雷蛇 Blade Stealth (i7-7500U) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U
Brand: Razer

成功新品。 这台在CES正式发布的为游戏玩家设计的亚笔记本电脑得到了英特尔Kaby Lake处理器更新。略高的性能当然总是好事，特别是再能够搭配雷蛇Core外置显卡。最好的消息是，雷蛇目前在德国和其他许多欧洲国家正式发布了新的Blade Stealth和雷蛇Core。

J. Simon Leitner, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 11/05/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Kaby Lake Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of Razer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U (Blade Stealth Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-7500U 2 x 2.7 - 3.5 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR3-1866MHz

Display

12.50 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 235 PPI, 电容式多点触控, Sharp SHP142F (LQ125T1JW02), IGZO LED, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, 256 GB

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 耳机／麦克风整合接口

Networking

Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 13.1 x 321 x 206

Battery

53.6 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 摄像头
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 防误操作键盘搭配Chroma背光, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.3 kg, Power Supply: 320 g

Price

1399 Euro

Links

Razer homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Dell Wireless 1820A 802.11ac	579 MBit/s +6%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	570 MBit/s +5%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (sim)	544 MBit/s
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	385 MBit/s -29%
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ Qualcomm Atheros QC61x4 Wireless Network Adapter	320 MBit/s -41%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Dell Wireless 1820A 802.11ac	461 MBit/s +9%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	438 MBit/s +4%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (sim)	423 MBit/s
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	397 MBit/s -6%
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ Qualcomm Atheros QC61x4 Wireless Network Adapter	260 MBit/s -39%


366 cd/m²	399 cd/m²	396 cd/m²
375 cd/m²	402 cd/m²	381 cd/m²
355 cd/m²	388 cd/m²	375 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Sharp SHP142F (LQ125T1JW02) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 402 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 381.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Contrast: 893:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U 2560x1440, 12.5"	Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U 3840x2160, 12.5"	Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 3200x1800, 13.3"	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 1920x1080, 13.3"	Asus Zenbook UX305UA-FC040T 1920x1080, 13.3"	Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display		22%	-5%	-1%	-4%
Display P3 Coverage	68.7	83.7 22%	64.6 -6%	66.4 -3%	65.1 -5%
sRGB Coverage	95.8	99.2 4%	91.6 -4%	97.5 2%	92.8 -3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.9	97.2 39%	66.5 -5%	68.4 -2%	66.3 -5%
Response Times		-43%	12%	-1%	-9%	-12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	37 ?(19, 18)	63.2 ?(27.6, 35.6) -71%	31 ?(13, 18) 16%	52.4 ?(18.4, 34) -42%	25 ?(15, 10) 32%	50 ?(22, 28) -35%
Response Time Black / White *	33.4 ?(13.2, 20.2)	38 ?(8, 30) -14%	31.2 ?(10.8, 20.4) 7%	23.6 ?(12, 11.6) 29%	28 ?(8, 20) 16%	29.6 ?(7.6, 22) 11%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(30)			220 ?(50) 10%	50 ?(20) -75%
Screen		16%	10%	-13%	-24%	-5%
Brightness middle	402	415 3%	444 10%	344 -14%	358 -11%	375 -7%
Brightness	382	399 4%	393 3%	326 -15%	351 -8%	358 -6%
Brightness Distribution	88	93 6%	82 -7%	87 -1%	86 -2%	87 -1%
Black Level *	0.45	0.309 31%	0.33 27%	0.36 20%	0.4 11%	0.39 13%
Contrast	893	1343 50%	1345 51%	956 7%	895 0%	962 8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.6	3.78 -5%	4 -11%	6.09 -69%	5.96 -66%	4.6 -28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.5	7.2 4%	7.7 -3%	10 -33%	10.99 -47%	8.8 -17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.3	3.38 21%	2.83 34%	5.36 -25%	8.93 -108%	4 7%
Gamma	2.1 ^105%	2.23 ^99%	2.05 ^107%	2.01 ^109%	2.28 ^96%	2.34 ^94%
CCT	6572 ^99%	7329 ^89%	6963 ^93%	7230 ^90%	6548 ^99%	7304 ^89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	62.3	85.1 37%	59.3 -5%	62.25 0%	60 -4%	57.9 -7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	95.7	99.3 4%	91.4 -4%	97.54 2%	93 -3%	88.7 -7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-2% / 9%	6% / 7%	-5% / -8%	-12% / -17%	-9% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
33.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13.2 ms rise
33.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 30 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel Core i7-7500U	144 Points +4%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Intel Core i7-7500U	139 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 Intel Core i7-7500U	137 Points -1%
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Intel Core i7-6560U	133 Points -4%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	117 Points -16%
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U Intel Core i7-6500U	115 Points -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Intel Core i7-7500U	348 Points
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel Core i7-7500U	344 Points -1%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 Intel Core i7-7500U	334 Points -4%
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Intel Core i7-6560U	314 Points -10%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	300 Points -14%
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U Intel Core i7-6500U	293 Points -16%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

139 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

348 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

45.78 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	3883 Points +15%
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D	3479 Points +3%
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ HD Graphics 520, 6500U, LiteOn CV1-8B512	3386 Points +1%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	3362 Points
Asus Zenbook UX305UA-FC040T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	3341 Points -1%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Phison S10C-512G	3085 Points -8%
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D	2868 Points -15%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	2761 Points -18%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	2550 Points -24%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3362 points
Help

	Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D	Asus Zenbook UX305UA-FC040T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ LiteOn CV1-8B512	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Samsung SSD SM951 512 GB MZHPV512HDGL
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-9%	-27%	-23%	-1%	115%
Read Seq	1178	1131 -4%	469.1 -60%	502 -57%	1193 1%	1502 28%
Write Seq	305.4	311.4 2%	412.1 35%	418.9 37%	309.6 1%	1547 407%
Read 512	638	685 7%	301.6 -53%	341.3 -47%	613 -4%	1020 60%
Write 512	305.7	276.3 -10%	327.1 7%	389.7 27%	311 2%	1480 384%
Read 4k	38.54	39.63 3%	28.08 -27%	29.69 -23%	42.43 10%	52 35%
Write 4k	153.4	133.9 -13%	71.9 -53%	86.8 -43%	144.9 -6%	139.5 -9%
Read 4k QD32	614	399.7 -35%	262 -57%	301.3 -51%	549 -11%	467.1 -24%
Write 4k QD32	302.7	245.6 -19%	274.7 -9%	211.2 -30%	311.3 3%	409.5 35%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256

Sequential Read: 1178 MB/s

Sequential Write: 305.4 MB/s

512K Read: 638 MB/s

512K Write: 305.7 MB/s

4K Read: 38.54 MB/s

4K Write: 153.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 614 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 302.7 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U	1947 Points +19%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1631 Points
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1543 Points -5%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1541 Points -6%
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1334 Points -18%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	1186 Points -27%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U	9788 Points +18%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	8289 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	7684 Points -7%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	7211 Points -13%
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	6151 Points -26%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	6078 Points -27%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U	1194 Points +20%
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	991 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	924 Points -7%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	902 Points -9%
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	864 Points -13%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	735 Points -26%

3DMark 11 Performance		1801 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6538 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		918 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
Sims 4 (2014)	182	56.4	27.6	18.3
The Witcher 3 (2015)	13.92
World of Warships (2015)	72.9	47.78	23.63
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	20.2	12.7

Noise Level

Idle		31 / 31 / 31 dB(A)
Load		35 / 40.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31 dB(A)

Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (40.5 dB)
Analysis not possible as maximum curve is missing or too high

Max. Load

Idle


46.7 °C	46.1 °C	35.1 °C
39.9 °C	40.2 °C	30.7 °C
33.4 °C	32.7 °C	30.2 °C

Maximum: 46.7 °C
Average: 37.2 °C


38.7 °C	46 °C	51.3 °C
33.7 °C	39 °C	39.4 °C
31.8 °C	34.1 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 51.3 °C
Average: 38.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.8 °C | Room Temperature 23.1 °C | Raytek Raynger ST

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.3 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.4 °C / 92.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-5.7 °C / -10.2 F).

Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	4.4 / 5.8 / 8.6 Watt
Load	35.2 / 52 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC940

	Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, , 2560x1440, 12.5"	Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D, IPS IGZO, 3840x2160, 12.5"	Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, , 3200x1800, 13.3"	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 6560U, Iris Graphics 540, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Asus Zenbook UX305UA-FC040T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ 6500U, HD Graphics 520, LiteOn CV1-8B512, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Power Consumption		-60%	18%	3%	18%	10%
Idle Minimum *	4.4	9 -105%	3.7 16%	3.3 25%	3.2 27%	4.1 7%
Idle Average *	5.8	12.8 -121%	6.1 -5%	7.4 -28%	6.5 -12%	6.7 -16%
Idle Maximum *	8.6	16.8 -95%	6.5 24%	8.2 5%	6.7 22%	7.4 14%
Load Average *	35.2	35.7 -1%	29.5 16%	36.5 -4%	30.6 13%	32.4 8%
Load Maximum *	52	39.3 24%	33 37%	43.7 16%	31 40%	32.4 38%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		13h 37min
WiFi Websurfing		8h 18min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 45min

	Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 53.6 Wh	Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh	Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 6560U, Iris Graphics 540, 46 Wh	Asus Zenbook UX305UA-FC040T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh	Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh	Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh	Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) 6560U, Iris Graphics 540, 56 Wh
Battery Runtime		-43%	18%	-11%	33%	5%	-22%	13%
Reader / Idle	817	437 -47%		810 -1%	1427 75%	1028 26%	722 -12%	944 16%
WiFi v1.3	498	228 -54%	526 6%	418 -16%	561 13%	472 -5%	278 -44%	436 -12%
Load	105	76 -28%	137 30%	89 -15%	118 12%	99 -6%	96 -9%	141 34%
H.264			547	486	545		243

Pros

+ 高端金属机身

+ 易于维护升级的组件

+ 可高度自定义的雷蛇Chroma键盘

+ HDMI 2.0和Thunderbolt 3支持

+ 屏幕明亮，对比度优秀

+ 优秀的色域覆盖、易于校准

+ 非常优秀的处理器性能

+ 优秀的电池续航

Cons

- 易于沾染指纹

- 对于12.5寸屏幕来说机身尺寸较大

- 无SD读卡器

- PCIe固态硬盘的写入速度没能完全发挥

- 键盘反馈稍弱

- 测试机有电流声

In Review: Razer Blade Stealth with Intel Kaby Lake

雷蛇的最新Blade Stealth几乎克服了前代机型最大的缺点：一般的电池续航。这台新设备的8到13小时续航表现完全可以让用户在一整天的时间内（根据使用需要）远离插座。它的机身没有变化，高端设计加上工艺品质和质感完全可以和Apple的MacBook系列抗衡。遗憾的是它的黑色磨砂表面比较容易沾染指纹，同时十分难以清除。

得力于Kaby Lake处理器和更大容量的电池，Blade Stealth现在不用再在其他亚笔记本电脑面前抬不起头了。雷蛇Core外置显卡也是个让人期待的搭配选项，不过即使没有它，Blade Stealth自身也是一台十分成功的笔记本电脑。

这次我们得到的测试机搭配了QHD+屏幕。这块面板在各方面的表现都十分优秀，完全可以媲美4K屏幕。特别是考虑到较小的12.5寸大小，这块屏幕的在大部分情况下可能都是更好的选择。这个搭配较低分辨率屏幕的配置型号价位也低200欧元（约1505人民币），同时可能也对降低功耗做出了贡献。

它的性能也让我们十分惊喜。这颗处理器的表现十分优秀，即使是在系统负载较高的情况下也十分稳定。Blade Stealth十分适合与雷蛇Core搭配，构建一个强劲的游戏系统。我们将在接下来的评测中提供更多的相关信息。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-7500U - 2016-10-25 10/25/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
J. Simon Leitner

Chassis

91 / 98 → 93%

Keyboard

71%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

61 / 80 → 76%

Weight

71 / 20-67 → 100%

Battery

91%

Display

86%

Games Performance

60 / 68 → 89%

Application Performance

86 / 92 → 94%

Temperature

87%

Noise

85%

Audio

80%

Average

79%

85%

Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Bernie Pechlaner - Senior Tech Writer - 276 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 雷蛇 Blade Stealth (i7-7500U) 笔记本电脑简短评测

J. Simon Leitner, 2016-11- 5 (Update: 2016-11- 6)