Notebookcheck Logo

联想 C2 智能手机简短评测

价格合理的电池巨擘。联想C2是一个入门级智能手机,将会吸引那些喜欢大容量可拆卸电池、高清显示屏和双卡的低预算客户。由于屏幕,摄像头和电池续航都相当不错,这很合理。但是,它是否也存在不足之处呢?
Touchscreen Smartphone ARM Android
Lenovo C2 (Vibe Series)
Processor
Mediatek MT6735 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memory
1024 MB 
Display
5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容式触控屏, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB 
, 5.46 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 毫米 耳机插口, Card Reader: microSD 高达32 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计,接近传感器
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B38/​B40/​B41); Bandwidth (Download/​Upload): 150Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE); SAR value: 0.59 W/kg (head), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 143 x 71.4
Battery
10.5 Wh, 2750 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix AF, LED flash, videos @720p
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 后置扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 电源适配器, USB电缆, McAfee Security, Navigate, SYNCit, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
139 g, Power Supply: 47 g
Price
129 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s +487%
Lenovo C2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
53.3 MBit/s
Alcatel Shine Lite
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.3 MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AX12
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s +409%
Lenovo C2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 MBit/s
Alcatel Shine Lite
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.5 MBit/s -8%
GPS Garmin overview
GPS Garmin overview
GPS Garmin bridge
GPS Garmin bridge
GPS Garmin forest
GPS Garmin forest
GPS Lenovo C2 overview
GPS Lenovo C2 overview
GPS Lenovo C2 bridge
GPS Lenovo C2 bridge
GPS Lenovo C2 forest
GPS Lenovo C2 forest

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2
orginal image
click to load images
453
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 470 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 448.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13.51 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 458 cd/m²
Contrast: 1309:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.15
Lenovo C2
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Huawei Y5 II
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
SAMOLED, 800x480, 4.5"
Wiko Lenny 3
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
LG K7
IPS, 854x480, 5"
Screen
-33%
10%
-13%
-44%
Brightness middle
458
465
2%
301
-34%
374
-18%
308
-33%
Brightness
449
443
-1%
303
-33%
343
-24%
300
-33%
Brightness Distribution
92
90
-2%
91
-1%
85
-8%
93
1%
Black Level *
0.35
0.84
-140%
0.47
-34%
0.26
26%
Contrast
1309
554
-58%
796
-39%
1185
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.5
7.8
-20%
4.9
25%
6
8%
12
-85%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.7
15.7
-34%
7.6
35%
11.9
-2%
25.3
-116%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.7
8.4
-9%
2.5
68%
6.7
13%
15.3
-99%
Gamma
2.15 102%
2.07 106%
2.02 109%
2.19 100%
2.15 102%
CCT
8518 76%
8438 77%
6314 103%
8073 81%
22440 29%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
23825 Points
Huawei Y5 II
23795 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
19253 Points -19%
Wiko Lenny 3
25237 Points +6%
LG K7
23997 Points +1%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
424 Points
Huawei Y5 II
561 Points +32%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
1192 Points
Huawei Y5 II
1573 Points +32%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
8.5 fps
Huawei Y5 II
15 fps +76%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
15 fps +76%
Wiko Lenny 3
8 fps -6%
LG K7
10 fps +18%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
5 fps
Huawei Y5 II
8.4 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
5.5 fps +10%
Wiko Lenny 3
4.4 fps -12%
LG K7
4.3 fps -14%
GFXBench 3.0 - on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
3.7 fps
Huawei Y5 II
6.1 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
7.9 fps +114%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps -100%
LG K7
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
2.7 fps
Huawei Y5 II
fps -100%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps -100%
LG K7
fps -100%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
1.2 fps
Huawei Y5 II
fps -100%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps -100%
LG K7
fps -100%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
1908 Points
Huawei Y5 II
3237 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3241 Points +70%
Wiko Lenny 3
2832 Points +48%
LG K7
2553 Points +34%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
147 Points
Huawei Y5 II
183 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
494 Points +236%
Wiko Lenny 3
399 Points +171%
LG K7
350 Points +138%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
826 Points
Huawei Y5 II
1094 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
1019 Points +23%
Wiko Lenny 3
988 Points +20%
LG K7
1011 Points +22%
Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
332 Points
Huawei Y5 II
375 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
546 Points +64%
Wiko Lenny 3
293 Points -12%
LG K7
189 Points -43%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
177 Points
Huawei Y5 II
283 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
199 Points +12%
Wiko Lenny 3
138 Points -22%
LG K7
145 Points -18%
Web (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
9 Points
Huawei Y5 II
10 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
539 Points +5889%
Wiko Lenny 3
632 Points +6922%
LG K7
541 Points +5911%

Legend

 
Lenovo C2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y5 II Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 Samsung Exynos 3475 Quad, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko Lenny 3 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K7 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
2159 Points
Huawei Y5 II
2707 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
2323 Points +8%
Wiko Lenny 3
2133 Points -1%
LG K7
2280 Points +6%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
16585 ms *
Huawei Y5 II
12505 ms * +25%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
16486 ms * +1%
Wiko Lenny 3
14863 ms * +10%
LG K7
14579 ms * +12%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
13.5 Points
Huawei Y5 II
18.47 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
15 Points +11%
Wiko Lenny 3
14.07 Points +4%
LG K7
14.37 Points +6%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
120.7 MB/s
Huawei Y5 II
173.3 MB/s +44%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
164.1 MB/s +36%
Wiko Lenny 3
132.5 MB/s +10%
LG K7
128.2 MB/s +6%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
8 MB/s
Huawei Y5 II
21.6 MB/s +170%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
40.91 MB/s +411%
Wiko Lenny 3
11.6 MB/s +45%
LG K7
8.2 MB/s +3%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
14.5 MB/s
Huawei Y5 II
27.3 MB/s +88%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
17.27 MB/s +19%
Wiko Lenny 3
15.1 MB/s +4%
LG K7
15.63 MB/s +8%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
4.7 MB/s
Huawei Y5 II
6 MB/s +28%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
9.92 MB/s +111%
Wiko Lenny 3
6.2 MB/s +32%
LG K7
5.33 MB/s +13%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
24.2 MB/s
Huawei Y5 II
29.47 MB/s +22%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
64.4 MB/s +166%
Wiko Lenny 3
40.59 MB/s +68%
LG K7
37.84 MB/s +56%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
16.1 MB/s
Huawei Y5 II
18.03 MB/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
43.56 MB/s +171%
Wiko Lenny 3
19.59 MB/s +22%
LG K7
19.27 MB/s +20%
Max. Load
 33.2 °C32.6 °C33.2 °C 
 34.2 °C32.8 °C34.2 °C 
 34.3 °C32.7 °C32.9 °C 
Maximum: 34.3 °C
Average: 33.3 °C
32.7 °C32.7 °C34.4 °C
32.9 °C33.5 °C35 °C
32.2 °C34.4 °C36.2 °C
Maximum: 36.2 °C
Average: 33.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.8 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.827.429.82530.827.930.83128.525.228.54031.328.731.35029.926.429.96327.422.927.48029.123.629.110029.824.329.812532.225.132.216026.919.726.920026.318.626.325030.219.730.231542.119.942.140050.218.950.250056.818.956.863058.519.858.580066.620.866.6100067.317.267.3125068.717.168.716007114.47120007113.971250070.413.270.431506712.967400068.11368.1500067.512.867.5630066.912.766.9800066.912.766.91000064.212.864.21250065.512.865.51600057.613.157.6SPL80.12880.1N43.8143.8median 65.5median 17.1median 65.5Delta11.13.911.132.433.931.330.231.731.82632.939.440.236.235.328.629.825.428.321.33223.327.822.530.422.437.221.342.318.446.217.555.417.557.317.262.416.867.517.368.317.467.416.676.617.375.617.675.217.679.517.779.817.477.417.772.917.967.918.158.118.140.429.8871.359.8median 17.7median 62.41.716.641.838.632.441.82936.531.32931.631.431.731.628.533.12628.53735.939.43731.929.336.231.9252628.62525.930.725.425.924.629.321.324.62435.823.32425.440.422.525.43047.522.43036.151.721.336.13955.918.43945.162.317.545.150.965.517.550.955.771.617.255.757.374.716.857.355.171.917.355.154.371.517.454.356.475.216.656.456.274.717.356.25572.517.65553.872.317.653.855.473.617.755.458.977.417.458.959.677.917.759.653.571.517.953.54765.618.14738.155.818.138.167.785.729.867.721.6641.321.6median 53.5median 71.5median 17.7median 53.59.910.61.79.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo C2Huawei Y5 IISamsung Galaxy J1 2016
Lenovo C2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Y5 II audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.23 / 0.35 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.71 / 1.62 / 1.64 Watt
Load midlight 3.24 / 3.36 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo C2
2750 mAh
Huawei Y5 II
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
2050 mAh
Wiko Lenny 3
2000 mAh
LG K7
2125 mAh
Power Consumption
-4%
28%
-37%
9%
Idle Minimum *
0.71
0.54
24%
0.44
38%
0.76
-7%
0.61
14%
Idle Average *
1.62
1.58
2%
1.1
32%
2.16
-33%
1.36
16%
Idle Maximum *
1.64
1.7
-4%
1.17
29%
2.35
-43%
1.38
16%
Load Average *
3.24
2.98
8%
2.31
29%
4.65
-44%
3.11
4%
Load Maximum *
3.36
4.98
-48%
3.04
10%
5.35
-59%
3.59
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
11h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 47min
Lenovo C2
2750 mAh
Huawei Y5 II
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
2050 mAh
Wiko Lenny 3
2000 mAh
LG K7
2125 mAh
Battery Runtime
-18%
13%
-32%
-14%
WiFi v1.3
662
503
-24%
535
-19%
549
-17%
453
-32%
Load
287
253
-12%
415
45%
155
-46%
299
4%
Reader / Idle
1102
1242
944
1000
H.264
738
311

Pros

+ 体面,坚实的机身
+ 可拆卸电池
+ 电池续航长
+ 明亮的显示效果
+ 良好的灰度和对比度
+ 低发热
+ 双卡和SD卡
+ 准确的触摸屏
+ 优秀的后置摄像头

Cons

- 使用免提时的有杂音
- 薄弱的麦克风质量
- 平庸的视频录制质量
- 屏幕有明显的蓝色光...
- ...和高色偏差
- 系统性能略低于平均水平
In review: Lenovo C2. Review unit provided by Lenovo Germany.
In review: Lenovo C2. Review unit provided by Lenovo Germany.

联想的C2不仅是一个电池巨擘:它还提供了一个稳固的机身,能拍摄相当清晰照片的主摄像头与绚丽明亮的屏幕。此外,扬声器不会太差,发热有限,并且电池续航良好。电池也是可拆卸的,所以联想C2可以说是拥有持续作战能力的“猛兽”。所有这些,在某些情况下,可以在网上以不到100欧元(约106美元)的价格获得。 

这个智能手机是联想一个真正值得庆贺的成就,虽然存在缺陷,但是它们大多是细节上的:使用免提功能时有可察觉的背景噪声,主摄像头录视频能力远远不如拍照片的能力。在这个价格范围内,SoC比起其他智能手机的功能,有点不够那么强大,而且一些游戏只能在较低的图像质量设置下运行。但总的来说,联想C2可以在速度上跟上与其价格相似的智能手机。只不过存储访问真的很慢...

C2,联想为市场带来了的拥有优秀性价比的智能手机:在摄像,显示和电池续航方面,它远超同类竞争对手。性能的局限使它无法与其他价格更昂贵的设备竞争。

非常好的性价比,使联想C2值得推荐给任何正在寻找续航时间长的入门级智能手机的用户。联想C2目前是这个价格范围内最好的设备之一,前提是你愿意牺牲一点系统性能。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Lenovo C2 - 02/02/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
33 / 60 → 55%
Weight
93%
Battery
94%
Display
84%
Games Performance
6 / 63 → 10%
Application Performance
18 / 70 → 25%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 61%
Camera
69%
Average
68%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 C2 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2017-02-19 (Update: 2017-02-27)