雷蛇 Blade 2017 (GTX 1060, 7700HQ, 全高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 272 cd/m²
Contrast: 1046:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.28 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Razer Blade (2017) LP140WF3-SPD1, , 1920x1080, 14" | Gigabyte Aero 14 LG Philips LP140QH1-SPF1 (LGD049A), , 2560x1440, 14" | Alienware 13 R3 JJT6C_133KL05 (SDCA029), , 2560x1440, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) APPA033, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | ||||
Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 99.2 | ||
sRGB Coverage | 91.8 | 99.9 | ||
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.5 | 87.6 | ||
Response Times | -32% | -5% | -101% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 25.2 ? | 41 ? -63% | 47.2 ? -87% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 24.8 ? | 25 ? -1% | 2.8 ? 89% | 53 ? -114% |
PWM Frequency | 21370 | 240 ? -99% | ||
Screen | -1% | 32% | 35% | |
Brightness middle | 272 | 290 7% | 313 15% | 569 109% |
Brightness | 277 | 257 -7% | 310 12% | 542 96% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 79 -6% | 87 4% | 90 7% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.3 -15% | 0.56 -115% | |
Contrast | 1046 | 967 -8% | 1016 -3% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.59 | 4.59 -0% | 2.54 45% | 1.4 69% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.49 | 8.68 -2% | 3.94 54% | 2.9 66% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.28 | 4.32 -1% | 1.43 67% | 1.8 58% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.3 96% | 2.16 102% |
CCT | 6848 95% | 7320 89% | 6337 103% | 6877 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 59 7% | 78 42% | 78.4 43% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 83 | 92 11% | 97 17% | 99.3 20% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% /
-7% | 14% /
25% | -33% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 21370 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 21370 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 21370 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3958 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5008 points | |
Help |
Razer Blade (2017) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Razer Blade (2016) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | Razer Blade (2016) FHD | Gigabyte Aero 14 LiteOn CX2-8B256 | Alienware 13 R3 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) Apple SSD AP0256 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 35% | 113% | 60% | 35% | 93% | |
Read Seq | 1122 | 1296 16% | 1977 76% | 1584 41% | 1373 22% | 1662 48% |
Write Seq | 311 | 603 94% | 1668 436% | 795 156% | 789 154% | 1336 330% |
Read 512 | 682 | 655 -4% | 800 17% | 985 44% | 1070 57% | 1183 73% |
Write 512 | 310 | 604 95% | 1030 232% | 814 163% | 405.6 31% | 1481 378% |
Read 4k | 34.8 | 42.22 21% | 58.1 67% | 44.93 29% | 37.65 8% | 16.1 -54% |
Write 4k | 134.3 | 139.6 4% | 145.6 8% | 131.2 -2% | 140.2 4% | 23.5 -83% |
Read 4k QD32 | 565 | 573 1% | 592 5% | 602 7% | 593 5% | 657 16% |
Write 4k QD32 | 308 | 480 56% | 508 65% | 441 43% | 311.2 1% | 419 36% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 | |
Alienware 13 R3 | |
Razer Blade (2017) | |
Razer Blade 14 2015 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 12114 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9313 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4948 points | |
Help |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided | |
1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Razer Blade (2017) | |
Razer Blade (2016) FHD | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS AF:8x | |
Razer Blade (2017) | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Razer Blade (2016) FHD |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
Razer Blade (2017) | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
Asus FX502VM-AS73 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 | |
Razer Blade (2017) |
Mass Effect Andromeda | |
1920x1080 High Preset (Resolution Scale Mode off) AA:T | |
Razer Blade (2017) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Mode off) AA:T | |
Razer Blade (2017) |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Razer Blade (2017) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Razer Blade (2017) |
For Honor | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
Razer Blade (2017) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Razer Blade (2017) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 183 | 68 | 37 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 158 | 71 | 57 | |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 103 | 55 | 30 | |
For Honor (2017) | 145 | 94 | 71 | |
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) | 122 | 50 | 43 |
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.1 °C / 97 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-7.3 °C / -13.2 F).
Off / Standby | 0.65 / 1.03 Watt |
Idle | 7.5 / 12.1 / 14.3 Watt |
Load |
73.5 / 110.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Razer Blade (2017) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, , IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IGZO, 3200x1800, 14" | Gigabyte Aero 14 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, LiteOn CX2-8B256, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Alienware 13 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, OLED, 2560x1440, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Apple SSD AP0256, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -42% | -20% | -16% | -13% | 44% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.5 | 14 -87% | 9 -20% | 8 -7% | 7 7% | 2.1 72% |
Idle Average * | 12.1 | 18 -49% | 14 -16% | 13 -7% | 12 1% | 7.6 37% |
Idle Maximum * | 14.3 | 21 -47% | 22 -54% | 20 -40% | 18 -26% | 8.2 43% |
Load Average * | 73.5 | 70 5% | 72 2% | 78 -6% | 76 -3% | 56.4 23% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 108 | 110 -2% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 110.2 | 146 -32% | 124 -13% | 146 -32% | 161 -46% | 59.8 46% |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade (2017) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh | Razer Blade (2016) FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh | Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 14 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 94 Wh | Alienware 13 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 76 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 49.2 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -22% | -55% | -4% | -41% | 4% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 545 | 427 -22% | 243 -55% | 524 -4% | 320 -41% | 566 4% |
Reader / Idle | 760 | 909 | 524 | |||
H.264 | 312 | 358 | 483 | |||
Load | 59 | 129 | 90 | 66 |
Pros
Cons
Verdict - Gaming Laptop or Multimedia Notebook?
很明显,自从我们第一次评测以来,雷蛇继续改进了Blade,并在这个过程里消除了它的各种弱点。保持不变是原本优秀的机身——就制作质量和完成度而言——几乎可以作为Windows构架下的标杆。只有指纹印(容易迅速积累)仍然是一个问题。
键盘非常优秀,我们也很喜欢触摸板,它很容易响应,并允许手指轻松滑动。指点设备还具有两个专用的鼠标按钮——现在很罕见。鉴于紧凑的尺寸,Blade提供了我们需要的所有连接方式,虽然我们可能不会在意以太网端口的遗漏,但SD卡读卡器的缺失,令人失望。
作为其他硬件的补充,全高清显示器,特别是因为Geforce GTX 1060的存在,能够以原始分辨率和高设置处理大多数时下的游戏。对创意方面感兴趣的用户可能想考虑可选的QHD +显示(请参阅我们的评论),它不仅具有更高的分辨率,而且还能更好地覆盖专业色彩空间,更容易校准。
就性能而言,英特尔四核处理器 和GeForce GTX 1060的组合无疑是非常强大的。虽然该紧凑型笔记本电脑,轻微地借鉴了游戏本的配置,但是即使在长时间的负载下,系统表现一直很好。
这造成了一个显而易见的缺点:雷蛇 Blade可能在闲置或网络化期间完全保持安静,但在游戏过程中,机器可能会变得很嘈杂。我们绝对推荐带耳机玩游戏。
最后,电池续航非常牢靠的:在我们的WLAN测试期间,Blade运行了9个小时,因此该笔记本电脑也获得了“最长续航游戏本”的称号。
存在更快的游戏本以及更便宜的笔记本——但没有一个的设计看起来像雷蛇 Blade这样的性感。
但是雷蛇 Blade的定位在哪里呢?高端移动的游戏本还是具有游戏野心的强大多媒体电脑?如果我们将其分类为多媒体笔记本,我们的自动评级系统将为Blade分配89%的优异成绩(“非常好”)。然而,分类为游戏机,笔记本“只有”87%,这仍然非常优秀。其中差异是由个别分数(见我们在这里的解释)的计算造成的。鉴于这些原因,我们决定将雷蛇 Blade分类为多媒体笔记本。请放心,Blade是一款优异的游戏本,但是考虑到所有的因素,它更适合作为具有高性能需求的创新用户的便携伴侣。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Razer Blade (2017)
- 04/07/2017 v6 (old)
J. Simon Leitner