Notebookcheck Logo

BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 智能手机简短评测

更光鲜亮丽。 BQ, 作为西班牙的制造商,推出了它的中端手机Aquaris X5 Plus。该设备带有指纹传感器,双SIM卡功能以及(非常)明亮的5英寸FHD屏幕。 在我们的评测中,我们将了解该智能手机在当前市场中的表现。
Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus (Aquaris Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 510, Core: 600 MHz
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
5.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 441 PPI, 多点触摸 - 5 点电容式触摸, IPS, Dinorex-Glass, 抗指纹, Quantum Color +, 620 Nits, NTSC 84%, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm 音频插孔, Card Reader: microSD up to256 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 霍尔传感器,电子罗盘,陀螺仪,加速度计,近距离传感器, UKW-收音机, Wi-Fi 直连, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G GSM (850 / 900 / 1,800 / 1,900), 3G HSPA+ (850 / 900/ 1,900 / 2,100), 4G (LTE ) FDD (800 / 1,800 / 2,100 / 2,600), SAR (Head): 0.253 W/kg (10g), SAR (Body): 1.480 W/kg (10g), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 145 x 70
Battery
11.8 Wh, 3200 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (Auto-focus f/2.0, 2160p-Video @ 30 fps, 720p-Video @ 120 fps, Sony IMX298)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (Fix focus f/2.0, 1080p-Video @ 60 fps, Sony IMX219)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono speaker below, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, USB cable, BQ Plus App, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
145 g
Price
299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus

Size Comparison

147.5 mm 71 mm 7.8 mm 153 g146.8 mm 72.6 mm 7.5 mm 147 g145 mm 70 mm 7.7 mm 145 g144.5 mm 69.4 mm 7.7 mm 160 g144.8 mm 71 mm 7.3 mm 155 g143.6 mm 66.8 mm 7.9 mm 137 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
435 MBit/s +69%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s +30%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 16 GB eMMC Flash
258 MBit/s
Fairphone 2
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 32 GB eMMC Flash
254 MBit/s -2%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s -57%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.9 MBit/s -79%
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
515 MBit/s +48%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 16 GB eMMC Flash
348 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s -19%
Fairphone 2
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 32 GB eMMC Flash
164 MBit/s -53%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s -65%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 MBit/s -85%
Garmin Edge 500 - Route
Garmin Edge 500 - Route
Garmin Edge 500 - Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning Point
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning Point
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus - Route
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus - Route
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus - Underpass
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus - Underpass
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus - Turning Point
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus - Turning Point
ColorChecker colors photographed. In the bottom half of each patch, the original color is shown.
ColorChecker colors photographed. In the bottom half of each patch, the original color is shown.
Excerpt from the test picture
Excerpt from the test picture
Test picture (click for original)
Test picture (click for original)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
590
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
640
cd/m²
585
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
657
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 657 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 609.3 cd/m² Minimum: 7.32 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 640 cd/m²
Contrast: 688:1 (Black: 0.93 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.35
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Sony Xperia XA
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Huawei P9 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Gigaset ME
IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Screen
Brightness middle
640
518
-19%
327
-49%
505
-21%
378
-41%
445
-30%
Brightness
609
475
-22%
335
-45%
468
-23%
380
-38%
456
-25%
Brightness Distribution
85
81
-5%
94
11%
88
4%
91
7%
93
9%
Black Level *
0.93
0.61
34%
0.74
20%
0.38
59%
Contrast
688
849
23%
682
-1%
1171
70%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.8
6.8
-143%
6.3
-125%
4.1
-46%
1.95
30%
4.29
-53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.7
11.4
-100%
11.4
-100%
5.8
-2%
3.09
46%
7.89
-38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
7
-169%
7.1
-173%
4.9
-88%
1.86
28%
4.97
-91%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.35 94%
2.25 98%
2.5 88%
2.13 103%
2.57 86%
CCT
6477 100%
8151 80%
7637 85%
7116 91%
6376 102%
7625 85%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
80 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 42 ms rise
↘ 38 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
75533 Points
Sony Xperia XA
48331 Points -36%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
46968 Points -38%
Huawei P9 Lite
50366 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
41676 Points -45%
Gigaset ME
54213 Points -28%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
843 Points
Sony Xperia XA
717 Points -15%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
10 Points -99%
Huawei P9 Lite
765 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
741 Points -12%
Gigaset ME
1233 Points +46%
Graphics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1635 Points
Sony Xperia XA
669 Points -59%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
827 Points -49%
Huawei P9 Lite
818 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
488 Points -70%
Gigaset ME
4449 Points +172%
Memory (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
798 Points
Sony Xperia XA
1076 Points +35%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
1052 Points +32%
Huawei P9 Lite
1346 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
554 Points -31%
Gigaset ME
781 Points -2%
System (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
2582 Points
Sony Xperia XA
2289 Points -11%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
1379 Points -47%
Huawei P9 Lite
2438 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2153 Points -17%
Gigaset ME
1422 Points -45%
Overall (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1297 Points
Sony Xperia XA
1043 Points -20%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
328 Points -75%
Huawei P9 Lite
1197 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
810 Points -38%
Gigaset ME
1571 Points +21%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
2511 Points
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
2092 Points -17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1204 Points
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
698 Points -42%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
3248 Points
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
4964 Points
Sony Xperia XA
4685 Points -6%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
3663 Points -26%
Huawei P9 Lite
5339 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
4008 Points -19%
Gigaset ME
4544 Points -8%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
9138 Points
Sony Xperia XA
4046 Points -56%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
3371 Points -63%
Huawei P9 Lite
4756 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3611 Points -60%
Gigaset ME
7109 Points -22%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
3465 ms *
Sony Xperia XA
9610 ms * -177%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
11109 ms * -221%
Huawei P9 Lite
9397 ms * -171%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
11887 ms * -243%
Gigaset ME
7670 ms * -121%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
50.1 Points
Sony Xperia XA
27.5 Points -45%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
23 Points -54%
Huawei P9 Lite
29.03 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
22 Points -56%
Gigaset ME
28.48 Points -43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
31 fps
Sony Xperia XA
28 fps -10%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
18 fps -42%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps -55%
Gigaset ME
50 fps +61%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
30 fps
Sony Xperia XA
18 fps -40%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
17 fps -43%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps -53%
Gigaset ME
51 fps +70%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
14 fps
Sony Xperia XA
7.2 fps -49%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
6.7 fps -52%
Huawei P9 Lite
7.8 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps -73%
Gigaset ME
24 fps +71%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
14 fps
Sony Xperia XA
15 fps +7%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
7 fps -50%
Huawei P9 Lite
8.4 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps -73%
Gigaset ME
25 fps +79%
GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
9.6 fps
Sony Xperia XA
4.8 fps -50%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
4.2 fps -56%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.5 fps -53%
Gigaset ME
17 fps +77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
9.4 fps
Sony Xperia XA
11 fps +17%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
4.5 fps -52%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.9 fps -48%
Gigaset ME
18 fps +91%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
11532 Points
Sony Xperia XA
12138 Points +5%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
9670 Points -16%
Huawei P9 Lite
13676 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
9495 Points -18%
Gigaset ME
10927 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
21668 Points
Sony Xperia XA
10916 Points -50%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
9913 Points -54%
Huawei P9 Lite
11318 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7542 Points -65%
Gigaset ME
25016 Points +15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
18127 Points
Sony Xperia XA
11156 Points -38%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
9858 Points -46%
Huawei P9 Lite
11769 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7903 Points -56%
Gigaset ME
19445 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1793 Points
Sony Xperia XA
1259 Points -30%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
1102 Points -39%
Huawei P9 Lite
1373 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
1479 Points -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1252 Points
Sony Xperia XA
525 Points -58%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
606 Points -52%
Huawei P9 Lite
473 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
275 Points -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
1342 Points
Sony Xperia XA
603 Points -55%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
673 Points -50%
Huawei P9 Lite
554 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
336 Points -75%
AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
12.44 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA
10.6 MB/s -15%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
6.7 MB/s -46%
Huawei P9 Lite
15.35 MB/s +23%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
11.2 MB/s -10%
Gigaset ME
15 MB/s +21%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
36.85 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA
22.05 MB/s -40%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
14.05 MB/s -62%
Huawei P9 Lite
38.22 MB/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
22.9 MB/s -38%
Gigaset ME
22 MB/s -40%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
47.03 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA
68.6 MB/s +46%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
122.8 MB/s +161%
Huawei P9 Lite
46.24 MB/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
60.4 MB/s +28%
Gigaset ME
131 MB/s +179%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
228.4 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA
240.4 MB/s +5%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
230.8 MB/s +1%
Huawei P9 Lite
283.5 MB/s +24%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
209.4 MB/s -8%
Gigaset ME
232 MB/s +2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
54.9 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA
50.7 MB/s -8%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
50.3 MB/s -8%
Huawei P9 Lite
25.1 MB/s -54%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
73.2 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA
72.9 MB/s 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
73.9 MB/s +1%
Huawei P9 Lite
60.8 MB/s -17%

Legend

 
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Axon 7 Mini Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset ME Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 37.8 °C37.3 °C36.6 °C 
 37.7 °C37.5 °C36.5 °C 
 36.6 °C36.6 °C35.8 °C 
Maximum: 37.8 °C
Average: 36.9 °C
33.4 °C36.5 °C38.5 °C
34.9 °C35.5 °C39.9 °C
34.8 °C36.5 °C39.9 °C
Maximum: 39.9 °C
Average: 36.7 °C
Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Wärmebild BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
Wärmebild BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.634.92525.428.83125.328.44032.936.75033.638.46331.634.18028.425.61002726.912520.828.41602238.320021.346.625020.853.531521.258.340019.46250019.564.963017.767.180017.967.2100017.871.9125017.373.9160017.473.4200016.774.1250017.276.7315018.277.4400017.978.4500017.682.1630017.777.5800017.8771000017.978.31250018.1751600018.267.8SPL3088.5N1.373median 17.9median 73Delta1.410.72832.42833.331.333.332.531.732.534.92634.947.639.447.633.736.233.730.728.630.727.925.427.930.421.330.433.223.333.235.122.535.141.822.441.845.421.345.45018.45055.817.555.860.517.560.56717.26767.416.867.468.117.368.164.817.464.858.716.658.76417.36471.517.671.57417.67474.517.774.573.917.473.97117.77169.417.969.458.318.158.348.918.148.98229.88248.51.348.5median 60.5median 17.7median 60.511.41.711.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBQ Aquaris X5 PlusSony Xperia XA
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Sony Xperia XA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Frequency diagram to compare (Checkboxes can be selected!)

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.26 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.87 / 1.33 / 1.35 Watt
Load midlight 5.44 / 7.11 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
3200 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
2705 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Gigaset ME
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
8%
23%
-9%
3%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.72
17%
0.68
22%
0.73
16%
0.96
-10%
0.75
14%
Idle Average *
1.33
1.5
-13%
0.96
28%
2.09
-57%
1.64
-23%
1.7
-28%
Idle Maximum *
1.35
1.57
-16%
1.06
21%
2.11
-56%
1.71
-27%
1.84
-36%
Load Average *
5.44
3.48
36%
3.22
41%
4.15
24%
2.98
45%
7.18
-32%
Load Maximum *
7.11
6.04
15%
6.75
5%
5.05
29%
5.08
29%
12.75
-79%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 54)
8h 24min
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
3200 mAh
Sony Xperia XA
2300 mAh
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
2705 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Gigaset ME
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
504
353
-30%
399
-21%
604
20%
626
24%
393
-22%

Pros

+ 坚固的机身
+ 双SIM卡
+ microSD卡可以格式化为内部存储
+ USB-OTG,Miracast和NFC
+ 指纹传感器
+ 精准的传感器和良好的触摸屏
+ 优秀的整体表现
+ 屏幕非常明亮,颜色精度高
+ 可以接受的扬声器
+ 白天时,清晰的照相和视频表现...

Cons

- …但在较差的照明条件下,照相和视频表现欠佳
- 触摸屏和边框之间的过渡粗糙
- 内部存储器的写入速度很低
- 一般般的屏幕对比度
- 配件不包括耳机和电源适配器
- 集成电池

Verdict

In review: BQ Aquaris X5 Plus. Test model provided by BQ Germany.
In review: BQ Aquaris X5 Plus. Test model provided by BQ Germany.

作为中端智能手机,BQ Aquaris X5 Plus是相当令人印象深刻的:它的处理器的性能足以满足日常任务的需要,拥有诸如USB OTG,Miracast和NFC等优秀功能。显示屏非常明亮,而在正常的照明条件下,前后摄像头的照相效果都相当的好。主相机能拍摄出非常精细的照片。然而,在照明条件不佳时,摄像头将会缺乏清晰度;这使得用来这款机器,和相对更昂贵的高端机型之间的差距变得明显。我们喜欢三个卡槽和双SIM卡功能。指纹传感器也可以确保设备的安全。

BQ Aquaris X5 Plus是一个全能型的中端智能手机:它提供了一个优秀的屏幕,众多的功能和良好的性能(总体上来说)。包装盒内的配件有点少。

在某些商店中,消费者可以获得,与我们的测试机型价格相同,并且拥有更大存储空间的32 GB版本的(具有3 GB RAM的)Aquaris X5 Plus。然而,如果你正在寻找一个拥有更大屏幕和更长电池续航时间的设备,那么我们建议你看看300欧元(〜 312美元,最新价格)的三星Galaxy A5(2016年)

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

BQ Aquaris X5 Plus - 12/09/2016 v6 (old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
70 / 75 → 93%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
48 / 60 → 81%
Weight
93%
Battery
91%
Display
88%
Games Performance
41 / 63 → 66%
Application Performance
51 / 70 → 72%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 74%
Camera
71%
Average
76%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 智能手机简短评测
Andreas Kilian, 2016-12-25 (Update: 2018-05-15)