: 224 cd/m²
Contrast: 487:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 11.23 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.07% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.72% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Chi Mei CMN15C4 / N156HGE-EAB, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK LG Philips LGD04A7 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPK2 , , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Medion Akoya P6670 LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, , 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		-1%	-3%	-4%
Display P3 Coverage	39.72	39.26 -1%	38.57 -3%	38.14 -4%
sRGB Coverage	59.2	58.7 -1%	57.4 -3%	57.2 -3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	41.07	40.59 -1%	39.89 -3%	39.43 -4%
Response Times		-53%	-28%	-50%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42.4 ?(22, 20.4)	40 ?(19, 21) 6%	39 ?(21, 18) 8%	42 ?(18, 24) 1%
Response Time Black / White *	14.6 ?(9.4, 5.2)	24 ?(9, 15) -64%	24 ?(19, 5) -64%	22 ?(6, 16) -51%
PWM Frequency	28740	50 ?(90) -100%		50 -100%
Screen		25%	1%	15%
Brightness middle	224	284 27%	176 -21%	287 28%
Brightness	201	276 37%	169 -16%	269 34%
Brightness Distribution	75	80 7%	91 21%	74 -1%
Black Level *	0.46	0.33 28%	0.47 -2%	0.65 -41%
Contrast	487	861 77%	374 -23%	442 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	10.5	7.21 31%	8.83 16%	5.42 48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	16.8	15.12 10%	14.01 17%	9.54 43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	11.23	6.86 39%	8.97 20%	5.14 54%
Gamma	2.12 ^104%	2.46 ^89%	2.43 ^91%	2.48 ^89%
CCT	11096 ^59%	6726 ^97%	10234 ^64%	6952 ^93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	38	37 -3%	36.8 -3%	36 -5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	59	58 -2%	57.3 -3%	57 -3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-10% / 6%	-10% / -4%	-13% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.4 ms rise
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

28740 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 28740 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 28740 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points +65%
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	117 Points +50%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK Intel Core i5-6200U	109 Points +40%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 Intel Core i3-6100U	98 Points +26%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A AMD A12-9700P	78 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points +45%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK Intel Core i5-6200U	293 Points +28%
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	291 Points +27%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 Intel Core i3-6100U	250 Points +9%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A AMD A12-9700P	229 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

2262

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

5148

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.76 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

1.92 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

78 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

229 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Medion Akoya P6670 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Phison S11-128G	3396 Points +19%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	3294 Points +16%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3162 Points +11%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Radeon R8 M445DX, A12-9700P, Liteonit CV3-8D128	2847 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	4047 Points +5%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	3907 Points +2%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Radeon R8 M445DX, A12-9700P, Liteonit CV3-8D128	3844 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2847 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3844 points
Help

	Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Liteonit CV3-8D128	Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Toshiba MQ01ABD100	Medion Akoya P6670 Phison S11-128G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-91%	-90%	9%
Read Seq	348.6	84.5 -76%	95.3 -73%	441.8 27%
Write Seq	311.8	69.9 -78%	85.6 -73%	398 28%
Read 512	295.9	28.87 -90%	29.32 -90%	295.5 0%
Write 512	185.8	28.08 -85%	25.93 -86%	75.5 -59%
Read 4k	23.76	0.326 -99%	0.366 -98%	31.19 31%
Write 4k	44.94	0.595 -99%	0.726 -98%	60 34%
Read 4k QD32	171.6	0.602 -100%	0.647 -100%	258 50%
Write 4k QD32	143.2	0.612 -100%	0.722 -99%	85.7 -40%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Liteonit CV3-8D128

Sequential Read: 348.6 MB/s

Sequential Write: 311.8 MB/s

512K Read: 295.9 MB/s

512K Write: 185.8 MB/s

4K Read: 23.76 MB/s

4K Write: 44.94 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 171.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 143.2 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	4251 Points +12%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A12-9700P	3811 Points
Medion Akoya P6670 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2516 Points -34%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2343 Points -39%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	22439 Points +85%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A12-9700P	12140 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	8541 Points -30%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	3574 Points +71%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A12-9700P	2090 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	1580 Points -24%

3DMark 11 Performance		2992 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6270 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1644 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high
The Witcher 3 (2015)	24.3	15.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	23.9	14.8
Battlefield 1 (2016)	31.2		7.9
Civilization VI (2016)	36.8		9.7
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)	63.8		21.6
Dishonored 2 (2016)	13.8

Noise Level

Idle		31.4 / 31.4 / 31.9 dB(A)
DVD		36.6 / dB(A)
Load		33.7 / 33.8 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


35.7 °C	36.7 °C	27.2 °C
36 °C	36.8 °C	27.3 °C
32.4 °C	36.6 °C	27.4 °C

Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 32.9 °C


24.5 °C	31.4 °C	56.5 °C
24.8 °C	40 °C	50.1 °C
26.2 °C	34.5 °C	34.2 °C

Maximum: 56.5 °C
Average: 35.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 55.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.5 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.6 °C / 97.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-7.8 °C / -14.1 F).

Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Medion Akoya P6670 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.43 / 0.5 Watt
Idle	7.2 / 10.3 / 11.9 Watt
Load	48.2 / 63 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A A12-9700P, Radeon R8 M445DX, Liteonit CV3-8D128, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Medion Akoya P6670 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Phison S11-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		0%	3%	12%
Idle Minimum *	7.2	7.7 -7%	6 17%	6.7 7%
Idle Average *	10.3	11.7 -14%	8.1 21%	9.2 11%
Idle Maximum *	11.9	13.6 -14%	9.8 18%	9.7 18%
Load Average *	48.2	48.3 -0%	52.5 -9%	40.6 16%
Witcher 3 ultra *	51.8
Load Maximum *	63	41 35%	81.6 -30%	58 8%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		5h 58min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)		0h 55min

	Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A A12-9700P, Radeon R8 M445DX, 40 Wh	Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh	Medion Akoya P6670 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 44 Wh
Battery Runtime		15%	75%	9%
Reader / Idle	358	443 24%	767 114%
WiFi v1.3	257	225 -12%	451 75%	280 9%
Load	55	73 33%	75 36%
H.264			460

Pros

+ 坚固机身

+ 维护舱口

+ 工艺精良

+ 非常好的触控板

+ 固态硬盘 + 1 TB机械硬盘

+ 该价位下，良好的插口选择

+ 无屏幕闪烁

+ 必要的地方都酷

Cons

- 性能问题

- 无意义的双显卡，具有较小掉帧的机会

- 在压力测试之外，发现有节流

- 实际上几乎不适合游戏

- 风扇在某种程度上转速过高

- 非常差的显示：

- 对比度差

- 颜色再现不良

- 颜色深度不足

- 灾难性可视角度稳定性

In review: Acer Aspire E5-553G-109A. Test model provided by Cyberport.de

宏碁Aspire E5-553G-109A的功能中，我们最喜欢的是优秀（键盘）到非常好（ClickPad）输入设备以及坚固良好的机身。AMD处理器更适合于办公，并且具有一些缺点，例如节流，四核的较差使用感受以及单核的弱性能。在涉及到多任务时，它甚至很少比没有超线程的双核i3上领先。毫无意义的Radeon R8 M445DX双显卡构造是值得批评的。在大多数情况下，与专用R7 M440相比，它不会实现额外的帧速，但增加了轻微丢帧的危险。最后，其实这关系不大，因为双显卡解决方案可以关闭，R7 M440可以自己完成任务，这也是我们的建议。如果避免持续的高负载，AMD技术在实践中的表现将会变得很出色，大体确保了操作的顺畅。当然，固态硬盘功不可没。