Blackview P2 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 424 cd/m²
Contrast: 2827:1 (Black: 0.15 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 14.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.28
Blackview P2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | ZTE Blade V8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Blackview R6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Oukitel U16 Max 1280x720, 6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -23% | -18% | -12% | |
Brightness middle | 424 | 482 14% | 352 -17% | 417 -2% |
Brightness | 420 | 448 7% | 320 -24% | 405 -4% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 79 -7% | 81 -5% | 94 11% |
Black Level * | 0.15 | 0.64 -327% | 0.3 -100% | 0.21 -40% |
Contrast | 2827 | 753 -73% | 1173 -59% | 1986 -30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.5 | 4 58% | 8.7 8% | 11.9 -25% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.7 | 6.5 67% | 15.1 23% | 21.5 -9% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 14.5 | 3.4 77% | 10.5 28% | 14.4 1% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.13 103% | 2.04 108% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 10840 60% | 6774 96% | 8529 76% | 12820 51% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Computer Vision score (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Storage score (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Oukitel U16 Max |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max |
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
Blackview P2 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Blackview R6 | |
Oukitel U16 Max |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Blackview P2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Oukitel U16 Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.12 / 0.51 Watt |
Idle | 0.99 / 2.04 / 2.12 Watt |
Load |
3.77 / 5.78 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Blackview P2 6000 mAh | ZTE Blade V8 2730 mAh | Blackview R6 3000 mAh | Oukitel U16 Max 4000 mAh | Honor 6X 3340 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -44% | -54% | -31% | -10% | |
Reader / Idle | 1957 | 964 -51% | 1573 -20% | 2250 15% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 1083 | 700 -35% | 604 -44% | 731 -33% | 957 -12% |
Load | 563 | 297 -47% | 203 -64% | 346 -39% | 375 -33% |
H.264 | 545 | 885 |
Pros
Cons
这台Blackview最大的缺点很容易发现:它太重了。除了这点以外,没有其大的问题。经得起时间考验的设计,不抓人眼球但也不显得无趣。屏幕透亮,机身坚固。别用高出四倍价格的产品来比较它的摄像头;考虑到价格,这台设备有着很好的配置:4GB运存和64GB的eMMC闪存,处理器速度也不错。如果你找的是一台价格合理,机身坚固,配置不错的智能手机,而且你不在乎他的重量,那么这台设备会是一个正确的选择。
一个“镇纸“,有着不错的配置和高性价比。
多花一些钱从当经销商购买是也许是正确的选择因为Blackview并不提供保修。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Blackview P2
-
06/20/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Schaar