微星 CX62 7QL 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: MSI CX62 7QL
Brand: MSI

冷静而迟缓。 别被它和GE62一样的外表欺骗了—— CX62对于大部分游戏来说都有点力不从心，同时它的768p品质有些让人难以接受。

Allen Ngo (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 01/22/2017 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...

Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Windows

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI CX62 7QL (CX62 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1122 MHz, RAM: 2002 MHz, DDR3, 359.37, Optimus

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4, SK Hynix, PC4-17000, 15-15-15-36

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 100 PPI, TN LED, Name: 156WHU, Dell P/N: K96D2, ID: LGD04AF

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, 1024 GB

, 5400 rpm

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口和麦克风接口, Card Reader: SDXC 读卡器

Networking

Qualcomm Atheros AR8171/8175 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Optical drive

Asus Slimtype DVD A DU8AESH

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 29 x 383 x 260

Battery

41 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 6芯

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 全高清 1080p30

Additional features

Speakers: 4x 2瓦扬声器, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, Norton Security, MSI Shift OSD, Help Desk, Battery Calibration, SCM, Music Maker Jam, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.22 kg, Power Supply: 372 g

Price

700 USD

Links

MSI homepage
MSI notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

MSI CX62 7QL MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Dell Vostro 15 5568 DIN A4 ❌

Right: Optical drive, USB 2.0, SD reader, AC adapter

Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI 1.4, mDP, USB Type-C Gen. 1, 2x 3.5 mm microphone/earphones

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)	60.9 MB/s +153%
MSI CX62 7QL	24.1 MB/s
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T	19.1 MB/s -21%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)	88.4 MB/s +277%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T	27 MB/s +15%
MSI CX62 7QL	23.46 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GT73VR 6RF Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	660 MBit/s +134%
MSI CX62 7QL Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	282 MBit/s
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	56 MBit/s -80%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GT73VR 6RF Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	654 MBit/s +255%
MSI CX62 7QL Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	184 MBit/s
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	52.9 MBit/s -71%


212.5 cd/m²	191.9 cd/m²	181 cd/m²
213.9 cd/m²	196.1 cd/m²	184 cd/m²
208.3 cd/m²	189.6 cd/m²	183.9 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 213.9 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 195.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.53 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 196.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 261:1 (Black: 0.75 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 12.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.22% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2)

	MSI CX62 7QL TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768	HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) BOE0693, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 CMN N156HGE-EAL (CMN15D2), TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		8%	4%	42%	93%
Display P3 Coverage	40.22	43.27 8%	41.92 4%	61.5 53%	85.8 113%
sRGB Coverage	60.5	64.9 7%	62.9 4%	80.4 33%	99.8 65%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	41.56	44.71 8%	43.32 4%	58.8 41%	84.1 102%
Response Times		-2%	1%	14%	17%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	50.4 ?(24, 26.4)	42 ?(13.2, 28.8) 17%	53 ?(19, 34) -5%	40 ?(20, 20) 21%	43 ?(21, 22) 15%
Response Time Black / White *	28 ?(10, 18)	33.6 ?(7.6, 26) -20%	26 ?(6, 20) 7%	26 ?(6, 20) 7%	23 ?(7, 16) 18%
PWM Frequency		198.4	50 ?(50)		1000 ?(80)
Screen		46%	70%	65%	31%
Brightness middle	196.1	186.5 -5%	236 20%	326 66%	216 10%
Brightness	196	174 -11%	212 8%	316 61%	202 3%
Brightness Distribution	85	69 -19%	78 -8%	80 -6%	83 -2%
Black Level *	0.75	0.18 76%	0.18 76%	0.35 53%	0.48 36%
Contrast	261	1036 297%	1311 402%	931 257%	450 72%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	10.9	5.7 48%	3.92 64%	5.49 50%	9.98 8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	19	22.5 -18%	9.2 52%	11.36 40%	17.12 10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	12.6	4.4 65%	2.35 81%	4.84 62%	10.91 13%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.35 ^94%	2.34 ^94%	2.23 ^99%	2.31 ^95%
CCT	14195 ^46%	6963 ^93%	6161 ^106%	5971 ^109%	13185 ^49%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	38.4	44.71 16%	40 4%	53 38%	75 95%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	60.6	64.95 7%	63 4%	80 32%	100 65%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		17% / 32%	25% / 48%	40% / 54%	47% / 42%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 24 ms rise
50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 Intel Core i7-7500U	146 Points +13%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	134 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points +1%
MSI CX62 7QL Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	115 Points -11%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	108 Points -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	99 Points -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	678 Points +104%
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 Intel Core i7-7500U	349 Points +5%
MSI CX62 7QL Intel Core i5-7200U	332 Points
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T Intel Core i7-6500U	326 Points -2%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	288 Points -13%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	257 Points -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	223 Points -33%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 Intel Core i7-7500U	1.66 Points +13%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.5 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T Intel Core i7-6500U	1.47 Points 0%
MSI CX62 7QL Intel Core i5-7200U	1.47 Points
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	1.33 Points -10%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	1.28 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	1.14 Points -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.47 Points +103%
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 Intel Core i7-7500U	3.9 Points +6%
MSI CX62 7QL Intel Core i5-7200U	3.68 Points
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T Intel Core i7-6500U	3.61 Points -2%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	3.19 Points -13%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	2.81 Points -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	2.49 Points -32%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20111 Points +80%
MSI CX62 7QL Intel Core i5-7200U	11198 Points
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T Intel Core i7-6500U	11024 Points -2%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	9852 Points -12%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	8672 Points -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	7580 Points -32%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5126 Points +3%
MSI CX62 7QL Intel Core i5-7200U	4991 Points
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T Intel Core i7-6500U	4917 Points -1%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	4359 Points -13%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	4134 Points -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	3725 Points -25%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	790 s *
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 Intel Core i7-7500U	476 s *

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	849 s *
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 Intel Core i7-7500U	599 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6800

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11198

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4991

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

45.01 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.68 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.47 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

52.8 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

332 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

129 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Radeon R7 M460, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	3694 Points +3%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY	3603 Points 0%
MSI CX62 7QL GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3594 Points
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3424 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	3370 Points -6%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY	4951 Points +13%
MSI CX62 7QL GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	4364 Points
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4341 Points -1%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	4340 Points -1%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY	4375 Points +8%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4118 Points +2%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	4089 Points +1%
MSI CX62 7QL GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	4035 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3594 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4035 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4364 points
Help

	MSI CX62 7QL WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) Toshiba MQ01ABD100	Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-18%	8589%	5301%	6073%
Read Seq	113.7	109.5 -4%	529 365%	459.3 304%	530 366%
Write Seq	113.3	105.2 -7%	508 348%	325.5 187%	442.7 291%
Read 512	38.42	34.08 -11%	409.8 967%	279.2 627%	409.1 965%
Write 512	55.8	40.02 -28%	316.5 467%	280.1 402%	417.3 648%
Read 4k	0.48	0.429 -11%	36.01 7402%	22.43 4573%	21.81 4444%
Write 4k	1.282	1.008 -21%	106.7 8223%	74.9 5742%	93 7154%
Read 4k QD32	1.172	0.81 -31%	384.8 32733%	149 12613%	257 21828%
Write 4k QD32	1.296	0.893 -31%	237.3 18210%	234 17956%	168.3 12886%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0

Transfer Rate Minimum: 27.5 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 109 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 83.3 MB/s

Access Time: 16.8 ms

Burst Rate: 184.2 MB/s

CPU Usage: 3 %

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	25986 Points +181%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U	22439 Points +143%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ	14594 Points +58%
MSI CX62 7QL NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U	9252 Points
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U	9056 Points -2%
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 NVIDIA GeForce 830M, 5500U	7966 Points -14%
HP Pavilion x360 13t-u100 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	6243 Points -33%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4133 Points +148%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U	3574 Points +115%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ	1903 Points +14%
MSI CX62 7QL NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U	1664 Points
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U	1621 Points -3%
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 NVIDIA GeForce 830M, 5500U	1360 Points -18%
HP Pavilion x360 13t-u100 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	704 Points -58%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4826 Points +100%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U	4251 Points +76%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ	3220 Points +34%
MSI CX62 7QL NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U	2411 Points
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U	2206 Points -9%
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 NVIDIA GeForce 830M, 5500U	1961 Points -19%
HP Pavilion x360 13t-u100 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	1413 Points -41%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4466 Points +126%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U	4113 Points +108%
Intel Skull Canyon NUC6i7KYK Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580, 6770HQ	2784 Points +41%
MSI CX62 7QL NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U	1977 Points
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U	1858 Points -6%
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 NVIDIA GeForce 830M, 5500U	1677 Points -15%
HP Pavilion x360 13t-u100 Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	1125 Points -43%

3DMark 11 Performance		2529 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		65002 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6847 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1473 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		753 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high
BioShock Infinite (2013)	97.2	54.3	44
Metro: Last Light (2013)	51.3	39.5	28.5
Thief (2014)	50.7	29.3
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)	28
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)	60	58
Fallout 4 (2015)	34.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	40.1	23.2
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	19.4
Overwatch (2016)	73.5	51.4

Noise Level

Idle		32.1 / 32.2 / 32.2 dB(A)
Load		37.4 / 51.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	MSI CX62 7QL GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Radeon R7 M460, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
Noise		2%	6%	-1%	-6%
off / environment *	29		30.15 -4%	31.6 -9%	30 -3%
Idle Minimum *	32.1	32.2 -0%	30.2 6%	31.6 2%	35 -9%
Idle Average *	32.2	32.2 -0%	30.2 6%	31.6 2%	36 -12%
Idle Maximum *	32.2	33.7 -5%	31 4%	33.4 -4%	37 -15%
Load Average *	37.4	39.4 -5%	38 -2%	41.7 -11%	41 -10%
Load Maximum *	51.4	42.2 18%	38.6 25%	44.8 13%	46 11%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


34.8 °C	24.6 °C	24.8 °C
31.6 °C	38.4 °C	25.6 °C
27.8 °C	32.2 °C	23 °C

Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 29.2 °C


23.2 °C	25.2 °C	35.8 °C
23.2 °C	30.2 °C	29.4 °C
23.8 °C	24 °C	29.2 °C

Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 27.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 35.8 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.4 °C / -6.2 F).

MSI CX62 7QL audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.5% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.32 / 0.5 Watt
Idle	6.3 / 7 / 7.2 Watt
Load	35.1 / 61.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI CX62 7QL i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M460, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		-15%	6%	-36%	-110%
Idle Minimum *	6.3	6.16 2%	3.9 38%	5 21%	10 -59%
Idle Average *	7	8.48 -21%	7.8 -11%	8.9 -27%	14 -100%
Idle Maximum *	7.2	9.62 -34%	8.4 -17%	11.8 -64%	19 -164%
Load Average *	35.1	41.63 -19%	37 -5%	55 -57%	82 -134%
Load Maximum *	61.2	63.22 -3%	46 25%	93 -52%	118 -93%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		10h 13min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 05min

	MSI CX62 7QL i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh	HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M460, 35 Wh	Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, 48 Wh	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 41.4 Wh
Battery Runtime		-22%	13%	20%	-44%
Reader / Idle	613	438 -29%		816 33%	339 -45%
WiFi v1.3	283	220 -22%	320 13%	430 52%	158 -44%
Load	125	106 -15%		95 -24%	71 -43%

Pros

+ 清凉的运行温度，低核心温度

+ 两个硬盘槽盒M.2 NVMe支持

+ 光驱和USB-C第一代接口

+ 数字键盘和独立鼠标键

+ 校对后屏幕色彩准确度不错

+ 无处理器和显卡降频

+ 低负载下可以保持安静

+ 触控版响应快

+ 易于维护

Cons

- 低分辨率TN屏幕面板；对比度很低

- 机身质感廉价，坚固度低

- 用户自行升级维护会破坏质保

- 扬声器较差，几乎无低音

- 游戏中风扇的无规律噪音

- 无Thunderbolt 3接口

- 笨重

- 屏幕上盖坚固度低

考虑到笨重的机身，CX62的性能相对较弱。超低电压Kaby Lake处理器和GeForce 940MX显卡对于除了网页浏览和多媒体播放之外的用途来说都显得有些薄弱。它的游戏性能对于最新3D游戏基本只能够满足768p和低设定下流畅运行的水平，同时在负载之下它的风扇会发出不规则的呜呜声。它的机身虽然在外观上和广受欢迎的GE62十分相近，但在质感和坚固度上都远远不如。更让人遗憾的是，它的TN屏幕出场色彩偏差严重，同时对比度和背光亮度都较差。

能够帮它略微挽回颜面的功能包括对NVMe M.2接口的支持，和低发热量。前者可以帮助我们的机械硬盘测试机大幅提升系统响应速度，不过用户自行升级会破坏质保。同时，较低的核心温度对于和其他搭载更高功率硬件的G系列机型同样的机身来说并不成问题。这让GX62可以在运行中保持较快的Turbo Boost速度，相比大部分ULV处理器系统在更低温度运行。