Blackview R6 智能手机简短评测

Name: Blackview R6
Brand: Blackview

预算（太）紧张？ Blackview R6希望在130欧元（约942人民币）的价位上提供更高的配置：全高清屏幕，指纹感应器，不错的相机。而预算如此有限的情况下这真的可能吗？

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Manuel Masiero (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 02/25/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Blackview

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Blackview R6

Processor

Mediatek MT6737T 4 x 1.44 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Memory

3 GB

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容式, IPS, 2.5D glass, glossy: yes

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 26.49 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 32 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 近距感应器，加速感应器，位置感应器

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM: 850/900/1800/1900MHz, WCDMA: 900/2100MHz, FDD-LTE: B1/3/7/8/20; 下载最高300 MBit/s, 上传最高50 MBit/s (LTE), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 10 x 152 x 77.2

Battery

11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.2; 双LED闪光灯, 视频拍摄: 1080p
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 后置扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器，数据线，耳机，保护壳，屏幕保护贴膜, 文件管理器, 扫描, Xender, FM收音机, fanless

Weight

198 g, Power Supply: 49 g

Price

130 Euro

Links

Blackview homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Blackview R6 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash	49.6 MBit/s
Coolpad Modena 2 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	48.4 MBit/s -2%
Wileyfox Spark X Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	48.3 MBit/s -3%
iperf3 receive AX12
Wileyfox Spark X Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46 MBit/s +10%
Coolpad Modena 2 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	44.5 MBit/s +6%
Blackview R6 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41.9 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


285 cd/m²	350 cd/m²	334 cd/m²
292 cd/m²	352 cd/m²	329 cd/m²
289 cd/m²	329 cd/m²	320 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 352 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 320 cd/m² Minimum: 11.13 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 357 cd/m²
Contrast: 1173:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 10.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.04

	Blackview R6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Wileyfox Spark X IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Wiko Robby IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Coolpad Modena 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Lenovo Moto G4 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen		11%	16%	2%	29%
Brightness middle	352	554 57%	621 76%	482 37%	724 106%
Brightness	320	542 69%	576 80%	468 46%	723 126%
Brightness Distribution	81	96 19%	88 9%	86 6%	87 7%
Black Level *	0.3	0.68 -127%	0.73 -143%	0.63 -110%	0.71 -137%
Contrast	1173	815 -31%	851 -27%	765 -35%	1020 -13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.7	5.2 40%	4.7 46%	6.5 25%	4.5 48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	15.1	10.7 29%	9.4 38%	12.4 18%	8.4 44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	10.5	6.8 35%	5.2 50%	7.3 30%	4.9 53%
Gamma	2.04 ^108%	2.24 ^98%	2.51 ^88%	1.91 ^115%	2.44 ^90%
CCT	8529 ^76%	7118 ^91%	7505 ^87%	7249 ^90%	6496 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

102 Hz

≤ 1 % brightness setting

≤ 11.13 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 102 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % (11.13 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 102 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview R6	38038 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	32729 Points -14%
Wiko Robby	15797 Points -58%
Coolpad Modena 2	24875 Points -35%
Lenovo Moto G4	45242 Points +19%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Blackview R6	626 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	596 Points -5%
Coolpad Modena 2	459 Points -27%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Blackview R6	1390 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	1678 Points +21%
Coolpad Modena 2	1274 Points -8%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Blackview R6	5731 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	5334 Points -7%
Wiko Robby	2921 Points -49%
Coolpad Modena 2	3222 Points -44%
Lenovo Moto G4	9783 Points +71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Blackview R6	5380 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	4680 Points -13%
Wiko Robby	2476 Points -54%
Coolpad Modena 2	2789 Points -48%
Lenovo Moto G4	9816 Points +82%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Blackview R6	7424 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	10441 Points +41%
Wiko Robby	7868 Points +6%
Coolpad Modena 2	7061 Points -5%
Lenovo Moto G4	9668 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Blackview R6	258 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	209 Points -19%
Coolpad Modena 2	130 Points -50%
Lenovo Moto G4	669 Points +159%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview R6	217 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	172 Points -21%
Coolpad Modena 2	106 Points -51%
Lenovo Moto G4	609 Points +181%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Blackview R6	762 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	835 Points +10%
Coolpad Modena 2	621 Points -19%
Lenovo Moto G4	1022 Points +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Blackview R6	169 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	129 Points -24%
Lenovo Moto G4	389 Points +130%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview R6	138 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	104 Points -25%
Lenovo Moto G4	330 Points +139%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Blackview R6	814 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	833 Points +2%
Lenovo Moto G4	1028 Points +26%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Blackview R6	9.7 fps
Wileyfox Spark X	15 fps +55%
Wiko Robby	7.9 fps -19%
Coolpad Modena 2	8.9 fps -8%
Lenovo Moto G4	17 fps +75%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview R6	9.8 fps
Wileyfox Spark X	8.4 fps -14%
Wiko Robby	4.4 fps -55%
Coolpad Modena 2	5 fps -49%
Lenovo Moto G4	17 fps +73%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Blackview R6	4 fps
Wileyfox Spark X	6.7 fps +68%
Wiko Robby	fps -100%
Coolpad Modena 2	4 fps 0%
Lenovo Moto G4	6.7 fps +68%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview R6	4 fps
Wileyfox Spark X	3 fps -25%
Wiko Robby	fps -100%
Coolpad Modena 2	1.8 fps -55%
Lenovo Moto G4	6.4 fps +60%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Blackview R6	2.6 fps
Wileyfox Spark X	4.8 fps +85%
Wiko Robby	fps -100%
Coolpad Modena 2	1.2 fps -54%
Lenovo Moto G4	4.5 fps +73%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview R6	2.5 fps
Wileyfox Spark X	1.9 fps -24%
Wiko Robby	fps -100%
Coolpad Modena 2	2.9 fps +16%
Lenovo Moto G4	fps -100%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Blackview R6	2759 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	3007 Points +9%
Wiko Robby	2785 Points +1%
Coolpad Modena 2	3119 Points +13%
Lenovo Moto G4	5154 Points +87%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Blackview R6	177 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	227 Points +28%
Wiko Robby	432 Points +144%
Coolpad Modena 2	483 Points +173%
Lenovo Moto G4	295 Points +67%
System (sort by value)
Blackview R6	562 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	1222 Points +117%
Wiko Robby	983 Points +75%
Coolpad Modena 2	909 Points +62%
Lenovo Moto G4	1499 Points +167%
Memory (sort by value)
Blackview R6	472 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	773 Points +64%
Wiko Robby	404 Points -14%
Coolpad Modena 2	598 Points +27%
Lenovo Moto G4	652 Points +38%
Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview R6	383 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	292 Points -24%
Wiko Robby	137 Points -64%
Coolpad Modena 2	178 Points -54%
Lenovo Moto G4	843 Points +120%
Web (sort by value)
Blackview R6	10 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	10 Points 0%
Wiko Robby	640 Points +6300%
Coolpad Modena 2	565 Points +5550%
Lenovo Moto G4	10 Points 0%

Legend

Blackview R6 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Wileyfox Spark X Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Wiko Robby Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Coolpad Modena 2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Blackview R6	11227 ms *
Wileyfox Spark X	12625 ms * -12%
Wiko Robby	15131 ms * -35%
Coolpad Modena 2	19647 ms * -75%
Lenovo Moto G4	10813 ms * +4%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview R6	3195 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	3239 Points +1%
Wiko Robby	2159 Points -32%
Coolpad Modena 2	1975 Points -38%
Lenovo Moto G4	3402 Points +6%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview R6	21.9 Points
Wileyfox Spark X	20.75 Points -5%
Wiko Robby	13.55 Points -38%
Coolpad Modena 2	13.15 Points -40%
Lenovo Moto G4	22.31 Points +2%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Blackview R6	228 MB/s
Wileyfox Spark X	194.8 MB/s -15%
Wiko Robby	126.2 MB/s -45%
Coolpad Modena 2	147 MB/s -36%
Lenovo Moto G4	272.2 MB/s +19%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Blackview R6	76.1 MB/s
Wileyfox Spark X	37.91 MB/s -50%
Wiko Robby	47.6 MB/s -37%
Coolpad Modena 2	42.56 MB/s -44%
Lenovo Moto G4	46.3 MB/s -39%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Blackview R6	18.73 MB/s
Wileyfox Spark X	12.26 MB/s -35%
Wiko Robby	15.7 MB/s -16%
Coolpad Modena 2	23.03 MB/s +23%
Lenovo Moto G4	36.4 MB/s +94%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Blackview R6	13.5 MB/s
Wileyfox Spark X	15.57 MB/s +15%
Wiko Robby	6.9 MB/s -49%
Coolpad Modena 2	6.79 MB/s -50%
Lenovo Moto G4	37.5 MB/s +178%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Blackview R6	22.74 MB/s
Wileyfox Spark X	39.5 MB/s +74%
Wiko Robby	41.39 MB/s +82%
Coolpad Modena 2	35.59 MB/s +57%
Lenovo Moto G4	78.5 MB/s +245%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Blackview R6	9.34 MB/s
Wileyfox Spark X	20.59 MB/s +120%
Wiko Robby	19.68 MB/s +111%
Coolpad Modena 2	18.25 MB/s +95%
Lenovo Moto G4	49.7 MB/s +432%

Max. Load

Idle


41.4 °C	37.2 °C	38.7 °C
41.1 °C	40.4 °C	38.8 °C
40.2 °C	39.6 °C	38.3 °C

Maximum: 41.4 °C
Average: 39.5 °C


31.3 °C	32.9 °C	39.2 °C
31.7 °C	32.2 °C	39.8 °C
32 °C	33.4 °C	38.2 °C

Maximum: 39.8 °C
Average: 34.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 44.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Blackview R6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Moto G4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.09 Watt
Idle	0.78 / 1.63 / 1.84 Watt
Load	7.47 / 7.47 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Blackview R6 3000 mAh	Wileyfox Spark X 3000 mAh	Wiko Robby 2500 mAh	Coolpad Modena 2 2500 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		23%	-5%	10%	5%
Idle Minimum *	0.78	0.53 32%	0.92 -18%	0.64 18%	0.65 17%
Idle Average *	1.63	1.76 -8%	2.12 -30%	1.96 -20%	1.89 -16%
Idle Maximum *	1.84	1.86 -1%	2.34 -27%	1.98 -8%	1.92 -4%
Load Average *	7.47	3.97 47%	5.3 29%	4.99 33%	5.28 29%
Load Maximum *	7.47	4.21 44%	5.78 23%	5.48 27%	7.45 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		10h 04min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 23min

	Blackview R6 3000 mAh	Wileyfox Spark X 3000 mAh	Wiko Robby 2500 mAh	Coolpad Modena 2 2500 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		21%	8%	-14%	10%
WiFi v1.3	604	675 12%	712 18%	518 -14%	698 16%
Load	203	264 30%	199 -2%		211 4%
Reader / Idle		1381	1253		1199
H.264		777			706

Pros

+ 优秀的闪存配置

+ 全高清屏幕面板

+ 易用

+ 坚固的机身

+ 高速LTE

+ 指纹感应器

+ 合理的运行温度

Cons

- 照片和屏幕色彩偏蓝

- 负载下功耗较高

- 机身较重

- microSD读卡器偶尔无法正常工作

- 不准确的GPS模组

- 质保不够完善

- 屏幕较暗

In review: Blackview R6. Review sample courtesy of Blackview

对可以接受不完善质保的风险的用户来说，Blackview R6将会是一台性价比极高的设备。它的系统运行稳定，机身也十分坚固。在连接性上，它提供了一个指纹感应器，同时搭配了大容量闪存，以及一块在同价位设备中十分优秀的高分辨率屏幕。

当然，紧张的预算也带来了一些弱点：它的相机拍摄品质不算锐利，色彩有一些偏蓝。同时它本已相对昏暗且色彩偏差较大的屏幕也十分偏蓝。它的GPS模组也不算准确，microSD读卡器能否正常工作似乎要靠运气。另外，这台设备在负载下的功耗也较高。

Blackview的这台智能手机比较沉重但十分坚固，搭配了高分辨率屏幕和同价位产品中非常优秀的配置。它的缺点在于功耗和屏幕亮度。可以接受这些问题的用户将会得到一台高性价比设备。

由于电池的容量较大，它的电池续航还十分不错，机身也不会变得很热。Blackview R6的性能中规中矩，它完全可以适合正在寻找高性价比机型且不在意手机较重的用户的需要。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Blackview R6 - 02/15/2017 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis

82%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

90%

Connectivity

35 / 60 → 58%

Weight

88%

Battery

93%

Display

81%

Games Performance

10 / 63 → 16%

Application Performance

25 / 70 → 36%

Temperature

87%

Noise

100%

Audio

51 / 91 → 56%

Camera

60%

Average

67%

77%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Blackview R6 智能手机简短评测

Florian Wimmer, 2017-02-25 (Update: 2017-02-25)