Notebookcheck Logo

富士通 Celsius H760 工作站简短评测

大成功。 富士通Celsius H760是经典工作站设备的一个成功范例。性能,灵活性,品质和人体工程学设计都是它们不可或缺的特质。我们将在接下来的深入评测中为你分析这台测试机的实际表现。
Business Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows Workstation
good (86%) Fujitsu Celsius H760 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5NVIDIA Quadro M2000M Workstation - 10/12/2016 - v5.1
Test device courtesy of http://shop.fujitsu.com/de/notebooks/mobile-workstations
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Fujitsu Celsius H760 (Celsius H Series)
Processor
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 4 x 2.8 - 3.7 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M - 4 GB VRAM, 10.18.13.5459 - nVIDIA ForceWare 354.59, Nvidia Optimus mit Nvidia Quadro M2000M und Intel P530
Memory
16 GB 
, 三星 DDR4 2x 8 GB, SO DIMM 2133 MHz / PC4-17000 ECC (M474A1G43EB1-CPB), 2 空余插槽
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD046F LP156WF6-SPP1, IPS LED, 88 % sRGB, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel CM236 (Skylake PCH-H)
Storage
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e, 512 GB 
, + 1 TB HDD Seagate ST1000LM 014-1EJ164
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Skylake PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 分开的输入和输出接口(3.5寸麦克风/立体声耳机接口), Card Reader: Realtek PCIe SD读卡器, SDHC, SDXC, 1 SmartCard, 0 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: PalmSecure指纹感应器, TPM 2.0
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, Sierra Wireless Airprime EM7305 (LTE/ HSPA+), GPS
Optical drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 32 x 380 x 257
Battery
72 Wh, 6400 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 10.8V
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 200万像素
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
2.98 kg
Price
3700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front: status LEDs
Front: status LEDs
Rear: Fan exhaust, battery
Rear: Fan exhaust, battery
Left: AC power, LAN, VGA; DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB 3.0, SmartCard reader, card reader, audio in/out
Left: AC power, LAN, VGA; DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB 3.0, SmartCard reader, card reader, audio in/out
Right: Optical drive, USB 2.0, slot for a Kensington Lock
Right: Optical drive, USB 2.0, slot for a Kensington Lock
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Fujitsu Celsius H760
 
84 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Fujitsu Celsius H760
 
171 MB/s
Networking
WiFi Speed Client 1m
WiFi Speed Server 1m
306
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LGD046F LP156WF6-SPP1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 341 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 310 cd/m² Minimum: 17.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 342 cd/m²
Contrast: 1003:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Calman 2D)
82.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Fujitsu Celsius H760
LGD046F LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP ZBook 15 G3
Samsung SDC5344, , 1920x1080, 15.6"
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
LP156WF6-SPK1, , 1920x1080, 15.6"
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
Sharp LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.6"
Display
12%
-34%
40%
Display P3 Coverage
63.9
66.8
5%
39.13
-39%
86.2
35%
sRGB Coverage
82.4
95.5
16%
58.5
-29%
99.7
21%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
60.3
69
14%
40.45
-33%
99
64%
Response Times
-40%
-11%
-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38 ?(15, 23)
54 ?(24.4, 29.6)
-42%
46 ?(17, 29)
-21%
40.4 ?(19.6, 20.8)
-6%
Response Time Black / White *
26 ?(7, 19)
35.6 ?(11.6, 24)
-37%
26 ?(9, 17)
-0%
27.6 ?(6.8, 20.8)
-6%
PWM Frequency
198 ?(95)
198.4 ?(29)
Screen
-29%
-18%
4%
Brightness middle
341
306
-10%
263
-23%
279.2
-18%
Brightness
310
289
-7%
236
-24%
271
-13%
Brightness Distribution
82
85
4%
78
-5%
83
1%
Black Level *
0.34
0.34
-0%
0.34
-0%
0.266
22%
Contrast
1003
900
-10%
774
-23%
1050
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.8
5.1
-34%
2.35
38%
4.14
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.8
9.9
8%
6.56
39%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
7.4
-270%
3.33
-67%
3.26
-63%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.37 93%
2.38 92%
2.19 100%
CCT
6581 99%
7263 89%
6917 94%
6375 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
63
17%
37
-31%
85.68
59%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
82.2
95
16%
58
-29%
99.72
21%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-19% / -22%
-21% / -20%
13% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

 
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
158 Points 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
158 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
157 Points -1%
HP ZBook Studio G3
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
149 Points -6%
Dell Precision 3510
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
144 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
729 Points +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
710 Points
HP ZBook Studio G3
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
706 Points -1%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
674 Points -5%
Dell Precision 3510
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
601 Points -15%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Fujitsu Celsius H760
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
1.79 Points
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
1.78 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
1.78 Points -1%
HP ZBook Studio G3
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
1.74 Points -3%
Dell Precision 3510
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.69 Points -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
7.99 Points +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
7.73 Points
HP ZBook Studio G3
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
7.7 Points 0%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
7.42 Points -4%
Dell Precision 3510
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
6.79 Points -12%
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
94.5 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.73 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.79 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
114 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
710 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
158 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Fujitsu Celsius H760
4028 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
4023 Points 0%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
4020 Points 0%
HP ZBook 15 G3
3959 Points -2%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
5537 Points +27%
HP ZBook 15 G3
4392 Points +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
4345 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
4291 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Fujitsu Celsius H760
5301 Points
HP ZBook 15 G3
5221 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
4372 Points -18%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
4246 Points -20%

Legend

 
Fujitsu Celsius H760 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e
 
HP ZBook 15 G3 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
 
Lenovo ThinkPad P50 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
 
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
Fujitsu Celsius H760
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
HP ZBook Studio G3
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Dell Precision 5510
SK hynix SC920 512 GB
MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL
2x Plextor PX512M6GV-2280 (RAID 0)
AS SSD
3%
-69%
-10%
-515%
-48%
Copy Game MB/s
978
1045
7%
206.7
-79%
1104
13%
349
-64%
Copy Program MB/s
571
480.1
-16%
171.3
-70%
593
4%
221
-61%
Copy ISO MB/s
1325
1391
5%
269.3
-80%
1280
-3%
387
-71%
Access Time Read *
0.036
0.036
-0%
0.058
-61%
0.046
-28%
0.111
-208%
0.054
-50%
Access Time Write *
0.018
0.025
-39%
0.038
-111%
0.025
-39%
0.74
-4011%
0.041
-128%
4K-64 Read
801
1067
33%
381.2
-52%
1050
31%
327
-59%
437.1
-45%
4K-64 Write
285
375.7
32%
258.3
-9%
230.6
-19%
257
-10%
375.8
32%
Seq Read
1916
1953
2%
515
-73%
1713
-11%
474
-75%
880
-54%
Seq Write
1492
1484
-1%
272.8
-82%
947
-37%
389
-74%
821
-45%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e
Sequential Read: 1916MB/s
Sequential Write: 1492MB/s
4K Read: 34MB/s
4K Write: 188MB/s
4K-64 Read: 801MB/s
4K-64 Write: 285MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.036ms
Access Time Write: 0.018ms
Copy ISO: 1325MB/s
Copy Program: 571MB/s
Copy Game: 978MB/s
Score Read: 1048Points
Score Write: 623Points
Score Total: 2201Points
SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
84.8 fps +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
74.7 fps +2%
Dell Precision 7710
73 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
73 fps
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
68.7 fps -6%
HP ZBook 15 G3
66 fps -10%
Dell Precision 3510
32 fps -56%
HP ZBook 15u G3
31.41 fps -57%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
65.8 fps +96%
Dell Precision 7710
63 fps +88%
HP ZBook 15 G3
35.87 fps +7%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
33.6 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
32.86 fps -2%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
32.41 fps -4%
Dell Precision 3510
26 fps -23%
HP ZBook 15u G3
19.89 fps -41%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
43.81 fps +95%
Dell Precision 7710
37 fps +64%
HP ZBook 15 G3
23.86 fps +6%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
22.5 fps
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
21.15 fps -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
20.58 fps -9%
Dell Precision 3510
14 fps -38%
HP ZBook 15u G3
4.98 fps -78%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Dell Precision 7710
27 fps +84%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
22.34 fps +52%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
18.19 fps +24%
HP ZBook 15 G3
15.03 fps +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
14.7 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
14.43 fps -2%
HP ZBook 15u G3
6.09 fps -59%
Dell Precision 3510
5.9 fps -60%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
50.4 fps +42%
Dell Precision 7710
46 fps +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
37.15 fps +5%
HP ZBook 15 G3
35.94 fps +1%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
35.55 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
35.5 fps
Dell Precision 3510
22 fps -38%
HP ZBook 15u G3
16.38 fps -54%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
4.85 fps +52%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
3.98 fps +25%
HP ZBook 15 G3
3.29 fps +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
3.19 fps
Dell Precision 7710
3.17 fps -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
3.13 fps -2%
HP ZBook 15u G3
0.41 fps -87%
Dell Precision 3510
0.38 fps -88%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
64.8 fps +62%
Dell Precision 7710
50 fps +25%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
45 fps +13%
HP ZBook 15 G3
40.61 fps +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
40 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
39.39 fps -2%
Dell Precision 3510
20 fps -50%
HP ZBook 15u G3
16.87 fps -58%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
77.9 fps +66%
Dell Precision 7710
58 fps +23%
HP ZBook 15 G3
47.08 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
47 fps
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
45.28 fps -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
44.98 fps -4%
Dell Precision 3510
23 fps -51%
HP ZBook 15u G3
18.62 fps -60%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)
Fujitsu Celsius H760
40 fps
SPECviewperf 11
1920x1080 Siemens NX
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
49.91 fps +16%
Dell Precision 7710
49 fps +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
43.29 fps +1%
HP ZBook 15 G3
43.17 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
43 fps
Dell Precision 3510
30 fps -30%
1920x1080 Tcvis
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
56.3 fps +28%
HP ZBook 15 G3
44.89 fps +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
44 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
43.79 fps 0%
Dell Precision 7710
36 fps -18%
Dell Precision 3510
8 fps -82%
1920x1080 SolidWorks
Dell Precision 7710
74 fps +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
53 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
53 fps
HP ZBook 15 G3
48.13 fps -9%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
48.01 fps -9%
Dell Precision 3510
30 fps -43%
1920x1080 Pro/ENGINEER
Fujitsu Celsius H760
23 fps
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
22.46 fps -2%
HP ZBook 15 G3
21.57 fps -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
21.27 fps -8%
Dell Precision 7710
11.7 fps -49%
Dell Precision 3510
4.3 fps -81%
1920x1080 Maya
Dell Precision 7710
106 fps +83%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
58 fps
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
57.8 fps 0%
HP ZBook 15 G3
57.7 fps -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
57.3 fps -1%
Dell Precision 3510
21 fps -64%
1920x1080 Lightwave
Dell Precision 7710
84 fps +53%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
56.4 fps +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
55 fps
HP ZBook 15 G3
52 fps -5%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
51.9 fps -6%
Dell Precision 3510
36 fps -35%
1920x1080 Ensight
Dell Precision 7710
70 fps +52%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
59.1 fps +28%
HP ZBook 15 G3
46.68 fps +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
46 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
45.8 fps 0%
Dell Precision 3510
24 fps -48%
1920x1080 Catia
Dell Precision 7710
61 fps +9%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
56 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
54.1 fps -3%
HP ZBook 15 G3
53.5 fps -4%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA
53.4 fps -5%
Dell Precision 3510
13 fps -77%

Legend

 
Fujitsu Celsius H760 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e
 
Lenovo ThinkPad P50 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
 
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
 
HP ZBook 15 G3 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
 
Dell Precision 3510 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, AMD FirePro W5130M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
 
HP ZBook 15u G3 Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
 
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
 
Dell Precision 7710 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5, AMD FirePro W7170M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Core i7-6820HQ
30495 Points +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
30255 Points
HP ZBook 15 G3
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
30236 Points 0%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
26869 Points -11%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
4193 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Core i7-6820HQ
4126 Points +2%
HP ZBook 15 G3
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
4091 Points +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
4053 Points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Sala GPUs-only
HP ZBook 15 G3
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
1556 Samples/s +62%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Core i7-6820HQ
1426 Samples/s +48%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
961 Samples/s
Room GPUs-only
HP ZBook 15 G3
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
930 Samples/s +49%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Core i7-6820HQ
791 Samples/s +26%
Fujitsu Celsius H760
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
626 Samples/s
Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit
Fujitsu Celsius H760
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
94.5 fps
HP ZBook 15 G3
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
94 fps -1%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
93.5 fps -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Core i7-6820HQ
43.32 fps -54%
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
90607 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
18192 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3794 points
Help
lowmed.highultra
Metro: Last Light (2013) 118.9 94.8 55.3 29.5
Dirt Rally (2015) 272 136 76 33
The Witcher 3 (2015) 68 49 22 15

Noise Level

Idle
29 / 29 / 29 dB(A)
HDD
29 dB(A)
Load
43.1 / 49.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Max. Load
 25.3 °C30.1 °C38.5 °C 
 26.8 °C32.5 °C35.1 °C 
 23.7 °C26.2 °C24.6 °C 
Maximum: 38.5 °C
Average: 29.2 °C
29.3 °C42.8 °C27.1 °C
36.9 °C35.4 °C25.7 °C
25.3 °C31.4 °C24.2 °C
Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 30.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  45.9 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fennel FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.1 °C / 89.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-4.3 °C / -7.8 F).
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7.7 / 11.8 / 12.9 Watt
Load midlight 90.2 / 130.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Fujitsu Celsius H760
E3-1505M v5, Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
E3-1535M v5, Quadro M2000M, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512), IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"
HP ZBook 15 G3
E3-1505M v5, Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e, UWVA-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
6820HQ, Quadro M2000M, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Dell Precision 3510
6700HQ, FirePro W5130M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"
Power Consumption
-103%
5%
21%
36%
Idle Minimum *
7.7
23.9
-210%
5.7
26%
5.6
27%
4.2
45%
Idle Average *
11.8
28.9
-145%
12.2
-3%
8.6
27%
6.5
45%
Idle Maximum *
12.9
30
-133%
12.6
2%
9.3
28%
7.1
45%
Load Average *
90.2
95.2
-6%
83.1
8%
89.5
1%
74.6
17%
Load Maximum *
130.8
157.1
-20%
138.2
-6%
105
20%
92.2
30%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
9h 17min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 33min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 46min
Fujitsu Celsius H760
E3-1505M v5, Quadro M2000M, 72 Wh
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)
E3-1535M v5, Quadro M2000M, 91 Wh
HP ZBook 15 G3
E3-1505M v5, Quadro M2000M, 90 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad P50
6820HQ, Quadro M2000M, 90 Wh
Dell Precision 3510
6700HQ, FirePro W5130M, 84 Wh
Battery Runtime
-38%
33%
52%
79%
Reader / Idle
557
268
-52%
822
48%
860
54%
1168
110%
H.264
273
449
64%
533
95%
605
122%
WiFi v1.3
333
239
-28%
386
16%
498
50%
591
77%
Load
106
70
-34%
110
4%
113
7%
111
5%

Pros

+ 机身稳定性
+ 工艺品质
+ 处理器性能
+ 显卡性能
+ 系统性能
+ 负载下的性能稳定性
+ 接口配备
+ 可定制性
+ 模块插槽
+ 多种质保和支持选项
+ 多种配件可供选择
+ 发热噪音低

Cons

- 使用电池时性能有所下降
- 屏幕的色域和色彩准确度
- 摄像头和扬声器
- 最高负载下的系统噪音

富士通Celsius H760是前代机型Celsius H740的改进版,它在各个方面都表现优秀。他的机身坚固优质,设计也看起来不差。

在实用性上,我们很喜欢它更新后的接口配备,丰富的配置组合和合理的性能水平。

在工作站这类产品中,用户当然不希望为强劲性能而放弃常见的商务特性。它搭载了完备的安全功能,优秀的输入设备和可选质保和服务,这都让它更加全面。

一项不显眼但十分重要的功能是内置的模块插槽。搭配不同的可选模块,它有了更高的灵活性,也可以与其他竞争对手有所区别。

它的摄像头表现中规中矩,噪音在最高负载下较高,使用电池时性能会有所下降,这些你可能能勉强接受,但它最大的问题是全高清屏幕面板。尽管这是一块不错的宽视角IPS屏幕,但它很难达到这个价位的平均水平。它不够优秀的色域覆盖和色彩准确性,以及可见的像素网格都在一定程度上影响了优秀性能所带来的良好印象,也会影响需要准确色彩的一些专业用途。

整体上,富士通的Celsius H760移动工作站相比同类产品不乏独特之处,根据配置不同,它的定价也十分合理。

 

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Fujitsu Celsius H760 - 10/12/2016 v5.1 (old)
Tobias Winkler

Chassis
93 / 98 → 95%
Keyboard
97%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
76 / 81 → 94%
Weight
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Battery
81%
Display
87%
Games Performance
86%
Application Performance
93%
Workstation
68%
Temperature
90 / 95 → 94%
Noise
83 / 90 → 92%
Audio
63%
Camera
21 / 85 → 25%
Average
78%
86%
Workstation - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 富士通 Celsius H760 工作站简短评测
Tobias Winkler, 2016-10-28 (Update: 2016-10-29)