宏碁 Aspire E5-575G (i5-7200U, GTX 950M) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Brand: Acer

丰富配置，低廉价格。 由于搭配了GeForce GTX 950M和快速的Kaby Lake处理器，宏碁Aspire E5-575G应该可以流畅运行十分复杂的游戏——而它的售价也只有600欧元（约4499人民币）。这其中的机关在哪儿呢？

Till Schönborn, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 10/01/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D (Aspire E15 E5 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 928 MHz, RAM: 5000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 362.03, Optimus

Memory

8 GB

, 1x 8 GB DDR4-2133, 2个内存槽1个已占用

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Chi Mei CMN15C4, TN, LED 背光, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Toshiba MQ01ABD100, 1000 GB

, 5400 rpm, 空余 M.2 插槽

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: SD

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Optical drive

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 29.2 x 382 x 259

Battery

62 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Linux

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, 90瓦电源适配器, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.4 kg, Power Supply: 460 g

Price

630 Euro

Links

Acer homepage
Acer notebook section
Aspire E15 E5 (Series)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV	77.6 MB/s +48%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1	57.4 MB/s +9%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D	52.6 MB/s
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873	24.2 MB/s -54%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2	13 MB/s -75%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV	88.8 MB/s +10%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D	80.9 MB/s
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873	27.5 MB/s -66%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2	25 MB/s -69%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	317 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	293 MBit/s


164 cd/m²	167 cd/m²	166 cd/m²
162 cd/m²	176 cd/m²	166 cd/m²
177 cd/m²	178 cd/m²	162 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Chi Mei CMN15C4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 178 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 168.7 cd/m² Minimum: 26 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 177 cd/m²
Contrast: 374:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.97 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.57% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Chi Mei CMN15C4, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Innolux N156HGE-EAL, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 ChiMei N156HGE-EAL, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) CMN15BA, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 LG LP156WF6-SPK1, AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		100%	101%	26%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	38.57	84.2 118%	84.9 120%	48.96 27%	39.48 2%
sRGB Coverage	57.4	99.7 74%	99.8 74%	70.9 24%	59 3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	39.89	82.7 107%	83.3 109%	50.3 26%	40.81 2%
Response Times		-5%	-15%		4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	39 ?(21, 18)	44 ?(24, 20, starke Schwankungen mit/ohne PSU) -13%	44 ?(25, 19, short plateau) -13%		36 ?(13, 23) 8%
Response Time Black / White *	24 ?(19, 5)	23 ?(7, 16, Plateau) 4%	28 ?(11, 17, short plateau) -17%		24 ?(8, 16) -0%
PWM Frequency		1000 ?(80)	200 ?(90)		50 ?(50)
Screen		13%	27%	51%	22%
Brightness middle	176	234 33%	249 41%	389 121%	291 65%
Brightness	169	219 30%	240 42%	353 109%	270 60%
Brightness Distribution	91	80 -12%	86 -5%	83 -9%	85 -7%
Black Level *	0.47	0.48 -2%	0.48 -2%	0.31 34%	0.38 19%
Contrast	374	488 30%	519 39%	1255 236%	766 105%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.83	11.8 -34%	10.15 -15%	11.53 -31%	8.6 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.01	20.69 -48%			17.39 -24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.97	13.3 -48%	12.13 -35%	13.46 -50%	8.5 5%
Gamma	2.43 ^91%	2.47 ^89%	2.48 ^89%	2.3 ^96%	2.31 ^95%
CCT	10234 ^64%	17098 ^38%	13445 ^48%	12024 ^54%	6184 ^105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	36.8	74 101%	74 101%	46 25%	32 -13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	57.3	100 75%	100 75%	71 24%	59 3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		36% / 28%	38% / 37%	39% / 45%	9% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | X264 HD Benchmark 4.0

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	141 Points +9%
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	140 Points +9%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Intel Core i5-6300HQ	136 Points +5%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points +1%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	119 Points -8%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	115 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	677 Points +105%
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	673 Points +103%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Intel Core i5-6300HQ	465 Points +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	347 Points +5%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 Intel Core i7-6500U	300 Points -9%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	295 Points -11%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	288 Points -13%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.68 Points +14%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.68 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	1.57 Points +6%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 Intel Core i7-6500U	1.48 Points 0%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	1.48 Points
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Intel Core i5-6300HQ	1.46 Points -1%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	1.35 Points -9%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	1.33 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.48 Points +102%
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.41 Points +100%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Intel Core i5-6300HQ	5.36 Points +45%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	3.83 Points +4%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	3.7 Points
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 Intel Core i7-6500U	3.33 Points -10%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	3.24 Points -12%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	3.19 Points -14%

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Intel Core i5-6300HQ	149 fps +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	120.4 fps +7%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	112.1 fps
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	101.3 fps -10%
Pass 2
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Intel Core i5-6300HQ	31 fps +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	22.62 fps +4%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	21.68 fps
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	19.04 fps -12%

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

4620

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11301

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5022

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.7 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

53.8 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.48 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

331 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

129 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

75 fps

Help

... in comparison

	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Toshiba MQ01ABD100	Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB	Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		5491%	29%	14969%	15639%
Read Seq	95.3	433.2 355%	108.1 13%	503 428%	509 434%
Write Seq	85.6	131.9 54%	105.6 23%	302.9 254%	459.4 437%
Read 512	29.32	250 753%	35.32 20%	424.5 1348%	413.8 1311%
Write 512	25.93	90.6 249%	46.13 78%	302.2 1065%	383.6 1379%
Read 4k	0.366	30.69 8285%	0.413 13%	33.57 9072%	45.35 12291%
Write 4k	0.726	51.2 6952%	0.9 24%	90.6 12379%	100.1 13688%
Read 4k QD32	0.647	112.2 17242%	0.895 38%	353.7 54568%	356.1 54939%
Write 4k QD32	0.722	73.2 10039%	0.884 22%	294.1 40634%	294.1 40634%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Toshiba MQ01ABD100

Transfer Rate Minimum: 39.8 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 111.2 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 86 MB/s

Access Time: 18.1 ms

Burst Rate: 113.3 MB/s

CPU Usage: 10 %

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3390 Points +7%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	3266 Points +3%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3162 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	4498 Points +11%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	4047 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3970 Points -2%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3162 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3696 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4047 points
Help

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5452 Points +28%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	4482 Points +5%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6500U	4350 Points +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	4251 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	4239 Points 0%
Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-572G-54YG NVIDIA GeForce 945M, Intel Core i5-6200U	2759 Points -35%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	27162 Points +21%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	22439 Points
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	21715 Points -3%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	21635 Points -4%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6500U	20061 Points -11%
Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-572G-54YG NVIDIA GeForce 945M, Intel Core i5-6200U	17980 Points -20%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	4249 Points +19%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	3574 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	3555 Points -1%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	3238 Points -9%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6500U	3102 Points -13%
Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-572G-54YG NVIDIA GeForce 945M, Intel Core i5-6200U	2816 Points -21%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		18647 points
3DMark 11 Performance		4212 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		45360 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		9392 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3218 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		1614 points
Help

... in comparison

Rise of the Tomb Raider | BioShock Infinite | Battlefield 4

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	35.8 fps +13%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	31.6 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	30.6 (29^min - 34^max) fps -3%
Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	28.8 fps -9%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	29.6 fps +57%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	21.1 fps +12%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	18.8 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	18.2 (17^min - 21^max) fps -3%
Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	16.9 fps -10%

BioShock Infinite
1366x768 High Preset
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	110 fps +27%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC GeForce GTX 950M, 6300HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB	87.6 fps +1%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	86.7 fps
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	85.3 (14.66^min - 145.45^max) fps -2%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	69.5 (11.6^min - 138^max) fps -20%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	45.8 fps +31%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	35.7 (8.8^min - 109.06^max) fps +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	35 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	24 (5.7^min - 45.5^max) fps -31%

Battlefield 4
1366x768 High Preset
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	63.1 fps +3%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	61 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	46.2 fps -24%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	28.5 fps +6%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	26.9 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	18.9 fps -30%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	126.8	96.8	86.7	35
Battlefield 4 (2013)	109.7	78.6	61	26.9
Dirt Rally (2015)	144.1	79.3	45.2	24.6
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015)	33.8	30.6	18.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	45.2	31.6	18.8	16.9
The Division (2016)	63.8	41.5	20.4	15.4
Hitman 2016 (2016)	34.6	34.1	11.6
Overwatch (2016)	152.7	107.4	71.5	32.8
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)	69.3	51.6	23.6	18.3
No Man's Sky (2016)	35.6	29.4	18.2
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	30.9	24.5	14.2

Noise Level

Idle		30.8 / 30.8 / 30.8 dB(A)
HDD		31.2 dB(A)
Load		33.4 / 40.1 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.9 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


41.6 °C	41 °C	33.2 °C
42.3 °C	48.1 °C	33.1 °C
36.7 °C	41.8 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 48.1 °C
Average: 39.2 °C


30.8 °C	42.1 °C	60.8 °C
31.5 °C	50.7 °C	44.1 °C
34.8 °C	37.4 °C	34.5 °C

Maximum: 60.8 °C
Average: 40.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 55.3 °C | Room Temperature 24.5 °C | Fluke 62 Max

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.1 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.8 °C / 141 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-13 °C / -23.4 F).

Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.25 / 1 Watt
Idle	6 / 8.1 / 9.8 Watt
Load	52.5 / 81.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 6500U, GeForce GTX 950M, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9, AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		-27%	-40%	-65%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	6	8.3 -38%	8.7 -45%	10.2 -70%	5.6 7%
Idle Average *	8.1	12.1 -49%	14.5 -79%	15.6 -93%	10.9 -35%
Idle Maximum *	9.8	15.4 -57%	15.6 -59%	17 -73%	10.6 -8%
Load Average *	52.5	56 -7%	61 -16%	79 -50%	61 -16%
Load Maximum *	81.6	70 14%	82 -0%	115.2 -41%	60 26%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		12h 47min
WiFi Websurfing		7h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 15min

	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh	Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 6500U, GeForce GTX 950M, 44 Wh	Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 56 Wh	Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime		12%	-33%	-40%	-14%	-20%
Reader / Idle	767	667 -13%	521 -32%		715 -7%	535 -30%
H.264	460	335 -27%	114 -75%		241 -48%	305 -34%
WiFi v1.3	451	386 -14%	230 -49%	270 -40%	255 -43%	303 -33%
Load	75	152 103%	93 24%		108 44%	87 16%

Pros

+ 超高性价比

+ 不错的配置

+ 高速处理器

+ 适合游戏的显卡

+ 全高清屏幕

+ USB-C接口

+ 长电池续航

+ 空余M.2插槽

+ 支持无线ac标准

Cons

- 屏幕亮度较低

- 无操作系统

- 硬盘较慢

- 在压力测试中有降频现象

In review: Acer Aspire E5-575G. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

当然我们不能期待一台仅仅600欧元（约4499人民币）的笔记本电脑有完美无缺的高端特性。不过宏碁Aspire E15 E5-575G-549D依然是一台配置优秀，适合游戏的主流设备。它较低的售价来自一些让人遗憾的低成本设计。显然它的预算里不会有时尚的金属机身，高速固态硬盘或明亮IPS屏幕——不过最新的Kaby Lake处理器，高速中端显卡和8GB DDR4内存以及大容量硬盘都得到了存身之地。这台Aspire的配置十分适合游戏，不过屏幕原生分辨率只有在一部分情况下可以得到利用。不过，大部分新游戏都可以在降低图形细节后流畅运行，这并不是所有笔记本电脑都可以做到的。

除了机身品质和输入设备品质外，Aspire都可以得到十分不错的分数。除了屏幕过低的亮度，这台设备整体上几乎没有缺陷，在许多方面甚至表现超乎我们的预期：它可以提供7到8小时的实际使用电池续航时间，高速的无线ac连接几乎超过了许多更贵的机型。总结来说：