黑莓 DTEK50 智能手机简短评测
| SD Card Reader | |
| maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
| average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Acer Liquid Jade Primo | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Acer Liquid Jade Primo | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 535 cd/m²
Contrast: 601:1 (Black: 0.89 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.21
| BlackBerry DTEK50 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Acer Liquid Jade Primo AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | HTC One A9 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5" | Lenovo Moto G4 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 1% | 9% | 18% | 19% | |
| Brightness middle | 535 | 355 -34% | 346 -35% | 609 14% | 378 -29% |
| Brightness | 511 | 356 -30% | 349 -32% | 589 15% | 380 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 93 4% | 87 -2% | 91 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.89 | 0.63 29% | |||
| Contrast | 601 | 967 61% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 2.9 33% | 1.55 64% | 3.8 12% | 1.95 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.2 | 10.5 -28% | 8.3 -1% | 3.09 62% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 1.2 67% | 2.05 43% | 3.1 14% | 1.86 48% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.26 97% | 2.15 102% | 2.06 107% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 6352 102% | 6381 102% | 6267 104% | 6725 97% | 6376 102% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| Acer Liquid Jade Primo | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Acer Liquid Jade Primo | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Acer Liquid Jade Primo | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Acer Liquid Jade Primo | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Acer Liquid Jade Primo | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| Acer Liquid Jade Primo | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| Acer Liquid Jade Primo | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| Acer Liquid Jade Primo | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| HTC One A9 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Plus | |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
BlackBerry DTEK50 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Liquid Jade Primo audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.08 / 0.13 Watt |
| Idle |  0.78 / 1.72 / 1.77 Watt |
| Load |
4.33 / 8.21 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| BlackBerry DTEK50 2610 mAh | Acer Liquid Jade Primo 2870 mAh | HTC One A9 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -39% | 15% | 0% | 11% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.78 | 1.22 -56% | 0.9 -15% | 0.63 19% | 0.96 -23% |
| Idle Average * | 1.72 | 2.25 -31% | 1.2 30% | 1.91 -11% | 1.64 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.77 | 2.32 -31% | 1.4 21% | 1.96 -11% | 1.71 3% |
| Load Average * | 4.33 | 7.84 -81% | 3.8 12% | 3.88 10% | 2.98 31% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.21 | 8.07 2% | 5.9 28% | 8.74 -6% | 5.08 38% |
* ... smaller is better
| BlackBerry DTEK50 2610 mAh | Acer Liquid Jade Primo 2870 mAh | HTC One A9 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Plus 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -17% | -6% | 37% | 81% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1020 | 1154 13% | 1226 20% | 2323 128% | |
| H.264 | 472 | 465 -1% | 775 64% | 672 42% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 404 | 334 -17% | 368 -9% | 735 82% | 626 55% |
| Load | 244 | 176 -28% | 201 -18% | 483 98% |
Pros
Cons
命名有些奇怪的DTEK50是黑莓为我们带来的可能是目前最安全的安卓智能手机。得到加强的安卓6.0系统在加密模式下运行，不会被篡改指令，只有在bootloader没有被改变的情况下启动。另外，命名类似的DTEK应用会在智能手机中扫描可疑进程，为用户提供改进安全性的建议。生产商的更新计划也展现出了黑莓对于安全性的谨慎。黑莓将会比其它竞争厂商更快地对网络攻击和病毒作出反应，最近已经通过对“QuadRooter”安全漏洞的即使修复证明了这一点。不过，DTEK50依然没有搭配指纹感应器，这让人十分费解。
没有其他一台安卓智能手机可以像黑莓DTEK50一样如此出色地帮助用户防范安全漏洞和网络攻击。
除了完备的安全功能之外，黑莓DTEK50是一台不错的中端智能手机。它提供了明亮的全高清屏幕，不错的处理器性能，强劲的立体声扬声器，和不错的电池续航。尽管有出色的安全性，它300欧元（约2233人民币）的售价相比配置相当的产品并不算高。不过，黑莓在闪存空间上作出了让步，16GB存储空间中用户只有约9GB的实际可用空间。它的相机应该也不会让人眼前一亮，它们的表现只算中规中矩。尽管支持802.11ac，这台智能手机的连接速度无法超过40Mbps让人十分失望。我们还对DTEK50的一些不兼容性有些不满：我们在测试中遇到了三款基准测试软件无法运行的情况，不过这可能是由它的安全机制所致。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
BlackBerry DTEK50
- 09/12/2016 v5.1 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
