Chuwi CoreBook X笔记本电脑评论。像华为MateBook,但更便宜
CoreBook X是Chuwi最新推出的钱包友好型笔记本电脑,零售价低于550美元。与该制造商的大多数其他型号一样,CoreBook X将显示质量和视觉吸引力放在首位,整合了一个高分辨率的3:2 160 x 1440显示屏,包裹着一个光滑的金属合金和塑料底盘。为了控制成本,该系统采用了较慢的部件,包括三年前的第八代英特尔酷睿i5-8259U CPU,而不是较新的第十代或第十一代部件。
这一领域的竞争者包括其他廉价的多媒体笔记本电脑,如 Honor MagicBook 14, 华硕VivoBook 14, 或 Acer Swift 5.然而,很明显,CoreBook X试图模仿价格较高的3:2笔记本电脑,如 华为MateBook X Pro或 微软Surface Laptop 4.
更多Chuwi评论。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Chuwi CoreBook X i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 1.5 kg | 20.6 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
80.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Infinix INBook X1 Pro i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.5 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | SCHENKER Vision 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | ||
84.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2021 | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 967 g | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1 kg | 14.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
案例
机箱与LarkBook等其他Chuwi机型相似,都是由相同的灰色金属和塑料材料组合而成。不幸的是,这些材料只在远处看起来不错,因为拿着的时候感觉比较弱。硬度远不及其他金属笔记本电脑,如 戴尔XPS或惠普Spectre等其他金属笔记本电脑,但与便宜的塑料笔记本电脑相比,它仍然是一个进步,如 华硕VivoBook或 Acer Aspire 1等更符合其价格范围的廉价塑料笔记本电脑相比,它仍然是一个进步。
该系统比许多其他14英寸笔记本电脑厚了几毫米。由于采用更大的3:2外形尺寸,它也明显重了几百克。
连接性
虽然Chuwi宣传USB-A端口具有3.0的速度,但我们用USB 3.0驱动器进行的实际测试只能达到约40至60 MB/s的最高速度,更接近于USB 2.0。值得庆幸的是,另一侧更快的USB-C端口同时支持Power Delivery和DisplayPort,分别用于充电和对接目的。
SD卡阅读器
将1GB的照片从我们的UHS-II测试卡上移到桌面上,大约需要40秒,速度偏慢。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 (AV PRO V60) | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X (AV PRO V60) | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro (AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 (AV PRO V60) | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro (AV Pro V60) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X (AV PRO V60) |
沟通
包括一个英特尔7265,用于2x2 Wi-Fi 5(802.11ac)和蓝牙4.2兼容。传输速率对于浏览和视频流来说足够稳定,即使它们远没有最新的英特尔AX200/201 Wi-Fi 6模块那么快,而且可能偶尔会出现下滑。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Chuwi CoreBook X |
网络摄像头
即使按照笔记本电脑的标准,网络摄像头也是非常模糊的,特别是在边缘和角落。没有用于控制隐私的快门。
维护
只用一把飞利浦螺丝刀就可以很容易地拆下底板。然而,它的边缘很锋利,所以用户应该小心。内存(1个SODIMM)和存储(1个M.2 2280)都是可以升级的。默认情况下,有8GB的焊接单通道内存。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和小型用户指南外,盒子里没有其他附件。根据地区不同,申请保修可能会有困难,因为用户可能需要运送到海外。
输入设备
键盘
键盘反馈比其他大多数超极本更清晰、更有力,让人有更满意的打字体验。请记住,为了给全尺寸的方向键腾出空间,右边的Shift键的尺寸被缩小了。
触摸板
点击板的空间非常大,有12 x 7.9厘米,而且它的反馈比其他大多数点击板更硬、更响亮。然而,手指在滑过时往往会粘得更紧,因此,点击板的表面可以更光滑。
显示
Chuwi正在使用完全相同的P140ZKA-BZ1 IPS面板,因为发现在 2020年华为MateBook 14.这是一个高质量的面板,具有更深的对比度,更明亮的背光,以及比大多数其他笔记本电脑在这个预算价格范围内更广泛的颜色,包括新的 英菲尼克斯INBook X1.
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 355.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1045:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.23
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
68.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.02
Chuwi CoreBook X Chi Mei P140ZKA-BZ1, IPS, 14", 2160x1440 | Infinix INBook X1 Pro BOE NV140FHM-N62, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | SCHENKER Vision 14 CSOT T3_MNE007ZA1_1, IPS, 14", 2880x1800 | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 BOE092E, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G LG Display LP140WU1-SPA1, IPS, 14", 1920x1200 | Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN AU Optronics AUO7490, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -7% | 8% | -3% | 24% | -0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.2 | 65.7 -2% | 75.4 12% | 64.8 -4% | 97.6 45% | 67 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 98 | 86.6 -12% | 99 1% | 96.3 -2% | 99.9 2% | 98.3 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.8 | 63.3 -8% | 76.4 11% | 66.1 -4% | 85.3 24% | 68.3 -1% |
Response Times | -46% | 17% | 21% | -6% | 33% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36.4 ? | 43.2 ? -19% | 32.8 ? 10% | 31.2 ? 14% | 45 ? -24% | 30 ? 18% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26.4 ? | 32 ? -21% | 20.4 ? 23% | 19.2 ? 27% | 23 ? 13% | 14 ? 47% |
PWM Frequency | 10000 ? | 200 ? -98% | ||||
Screen | -31% | 21% | 25% | 9% | 39% | |
Brightness middle | 355.3 | 282 -21% | 390 10% | 341 -4% | 352 -1% | 404 14% |
Brightness | 344 | 271 -21% | 387 13% | 313 -9% | 332 -3% | 377 10% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 74 -21% | 94 0% | 87 -7% | 91 -3% | 79 -16% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.24 29% | 0.29 15% | 0.27 21% | 0.22 35% | 0.25 26% |
Contrast | 1045 | 1175 12% | 1345 29% | 1263 21% | 1600 53% | 1616 55% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 6.1 2% | 2.8 55% | 1.76 72% | 2.89 53% | 1.47 76% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.96 | 14.05 -28% | 4.4 60% | 4.85 56% | 4.66 57% | 2.6 76% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.23 | 3.94 -220% | 1.8 -46% | 1.01 18% | 2.7 -120% | 0.84 32% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.9 | 8.7 -10% | 3.5 56% | 3.3 58% | 6.9 13% | 1.7 78% |
Gamma | 2.02 109% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.34 94% | 2.35 94% |
CCT | 7450 87% | 8672 75% | 6174 105% | 7233 90% | 7904 82% | 6662 98% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 76.4 | 66 | 76 | 63 | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 89 | 100 | 98 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -28% /
-29% | 15% /
18% | 14% /
18% | 9% /
10% | 24% /
30% |
* ... smaller is better
色彩空间涵盖了所有的sRGB标准,对于这样一台廉价的笔记本电脑来说,这是非常了不起的。Chuwi笔记本电脑的显示屏通常比笔记本电脑的其他部分质量更高,CoreBook X延续了这种趋势。
X-Rite色度计的测量结果显示,尽管上面提到了令人印象深刻的色彩覆盖率,但开箱后的显示屏校准效果很差。简而言之,制造商从奇美采购了高质量的面板,但它没有资源在工厂校准每一块。我们强烈建议校准面板或应用我们上述的ICC配置文件,以获得显示器的最大效益。正如我们下面的CalMAN结果所示,灰度和色彩deltaE值将得到明显改善。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 10000 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 10000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 10000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
室外的能见度是有限的,因为光泽的屏幕造成了严重的眩光。背光,虽然在室内时远非昏暗,但亮度不足以克服室外的环境照明。
业绩
处理器
CPU性能仅比我们数据库中配备相同的笔记本电脑的平均水平低几个百分点。 酷睿i5-8259UCPU,包括Apple's 2018款MacBook Pro 13.一般来说,性能最类似于 酷睿i5-8265U同时明显快于任何酷睿i3、赛扬或Atom解决方案,后者通常有较少的内核和线程。
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (1385 - 1567, n=5) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Dell Latitude 3400 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (369 - 386, n=5) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Dell Latitude 3400 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (3592 - 4025, n=5) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (959 - 991, n=4) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (575 - 687, n=7) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Dell Latitude 3400 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Dell Latitude 3400 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (132 - 154, n=6) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (688 - 769, n=6) | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (3753 - 4022, n=6) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (17799 - 28824, n=6) | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (948 - 984, n=3) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (3359 - 3839, n=3) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (4.72 - 5.49, n=6) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (62.7 - 76, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (0.738 - 0.818, n=5) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
PCMark得分一直低于采用较新的第10代或第11代英特尔CPU的笔记本电脑,特别是在数字内容创作方面,Iris Xe可以在现在过时的Iris Plus 655系列中发挥其力量。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (3284 - 4132, n=6) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (7364 - 8351, n=6) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (4390 - 6400, n=6) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (2679 - 3902, n=6) |
PCMark 10 Score | 4062 points | |
Help |
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时的DPC延迟问题。在60 FPS的情况下,4K视频播放很流畅,没有任何掉帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备在发货时配备了一个512GB的 金士顿RBUSNS8154P3512GJ这是一款经济型PCIe 3 NVMe SSD。读取率最高为1600MB/s,而西部数据SN730或SK Hynix PC601的读取率是其两倍多。然而,对于目标预算用户和要求不高的应用,这仍然是一个非常快的驱动器。
Chuwi CoreBook X Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Infinix INBook X1 Pro Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13 | SCHENKER Vision 14 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG | Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 14% | 165% | 92% | 70% | 13% | |
Seq Read | 1393 | 2135 53% | 4899 252% | 3021 117% | 2975 114% | 1405 1% |
Seq Write | 954 | 1776 86% | 3952 314% | 2341 145% | 1261 32% | 1011 6% |
4K Read | 39.51 | 28.88 -27% | 83.8 112% | 47.9 21% | 49.97 26% | 53.7 36% |
4K Write | 98.9 | 147.9 50% | 205 107% | 186.7 89% | 168.4 70% | 122.7 24% |
4K-64 Read | 834 | 712 -15% | 2938 252% | 1472 76% | 1539 85% | 803 -4% |
4K-64 Write | 687 | 643 -6% | 2077 202% | 1829 166% | 1517 121% | 810 18% |
Access Time Read * | 0.066 | 0.052 21% | 0.025 62% | 0.06 9% | 0.036 45% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.044 | 0.092 -109% | 0.02 55% | 0.021 52% | 0.026 41% | 0.032 27% |
Score Read | 1013 | 954 -6% | 3512 247% | 1822 80% | 1886 86% | 997 -2% |
Score Write | 881 | 968 10% | 2677 204% | 2249 155% | 1811 106% | 1034 17% |
Score Total | 2399 | 2395 0% | 7939 231% | 4973 107% | 4579 91% | 2536 6% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 983 | 1296 32% | 2100 114% | 1510 54% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 643 | 900 40% | 994 55% | 950 48% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 920 | 1588 73% | 1859 102% | 1470 60% | ||
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 72% | 249% | 120% | 103% | 17% | |
Write 4K | 130.5 | 228.3 75% | 240 84% | 223.7 71% | 198.9 52% | 77.8 -40% |
Read 4K | 38.72 | 60.7 57% | 90.9 135% | 51.2 32% | 55.9 44% | 46.98 21% |
Write Seq | 709 | 1895 167% | 4236 497% | 2579 264% | 2441 244% | 1054 49% |
Read Seq | 717 | 1573 119% | 4101 472% | 2553 256% | 1939 170% | 1137 59% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 510 | 476.6 -7% | 662 30% | 671 32% | 631 24% | 474.5 -7% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 554 | 592 7% | 720 30% | 761 37% | 704 27% | 601 8% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1037 | 2136 106% | 5222 404% | 2721 162% | 2566 147% | 1062 2% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1609 | 2413 50% | 7102 341% | 3358 109% | 3451 114% | 2309 44% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 43% /
35% | 207% /
196% | 106% /
104% | 87% /
82% | 15% /
15% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
根据3DMark,图形性能比一般的Iris Plus 655要慢。 平均Iris Plus 655在我们的数据库中慢了大约10%到15%。我们将较差的结果归因于有限的8GB单通道内存,而不是更常见的双通道16GB。升级到一个较新的 Iris Plus G7 Ice Lake 平台可以使用户的GPU功率提高50%到60%。
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (1365 - 3081, n=8) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Dell Latitude 3400 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (1245 - 2688, n=8) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Dell Latitude 3400 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2836 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 10632 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1562 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 588 points | |
Help |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (9.11 - 18.1, n=8) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 | |
1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (7.88 - 9.73, n=4) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
1920x1080 High Quality | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (5.25 - 6.55, n=4) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X |
X-Plane 11.11 | |
1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (13.8 - 42.8, n=7) | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (9.75 - 29.5, n=7) | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN | |
Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (8.55 - 25.1, n=7) | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 24.7 | 14.6 | 10.9 | 5.6 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 92.6 | 57 | 27.8 | 24.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 15.6 | 7.88 | 5.25 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 21.2 | 15.3 | 13.4 |
Emissions
系统噪音
在桌面上空转时,内部风扇会空转,但即使是最轻微的动作,如网页浏览、启动应用程序或视频流,也会使风扇脉冲高达31.1分贝(A),而背景是24.9分贝(A)。
我们可以从我们的测试装置中注意到沉重的线圈啸叫或电子噪音,这是廉价或低质量组件的迹象。高音的噪音足以使敏感的用户感到不安。
Chuwi CoreBook X Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Infinix INBook X1 Pro Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13 | SCHENKER Vision 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG | Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | -2% | -1% | 6% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 24.9 | 24.6 1% | 25 -0% | 24 4% | 26 -4% | 25 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.5 | 25.1 2% | 25 2% | 24 6% | 26 -2% | 25 2% |
Idle Average * | 25.5 | 25.1 2% | 25 2% | 25 2% | 26 -2% | 25 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.1 | 25.1 14% | 26.9 8% | 28 4% | 26 11% | 25 14% |
Load Average * | 36.8 | 32.7 11% | 38.6 -5% | 36 2% | 30.5 17% | 34.7 6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.2 | 33.4 10% | 41.2 -11% | |||
Load Maximum * | 37.1 | 33.4 10% | 41.2 -11% | 46 -24% | 30.5 18% | 34 8% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.5 / 25.5 / 29.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.8 / 37.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.9 dB(A) |
温度
由于冷却解决方案的定位,左半边的表面温度总是比右半边高。热点的温度可以达到47摄氏度,而在机箱较冷的一侧只有34摄氏度。在运行更高的负载时,温度差异是明显的。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.4 °C / 90.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
压力测试
当使用Prime95时,CPU会提升到3 GHz,直到大约15秒后达到82 C。此后,时钟频率和温度将下降并分别稳定在2 GHz和64 C。
如果运行 Witcher 3代表真实世界的游戏负载,GPU时钟速率将稳定在850至900 MHz范围内,根据GPU-Z,GPU功耗略低于15 W。
用电池供电运行将限制图形性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为7447和1345分,而在主电源上则为7105和2632分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 39 |
Prime95压力 | 2.0 | -- | 64 |
Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 0.8 | -- | 66 |
Witcher 3 Stress | 1.1 | 950 | 66 |
发言人
Chuwi CoreBook X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management
消耗功率
在最低亮度设置下,在桌面上空转仅消耗6.2瓦,而最大亮度设置将需要大约4.5瓦。中等负荷将消耗约40瓦,与许多第11代Tiger Lake-U笔记本电脑相似,尽管在我们的Chuwi上性能要慢得多。自从2018年推出酷睿i5-8259U以来,英特尔在每瓦性能方面取得了长足的进步。
我们能够从小型(约6.4 x 6.4 x 3.0厘米)的65瓦交流适配器中测出40.5瓦的最大消耗。如下图所示,由于系统的Turbo Boost有限,这个比率是暂时的。
Off / Standby | 2.8 / 1.7 Watt |
Idle | 6.2 / 10.7 / 12.5 Watt |
Load |
40.5 / 39.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Chuwi CoreBook X i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Infinix INBook X1 Pro i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | SCHENKER Vision 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -12% | -30% | 8% | 32% | 18% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.2 | 5 19% | 9.8 -58% | 4 35% | 2.5 60% | 2.4 61% |
Idle Average * | 10.7 | 11.5 -7% | 12.5 -17% | 6 44% | 5.3 50% | 3.5 67% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.5 | 12 4% | 13.7 -10% | 10 20% | 9.5 24% | 6.6 47% |
Load Average * | 40.5 | 48.7 -20% | 39.3 3% | 34 16% | 26.2 35% | 47 -16% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.4 | 46.4 -18% | 44.8 -14% | |||
Load Maximum * | 39.2 | 58.8 -50% | 72.8 -86% | 68 -73% | 42.8 -9% | 67.2 -71% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3
电池寿命
运行时间略低于平均水平,实际使用WLAN的时间约为6.5小时。即便如此,这对大多数用户来说可能也是绰绰有余。
从空电到满电大约需要2小时。该系统还可以通过USB-C进行充电。
Chuwi CoreBook X i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, 46.2 Wh | Infinix INBook X1 Pro i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 55 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh | Honor Magicbook 14 i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh | Acer Swift 5 SF514-55T-58DN i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 56 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 27% | -8% | 45% | 114% | 99% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 400 | 508 27% | 366 -8% | 580 45% | 854 114% | 794 99% |
Load | 107 | 219 | 96 | |||
Reader / Idle | 2925 |
Pros
Cons
判决书
Chuwi CoreBook X第一眼就令人印象深刻。它的光面显示屏非常清晰,具有完整的sRGB色彩覆盖,而其坚固的键盘按键和大的点击板使用起来令人满意。易于扩展的内存和M.2存储也值得注意,而且酷睿U系列CPU的速度明显快于其他大多数超廉价笔记本电脑上常见的Atom或Celeron。只需大约500美元,它就可以与价格较高的机型相媲美,如Honor MagicBook 14或Acer Swift 5 SF514非常好,特别是在显示质量方面。
它的规格和显示屏对于这个价格来说是一个巨大的便宜。然而,如果你在使用几个月后遇到一些质量问题,请不要感到惊讶。
买家应该记住的是一些边角料。首先是寿命问题,因为该系统感觉并不像能持续使用。特别是铰链很弱,线圈的啸叫声很烦人,而且对于一个超低电压的笔记本电脑来说,风扇的脉冲非常频繁。我们在过去的Chuwi设备上的经验并没有激发出对CoreBook X在一两年后会如何保持的信心。
价格和可用性
我们的确切配置目前可以在亚马逊上找到https://www.amazon.com/CHUWI-CoreBook-Processor-Keyboard-Lightweight/dp/B08KZRZ63G/?tag=nbcreviewsnet-20以499美元的价格出售。该系统也可以通过官方的Chuwi在线商店购买。.
Chuwi CoreBook X
- 07/01/2021 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo