联想 C2 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Alcatel Shine Lite | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Alcatel Shine Lite |
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 458 cd/m²
Contrast: 1309:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.15
Lenovo C2 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Huawei Y5 II IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 SAMOLED, 800x480, 4.5" | Wiko Lenny 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | LG K7 IPS, 854x480, 5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -33% | 10% | -13% | -44% | |
Brightness middle | 458 | 465 2% | 301 -34% | 374 -18% | 308 -33% |
Brightness | 449 | 443 -1% | 303 -33% | 343 -24% | 300 -33% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 90 -2% | 91 -1% | 85 -8% | 93 1% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.84 -140% | 0.47 -34% | 0.26 26% | |
Contrast | 1309 | 554 -58% | 796 -39% | 1185 -9% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 7.8 -20% | 4.9 25% | 6 8% | 12 -85% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.7 | 15.7 -34% | 7.6 35% | 11.9 -2% | 25.3 -116% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.7 | 8.4 -9% | 2.5 68% | 6.7 13% | 15.3 -99% |
Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.07 106% | 2.02 109% | 2.19 100% | 2.15 102% |
CCT | 8518 76% | 8438 77% | 6314 103% | 8073 81% | 22440 29% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 26 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 |
GFXBench 3.0 - on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 |
* ... smaller is better
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 | |
Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 | |
Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Lenovo C2 | |
Huawei Y5 II | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 | |
Wiko Lenny 3 | |
LG K7 |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Lenovo C2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Y5 II audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.23 / 0.35 Watt |
Idle | 0.71 / 1.62 / 1.64 Watt |
Load |
3.24 / 3.36 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo C2 2750 mAh | Huawei Y5 II 2200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 2050 mAh | Wiko Lenny 3 2000 mAh | LG K7 2125 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -4% | 28% | -37% | 9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.71 | 0.54 24% | 0.44 38% | 0.76 -7% | 0.61 14% |
Idle Average * | 1.62 | 1.58 2% | 1.1 32% | 2.16 -33% | 1.36 16% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.64 | 1.7 -4% | 1.17 29% | 2.35 -43% | 1.38 16% |
Load Average * | 3.24 | 2.98 8% | 2.31 29% | 4.65 -44% | 3.11 4% |
Load Maximum * | 3.36 | 4.98 -48% | 3.04 10% | 5.35 -59% | 3.59 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo C2 2750 mAh | Huawei Y5 II 2200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 2050 mAh | Wiko Lenny 3 2000 mAh | LG K7 2125 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -18% | 13% | -32% | -14% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 662 | 503 -24% | 535 -19% | 549 -17% | 453 -32% |
Load | 287 | 253 -12% | 415 45% | 155 -46% | 299 4% |
Reader / Idle | 1102 | 1242 | 944 | 1000 | |
H.264 | 738 | 311 |
Pros
Cons
联想的C2不仅是一个电池巨擘:它还提供了一个稳固的机身,能拍摄相当清晰照片的主摄像头与绚丽明亮的屏幕。此外,扬声器不会太差,发热有限,并且电池续航良好。电池也是可拆卸的,所以联想C2可以说是拥有持续作战能力的“猛兽”。所有这些,在某些情况下,可以在网上以不到100欧元(约106美元)的价格获得。
这个智能手机是联想一个真正值得庆贺的成就,虽然存在缺陷,但是它们大多是细节上的:使用免提功能时有可察觉的背景噪声,主摄像头录视频能力远远不如拍照片的能力。在这个价格范围内,SoC比起其他智能手机的功能,有点不够那么强大,而且一些游戏只能在较低的图像质量设置下运行。但总的来说,联想C2可以在速度上跟上与其价格相似的智能手机。只不过存储访问真的很慢...
C2,联想为市场带来了的拥有优秀性价比的智能手机:在摄像,显示和电池续航方面,它远超同类竞争对手。性能的局限使它无法与其他价格更昂贵的设备竞争。
非常好的性价比,使联想C2值得推荐给任何正在寻找续航时间长的入门级智能手机的用户。联想C2目前是这个价格范围内最好的设备之一,前提是你愿意牺牲一点系统性能。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Lenovo C2
-
02/02/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer