宏碁 Aspire E5-774G-78NA (GeForce 940MX GDDR5) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Brand: Acer

成功的桌面时笔记本电脑。 宏碁带来了一台配置优秀的17.3寸桌面式笔记本电脑，Aspire E5-774g。它的GeForce 940MX搭配了GDDR5显存帮助许多游戏可以在它的磨砂全高清屏幕上运行。不过，用户需要为它准备出1000欧元（约7498人民币）的预算。

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 09/24/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA (Aspire E5 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-6500U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 861 MHz, RAM: 1253 MHz, GDDR5, 64位界面, ForceWare 372.70, Optimus

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4-2132, 双通道, 两个内存槽均已占用

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HTN01.1, TN LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Lite-On CV1-8B256, 256 GB

, + WDC WD10JPVX (1TB, 5400 rpm), 1131 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

2 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Optical drive

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 33.1 x 423.32 x 281.9

Battery

41 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清摄像头

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, McAfee LiveSafe-Internet Security (试用版), MS Office (试用版), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

3 kg, Power Supply: 340 g

Price

999 Euro

Links

Acer homepage
Acer notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

▶ load Youtube video

Size Comparison

Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP Asus F756UX-T7013T HP Pavilion 17-g120ng Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT DIN A4 ❌

Left: cable lock slot, Type-C-USB (USB 3.1 gen 1), Gigabit-Ethernet, VGA, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0

Right: combo audio, 2x USB 2.0, DVD burner, power-in

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA	40.3 MB/s
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT	35.1 MB/s -13%
Asus F756UX-T7013T	27.2 MB/s -33%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE	14.3 MB/s -65%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT	84.3 MB/s +5%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA	80.5 MB/s
Asus F756UX-T7013T	38.6 MB/s -52%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE	26.7 MB/s -67%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)	331 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)	327 MBit/s


295 cd/m²	312 cd/m²	310 cd/m²
282 cd/m²	320 cd/m²	290 cd/m²
294 cd/m²	327 cd/m²	287 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics B173HTN01.1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 327 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 301.9 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 320 cd/m²
Contrast: 800:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.87 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA TN LED, 1920x1080	Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP TN LED, 1920x1080	HP Pavilion 17-g120ng IPS, 1920x1080	Asus F756UX-T7013T TN LED, 1920x1080	Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT TN LED, 1600x900	Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE TN LED, 1600x900
Display		-3%	-3%	-7%	-26%	-23%
Display P3 Coverage	72.3	69.4 -4%	65.7 -9%	63.9 -12%	52.4 -28%	52.4 -28%
sRGB Coverage	94.8	91.9 -3%	97.6 3%	93.7 -1%	70.9 -25%	76.1 -20%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.3	67.3 -3%	67.7 -2%	64.6 -7%	52 -25%	54.2 -22%
Response Times			-84%	2%	7%	-4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	43 ?(23, 20)		70 ?(32, 38) -63%	42 ?(20, 22) 2%	17 ?(7, 10) 60%	42 ?(22, 30) 2%
Response Time Black / White *	22 ?(5, 17)		46 ?(16, 30) -109%	21 ?(6, 15) 5%	10 ?(5, 5) 55%	24 ?(7, 17) -9%
PWM Frequency	1000 ?(90)		200 ?(50) -80%	1000 ?(90) 0%	50 ?(90) -95%
Screen		-21%	17%	14%	-52%	-26%
Brightness middle	320	243 -24%	309 -3%	268 -16%	263 -18%	205 -36%
Brightness	302	284 -6%	292 -3%	255 -16%	257 -15%	182 -40%
Brightness Distribution	86	79 -8%	86 0%	83 -3%	86 0%	77 -10%
Black Level *	0.4	0.45 -13%	0.27 32%	0.17 57%	1 -150%	0.43 -8%
Contrast	800	540 -32%	1144 43%	1576 97%	263 -67%	477 -40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.78	12.04 -55%	4.53 42%	7.18 8%	13.6 -75%	9.75 -25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.74			11.67 8%	22.06 -73%	16.02 -26%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.87	13.25 -49%	5.66 36%	7.97 10%	15.27 -72%	12.09 -36%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.6 ^85%	2.62 ^84%	2.34 ^94%	1.94 ^113%	2.62 ^84%
CCT	8979 ^72%	14950 ^43%	7893 ^82%	8541 ^76%	16460 ^39%	12875 ^50%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	62	60 -3%	62 0%	59 -5%	46 -26%	49 -21%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	95	92 -3%	98 3%	94 -1%	71 -25%	76 -20%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-12% / -17%	-23% / -7%	3% / 8%	-24% / -36%	-18% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1000 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23 ms rise
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6305

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11143

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4944

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

44.48 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.64 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.49 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

56.3 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

330 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

131 Points

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI CX72-7QL Intel Core i7-7500U	145 Points +11%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	131 Points
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng Intel Core i7-6500U	123 Points -6%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP Intel Core i7-5500U	121 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	118 Points -10%
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points -11%
Asus F756UX-T7013T Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI CX72-7QL Intel Core i7-7500U	363 Points +10%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	330 Points
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng Intel Core i7-6500U	316 Points -4%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP Intel Core i7-5500U	293 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	292 Points -12%
Asus F756UX-T7013T Intel Core i5-6200U	289 Points -12%
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT Intel Core i5-6200U	288 Points -13%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
MSI CX72-7QL Intel Core i7-7500U	12824 Points +15%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	11143 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	9971 Points -11%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP Intel Core i7-5500U	9942 Points -11%
Asus F756UX-T7013T Intel Core i5-6200U	9881 Points -11%
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng Intel Core i7-6500U	8454 Points -24%
Rendering Single 32Bit
MSI CX72-7QL Intel Core i7-7500U	5666 Points +15%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	4944 Points
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP Intel Core i7-5500U	4589 Points -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	4412 Points -11%
Asus F756UX-T7013T Intel Core i5-6200U	4357 Points -12%
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng Intel Core i7-6500U	3295 Points -33%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI CX72-7QL Intel Core i7-7500U	3706 Points +13%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	3266 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	2396 Points -27%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI CX72-7QL Intel Core i7-7500U	7835 Points +14%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	6847 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	5569 Points -19%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
MSI CX72-7QL Intel Core i7-7500U	248.2 Points +14%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	216.8 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	192.6 Points -11%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP Intel Core i7-5500U	2900 ms * -153%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	1280 ms * -11%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	1148 ms *
MSI CX72-7QL Intel Core i7-7500U	962 ms * +16%

Octane V2 - Total Score
MSI CX72-7QL Intel Core i7-7500U	37473 Points +17%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Intel Core i7-6500U	32108 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Intel Core i5-6200U	28189 Points -12%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP Intel Core i7-5500U	10846 Points -66%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score		5479 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3734 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4350 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4545 points
Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	3734 Points
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP GeForce 940M, 5500U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD	3429 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Radeon R5 M330, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3184 Points -15%
Asus F756UX-T7013T GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	3162 Points -15%
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT GeForce 930M, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	2906 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	4545 Points
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP GeForce 940M, 5500U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD	4444 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Radeon R5 M330, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	4206 Points -7%
Asus F756UX-T7013T GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	3969 Points -13%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Lite-On CV1-8B256

Sequential Read: 520 MB/s

Sequential Write: 332.8 MB/s

512K Read: 382.8 MB/s

512K Write: 357.7 MB/s

4K Read: 32.31 MB/s

4K Write: 85.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 277.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 269.8 MB/s

	Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Lite-On CV1-8B256	Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD	HP Pavilion 17-g120ng Toshiba MQ01ABD100	Asus F756UX-T7013T HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT Toshiba MQ01ABD100	Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Toshiba MQ01ABD100
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-8%	-91%	-91%	-91%	-91%
Read Seq	520	515 -1%	104.6 -80%	105.8 -80%	107.4 -79%	100.6 -81%
Write Seq	332.8	343.2 3%	96.3 -71%	105 -68%	106.7 -68%	96.3 -71%
Read 512	382.8	341.1 -11%	30.33 -92%	33.33 -91%	30.73 -92%	28.15 -93%
Write 512	357.7	337.2 -6%	36.95 -90%	39.12 -89%	24.93 -93%	43.34 -88%
Read 4k	32.31	31.24 -3%	0.358 -99%	0.413 -99%	0.386 -99%	0.312 -99%
Write 4k	85.1	86.6 2%	0.815 -99%	0.947 -99%	0.809 -99%	0.792 -99%
Read 4k QD32	277.7	178.5 -36%	0.679 -100%	0.812 -100%	0.773 -100%	0.708 -100%
Write 4k QD32	269.8	242.4 -10%	0.79 -100%	0.968 -100%	0.807 -100%	0.764 -100%

3DMark 05 Standard		21714 points
3DMark 06 Standard Score		15623 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		9862 points
3DMark 11 Performance		3008 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		43456 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		7667 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		2049 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		979 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		710 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus F756UX-T7013T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	4083 Points +45%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	2813 Points
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	2734 Points -3%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-5500U	2427 Points -14%
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U	2389 Points -15%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2343 Points -17%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2273 Points -19%
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT NVIDIA GeForce 930M, Intel Core i5-6200U	2161 Points -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U	1518 Points -46%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus F756UX-T7013T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	18547 Points +43%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	12934 Points
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	11713 Points -9%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-5500U	8854 Points -32%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	8541 Points -34%
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U	8516 Points -34%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	8310 Points -36%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U	4897 Points -62%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus F756UX-T7013T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	2943 Points +32%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	2231 Points
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	1889 Points -15%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-5500U	1633 Points -27%
HP Pavilion 17-g120ng NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U	1583 Points -29%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	1580 Points -29%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	1561 Points -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U	874 Points -61%

	low	med.	high	ultra
Tomb Raider (2013)	181.4	96.4	62.3	29.2
BioShock Infinite (2013)	116.4	71.4	62.1	22
Battlefield 4 (2013)	88.6	61.3	44.4	18
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)	77.2	49.1	17.8	11.7
GTA V (2015)	91	80.2	22.3	9.8
Dirt Rally (2015)	187.2	69.4	37	16.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	37.9	23.8	13	7.1
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)	37	32	13	8
Mad Max (2015)		54	27.2	24.7
Anno 2205 (2015)	64	36	16.7	6.6
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015)	64.8	39	20.1	19.1
Fallout 4 (2015)	43.3	28.7	15.8	12.6
Star Wars Battlefront (2015)	70.8	45	20.4	17.3
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015)	34.4	26.4	15.3	5.8
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)	96.1	61.7	31.9	26.4
Just Cause 3 (2015)	48	37.5	18.2	17
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	34.7	24	14.7	12.7
XCOM 2 (2016)	45.7	16.2	10.3	4.1
Far Cry Primal (2016)	41	19	17	12
The Division (2016)	49.2	30.7	13.7	10.4
Hitman 2016 (2016)	26.7	27.9	15.2	14.7
Need for Speed 2016 (2016)	52.1	43.5	23.2	18
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	22.6	14	12.1
Doom (2016)	49.7	38.9	15.8	12.7
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)	54.1	33.8	15.8	12.8
No Man's Sky (2016)	30.5	24.3	14.3	6.2
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	24.7	18.4	10.4	4.9

BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	117.9 fps +90%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	85.3 (14.66^min - 145.45^max) fps +37%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF GeForce 945M, 6300HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	78.7 fps +27%
Asus F756UX-T7013T GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	69.7 fps +12%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	69.5 (11.6^min - 138^max) fps +12%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	62.1 fps
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-CE512	53.1 fps -14%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP GeForce 940M, 5500U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD	39.9 fps -36%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	39.3 fps -37%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND	39 fps -37%
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT GeForce 930M, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	38.78 fps -38%
HP ProBook 470 G3 W4P78EA Radeon R7 M340, 6200U, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB	33.5 fps -46%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE Radeon R5 M330, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	20.5 fps -67%
Acer Aspire E17 E5-752G-T7WY Radeon R8 M365DX, A10-8700P, WDC WD10JPVX-08JC3T5	0 fps -100%

Tomb Raider - 1366x768 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF GeForce 945M, 6300HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	68 fps +9%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	62.3 fps
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND	34.5 fps -45%
Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT GeForce 930M, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	33 fps -47%

Battlefield 4 - 1366x768 High Preset
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	63.1 fps +42%
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF GeForce 945M, 6300HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	54.4 fps +23%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	46.2 fps +4%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	44.4 fps
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-CE512	32.4 fps -27%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND	29.3 fps -34%
Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP GeForce 940M, 5500U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD	28.5 fps -36%

Star Wars Battlefront - 1024x768 Low Preset
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	70.8 fps
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND	50.5 fps -29%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-CE512	40.1 fps -43%

Mirror's Edge Catalyst - 1280x720 Low Preset AF:2x
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	54.1 fps
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND	47.8 fps -12%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-CE512	44 fps -19%

Dirt Rally - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Aspire V Nitro VN7-792G-55SF GeForce 945M, 6300HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	98.5 fps +42%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	69.4 fps
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	66.2 (45.7^min - 86.5^max) fps -5%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-CE512	52.4 fps -24%

Noise Level

Idle		33.2 / 33.2 / 33.7 dB(A)
HDD		33 dB(A)
DVD		36.6 / dB(A)
Load		36 / 40 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)

	Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA 6500U, GeForce 940MX	Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP 5500U, GeForce 940M	HP Pavilion 17-g120ng 6500U, GeForce 940M	Asus F756UX-T7013T 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT 6200U, GeForce 930M	Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE 6200U, Radeon R5 M330
Noise		-2%	-9%	-4%	2%	1%
off / environment *	31.2			31.2 -0%	31.2 -0%	31.2 -0%
Idle Minimum *	33.2	32 4%	33.5 -1%	32.4 2%	32.3 3%	32.5 2%
Idle Average *	33.2	32.3 3%	33.5 -1%	32.6 2%	32.3 3%	33.4 -1%
Idle Maximum *	33.7	32.6 3%	33.5 1%	32.6 3%	33.2 1%	33.4 1%
Load Average *	36	41.2 -14%	45 -25%	42 -17%	34.9 3%	36.1 -0%
Load Maximum *	40	41.6 -4%	47 -18%	45.2 -13%	40.3 -1%	38.8 3%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


33.4 °C	28.7 °C	25.6 °C
34.2 °C	37.1 °C	26 °C
32.9 °C	36.1 °C	28.9 °C

Maximum: 37.1 °C
Average: 31.4 °C


23.6 °C	25.5 °C	34 °C
23.9 °C	27.5 °C	48 °C
28.1 °C	34.3 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 30.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.1 °C / 97 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-7.3 °C / -13.2 F).

	Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA 6500U, GeForce 940MX	Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP 5500U, GeForce 940M	HP Pavilion 17-g120ng 6500U, GeForce 940M	Asus F756UX-T7013T 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT 6200U, GeForce 930M	Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE 6200U, Radeon R5 M330
Heat		-20%	-10%	-5%	7%	4%
Maximum Upper Side *	37.1	46.9 -26%	46 -24%	42 -13%	37.4 -1%	36.6 1%
Maximum Bottom *	48	54.7 -14%	47 2%	50.5 -5%	37.6 22%	41.4 14%
Idle Upper Side *	26.1	32.6 -25%	29.7 -14%	27.2 -4%	26.7 -2%	26.2 -0%
Idle Bottom *	27.6	31.3 -13%	29.1 -5%	27 2%	25.6 7%	28 -1%

* ... smaller is better

Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.22 / 2.66 Watt
Idle	8.2 / 12.6 / 13 Watt
Load	51 / 54.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA 6500U, GeForce 940MX	Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP 5500U, GeForce 940M	HP Pavilion 17-g120ng 6500U, GeForce 940M	Asus F756UX-T7013T 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT 6200U, GeForce 930M	Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE 6200U, Radeon R5 M330
Power Consumption		-5%	15%	-2%	-5%	36%
Idle Minimum *	8.2	6 27%	4.8 41%	5.8 29%	10.6 -29%	4.5 45%
Idle Average *	12.6	12.2 3%	10.1 20%	11.2 11%	13.5 -7%	8.1 36%
Idle Maximum *	13	14.5 -12%	10.4 20%	11.9 8%	14 -8%	8.7 33%
Load Average *	51	54 -6%	45.4 11%	54 -6%	44 14%	29.8 42%
Load Maximum *	54.6	73.7 -35%	63 -15%	84 -54%	52 5%	42 23%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		11h 42min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38.14393.0.0)		5h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		4h 59min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 00min

	Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA 41 Wh	Acer Aspire E5-772G-70VP 37 Wh	HP Pavilion 17-g120ng 41 Wh	Asus F756UX-T7013T 38 Wh	Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT 44 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE 41 Wh
Battery Runtime		-12%	-20%	-13%	-22%	26%
Reader / Idle	702	454 -35%		491 -30%
H.264	299
WiFi v1.3	322	259 -20%	256 -20%	217 -33%	252 -22%	406 26%
Load	60	72 20%		75 25%

Pros

+ 磨砂屏幕

+ 全高清分辨率

+ 充足的运算性能

+ 固态硬盘+传统硬盘

+ 维护底盖

+ 无线网络ac标准

Cons

- 接口布局

In review: Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

宏碁的17.3寸笔记本电脑可以提供不错的应用程序性能。除此之外，这台笔记本电脑还可以流畅运行一些较老的电脑游戏而不会变得很吵。在较高的负载下它的噪音也控制在了合理的范围内，在发热量方面也是如此。一块高速固态硬盘保证了系统的响应速度，而2.5寸传统硬盘带来充足的存储空间。宏碁为它设计了维护底盖，因此存储设备可以方便的更换。它搭配的键盘并不算是顶级，不过给我们的使用感受还不错。作为17.3寸设备它的电池续航也十分不错。

宏碁Aspire E5-774G是一台成功的家用桌面式全功能设备。

这台笔记本电脑的屏幕整体表现优秀。它很明亮，对比度高，色域覆盖也不错。唯一的不足是宏碁为它搭配了可视角度比较窄的TN面板。尽管这块面板表现不错，但IPS屏幕依然会给这台设备带来更好的使用感受。不过作为桌面式笔记本电脑，这个缺点在大部分情况下还可以接受。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA - 2016-09-16 09/16/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

79 / 98 → 80%

Keyboard

74%

Pointing Device

84%

Connectivity

48 / 81 → 60%

Weight

57 / 20-67 → 79%

Battery

82%

Display

82%

Games Performance

67 / 85 → 79%

Application Performance

87 / 92 → 94%

Temperature

92%

Noise

84 / 95 → 88%

Audio

54%

Camera

25 / 85 → 29%

Average

70%

78%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 宏碁 Aspire E5-774G-78NA (GeForce 940MX GDDR5) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sascha Mölck, 2016-09-24 (Update: 2024-08-15)