Notebookcheck Logo

Blackview N6000 评测 - 性能强劲、价格实惠的户外手机

方便、坚固。

如果您正在寻找一款可以轻松放进口袋,同时又能抵御自然力量的智能手机,那么您应该了解一下 Blackview N6000。在这次测试中,我们将近距离了解这款小型户外手机。
Android ARM Smartphone
Blackview N6000
Blackview N6000 (N Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
4.30 inch 20:9, 1200 x 540 pixel 306 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Gorilla Glas 5, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 210 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18.4 x 133 x 65.3
Battery
3880 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.79, phase comparison-AF, dual LED-flash, Videos @1440p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.2, Videos @1080p
Additional features
Speakers: speaker on the back, charger, USB cable, 12 Months Warranty, FM radio, IP68/​IP69K-certified, MIL-STD-810H-certified, assignable button, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
208 g
Price
260 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
76.5 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Blackview N6000
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
208 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash4.30"1200x540
75.4 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
149 g128 GB eMMC Flash4.50"1170x480
75.3 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Cubot Pocket
T310, PowerVR GE8300
128 g64 GB eMMC Flash4.00"1080x540
86.1 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2022
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
144 g64 GB SSD4.70"1334x750

手机壳和功能 - 户外手机适合放在许多口袋中

几乎没有手机的屏幕小于 5 英寸。iPhone SE Apple iPhone SE是一个明显的例外,但它的价格超过 500 欧元,也很昂贵。Blackview N6000 的价格只有它的一半,而且还适合户外使用:它通过了 IP69K 和 MIL-STD-810H 测试。这意味着您可以带着它在浅水中潜水或在灰尘很大的环境中使用,而不会损坏手机。

不过,这款便携式手机的重量为 208 克,并不十分轻巧,而且屏幕边缘较宽,可提供足够的保护,防止跌落造成损坏。屏幕还受到大猩猩 5 号玻璃的保护。橡胶涂层也能防止 Blackview N6000 从手中滑落。

在设计方面,这款户外手机是同类产品中的经典之作,可见的螺丝和工业设计表明这是一款坚固耐用的设备。手机有纯黑色、橙色或绿色可供选择。

手机配备了 NFC 功能,因此您还可以使用移动支付服务。256 GB 的大容量存储空间也为数据提供了充足的存储空间,8 GB RAM 确保系统运行速度不会变慢。

这款智能手机没有 microSD 插槽,也不支持 eSIM,但最多可以插入 2 张 nano SIM 卡。

Blackview N6000
Blackview N6000
Blackview N6000
Blackview N6000

尺寸比较

133 mm 65.3 mm 18.4 mm 208 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 144 g131 mm 58.1 mm 13.4 mm 149 g119 mm 58 mm 12.5 mm 128 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

通信、软件和操作 - 纯Android 13 无广告

WiFi 5 是 Blackview N6000 可用于连接网络的最快 Wi-Fi 标准。因此,在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中,它的传输速率非常稳定,达到了同类产品的水平。在 310 和 362 MBit/s 之间的速度下,千兆互联网线路的利用率最高可达三分之一。

在移动网络方面,4G 是最高级别,但也有多个频段可供选择,因此手机也可在国外使用。在两周左右的测试期间,我们反复检查了市区的接收强度。与高端智能手机相比,Blackview N6000 在这里的稳定性稍差,但接收质量仍然不错。

Android 操作系统使用的是 13,制造商安装了自己的 DokeOS 界面。不过,这与标准的 变化不大,而且不包括任何第三方广告软件。安全更新日期为 2023 年 7 月,因此比较老。Android

在操作方面,Blackview 手机由于尺寸小巧,虽然许多按键都很小,但也适合小手使用。外壳左侧有一个按键,单击和长按各可分配一个应用程序,然后启动。但无法实现更复杂的功能,如宏功能或通过按键打开手电筒。

Blackview N6000 还配备了指纹传感器,它隐藏在右侧的待机键中。如果你触摸它,系统解锁前只有短暂的延迟。还可以进行人脸识别,效果也很可靠,但由于使用的是二维图像识别,因此在防止操控方面不那么安全。

Networking
Blackview N6000
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
362 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
329 (min: 310) MBit/s ∼44%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
324 (min: 294) MBit/s ∼43%
Cubot Pocket
802.11a/b/g/n
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
368 (min: 355) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
210 (min: 204) MBit/s ∼28%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
888 (min: 869) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
746 (min: 599) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Blackview N6000; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (310-340)
Blackview N6000; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø362 (331-382)

照相机 - 一般设备

使用前置摄像头拍摄
使用前置摄像头拍摄

背面的 4800 万像素摄像头通常只能拍摄 1200 万像素的照片,因为它将 4 个像素合成一个像素,从而实现了更高的感光度。在相机软件的特殊模式下,也可以使用全分辨率。

拍摄出来的照片在动态范围方面表现平平,尤其是亮部很快就变得太亮,暗部几乎看不到任何细节。色彩还原也略显苍白。图像的清晰度也处于较低水平。在光线不足和对比度较高的情况下,拍摄的图像在暗部和亮部同样缺乏细节,清晰度也不高。

录制的视频最高分辨率为 2K,帧频为 30 帧/秒,即使在全高清模式下也不支持更高的帧频。自动对焦有时工作不太正常,曝光补偿也需要一段时间才能做出反应。不过,总的来说,在光线良好的情况下,拍摄的视频还是可以使用的。

虽然背面有第二个镜头,但制造商没有提供任何相关信息。这意味着它可能只是用于人像拍摄的辅助镜头。无论如何,你都不能用它拍照。

前置 1600 万像素自拍摄像头。在光线良好的情况下,它能拍摄出可用的自拍照。不过,您不应该将照片放大太多,因为细节会导致照片颗粒感很强。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Blackview N6000: 4.24 ∆E min: 1.28 - max: 8.93 ∆E
ColorChecker
26.7 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
54 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
56.6 ∆E
56.5 ∆E
23 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
62.3 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
21 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Blackview N6000: 38.17 ∆E min: 11.73 - max: 62.34 ∆E

显示屏 - 明亮,但色彩不真实

子像素结构
子像素结构

4.3 英寸的 IPS 屏幕并不大,因此 1200 x 540 像素的分辨率足以提供相当清晰的图像。亮度也令人惊喜,在曝光亮度传感器的作用下,平均最大值达到 661 cd/m²,处于较高水平。不过,对比设备的亮度值也相差无几。

无论如何,Blackview N6000 也适用于亮度较高的环境,因为屏幕内容仍然易于阅读。在使用分光光度计进行测量时,我们发现显示屏偏蓝现象相当严重,因此色彩保真度受到影响。

不过,即使在亮度很低的情况下,我们也没有测到 PWM 闪烁。

646
cd/m²
658
cd/m²
681
cd/m²
649
cd/m²
644
cd/m²
658
cd/m²
655
cd/m²
662
cd/m²
698
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 698 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 661.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.98 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 644 cd/m²
Contrast: 1073:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.257
Blackview N6000
IPS, 1200x540, 4.3"
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
IPS, 1170x480, 4.5"
Cubot Pocket
IPS, 1080x540, 4"
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Retina HD, IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"
Response Times
-69%
-40%
-71%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
28.7 ?(19.9, 8.8)
44.6 ?(21.3, 23.3)
-55%
34 ?(17, 17)
-18%
56 ?(27, 29)
-95%
Response Time Black / White *
13.7 ?(10.5, 3.2)
25 ?(12.5, 12.5)
-82%
22 ?(10, 12)
-61%
20 ?(7, 13)
-46%
PWM Frequency
Screen
5%
13%
36%
Brightness middle
644
639
-1%
628
-2%
662
3%
Brightness
661
624
-6%
632
-4%
647
-2%
Brightness Distribution
92
82
-11%
93
1%
92
0%
Black Level *
0.6
0.6
-0%
0.57
5%
0.4
33%
Contrast
1073
1065
-1%
1102
3%
1655
54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.6
4.98
11%
4.23
24%
1.44
74%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.32
8.55
17%
8.81
15%
4.74
54%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.5
4
27%
2.3
58%
1.7
69%
Gamma
2.257 97%
2.223 99%
2.136 103%
2.179 101%
CCT
8251 79%
6873 95%
6945 94%
6746 96%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-32% / -10%
-14% / 2%
-18% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
13.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.5 ms rise
↘ 3.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.9 ms rise
↘ 8.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 功能强大,持续时间长

联发科 联发科 Helio G99在比 Blackview N6000 稍微昂贵一些的智能手机上也会有不错的表现,因此这款手机在性能方面无疑令人印象深刻。当然,它的性能还达不到 iPhone SE的性能,但同类智能手机的速度明显要慢得多。

这意味着,在日常使用中,N6000 也能流畅运行一些更复杂的应用程序,甚至在屏幕分辨率相当低的情况下也能进行高要求的图形计算。

凭借 UFS 2.1 内存,Blackview N6000 的运行速度也非常快。

即使在重负载情况下,手机的最高温度也能达到 37.5 °C。用手触摸外壳时,会明显感觉到与周围环境有细微差别,但并不令人感到不适。即使手机长时间处于重负载状态,SoC 也不会出现节流现象。

例如,当手机放在柔软的表面上时,加固型智能手机背面的扬声器会明显发闷。虽然扬声器未被遮盖时声音很大,但音质一般,不够饱满和清晰。声音还可以通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙发送到外部音频设备。Blackview N6000 支持多种音频编解码器进行无线传输,包括用于近似或实际 HiRes 音频的 aptX HD 或 LHDC。

Blackview N6000 的电池容量为 3880 mAh。制造商称这是一种固态电池,应该更加坚固耐用,并能抵御极端温度。无论如何,电池的续航时间还是不错的:在我们的无线局域网测试中,该手机的续航时间达到了 16:54 小时,在一般使用情况下足够两个工作日使用。手机的最大充电功率为 18 瓦,因此电池从空充到完全充满需要 1:30 小时。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
1741 Points +218%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)
1040 Points +90%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
547 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (490 - 576, n=17)
547 Points 0%
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
376 Points -31%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
345 Points -37%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
4788 Points +164%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)
3474 Points +92%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1670 - 1981, n=17)
1828 Points +1%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1813 Points
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1184 Points -35%
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
756 Points -58%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=173, last 2 years)
1494 Points +104%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
732 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (710 - 738, n=11)
728 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=173, last 2 years)
4189 Points +104%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2051 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1864 - 2065, n=11)
1987 Points -3%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13174 Points +39%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8885 - 11379, n=17)
9894 Points +4%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9506 Points
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
6866 Points -28%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6782 Points -29%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=69, last 2 years)
3014 Points +15%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2632 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2471 - 2791, n=16)
2593 Points -1%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1387 Points -47%
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
406 Points -85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=69, last 2 years)
3179 Points +29%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2467 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2326 - 2655, n=16)
2434 Points -1%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1266 Points -49%
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
335 Points -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3433 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3101 - 3471, n=16)
3346 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=69, last 2 years)
3259 Points -5%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2084 Points -39%
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
1572 Points -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)
8239 Points +211%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2649 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2543 - 2843, n=16)
2642 Points 0%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1393 Points -47%
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
404 Points -85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)
12402 Points +406%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2375 - 3908, n=16)
2552 Points +4%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2453 Points
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1234 Points -50%
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
333 Points -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)
4754 Points +29%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3677 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3102 - 3798, n=16)
3575 Points -3%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2533 Points -31%
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
1588 Points -57%
Wild Life Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
8357 Points +567%
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=112, last 2 years)
2816 Points +125%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1252 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1165 - 1364, n=17)
1239 Points -1%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
738 Points -41%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
8909 Points +630%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 25785, n=188, last 2 years)
7925 Points +550%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1220 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1011 - 1340, n=17)
1195 Points -2%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
737 Points -40%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
2399 Points +595%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=194, last 2 years)
2182 Points +532%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (330 - 378, n=17)
346 Points 0%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
345 Points
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
186 Points -46%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=193, last 2 years)
2166 Points +547%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
1877 Points +460%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (323 - 366, n=17)
337 Points +1%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
335 Points
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
187 Points -44%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
60 fps +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 166, n=206, last 2 years)
50.9 fps +16%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
44 fps
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
22 fps -50%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (12 - 44, n=17)
17.3 fps -61%
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
9.1 fps -79%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
95.9 fps +499%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=206, last 2 years)
85.3 fps +433%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
16 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (14 - 18, n=17)
15.7 fps -2%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.6 fps -46%
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
3 fps -81%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
60 fps +114%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)
39.3 fps +40%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
28 fps
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
13 fps -54%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8.3 - 28, n=17)
11.3 fps -60%
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
5.9 fps -79%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
39 fps +550%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)
34.4 fps +473%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5.4 - 6.5, n=17)
5.88 fps -2%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3.3 fps -45%
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
1.1 fps -82%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 53, n=207, last 2 years)
16.1 fps +544%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2.5 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2.2 - 2.8, n=17)
2.5 fps 0%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1.5 fps -40%
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
0.48 fps -81%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
65969 Points +230%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +93%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (17228 - 25005, n=17)
20999 Points +5%
Blackview N6000
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
20019 Points
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
12386 Points -38%
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
11986 Points -40%
Blackview N6000Cubot KingKong Mini 3Cubot PocketAverage 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-81%
-80%
-40%
44%
Sequential Read 256KB
971.8
277.3
-71%
261.6
-73%
829 ?(496 - 984, n=23)
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB
914
131
-86%
186.9
-80%
Random Read 4KB
264.6
43
-84%
32.7
-88%
168.8 ?(108.4 - 265, n=23)
-36%
Random Write 4KB
275
46.4
-83%
59.5
-78%
143.6 ?(22.1 - 280, n=23)
-48%

温度

Max. Load
 37.2 °C36.4 °C36.8 °C 
 37.5 °C37.2 °C36.6 °C 
 37.2 °C36.8 °C36.8 °C 
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 36.9 °C
31.1 °C31.4 °C31.1 °C
30.9 °C32.9 °C30.5 °C
32.1 °C33.6 °C30.7 °C
Maximum: 33.6 °C
Average: 31.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.9 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


正面热图
正面热图
热图返回
热图返回
051015202530354045Tooltip
Blackview N6000 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.07 (2.07-2.08)
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø10.7 (9.12-14.9)
Blackview N6000 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.5 (7.48-7.51)
Cubot KingKong Mini 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.47 (4.42-4.49)
Apple iPhone SE 2022 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.3 (39-49)

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.638.4253032.73126.3234028.826.75034.330.56324.724.68019.319.910022.319.812522.123.416019.730.120013.933.425011.536.131510.344.94008.555.65009.265.663010.571.680013.870.6100011.763.112509.667.716009.768.4200010.873.6250011.278.33150147640001360.7500013.650.4630013.854.4800014.547.51000015.453.41250016.358.41600017.247.1SPL24.983.4N0.646.5median 13.6median 55.6Delta3.212.741.551.135.542.731.733.630.831.932.236.325.13119.427.320.932.317.639.515.847.21348.111.747.710.649.910.556.311.963.513.867.615.469.612.771.21674.512.475.911.675.813.176.513.174.413.774.214.271.614.770.415.375.815.97616.565.117.165.626.185.90.764median 13.8median 69.61.99.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBlackview N6000Apple iPhone SE 2022
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Blackview N6000 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone SE 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Blackview N6000
3880 mAh
1014 min
Cubot Pocket
3000 mAh
994 min -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=208, last 2 years)
990 min -2%
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
3000 mAh
863 min -15%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
2018 mAh
769 min -24%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 54min

Pros

+ 便携式手机
+ IP 认证
+ 无 PWM 的明亮屏幕
+ 性能相对较高
+ 电池寿命长
+ 快速充电

Cons

- 相当重
- 屏幕色彩保真度低
- 低图像质量的摄像头
- 中度扬声器
- 无 5G

结论:小巧的户外手机,大有可为

回顾:Blackview N6000。
回顾:Blackview N6000。

Blackview N6000 是一款相对便宜且方便的户外手机,即使在极端情况下也不会让你失望:它的屏幕亮度较高,外壳也能抵御震动和环境影响。

这款手机在性能方面也毫不逊色:它有充足的电量,还能处理更复杂的应用程序。它的电池续航能力也不错,充电速度也相当快。

不过,N6000 只在有限的范围内适合相机爱好者,而且手机相对较重,由于其引人注目的工业设计,也许并不一定适合商务会议。扬声器的声音比较平庸,位置也不理想。

Blackview N6000 给人的印象是一款方便而坚固的手机,具有充足的电量和良好的电池续航能力。

更小巧、更便宜的是 Cubot Pocket但它没有防尘防水功能。较老的 金刚迷你 2可以提供更长的续航时间,但也没有通过 IP 认证。

价格和供应情况

用户可直接从制造商处购买 Blackview N6000。.美国亚马逊上也有该产品,售价约为 280 美元

Blackview N6000 - 11/04/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
64 / 75 → 86%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
44 / 70 → 63%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
83%
Games Performance
21 / 64 → 33%
Application Performance
65 / 86 → 76%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
56 / 90 → 62%
Camera
46%
Average
71%
77%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Blackview N6000 评测 - 性能强劲、价格实惠的户外手机
Florian Schmitt, 2023-11- 6 (Update: 2023-11- 6)