Notebookcheck Logo

Coolpad Mega 5A

Specifications

Coolpad Mega 5A
Coolpad Mega 5A (Mega Series)
Processor
unknown
Graphics adapter
unknown
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
5.45 inch 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
Connections
Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (SIM 2 slot), Sensors: Accelerometer, microUSB
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM, CDMA, UMTS, LTE, Dual SIM, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 148 x 70.7
Battery
2500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Keyboard: Virtual
Weight
148 g
Price
100 Euro

 

Price comparison

Average Score: 60% - poor
Average of 2 scores (from 2 reviews)
price: 50%, performance: 50%, features: - %, display: 60% mobility: 60%, workmanship: 60%, ergonomy: - %, emissions: - %

Reviews for the Coolpad Mega 5A

60% Coolpad Mega 5A review: Low price but that is all
Source: India Today English EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Design is okay, screen more than okay and camera performance of the Mega 5A is something I can forgive and forget. The software too is good, as it is based on Android 8 and battery life is decent. But the performance issues mean the Mega 5A is not a phone that can be recommended.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
60% Coolpad Mega 5A Review
Source: NDTV Gadgets English EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Coolpad Mega 5A has metal in its construction which is uncommon at this price point. While it has a good feel in the hand, it fails to deliver a good usable experience. The processor is slow, and that coupled with only 2GB of RAM results in longer load times and slower multitasking. We also found its battery life to be slightly on the lower side, and you’ll need to plug it in by the end of the day. If you are on a strict budget, the recently launched Xiaomi Redmi 6A seems to have better hardware on paper, and we will be able to confirm that once we finish reviewing it. If you can extend your budget a little, the Xiaomi Redmi 5 (Review) offers better value for your money.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 50% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60%

Comment

unknown:

 

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.


unknown: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.


5.45":

这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。

大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。

» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.


» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

 

Please share our article, every link counts!

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Nokia C02
unknown, unknown
Blu C5 Max
unknown, unknown
Blu C5L Max
unknown, unknown
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
unknown, unknown
BQ RU BQ 5765L Clever
unknown, unknown
Wiko Y52
unknown, unknown
Wiko Y51
unknown, unknown
Nokia C1 Plus
unknown, unknown
ZTE Blade A3 2020
unknown, unknown
Nokia C2
unknown, unknown
Nokia C1
unknown, unknown
Coolpad N3D
unknown, unknown
Coolpad N3C
unknown, unknown
ZTE Blade A5 2019
unknown, unknown
ZTE Blade A3 2019
unknown, unknown
Elephone A6 Mini
unknown, unknown
Alcatel 1S
unknown, unknown
Prestigio Muze V3 LTE
unknown, unknown
Lenovo K9
unknown, Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762
Xiaomi Mi 8 SE
unknown, unknown

Devices with the same GPU

HMD Barbie Phone
unknown, T107, 2.80", 0.1235 kg
Huawei Nova Flip
unknown, unknown, 6.94", 0.195 kg
Huawei Mate XT
unknown, unknown, 10.20", 0.298 kg
Vivo X200 Pro
unknown, unknown, 6.78", 0.228 kg
Huawei Pura 70
unknown, unknown, 6.60", 0.207 kg
Huawei Pura 70 Pro
unknown, unknown, 6.80", 0.22 kg
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
unknown, unknown, 6.78", 0.194 kg
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo3
unknown, unknown, 6.67", 0.179 kg
Huawei Pura 70 Pro+
unknown, unknown, 6.80", 0.22 kg
当前市场报价
Stefan Hinum (Update: 2018-10-23)