Asus Memo Pad FHD 10
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 18 scores (from 23 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus Memo Pad FHD 10
High-resolution x86 Android. An FHD resolution and the still uncommon for Android x86 processor lets the Memo Pad FHD stick out of the crowd. But how will the device fare when examined closely?
Source: Tablet PC2 - Heft 4/2014
Das Experiment, ein Intel-basiertes Tablet mit Android-Betriebssystem zu bestücken, ist Asus mit dem MeMO Pad FHD10 perfekt gelungen. Elegant kann sich das Tablet jetzt aufs Siegerpodest schwingen.
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 98%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ASUS' $329 MeMO Pad FHD 10 offers an attractive design, some useful apps and utilities, and excellent battery life. Unfortunately, its 1920 x 1200-pixel display is disappointingly dim, and its Intel Atom processor can be sluggish during everyday use.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/16/2013
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ASUS MeMO Pad FHD 10 runs the Android 4.2 Jelly Bean version of Android though ASUS does pre-load a number of its own apps. These include SuperNote Lite, and the ASUS Studio photo editing utility. There's also the addition of Miracast compatibility, which allows video to be streamed wirelessly to a compatible TV.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/23/2013
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As a budget tablet, the Memo Pad HD 7 perfectly fits the bill. It's fast enough, has all the features you'd expect and a particularly vibrant screen. It's keenly priced and generally offers an excellent user experience. It's also light enough to use comfortably for extended periods. There's no 3G or 4G version of the HD 7 available, so if accessing the internet on the move is a priority, the Asus FonePad is probably the most viable option, despite its lack of camera and slightly inferior performance and audio/visual quality.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/17/2013
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% features: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: Chip (Print) - Heft 2/2014
Review Type Unknown, , Very Short, Date: 01/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 87% features: 79% display: 90% mobility: 79% emissions: 84%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 24/2013
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/16/2013
Rating: Total score: 98%
Source: Onlinekosten.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2013
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 12/2013
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/01/2013
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Cyberbloc DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/02/2013
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobicroco DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2013
Rating: Total score: 81% features: 81% workmanship: 78% ergonomy: 83%
Source: SFT - Heft 10/2013
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 09/01/2013
Rating: Total score: 93%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/29/2013
Source: Onlinekosten.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/08/2013
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Hispazone ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/28/2013
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: PCM NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/22/2013
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tablety PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/04/2014
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: PC Lab.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2014
Source: Tablety PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/30/2013
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/25/2013
Source: Wikitech HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2013
Rating: Total score: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Geeks.hu HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2013
Comment
PowerVR SGX544MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Z2560: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
10.10":
这是在平板电脑和小型变形本中常见的屏幕尺寸。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.