宏碁 Aspire E5-774-54HJ 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Brand: Acer

实惠型台式替代机。Aspire E5-774运行安静，几乎不会变热，同时便于升级维护，提供了全高清屏幕和优秀电池续航——它是一台不错的桌面式笔记本电脑。而550欧元（约4038人民币）的售价也相对低廉，不过它没有预装Windows操作系统。

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 12/03/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ (Aspire E5 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620, Core: 1000 MHz, 单通道, 21.20.16.4494

Memory

4 GB

, DDR4-2400, 单通道, 两个内存槽 (一个已占用)

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HTN01.1, TN LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0, 500 GB

, 5400 rpm, 465 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

2 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Optical drive

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 28 x 423 x 282

Battery

41 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

FreeDos

Camera

Webcam: 高清

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

3 kg, Power Supply: 340 g

Price

549 Euro

Links

Acer homepage
Acer notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ	72.7 MB/s
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J	44 MB/s -39%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA	40.3 MB/s -45%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118	18 MB/s -75%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE	14.3 MB/s -80%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ	87.3 MB/s
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J	85.5 MB/s -2%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA	80.5 MB/s -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE	26.7 MB/s -69%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118	25.2 MB/s -71%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)	341 MBit/s
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)	331 MBit/s -3%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)	327 MBit/s +7%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)	307 MBit/s


327 cd/m²	330 cd/m²	306 cd/m²
323 cd/m²	353 cd/m²	293 cd/m²
319 cd/m²	338 cd/m²	289 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics B173HTN01.1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 353 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 319.8 cd/m² Minimum: 25.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 353 cd/m²
Contrast: 929:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13.38 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.69

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE TN LED, 1600x900, 17.3"	Acer Aspire E5-722-662J TN LED, 1600x900, 17.3"	Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118 TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display		2%	-21%	-17%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	71.3	72.3 1%	52.4 -27%	54.5 -24%	69.3 -3%
sRGB Coverage	91.7	94.8 3%	76.1 -17%	81.8 -11%	90.6 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.1	69.3 3%	54.2 -19%	56.1 -16%	66.3 -1%
Response Times		1%	-2%	-5%	-63%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42 ?(21, 21)	43 ?(23, 20) -2%	42 ?(22, 30) -0%	48 ?(25, 23) -14%	86 ?(44, 42) -105%
Response Time Black / White *	23 ?(6, 17)	22 ?(5, 17) 4%	24 ?(7, 17) -4%	24 ?(8, 16) -4%	24 ?(7, 17) -4%
PWM Frequency	1000 ?(90)	1000 ?(90) 0%		1042 ?(90) 4%	200 ?(90) -80%
Screen		-7%	-33%	-26%	-15%
Brightness middle	353	320 -9%	205 -42%	216 -39%	304 -14%
Brightness	320	302 -6%	182 -43%	199 -38%	292 -9%
Brightness Distribution	82	86 5%	77 -6%	80 -2%	84 2%
Black Level *	0.38	0.4 -5%	0.43 -13%	0.17 55%	0.37 3%
Contrast	929	800 -14%	477 -49%	1271 37%	822 -12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.07	7.78 -53%	9.75 -92%	12.2 -141%	10.62 -109%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.12	12.74 -26%	16.02 -58%	20.4 -102%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	13.38	8.87 34%	12.09 10%	13.3 1%	11.78 12%
Gamma	2.69 ^82%	2.27 ^97%	2.62 ^84%	2.15 ^102%	2.39 ^92%
CCT	15991 ^41%	8979 ^72%	12875 ^50%	15963 ^41%	12997 ^50%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60.1	62 3%	49 -18%	52 -13%	59 -2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	91.6	95 4%	76 -17%	76 -17%	90 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1% / -4%	-19% / -26%	-16% / -20%	-27% / -22%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1000 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4993

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11410

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

7530

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

129 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

328 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

34.48 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | JetStream 1.1

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	131 Points +2%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	118 Points -9%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118 Intel Core i5-6200U	106 Points -18%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J AMD A6-7310	45 Points -65%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	330 Points +1%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Intel Core i5-7200U	328 Points
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118 Intel Core i5-6200U	292 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	292 Points -11%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J AMD A6-7310	159 Points -52%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	3266 Points +15%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Intel Core i5-7200U	2852 Points
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118 Intel Core i5-6200U	2782 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	2396 Points -16%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	6847 Points +8%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Intel Core i5-7200U	6338 Points
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118 Intel Core i5-6200U	5993 Points -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	5569 Points -12%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Intel Core i5-7200U	3502 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Intel Core i5-7200U	6447 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	216.8 Points +3%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Intel Core i5-7200U	211.5 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	192.6 Points -9%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118 Intel Core i5-6200U	186.9 Points -12%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2854 points
Help

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	3734 Points +31%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118 Radeon R5 M335, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	3232 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Radeon R5 M330, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3184 Points +12%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0	2854 Points
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A6-7310, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	1855 Points -35%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0

Transfer Rate Minimum: 48.7 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 118.3 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 90.5 MB/s

Access Time: 18.5 ms

Burst Rate: 237.3 MB/s

CPU Usage: 8.3 %

	Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0	Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Lite-On CV1-8B256	Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Toshiba MQ01ABD100	Acer Aspire E5-722-662J WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118 Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		9156%	-10%	18%	-22%
Read Seq	88.9	520 485%	100.6 13%	113.9 28%	91.8 3%
Write Seq	70.9	332.8 369%	96.3 36%	113.8 61%	84.7 19%
Read 512	33.01	382.8 1060%	28.15 -15%	37.29 13%	26.59 -19%
Write 512	51.6	357.7 593%	43.34 -16%	51.8 0%	32.7 -37%
Read 4k	0.381	32.31 8380%	0.312 -18%	0.425 12%	0.288 -24%
Write 4k	1.117	85.1 7519%	0.792 -29%	1.153 3%	0.638 -43%
Read 4k QD32	0.891	277.7 31067%	0.708 -21%	1.095 23%	0.59 -34%
Write 4k QD32	1.13	269.8 23776%	0.764 -32%	1.162 3%	0.642 -43%

3DMark 11 Performance		1413 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	2813 Points +111%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118 AMD Radeon R5 M335, Intel Core i5-6200U	1784 Points +34%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1555 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U	1518 Points +14%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1331 Points
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A6-7310	764 Points -43%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	35.6	20.1	16.6	5.4

BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	116.4 fps +227%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	52.3 fps +47%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118 AMD Radeon R5 M335, Intel Core i5-6200U	44.9 fps +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U	43.2 fps +21%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	35.6 fps

Noise Level

Idle		30.8 / 30.8 / 30.8 dB(A)
HDD		32.4 dB(A)
DVD		35.6 / dB(A)
Load		32.1 / 33.8 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


29 °C	27.4 °C	24.6 °C
29.3 °C	30.4 °C	24.3 °C
28.2 °C	28.8 °C	24.9 °C

Maximum: 30.4 °C
Average: 27.4 °C


23.2 °C	26 °C	28.7 °C
23 °C	24.5 °C	30.6 °C
25 °C	25.2 °C	28.2 °C

Maximum: 30.6 °C
Average: 26 °C

Power Supply (max.) 35.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-1.2 °C / -2.1 F).

Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.2 / 0.6 Watt
Idle	5.3 / 10.1 / 10.5 Watt
Load	34.3 / 37 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		5h 20min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE 6200U, Radeon R5 M330, 41 Wh	406 min +27%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA 6500U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh	322 min +1%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh	320 min
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118 6200U, Radeon R5 M335, 40 Wh	301 min -6%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J A6-7310, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), 37 Wh	228 min -29%

Pros

+ 磨砂屏幕

+ 全高清分辨率

+ 空余M.2插槽

+ 优秀的电池续航

+ 维护底盖

+ ac标准无线模组

+ USB-C接口（USB 3.1第一代）

Cons

- 接口布局

In review: Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ. Test model provided by Cyberport.de

Kaby Lake架构的酷睿i5可以为日常使用带来足够的性能，而它的集成显卡也可以流畅运行很多（配置要求较低的）游戏。我们建议用户为它添加第二条内存来增强系统和图形性能。这台笔记本电脑在使用中可以保持安静，几乎不会变热。500GB的硬盘空间十分充裕，但我们建议为它增加一块M.2接口固态硬盘。由于它底盖设计有维护窗口，用户可以方便地对硬件更新升级。它的键盘也十分不错，作为一台17.3寸笔记本它的电池续航也算不错。磨砂的全高清屏幕亮度和对比度都很高，但由于采用TN技术可视角度范围较为有限。不过这应该算是品质最高的TN面板之一了，它的可视角度比普通的廉价TN面板宽广不少。遗憾的是，这仍然无法帮助它与IPS屏幕相提并论。