Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar
CMF Phone 1 评论--价格实惠的模块化智能手机
定制奇才
Nothing 的 CMF Phone 1 定位于经济型中端手机。除了拥有可观的硬件外，这款智能手机还采用了模块化设计，允许用户进行更多个性化定制。在这篇评测中，我们将讨论这款手机的优势和可改进之处。Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 - 经济实惠且可定制
CMF Phone 1 是 Nothing 子品牌的首款智能手机，其独特的设计令人印象深刻。虽然可更换背板其实并不新鲜，但该公司通过旋入式盖板增加了更多的实用性和选择。新增的附件点不仅增强了功能性，还吸引了人们的目光。
CMF Phone 1 凭借迅捷的联发科 SoC 提供了稳定的系统性能。尽管显示屏亮度没有承诺的那么高，但仍然达到了出色的亮度水平。
遗憾的是，该设备不支持 NFC。这是因为 CMF 智能手机最初只面向印度市场。这一缺陷可能会在 CMF Phone 2 发布时得到解决。我们还希望该设备能支持更长时间的更新。
尽管 CMF Phone 1 拥有 5G 功能，但它只支持过时的 Wi-Fi 5 标准。作为一款经济型手机，CMF Phone 1 的集成摄像头非常出色，但它没有第二个用于拍照的后置摄像头。另一方面，CMF Phone 1 的电池续航能力超强。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在德国，CMF Phone 1 目前在亚马逊等零售商的售价低至 179 欧元。对于美国读者，亚马逊 256 GB 机型的售价为289 美元。您也可以访问CMF Phone 1 的官方产品页面了解您所在地区的供货情况。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Geizhals | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 75.8%  | CMF Phone 1 MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Listenpreis 269€ Geizhals Suche | 197 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI Super AMOLED |
2. 78.3%  | Oppo Reno12 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | 184 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2412x1080 394 PPI AMOLED | |
3. 85.8% v7 (old)  | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Listenpreis 399€ | 187 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED |
4. 85.9% v7 (old)  | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Listenpreis 379€ | 209 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" 2340x1080 390 PPI Super AMOLED |
CMF Phone 1 是 Nothing 旗下经济型品牌发布的首款智能手机，最初只面向印度市场。然而，这一概念在国际上获得了积极反响，Nothing 决定也将该设备引入其他国家。
该手机有两个版本：8/128 GB（239 欧元，约合 199 美元）和 8/256 GB（269 欧元，约合 289 美元）。存储空间还可通过选配的 microSD 卡进行扩展。
规格
外壳和功能 - 带有附件点的可更换后盖
CMF Phone 1 采用模块化设计，背板可更换，由四个突出的螺钉而不是卡扣固定。面板上还有一个 Nothing 称为 "配件点 "的螺纹，用于安装可选配件，如挂绳、可折叠支架或卡片盒（每个 25 欧元或 25 美元）。后盖有四种颜色：黑色、蓝色、橙色和浅绿色。每个附加后盖的价格为 35 欧元（35 美元），包括一个相应的工具、新螺丝、一个卡托和一个配色的配件点盖。遗憾的是，Nothing 错过了让电池易于拆卸的机会，因为电池是用额外的粘合剂固定的，用户无法方便地取出。
背板由塑料制成，不易沾染指纹。蓝色和橙色款还采用了素食皮革表面处理。考虑到其价位，CMF Phone 1 的制造质量很好，手感也不错。正面的缝隙紧密均匀。设备在扭动时不会发出嘎吱声，感觉非常坚固。物理按键有一点弹力，但按起来非常顺手。
手机配备了一个混合插槽，可容纳两张 Nano SIM 卡或一张 microSD 卡和一张 SIM 卡。不过，该插槽在同类产品中并不是最快的。此外，该机还没有配备 NFC 功能。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| CMF Phone 1 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
连接性和软件 - 配备 ac Wi-Fi 和 5G 的 CMF Phone 1
在最佳情况下，CMF Phone 1 可以连接到 5G 移动网络。它覆盖的频率范围相当广，在欧洲建立移动连接应该不会有任何问题。虽然该设备能通过 Wi-Fi 5 与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器保持稳定连接，但速度并不特别令人印象深刻。
CMF 智能手机的语音质量不错。在安静的环境中，语音传输听起来相当自然，免提电话中只有轻微的回声。不过，降噪功能非常简陋。
CMF Phone 1 在Android 14 的基础上运行 Nothing OS 2.6。 Nothing Phone (2a).该公司承诺提供两次重大更新和三年的安全补丁，在这个价位上还是令人满意的。
生物识别安全由显示屏内的光学指纹传感器负责，它可以快速、可靠地解锁 CMF Phone 1。你也可以选择通过前置摄像头进行面部解锁，但这种方法不太安全，而且只有在光线条件良好的情况下才能正常工作。
与该公司的其他智能手机不同，Nothing 没有为 CMF Phone 1 提供任何可持续性信息。包装采用层压设计，但没有使用任何塑料。
摄像头 - CMF Phone 1 的主摄像头性能不错
尽管没有自动对焦功能，但只要光线充足，CMF Phone 1 的前置摄像头仍能拍摄出令人满意的照片。
背面的主摄像头提供高达 5000 万像素，并使用像素分档。不过，它也可以使用全分辨率，甚至可以捕捉 RAW 图像。在日光下拍摄的照片效果非常出色，具有令人愉悦的锐度和良好的动态效果。虽然有第二个后置镜头，但它是一个深度传感器，用于营造虚化效果。这款手机没有超广角、光学变焦或微距摄像头，也没有图像稳定功能。
主摄像头可拍摄 4K/30 fps 或 1080p/60 fps 的视频。不过，电子图像稳定功能只能在 1080p/30 fps 下工作。前置摄像头只能提供 30 或 60 fps 的全高清分辨率。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain camera5x zoomLow-light
显示屏：明亮的 OLED 显示屏，960Hz PWM 调光
当启用环境光传感器显示全白图像时，CMF Phone 1 的 Super AMOLED 屏幕达到了超过 1,200 cd/m² 的超高峰值亮度，尽管这明显低于宣传的 2,000 cd/m²。在 APL18 测量和 HDR 视频播放过程中，面板也保持了这一亮度水平。Nothing 声称的峰值亮度可能只有在播放 HDR 照片时才能达到。
系统可以将屏幕的刷新率调整为 60 或 120Hz。用户也可以选择将其固定在 60Hz。与许多竞争对手不同，CMF Phone 1 采用了高频 PWM 调光技术。虽然频率还不够高，不能完全消除敏感人群的潜在问题，但至少可以缓解这些问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1169 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
| CMF Phone 1 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Oppo Reno12 Pro AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -19% | -13% | -17% | |
| Brightness middle | 1169 | 1192 2% | 1205 3% | 904 -23% |
| Brightness | 1183 | 1209 2% | 1177 -1% | 912 -23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 92 -5% | 90 -7% | 97 0% |
| Black Level * | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.8 -20% | 1.51 -1% | 2.1 -40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.9 | 4 -38% | 4.07 -40% | 2.8 3% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 2.9 -53% | 2.5 -32% | 2.2 -16% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.33 94% | 2.175 101% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 6733 97% | 6242 104% | 6407 101% | 6478 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 14.67 % Secondary Frequency: 926 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.03 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.512 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5175 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7095 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7145 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命
CMF Phone 1 采用 联发科 Dimensity 7300和 8 GB 内存。该处理器可实现流畅的系统性能，而集成的 ARM Mali-G615 MP2GPU 可在大多数情况下实现无卡顿游戏，但不支持光线追踪或高帧率。
在我们的测试过程中，手机的表面温度始终保持在可接受的范围内；即使在长时间负载的情况下，SoC 也没有出现节流现象。下巴上的单声道扬声器音质悦耳，与同价位的手机相比非常出色。
在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，将屏幕设置为 120Hz 和 150 cd/m²，5,000 毫安时电池的使用时间达到了令人印象深刻的 18 小时。电池充电功率高达 33 瓦。
| CrossMark - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=158, last 2 years) | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (390 - 707, n=2) | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI | |
| Average of class Smartphone (191 - 4619, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (521 - 540, n=3) | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI | |
| Average of class Smartphone (192 - 32432, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (1051 - 1322, n=3) | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI | |
| Average of class Smartphone (118 - 44657, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (2697 - 2721, n=3) | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
GFXBench: on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| CMF Phone 1 | Oppo Reno12 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 59% | -5% | -50% | 42% | 54% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1024.12 | 1777.39 74% | 946.8 -8% | 529.32 -48% | 1749 ? 71% | 1834 ? 79% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 535.66 | 1700.51 217% | 808.2 51% | 270 -50% | 1163 ? 117% | 1420 ? 165% |
| Random Read 4KB | 294.28 | 228.05 -23% | 239.2 -19% | 244.24 -17% | 286 ? -3% | 276 ? -6% |
| Random Write 4KB | 394.59 | 265.4 -33% | 220.5 -44% | 62.59 -84% | 318 ? -19% | 309 ? -22% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
CMF Phone 1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| CMF Phone 1 | |
| Oppo Reno12 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
除了极高的性价比，CMF Phone 1 还因其独特的定制选项而脱颖而出。
CMF Phone 1
- 11/11/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
