华硕Chromebook Flip CX5回顾。高性能，高价格

Name: Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB
Brand: Asus

优秀的硬件...

在华硕Chromebook Flip CX5中遇到一个高质量的案例。几乎没有任何其他Chromebook ，拥有更强大的处理器或更多的内存。这款敞篷车提供了强大的性能，也适合游戏，正如用Steam游戏进行的一些测试所示。只有CX5的价格是令人讨厌的。

Marc Herter, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/24/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Chromebook Gaming Convertible / 2-in-1

对Chromebook的一个普遍偏见是，它们是动力不足的笔记本电脑，在日常生活中的存在要归功于它们纤细的操作系统。华硕Chromebook Flip CX5反驳了这种偏见。它拥有英特尔酷睿i7-1255U，16GB内存和快速的英特尔NVMe固态硬盘，能提供出色的性能。尽管有强大的硬件，但这台笔记本很安静，有很好的耐力。一支手写笔为其强大的功能锦上添花。

Chromebook Flip CX5有一种高质量的感觉。就像前代机型一样这要归功于金属、玻璃和塑料的稳定组合。此外，CX5的价格仍然远远超过1000欧元：华硕在去年CX5已经很高的价格上又增加了200欧元。去年的CX5的价格上再加200欧元，使其达到1400欧元。对于一个Chromebook ，这是一个非常高的价格。

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB

Processor

Intel Core i7-1255U 10 x 1.2 - 4.7 GHz, Alder Lake-U

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Memory

16 GB

Display

15.80 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 143 PPI, 10 point multitouch, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ, 512 GB

, 500 GB free

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3,5 mm Headset, Card Reader: Micro SD

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 358 x 260

Battery

55.4 Wh, 4800 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Google Chrome OS

Camera

Webcam: FullHD

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo 4 speakers, Keyboard: Chicklet, Keyboard Light: yes, Stylus, 24 Months Warranty, Guaranteed updates until Jun 2030

Weight

2.142 kg, Power Supply: 180 g

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

在我们的数据库中，有一些强大的Chromebooks，有高质量的外壳。然而，即使是联想IdeaPad GamingChromebook 16也没有华硕Chromebook CX5那么好的配置。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.8 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2.1 kg	20 mm	15.80"	1920x1200
83.4 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1.8 kg	19.95 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
83.7 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	1.4 kg	19.3 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
79.9 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 3015Ce, Vega 3	1.7 kg	18.6 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
79.4 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2022	Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 5 Chromebook SD 7c, Adreno 618	715 g	7.2 mm	13.30"	1920x1080
79.5 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2021	HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx SD 7c, Adreno 618	583 g	7.7 mm	11.00"	2160x1440
83.6 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2021	Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2 kg	18.5 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

机箱与设备 - 双USB-C与DisplayPort和PowerDelivery

在外观上，Chromebook Flip CX5的设计几乎没有变化。机箱的大部分仍然由塑料制成；只有显示器盖子是由铝制成的。除了双色版本外，现在还有一个制造精良的Chromebook 的黑色版本。端口的安排略有不同，只是在细节上可以注意到：这些端口现在为左侧的笔槽腾出了空间，而右侧增加了一个Kensington锁槽。最后，当前版本的CX5有三个USB接口，其中两个是带DisplayPort和PowerDelivery的USB-C。

尺寸比较

Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 5 Chromebook HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx DIN A4 ❌

USB 3.2 Gen 1，带PowerDelivery和DisplayPort的USB-C，Kensington锁插槽

手写笔、带PowerDelivery和DisplayPort的USB-C、HDMI、3.5毫米耳机接口、微型SD读卡器

Chromebook"的microSD读卡器相当快。我们观察到，使用Angelbird AV PRO microSD V60参考卡的传输速度高达90 MB/s。

网络摄像头的分辨率为210万像素。有一个机械性的隐私快门，可以防止窥视。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel Core i7-1255U	90 MB/s
Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years)	76 MB/s -16%
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP Intel Core i3-1115G4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	72 MB/s -20%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Intel Core i7-1165G7 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	57 MB/s -37%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Intel Core i5-1235U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	41.5 MB/s -54%
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c (Angelbird V60)	36.1 MB/s -60%
Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 AMD 3015Ce (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	32 MB/s -64%

ColorChecker Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB: 20.28 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 31.91 ∆E

维护

拧开Chromebook CX5是一件快速的事情。在里面我们发现一个可拆卸的英特尔NVMe固态硬盘和WLAN模块。在我们的测试装置中，没有胶粘的组件。电池、主板、子板和冷却系统也可以通过几个简单的步骤进行更换。然而，在拆除57Wh的电池时，我们注意到一些未使用的胶垫。因此，有可能该电池在其他设备中被胶合。

输入设备 - 触控笔在几秒钟内充电

这款15.8英寸的笔记本提供了充足的空间，华硕将其用于带有数字键盘的背光键盘。约1.4毫米的键程很好，键盘的触感也很好。键盘的背光是通过Alt键和上排的亮度键的组合来控制的。

触摸板和触摸屏对输入的反应迅速而准确。但输入选项中真正的明星显然是手写笔，它的重量只有6克。Chrome OS提供了一些可能性，，说明手写笔可以如何使用。华硕Chromebook Flip CX5的触控笔存放在左侧的笔仓中并进行充电。由于采用了电容技术，充电只需要几秒钟，这样就可以使用45分钟。然而，Chromebook 中的华硕笔并不像一些Windows笔记本电脑那样精确。据Krita称，该笔只提供256级压力。用这支笔绘画和书写还是可以的。

显示屏 - 普通IPS面板

这款二合一笔记本电脑配备了15.8英寸16:10格式的IPS显示屏。触摸屏的亮度为265cd/m²，由高反射玻璃覆盖。对比度高，视角稳定性好，但响应时间有点长，屏幕出血现象略微明显，色彩偏差大，该显示屏不是顶级型号，但可以使用。


263 cd/m²	276 cd/m²	280 cd/m²
272 cd/m²	287 cd/m²	276 cd/m²
239 cd/m²	258 cd/m²	229 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 287 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 264.4 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 287 cd/m²
Contrast: 5740:1 (Black: 0.05 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.26

	Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB IPS, 1920x1200, 15.8"	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 5 Chromebook OLED, 1920x1080, 13.3"	HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx IPS, 2160x1440, 11"	Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Response Times		36%	-18%	-28%	90%	-39%	-20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	30 ?(13, 17)	19.2 ?(10, 9.2) 36%	38 ?(20, 18) -27%	40 ?(19, 21) -33%	2.3 ?(1.1, 1.2) 92%	46.4 ?(22.8, 23.6) -55%	35 ?(16, 19) -17%
Response Time Black / White *	22 ?(12, 10)	14 ?(8.4, 5.6) 36%	24 ?(13, 11) -9%	27 ?(15, 12) -23%	2.6 ?(1.2, 1.4) 88%	26.8 ?(15.2, 11.6) -22%	27 ?(15, 12) -23%
PWM Frequency			25000 ?(80)	200 ?(10)	60.2 ?(100)
Screen		-41%	-50%	-44%	50%	-66%	-22%
Brightness middle	287	364.2 27%	242 -16%	200 -30%	358 25%	447.8 56%	282 -2%
Brightness	264	349 32%	225 -15%	196 -26%	366 39%	427 62%	259 -2%
Brightness Distribution	80	89 11%	82 3%	84 5%	97 21%	88 10%	84 5%
Black Level *	0.05	0.32 -540%	0.18 -260%	0.2 -300%		0.45 -800%	0.15 -200%
Contrast	5740	1138 -80%	1344 -77%	1000 -83%		995 -83%	1880 -67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.33	1.28 80%	6.61 -4%	4.82 24%	1.93 70%	1.48 77%	5.55 12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	17.48	3.49 80%	22.53 -29%	20.61 -18%	4.78 73%	2.6 85%	7.46 57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.2	2.4 61%	6.21 -0%	1.64 74%	1.6 74%	1.9 69%	4.97 20%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.21 ^100%	2.54 ^87%	2.43 ^91%	2.22 ^99%	2.08 ^106%	2.41 ^91%
CCT	6120 ^106%	6400 ^102%	6373 ^102%	6475 ^100%	6238 ^104%	6624 ^98%	6473 ^100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-3% / -26%	-34% / -43%	-36% / -41%	70% / 60%	-53% / -60%	-21% / -22%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在阳光下或光线明亮的房间里使用华硕Chromebook CX5 Flip是有问题的。高反射率的显示屏根本没有足够的亮度来超越明亮物体的反射。但由于屏幕具有良好的视角稳定性，笔记本电脑通常可以放置在这样的地方，使反光不至于让人分心。

性能 - 最强大的Chromebook?

对于一个Chromebook ，CX5装备精良：16GB内存和英特尔酷睿i7足以为超薄的操作系统提供动力。办公和互联网应用对笔记本电脑来说没有问题。游戏也是可能的：我们在这里通过Steam安装和测试了一些游戏。

处理器

Chromebook Flip CX5采用了强大的英特尔酷睿i7-1255U。这款高端芯片配备了两个P-cores和八个E-cores。十二个线程确保了强大的多任务处理能力。通过集成的英特尔Iris Xe，甚至可以完成要求苛刻的图形任务。在大多数基准测试中，Chromebook 提供了相对较强的数值。

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 6.0: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench ML: 0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5

CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Convertible	100 pt
Average Intel Core i7-1255U	91.9 pt
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel Core i7-1255U	77.1 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 ^-3! Intel Core i5-1235U	76.2 pt
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA ^-2! Intel Core i7-1165G7	73.5 pt
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP ^-3! Intel Core i3-1115G4	51.8 pt
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx ^-2! Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c	42.6 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 5 Chromebook ^-3! Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c	28.8 pt
Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 ^-3! AMD 3015Ce	23.7 pt

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years)	8658 Points +94%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (4463 - 8821, n=11)	7283 Points +63%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Intel Core i5-1235U	5528 Points +24%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel Core i7-1255U	4463 Points
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Intel Core i7-1165G7	3872 Points -13%
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP Intel Core i3-1115G4	2699 Points -40%
Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 5 Chromebook Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c	1725 Points -61%
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c	1687 Points -62%
Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 AMD 3015Ce	1135 Points -75%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (1560 - 1712, n=11)	1644 Points +5%
Average of class Convertible (319 - 2003, n=63, last 2 years)	1642 Points +5%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel Core i7-1255U	1563 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Intel Core i5-1235U	1456 Points -7%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Intel Core i7-1165G7	1302 Points -17%
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP Intel Core i3-1115G4	1190 Points -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 5 Chromebook Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c	620 Points -60%
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c	597 Points -62%
Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 AMD 3015Ce	564 Points -64%

Geekbench 6.0 / Multi-Core
Average of class Convertible (4534 - 11952, n=7, last 2 years)	8492 Points +87%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (4534 - 8791, n=2)	6663 Points +47%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel Core i7-1255U	4534 Points

Geekbench 6.0 / Single-Core
Average of class Convertible (1760 - 2384, n=7, last 2 years)	2061 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (1760 - 2227, n=2)	1994 Points +13%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel Core i7-1255U	1760 Points

Geekbench ML / 0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel Core i7-1255U	353 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U ()	353 Points 0%
Average of class Convertible (last 2 years)	353 Points 0%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Intel Core i7-1165G7	341 Points -3%
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c	254 Points -28%

系统性能

尽管新的华硕Chromebook Flip CX5提供了比前代产品更强大的处理器，但两款Chromebook在系统性能方面几乎不相上下。其中一个原因可能是内存稍微慢一些。英特尔固态硬盘670p似乎明显比其前代产品慢。因此，尽管华硕设备拥有强大的处理器，但却没有达到预期。

PCMark for Android / Work 3.0
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	12778 Points +10%
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX016N	11801 Points +2%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ	11617 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ()	11617 Points 0%
Average of class Convertible (last 2 years)	11617 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT256G	11558 Points -1%
Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 Vega 3, 3015Ce, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9775 Points -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 5 Chromebook Adreno 618, SD 7c, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9644 Points -17%
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx Adreno 618, SD 7c, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8837 Points -24%

CrXPRT 2 / Score
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	181 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT256G	177 Points +2%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ	173 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ()	173 Points 0%
Average of class Convertible (last 2 years)	173 Points 0%
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX016N	147 Points -15%
Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 Vega 3, 3015Ce, 64 GB eMMC Flash	71 Points -59%
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx Adreno 618, SD 7c, 128 GB eMMC Flash	53 Points -69%

CrXPRT 2 / Photo Effects
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx Adreno 618, SD 7c, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1201 Points +313%
Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 Vega 3, 3015Ce, 64 GB eMMC Flash	506 Points +74%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT256G	297 Points +2%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ	291 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ()	291 Points 0%
Average of class Convertible (last 2 years)	291 Points 0%
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX016N	243 Points -16%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	206 Points -29%

CrXPRT 2 / Face Detection
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx Adreno 618, SD 7c, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8968 Points +224%
Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 Vega 3, 3015Ce, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4874 Points +76%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT256G	3085 Points +11%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ	2767 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ()	2767 Points 0%
Average of class Convertible (last 2 years)	2767 Points 0%
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX016N	1825 Points -34%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	1546 Points -44%

CrXPRT 2 / Offline Notes
Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 Vega 3, 3015Ce, 64 GB eMMC Flash	204 Points +325%
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx Adreno 618, SD 7c, 128 GB eMMC Flash	201 Points +319%
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX016N	88 Points +83%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	73 Points +52%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT256G	50 Points +4%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ	48 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ()	48 Points 0%
Average of class Convertible (last 2 years)	48 Points 0%

CrXPRT 2 / Stocks Dashboard
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx Adreno 618, SD 7c, 128 GB eMMC Flash	305 Points +259%
Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 Vega 3, 3015Ce, 64 GB eMMC Flash	302 Points +255%
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX016N	130 Points +53%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	115 Points +35%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT256G	105 Points +24%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ	85 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ()	85 Points 0%
Average of class Convertible (last 2 years)	85 Points 0%

CrXPRT 2 / DNA Sequence Analysis
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx Adreno 618, SD 7c, 128 GB eMMC Flash	757 Points +301%
Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 Vega 3, 3015Ce, 64 GB eMMC Flash	566 Points +199%
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX016N	310 Points +64%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT256G	209 Points +11%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ	189 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ()	189 Points 0%
Average of class Convertible (last 2 years)	189 Points 0%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	174 Points -8%

CrXPRT 2 / 3D Shapes
Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 Vega 3, 3015Ce, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7512 Points +49%
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx Adreno 618, SD 7c, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7372 Points +47%
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX016N	5358 Points +7%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7	5149 Points +2%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ	5026 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ()	5026 Points 0%
Average of class Convertible (last 2 years)	5026 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT256G	2749 Points -45%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ	249 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT256G	231 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (183.4 - 249, n=9)	229 Points -8%
Average of class Convertible (49.4 - 314, n=59, last 2 years)	229 Points -8%

PCMark for Android | PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V10

PCMark for Android - Storage 2.0
Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 64 GB eMMC Flash	24872 Points +151%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA	20627 Points +108%
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX016N	20509 Points +107%
Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 5 Chromebook 64 GB eMMC Flash	19557 Points +98%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ	9895 Points
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ ()	9895 Points 0%
Average of class Convertible (last 2 years)	9895 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT256G	9253 Points -6%

PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V10
Disk Tests
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ	209998 Points
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ ()	209998 Points 0%
Average of class Convertible (last 2 years)	209998 Points 0%
Storage Read
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ	2214 MB/s
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ ()	2214 MB/s 0%
Average of class Convertible (last 2 years)	2214 MB/s 0%
Storage Write
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ	3284 MB/s
Average Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ ()	3284 MB/s 0%
Average of class Convertible (last 2 years)	3284 MB/s 0%

图形卡

集成在i7上的96EU的Iris Xe可能是目前能在Chromebook 。在Windows下，该芯片在有限的程度上也适用于游戏。然而，在测试的Android 应用程序中，Chromebook 只对该芯片的图形潜力进行了有限的利用。尽管如此，我们通过Steam进行的游戏测试表明，该笔记本的游戏性能可以与Windows笔记本相媲美。

3DMark | GPUScore: Sacred Path

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Convertible (824 - 15282, n=9, last 2 years)	4587 Points +109%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1978 - 4255, n=19)	3450 Points +57%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	2191 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1235U	1854 Points -15%
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Intel Core i3-1115G4	1647 Points -25%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Convertible (8426 - 48110, n=3, last 2 years)	23738 Points +182%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6964 - 13177, n=8)	9850 Points +17%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	8426 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1235U	8186 Points -3%
Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Intel Core i3-1115G4	5974 Points -29%

GPUScore: Sacred Path - 2560x1440 Official
Average of class Convertible (3.65 - 139.5, n=183, last 2 years)	50.2 fps +232%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.6 - 117.1, n=147)	44.7 fps +196%
Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	15.1 (0.5^min - 87.7^max) fps

游戏

同时，Steam现在可以在一些设备上的Chrome OS上运行。然而，这需要切换到Chrome OS的测试软件版本。同样的技术在Linux下或在Steam Deck.质子被用作兼容层，允许Windows游戏在Linux中播放。这是用Wine的修改版和一套强大的图形API实现来完成的。专门使用DirectX 12的游戏还不能在Linux或Chrome上运行。这里的另一个注意事项是，外部驱动器不能用于Chrome OS下的游戏安装。所以我们不得不重新下载所有的游戏，而不是使用我们的备份文件。

我们的许多游戏基准测试使用CapFrameX或Fraps软件来记录帧率。在Chrome OS上没有类似的软件。因此，我们不得不依靠我们的眼睛和Steam的帧率显示进行游戏测试。因此，下面列出的帧数应被视为近似值。我们发现，许多带有Vulkan、OpenGL或DirectX 11的游戏在Chrome OS下运行完美无缺。由于慷慨的内存和快速的英特尔酷睿i7，华硕Chromebook Flip CX5可以在中等图形设置下以全高清流畅地运行一些游戏。

游戏	1.920:1.200 低质量设置	1.920:1.200 中质量设置	备注
ARK: Survival Evolved	15 fps (normal settings) 30 fps (DirectX 10)
APEX Legends	20至45帧		需要很长时间才能使游戏顺利运行
Counter Strike:全球攻势		45fps
Dota 2	高达80fps	40fps	加载时间长，在游戏的前几秒出现卡顿现象
F1 2017	47fps	43fps	内部基准测试
发薪日2	70fps	40fps
火箭联盟	60fps	60fps	只能通过游戏手柄控制，键盘无法识别帧率锁定
Strange Brigade	60 fps	60 fps	帧率锁定不能被关闭，游戏运行稳定基准崩溃

通过质子游戏的一个特点是，在游戏运行良好之前可能需要一些时间。着色器是在后台预编译的，随着时间的推移，游戏的性能会提高。虽然几乎所有上述游戏一开始都很难玩，但几分钟就足以让帧数达到一个稳定的良好水平。

排放和能源。安静的风扇和强大的扬声器

噪声

与许多其他Chromebook不同，CX5有一个风扇。然而，这几乎是听不到的。该笔记本的最大音量为28 dB(A)，只有在特别安静的房间里才能听到。大多数时候，Chromebook ，不使用其风扇也能过关。

Noise Level

Idle		26 / 26 / 26.7 dB(A)
Load		28.1 / 28.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)

	Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT256G	Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX016N	Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7
Noise		4%	-4%	-9%
Idle Minimum *	26	23 12%	25.4 2%	26 -0%
Idle Average *	26	24.6 5%	25.4 2%	26 -0%
Idle Maximum *	26.7	25 6%	25.4 5%	26 3%
Load Average *	28.1	27.3 3%	32.1 -14%	28.5 -1%
Load Maximum *	28.4	29.6 -4%	32.3 -14%	41.8 -47%
off / environment *		23	25.4	26

* ... smaller is better

温度

尽管风扇大多不活跃，但二合一笔记本电脑的表面温度仍在限制范围内。掌托即使在负载下也保持凉爽。

Max. Load

Idle


29.2 °C	30.2 °C	25.9 °C
30.7 °C	28.7 °C	23.5 °C
24.3 °C	23.1 °C	21.8 °C

Maximum: 30.7 °C
Average: 26.4 °C


23.9 °C	31.4 °C	38.4 °C
24.3 °C	33.6 °C	27.6 °C
21.3 °C	22.5 °C	23.2 °C

Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 27.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.6 °C | Room Temperature 22.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-360 // 260 // 900 // FIRT 550-Pocket // Raytek Raynger ST // Fluke 62 Mini

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.3 °C / 75.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+3.8 °C / 6.9 F).

	Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP Intel Core i3-1115G4, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 AMD 3015Ce, AMD Radeon RX Vega 3	Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 5 Chromebook Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c, Qualcomm Adreno 618	HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c, Qualcomm Adreno 618	Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat		-6%	-7%	-21%	-1%	-12%	-6%
Maximum Upper Side *	30.7	35.2 -15%	32.5 -6%	37.4 -22%	34.6 -13%	38 -24%	36.9 -20%
Maximum Bottom *	38.4	40.8 -6%	35.9 7%	47.2 -23%	41.6 -8%	42.4 -10%	41.4 -8%
Idle Upper Side *	26.6	26 2%	28.8 -8%	31.7 -19%	22.4 16%	28 -5%	25.4 5%
Idle Bottom *	26.7	27.6 -3%	32.5 -22%	31.8 -19%	26.2 2%	29 -9%	26.9 -1%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

华硕Chromebook Flip CX5内置四个扬声器，即两个朝上的高音扬声器和两个朝下的中/低音驱动器。这导致了一种平衡的声音。只有低音有点弱。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

消耗功率

Chromebook Flip CX5在耗电方面相当经济，最大功率为35瓦。在空闲模式下，我们测得的功耗为4.3至8.7瓦，这使该敞篷车略高于平均Chromebook 。然而，强大的i7也需要更多一点的电力。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.35 / 0.45 Watt
Idle	4.3 / 8 / 8.7 Watt
Load	14.7 / 35.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.8"	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT256G, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX016N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 3015Ce, Vega 3, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 5 Chromebook SD 7c, Adreno 618, 64 GB eMMC Flash, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.3"	HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx SD 7c, Adreno 618, 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2160x1440, 11"	Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Average of class Convertible
Power Consumption		-21%	19%	27%	45%	53%	16%	-71%	-71%
Idle Minimum *	4.3	5.7 -33%	4.2 2%	3.9 9%	0.96 78%	1.7 60%	3.4 21%	5.34 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=193) -24%	5.21 ?(1.8 - 16.6, n=60, last 2 years) -21%
Idle Average *	8	9.8 -23%	6.7 16%	6.3 21%	6.7 16%	5.2 35%	6.5 19%	8.55 ?(3.8 - 63, n=193) -7%	8.16 ?(4.2 - 20.7, n=60, last 2 years) -2%
Idle Maximum *	8.7	9.9 -14%	7.4 15%	6.8 22%	6.8 22%	5.3 39%	7.8 10%	10.8 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=193) -24%	11.1 ?(4.5 - 33.9, n=60, last 2 years) -28%
Load Average *	14.7	14.3 3%	9.7 34%	12 18%	9 39%	6.1 59%	12.5 15%	45.3 ?(12.5 - 87.3, n=193) -208%	46.2 ?(14.6 - 85, n=60, last 2 years) -214%
Load Maximum *	35.4	49.4 -40%	25.3 29%	12.3 65%	11.4 68%	10.6 70%	30.1 15%	67.5 ?(30.1 - 123.3, n=193) -91%	67 ?(24.9 - 120.8, n=60, last 2 years) -89%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption idle mode

Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø5.37 (4.78-6.7)

Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs: Ø5.66 (4.93-28.6)

Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 3015Ce, Vega 3: Ø5.67 (5.47-6.72)

Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø5.15 (4.7-26.4)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB: Ø4.09 (3.57-5.47)

电池寿命

华硕Chromebook Flip CX5在WiFi网上冲浪测试中可能超过10小时，在闲置模式下可能达到18小时的电池电量。虽然这些是非常体面的运行时间，但它们也不完全具有代表性。这是因为在这两项测试中，无法控制的键盘背光被关闭。至少在实践中，在没有电池的情况下，超过9小时的运行时间是可能的。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		17h 33min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 32min

	Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55.4 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming Chromebook 16 i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 71 Wh	Acer Chromebook 514 CB514-1WT-36DP i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 50.3 Wh	Asus Chromebook Flip CM1 3015Ce, Vega 3, 50 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 5 Chromebook SD 7c, Adreno 618, 42 Wh	HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx SD 7c, Adreno 618, 32 Wh	Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh	Average of class Convertible
Battery Runtime		-36%	-16%	-17%	4%	-11%	-11%	11%
Reader / Idle	1053							1344 ?(528 - 3353, n=22, last 2 years) 28%
WiFi v1.3	632	405 -36%	533 -16%	524 -17%	660 4%	563 -11%	561 -11%	594 ?(305 - 981, n=61, last 2 years) -6%

Pros

+ i7和16GB内存带来的高性能

+ 大型NVMe SSD

+ 稳定的温度

+ 与USB-C PD和DisplayPort的广泛连接

+ WiFi 6E

+ 电池寿命长

+ 良好的声音

+ 保证更新至2030年6月

Cons

- 反射式显示器，只有250cd/m²

- 高价格

结论 - 可惜太贵了

华硕Chromebook Flip CX5证明了Chromebooks不一定是无聊的。凭借高于平均水平的性能，该笔记本几乎在所有领域都证明了自己。英特尔酷睿i7-1255U与16GB内存的结合确保了Chromebook Flip CX5的速度非常快。然而，Chromebook 的强大计算能力应该用于什么的问题仍然存在。除了游戏（仍处于测试阶段），几乎没有任何应用能充分利用该处理器的能力。关于缺陷，我们看到屏幕上有真正的改进潜力。光面显示屏应该更亮，以确保在任何情况下都有良好的可读性。如果安装了OLED显示屏，那么这款敞篷车的价格就合理了。

华硕Chromebook Flip CX5以强大的性能和高质量的外壳给人留下深刻印象。只有屏幕显示出轻微的缺陷。

由于其键盘、触摸板、触摸屏和手写笔，Chromebook ，可用于开展各种数字项目。Chrome操作系统不断增长的兼容性在这里也有帮助。Google Play商店、Chrome网络商店以及现在的Steam都提供了大量的应用程序和游戏，其中大部分都能在该设备上顺利运行。此外，谷歌保证在2030年中期之前对该设备进行更新。

这款笔记本的价格是一个明显的负面因素。1,400欧元简直太贵了。一些联想、戴尔和其他公司的带手写板的可转换笔记本具有可比性的功能和Windows系统，价格在1,000欧元左右。负担得起的游戏笔记本电脑和低成本多媒体笔记本电脑也可以考虑作为替代品。

价格和可用性

华硕Chromebook Flip CX5的全球供应似乎有限。在德国，制造商在其网站上对该笔记本的价格要求很高，约为EUR 1400在其网站上，该笔记本电脑的价格很高。建议其他国家的感兴趣的买家定期通过华硕的网站或亚马逊查询供货情况。

Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5601FB - 02/24/2023 v7 ^(old)
Marc Herter

Chassis

83 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

81%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

56 / 75 → 75%

Weight

62 / 20-75 → 77%

Battery

89%

Display

77%

Games Performance

69 / 78 → 88%

Application Performance

97 / 85 → 100%

Temperature

96%

Noise

95%

Audio

78 / 91 → 85%

Camera

34 / 85 → 40%

Average

77%

85%

Convertible - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.