BlackBerry DTEK60 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 590 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 1.88
| BlackBerry DTEK60 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Google Pixel XL 2016 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Huawei P9 Plus AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 4% | 2% | 37% | -9% | 34% | |
| Brightness middle | 590 | 402 -32% | 419 -29% | 557 -6% | 361 -39% | 554 -6% |
| Brightness | 608 | 408 -33% | 431 -29% | 553 -9% | 366 -40% | 552 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 85 -3% | 84 -5% | 97 10% | 87 -1% | 96 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.6 | 4 39% | 4.1 38% | 1.4 79% | 5.1 23% | 1.59 76% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.3 | 10.1 29% | 12 16% | 3.1 78% | 10 30% | 2.56 82% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 3.2 26% | 3.3 23% | 1.3 70% | 5.5 -28% | 2.01 53% |
| Gamma | 1.88 117% | 2.19 100% | 2.1 105% | 2.21 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.01 109% |
| CCT | 6966 93% | 7037 92% | 6550 99% | 6667 97% | 7388 88% | 6321 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.38 | 63.1 | 82.12 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99.83 | 99.98 | |||
| Contrast | 1591 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 238.1 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 | |
| Huawei P9 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
BlackBerry DTEK60 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.03 / 0.24 Watt |
| Idle |  0.7 / 1.13 / 1.2 Watt |
| Load |
6.52 / 9.75 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| BlackBerry DTEK60 3000 mAh | Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | -1% | -28% | 7% | 5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 0.53 24% | 0.57 19% | 0.77 -10% | 0.87 -24% | 0.63 10% |
| Idle Average * | 1.13 | 1.07 5% | 1.24 -10% | 2.04 -81% | 1.2 -6% | 1.1 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.2 | 1.12 7% | 1.36 -13% | 2.24 -87% | 1.27 -6% | 1.56 -30% |
| Load Average * | 6.52 | 5.53 15% | 5.92 9% | 4.69 28% | 4.69 28% | 5.95 9% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.75 | 6.26 36% | 10.53 -8% | 8.66 11% | 5.63 42% | 6.7 31% |
* ... smaller is better
| BlackBerry DTEK60 3000 mAh | Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -17% | 9% | 3% | -2% | 28% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1356 | 1333 -2% | 1338 -1% | 1835 35% | 1446 7% | 1663 23% |
| H.264 | 809 | 505 -38% | 847 5% | 813 0% | 776 -4% | 914 13% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 779 | 505 -35% | 840 8% | 587 -25% | 530 -32% | 732 -6% |
| Load | 218 | 230 6% | 268 23% | 225 3% | 263 21% | 392 80% |
Pros
Cons
黑莓从最近的失败中得到了经验，推出了新手机DTEK60，它在一个合理的价位上有着超出平均水平的表现。在一个抵抗网络攻击不论对个人或是公司都至关重要的时代，DTEK60增强了的安全保护毫无疑问成为了它的闪光点。
黑莓已经转向Android而不是自有的系统，这可能会让一些铁杆粉丝失望，但在品牌的市场占有率急剧下降的情况下，的确是合情合理的举动。黑莓对于原生系统只做出了很少的修改，包括提供了一些预装应用一集很少但是很好的系统增强。
手机本身毫无疑问有着出色的性能表现，坚固且吸引人的外壳设计，以及令人印象深刻的高音量扬声器。此外，电池续航能力足够支撑一整天的使用，成像效果出色。其高亮度及显著的高色域AMOLED屏幕可以说是一个真正的亮点。
但在另一方面，存储访问速度以及Wi-Fi速度偏慢，但这仅仅是一个小缺陷。更大的问题出现在应用程序的使用上。由于增强的安全措施倾向于限制应用程序的权限，导致一些应用崩溃。
考虑到DTEK60出色的配置，合理的价格，以及众多的出彩点，它的确有成为黑莓的救生艇的潜力。
除了企业市场之外，DTEK60也可以吸引到个人用户，特别是那些追求出色的多媒体表现以及安全性的用户。在经过几年不太成功的产品之后，DTEK60肯定能够为黑莓带来一些改观，但能否在销量上得到改善还有待观察。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
BlackBerry DTEK60
- 12/05/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
