CAT S61
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 13 scores (from 28 reviews)
Reviews for the CAT S61
The robust CAT S61 puts all those who say that there are no innovations in the smartphone market to shame. However, with the built-in thermal-imaging camera, a laser distance measure, and the automatic measure of the indoor air quality, its most important features might be more useful for professional users.
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s a pretty tight target market for the CAT S61 and it’s users who live and work in harsh environments that need a phone capable of surviving the day with them. If you’re not in a trade or industry that fits that bill then you’re not a target user.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/21/2019
Source: Htxt Africa EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's really not much to see with the S61 aside from the laser measuring and FLIR camera. Both work decently but not nearly as well as bespoke gadgets for those purposes. What really kills this handset is its middling features and premium price. We know its a rugged phone so there are trade-offs but we feel this handset doesn't compel us to cough up the price of admission.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The CAT S61 is the ultimate, money is no object, rugged phone. But it still isn’t perfect. Clearly aware it’s onto a winning format, Bullit has chosen not to rock the boat on the S60, refining rather than rethinking the design of the S61. Highlights include a more powerful thermal imaging sensor, laser measuring tool and ambient air sensor that will act as canary in a coal mine.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Smart EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s not much else to crit on the Cat S61. It’s a workhorse built for those for whom ‘light’ should not refer to neither their beer or smartphone. The Cat S61 is the best one in the range by far, pushing it from a mid-range muddler to a strong performer where you don’t need to sacrifice processing power nor screen quality.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/03/2018
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Cat S61 smartphone is not designed to compete with the Apple iPhone, OnePlus 6, Galaxy Note 8, or any other typical high end or mid-range smartphone. You should only consider buying the S61 if your company has a need for thermal imaging technology. If you just want a rugged smartphone with no need for thermal imaging, then take a look at the Cat S41 for $450.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, it’s great to see a phone fill a niche that isn’t being filled by many other manufacturers. For people that work in extreme conditions, this is a good option (or even if you’re just tough on your devices). It isn’t pretty and it will cost a whopping 899 Euros ($999 USD) when it launches in Q2, but this might be in the running for one of the best rugged phones out there.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/01/2018
Source: Android User DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2020
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/09/2018
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 73% features: 73% display: 94% mobility: 94%
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/22/2018
Source: Golem DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/22/2018
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Portables4Gamers FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/02/2019
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 80% mobility: 100%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/29/2018
Source: HWSW HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/03/2018
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/23/2018
Source: Alt om Data DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Ljud och Bild SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Playtech.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/07/2018
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 508:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 630: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.