微星Delta 15游戏笔记本电脑回顾。Radeon RX 6700M首次亮相
微星Delta 15 A5EFK是首批采用全新的Radeon RX 6700M 的笔记本电脑之一。恰当的是,在引擎盖下运行的是最新的Ryzen系列的高端CPU。R9 5900HX是市场上最强大的笔记本电脑处理器之一。图形显示在哑光全高清面板上,支持240赫兹和FreeSync。
16GB DDR4内存(双通道)和1TB固态硬盘也不赖。我们的评测样本采用Windows 10 Home 64位作为其操作系统。这款15英寸设备的价格略低于2000欧元(约合2320美元),主要要与基于GeForce RTX 3070的笔记本电脑竞争。
Delta 15的最大竞争对手包括类似尺寸的游戏笔记本电脑,配备Ryzen CPU和Nvidia Ampere一代的高端GPU,如华硕TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR ,华硕ROG Strix G15 G513QR ,华硕ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q ,以及 华硕ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS 。
前两台笔记本电脑采用RTX 3070(TGP分别为90和130瓦),而后一台笔记本电脑采用RTX 3080(分别为100和130瓦)。我们在每种情况下都选择了两种不同的比较方案,以便在一定程度上覆盖安培芯片的TGP谱。表中还包括我们评测的第一款RX 6800M设备,即华硕ROG Strix G15 513QY 。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | MSI Delta 15 A5EFK R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M | 2 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M | 2.4 kg | 27.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 27.2 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
83.8 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
85 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 27.2 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85 % v7 (old) | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
案例
这款箱子给人留下了良好的印象。虽然它的稳定性在某些方面可以做得更好(例如在掌托中心),但与同样薄的GS系列 相比,Delta 15不允许有那么大的扭转力。建造质量几乎没有任何批评的余地。在我们的审查样本中,几乎所有的元素都能顺利地相互融合。
这款15英寸手机在视觉上也很吸引人。它的设计看起来很新鲜,而且略显俏皮,特别是由于盖子上的龙形标志和底座上的流线型通风栅栏。然而,由于其深灰色的表面(盖子是由金属制成的),Delta 15仍然是相当谨慎的。宽广的光圈角度是另一个亮点(见照片)。只有极少数笔记本电脑能够做到180°。
尽管拥有极其强大的硬件,Delta 15在游戏笔记本电脑中属于轻量级。大多数竞争对手的重量都超过了2公斤。当涉及到建筑高度时,情况甚至更好。Delta 15的高度为1.9厘米(不包括机箱脚),是测试领域中最薄的设备(其余设备的高度在2.0和2.8厘米之间)。稍后,我们将分析低的构建高度是否对冷却系统或排放有负面影响。
连接性
接口
Delta 15的连接性本来可以更全面一些。除了读卡器和RJ45端口外,还缺少一个Thunderbolt端口(这是一个与AMD有关的问题)。作为交换,所有可用的USB端口(2个Type-A,2个Type-C)支持现代3.2 Gen 2标准。还包括一个HDMI端口(4K @60 Hz)用于图像输出。由于其中一个Type-C端口提供DisplayPort功能作为替代,所以可以连接两个外部显示器。
端口的分布是相当不理想的。由于它们相对位于侧面区域的中心,在连接鼠标时,你可能面临移动限制。
沟通
尽管Delta 15配备了英特尔最新的无线模块(Wi-Fi 6E AX210),但这还不足以使其在Wi-Fi测试中名列前茅。在发送和接收数据时,15英寸机都排在第五位(与我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器距离为1米)。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (675 - 1602, n=27) | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (914 - 1716, n=27) | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS |
网络摄像头
网络摄像头的质量不会让任何人感到震惊。正如预期的那样,图像清晰度和色彩准确性都相当一般。
辅料
盒子里的东西包括一个中等大小的240瓦的电源适配器(572克)和一些信息手册。
维护
微星值得批评的是有限的维护选项。尽管在取出13颗螺丝后,底盖可以被卸下,但由于大量使用了胶纸,机箱内部只有风扇、电池和无线模块可以接触。内存插槽(2个SO-DIMM)以及大容量存储插槽(2个M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4)将需要进一步拆卸。这通常是由竞争对手以更好的方式解决的。
担保
像往常一样,保修期为两年(提货和退货服务)。
输入设备
键盘
首先是积极的方面。喜欢使用方向箭头的用户在Delta 15上会得到他们的金钱回报。除了有点窄的F排(一个典型的问题)之外,几乎所有的键都有很大的尺寸。只有°^键和右边的Ctrl键可以再宽一点。事实上,微星再次使用了其奇特的基础布局,这是一个品味问题。除了<>|键,Fn键也出现在了一个不寻常的地方。对于许多德国用户来说,单行回车键也需要一些时间来适应。购买者一般要放弃数字键盘。
键盘提供的打字体验从体面到良好不等。在作者看来,压力点和行程可以更清晰、更明确一些。作为现代游戏笔记本的典型,微星已经实现了(相当统一的)RGB背光,尽管你不能单独控制每个键,也没有特殊区域。然而,有几种照明模式,可以通过按F8来循环使用。
触摸板
触摸板的尺寸为10.5 x 6.5厘米,相当小,但其操作方式的设计使你很少需要抬起手指来重新定位它。光滑的表面提供了良好的滑行性能。在测试中,该垫子的准确性和多点触摸支持没有显示出任何问题。另一方面,鼠标点击的噪音是相当明显的。总的来说,触控板听起来相当嘈杂,因此质量较差。大多数游戏玩家可能无论如何都会连接一个外部鼠标。
显示
当涉及到显示器时,Delta 15还不能完全跟上竞争者的步伐。虽然色彩空间覆盖率(98% sRGB)和响应时间大致相当,但这台微星笔记本电脑在其余类别中挣扎。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 291 cd/m²
Contrast: 808:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.293
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK LQ156M1JW03 (SHP155D), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY Sharp SHP152C, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q CMN N156KME-GNA (CMN152A), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR LQ156M1JW25, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T Sharp SHP1532, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 25% | 25% | -0% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 66.5 | 66.5 0% | 97.6 47% | 97.3 46% | 67.7 2% | |
sRGB Coverage | 97.8 | 97.7 0% | 99.9 2% | 99.9 2% | 94.3 -4% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.6 | 67.6 0% | 85.3 26% | 86.2 28% | 68.2 1% | |
Response Times | 21% | -14% | 12% | 24% | -22% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.8 ? | 8 ? 37% | 14 ? -9% | 8.8 ? 31% | 8.2 ? 36% | 12 ? 6% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 10 ? 4% | 12.4 ? -19% | 11.2 ? -8% | 9.2 ? 12% | 8 ? 23% |
PWM Frequency | 23580 ? | 1250 ? -95% | ||||
Screen | -6% | -11% | -17% | 9% | 33% | |
Brightness middle | 291 | 306 5% | 304.3 5% | 327 12% | 308 6% | 297 2% |
Brightness | 266 | 283 6% | 286 8% | 309 16% | 288 8% | 268 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 86 -2% | 76 -14% | 89 1% | 86 -2% | 84 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.25 31% | 0.33 8% | 0.33 8% | 0.23 36% | 0.22 39% |
Contrast | 808 | 1224 51% | 922 14% | 991 23% | 1339 66% | 1350 67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.98 | 4.97 -67% | 2.76 7% | 4.49 -51% | 3.28 -10% | 1.36 54% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.59 | 10.12 -33% | 5.57 27% | 8.42 -11% | 8.51 -12% | 3.82 50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.91 | 0.7 23% | 2.38 -162% | 2.27 -149% | 0.83 9% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 7.2 -71% | 4 5% | 4.2 -0% | 5 -19% | 1.88 55% |
Gamma | 2.293 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.14 103% | 2.173 101% | 2.057 107% | 2.48 89% |
CCT | 7624 85% | 7784 84% | 6844 95% | 7014 93% | 7393 88% | 6768 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 67.6 | 86 | 68 | 63 | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.7 | 99 | 90 | 99 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
-1% | 0% /
-4% | 7% /
-4% | 11% /
9% | 6% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
除了亮度(平均266cd/m²)和黑度(0.36cd/m²),对比度(808:1)与竞争对手相比也比较弱。由于亮度较差,Delta 15几乎不适合在户外或光线明亮的房间使用。
这伴随着轻微的蓝色色调,可以通过校准显示器来纠正。我们的ICC文件可以在上面发现的亮度分布对应的区域下载。
由于频率很高(23kHz),显示屏在23%的亮度以下闪烁的事实即使对敏感的用户来说也不应该是个问题。广视角面板的可视角度符合典型的IPS标准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 23580 Hz | ≤ 22 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 23580 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 22 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 23580 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
测试条件
预装的MSI中心不仅允许你监控硬件(负载、风扇速度......),而且还允许你调整各种系统设置。最重要的功能是 "用户场景 "菜单,它包含四个预定义的配置文件和一个用户模式。为了最大限度地利用硬件,我们在所有测试中使用了 "极限性能 "模式。只有电池测试是使用 "平衡 "模式进行的。
业绩
AMD终于回归到高端显卡领域。一旦有关组件供应的情况得到缓解(关键词:"芯片短缺",等等),这应该会导致竞争加剧。由于八核CPU和强大的RX 6700M,Delta 15是一款真正的游戏笔记本电脑,由于其高性能,也将吸引发烧级玩家。
处理器
从笔记本电脑的尺寸和重量来看,Ryzen 9 5900HX几乎看起来过于强大。这款AMD八核型号在负载下以3.3至4.6 GHz的速度运行,并可通过SMT并行处理多达16个线程。L3缓存为16MB。
我们用Cinebench R15循环检查了7纳米CPU在很长一段时间内的性能。结果是。对于Ryzen 9 5900HX来说,性能仍然出奇地稳定,并排在中等水平。然而,在较新的Cinebench版本(R20和R23)中,Delta 15在对比设备中排名最后,虽然这些设备大多更厚更重。
Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (2242 - 5476, n=30) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (471 - 584, n=29) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (1076 - 2267, n=29) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (197 - 243, n=25) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (219 - 442, n=29) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (36011 - 62503, n=29) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (4791 - 5905, n=29) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Multi-Core | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (5057 - 9294, n=27) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Single-Core | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (1271 - 1574, n=27) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (8.26 - 17.1, n=29) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (44.1 - 87.4, n=29) | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (0.48 - 0.599, n=29) | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
微星笔记本电脑在系统性能方面确实可以给人留下深刻印象。在PCMark 10中的7,316分代表了最高位置。主观上也是如此,操作系统的运行速度非常快,反应迅速。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T |
PCMark 10 Score | 7316 points | |
Help |
DPC延迟
想要实时编辑音频和/或视频的用户可能需要做一些改变。根据LatencyMon工具,开箱即用的延迟相当高,在相应的应用场景中可能会导致问题。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q |
* ... smaller is better
储存
微星在Delta 15的测试配置中安装了一块1000GB的NVMe SSD作为大容量存储设备。根据我们的基准测试,美光2210与三星PM991(华硕G513QY)基本持平。华硕G533QS中的威刚固态硬盘较慢,但华硕GA503Q和FA506QR中的SK海力士固态硬盘更快。
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 8% | -12% | 30% | 36% | |
Write 4K | 136.2 | 140.4 3% | 134.7 -1% | 156.4 15% | 182.5 34% |
Read 4K | 59.9 | 48.91 -18% | 34.46 -42% | 66.7 11% | 73.2 22% |
Write Seq | 1846 | 1613 -13% | 1123 -39% | 2318 26% | 3005 63% |
Read Seq | 1714 | 2043 19% | 1691 -1% | 2151 25% | 2358 38% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 344.2 | 482.5 40% | 581 69% | 525 53% | 389.5 13% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 582 | 553 -5% | 423.6 -27% | 452.1 -22% | 463.8 -20% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1874 | 1612 -14% | 1131 -40% | 3055 63% | 3166 69% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2096 | 3105 48% | 1859 -11% | 3607 72% | 3590 71% |
AS SSD | 9% | -117% | 35% | 50% | |
Seq Read | 2023 | 2706 34% | 1757 -13% | 2950 46% | 3133 55% |
Seq Write | 1836 | 1652 -10% | 1071 -42% | 1600 -13% | 2969 62% |
4K Read | 56.4 | 45.46 -19% | 22.07 -61% | 53.6 -5% | 55.2 -2% |
4K Write | 130.2 | 128.5 -1% | 124.2 -5% | 126.8 -3% | 129.7 0% |
4K-64 Read | 899 | 1342 49% | 439.4 -51% | 1429 59% | 1891 110% |
4K-64 Write | 1164 | 1066 -8% | 651 -44% | 2177 87% | 1795 54% |
Access Time Read * | 0.096 | 0.095 1% | 0.043 55% | 0.064 33% | 0.052 46% |
Access Time Write * | 0.031 | 0.03 3% | 0.341 -1000% | 0.029 6% | 0.028 10% |
Score Read | 1158 | 1658 43% | 637 -45% | 1778 54% | 2259 95% |
Score Write | 1478 | 1360 -8% | 882 -40% | 2464 67% | 2221 50% |
Score Total | 3233 | 3818 18% | 1814 -44% | 5090 57% | 5630 74% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
9% | -65% /
-73% | 33% /
33% | 43% /
44% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
Delta 15的主要亮点无疑是全新的GPU。通过Radeon RX 6700M,AMD为Nvidia著名的安培一代(RTX 3060至RTX 3080)提供了高端的对应产品。仅从显存的数量就可以看出,AMD在认真对待此事。10GB的GDDR6内存对于一个顶级移动游戏模型来说是合适的。相比之下,RTX 3070只能用8GB,而RTX 3060只有6GB。
考虑到现代游戏对VRAM的要求越来越极端(如 死亡之路,生化危机村,或 Far Cry 6),这是一个深思熟虑和令人高兴的决定,也确保了用户的高度未来性。其他规格,如时钟频率、着色器数量和内存接口,可以在我们专门的 GPU文章中找到 。
在我们的基准测试课程中,RX 6700M在与Nvidia的竞争中表现非常好。这样一来,AMD芯片的表现通常达到了GeForce RTX 3070的水平,这与最初的预期是一致的。在3DMark的Fire Strike 测试中,RX 6700M实际上超过了Nvidia的顶级型号,GeForce RTX 3080(至少在TGP版本的对比设备中)。目前还不是很普及的Radeon RX 6800M,平均领先20%左右。
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 46372 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 66973 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 25929 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 136454 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 47472 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24294 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 9360 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
游戏性能等级在很大程度上取决于光线追踪。当启用光线追踪时,Radeon RX 6700M经常被安培一代击败,倾向于与较早的图灵对应产品持平。因此,这种新技术的粉丝还是选择Nvidia比较好。
如果你在没有光线追踪的情况下进行游戏,反正大多数游戏中都没有光线追踪,Delta 15的性能非常好。正如在合成图形基准测试中,Radeon RX 6700M对GeForce RTX 3070,有时甚至对RTX 3080的日常游戏构成威胁。所以Nvidia在这里需要小心。
一般来说,Radeon RX 6700M的速度足以将任何现代游戏在原生全高清分辨率(1920x1080)和最大设置下流畅地呈现在屏幕上。只有在要求极高或程序较差的游戏中,如孤岛危机重制版或赛博朋克2077帧率才会降到60FPS以下。
Far Cry 6 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T | |
XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T | |
XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP | |
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK |
Watch Dogs Legion | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (DX12) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK |
Control | |
1920x1080 High Quality Preset (DX11) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
1920x1080 High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK |
Resident Evil Village | |
1920x1080 Max Preset | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Preset | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T |
一个小小的缺点。根据我们的60分钟测试,用这Witcher 3(全高清/超清),3D性能在长时间的负载后会有一些下降。这个问题主要与笔记本电脑(冷却系统)有关,不一定与显卡有关。
The Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 169 | 147 | 86.2 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 223 | 164 | 95.4 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 130 | 123 | 112 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 113 | 83.8 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 103 | 97 | 91 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 202 | 186 | 170 | |
Control (2019) | 117 | 82.2 | ||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 100 | 86.9 | 71.2 | |
Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 98.2 | 90.5 | 82.8 | |
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 100 | 90.6 | 87.9 | |
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 125 | 100 | ||
Doom Eternal (2020) | 200 | 182 | 175 | |
Gears Tactics (2020) | 208 | 134 | 96.2 | |
Death Stranding (2020) | 144 | 134 | 131 | |
Crysis Remastered (2020) | 146 | 63.6 | 45.9 | |
Serious Sam 4 (2020) | 105 | 98 | 79.8 | |
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 93.4 | 85.5 | ||
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) | 233 | 232 | 219 | |
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 96 | 87 | 64 | |
Dirt 5 (2020) | 119 | 98.8 | 80.6 | |
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 98 | 82 | 71 | |
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) | 111 | 96.2 | 90.2 | |
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) | 83 | 81 | 78 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) | 85.4 | 67.9 | 56.5 | |
Hitman 3 (2021) | 175 | 154 | 144 | |
Outriders (2021) | 107 | 98.1 | 94.6 | |
Resident Evil Village (2021) | 171 | 161 | 140 | |
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) | 99.6 | |||
Days Gone (2021) | 113 | 106 | 80.5 | |
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021) | 143 | 142 | ||
F1 2021 (2021) | 212 | 185 | 100 | |
Deathloop (2021) | 99.8 | 85.1 | 77.3 | |
New World (2021) | 82.2 | 78.5 | 73 | |
FIFA 22 (2021) | 229 | 224 | 217 | |
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 97 | 82 | 74 | |
Back 4 Blood (2021) | 195 | 163 | 149 |
排放
噪声排放
当涉及到噪音发展时,没有任何惊喜。负载下的47至51 dB(A)是游戏笔记本电脑的典型值,这也符合竞争对手的要求。在这个水平上,这台15英寸的笔记本在3D模式下既不安静也不太响亮。
当笔记本电脑闲置时,风扇偶尔会安静下来。然而,像启动程序这样的小任务会迅速导致风扇转速上升,这相当令人讨厌。也就是说,如前所述,我们使用了最高性能模式(例如,还有一个 "静音 "模式)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25 / 30 / 40 dB(A) |
Load |
| 47 / 51 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | 4% | 3% | 3% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 26 -4% | 25.5 -2% | 25 -0% | 24 4% | 26 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 26 -4% | 25.5 -2% | 26 -4% | 25 -0% | 26 -4% |
Idle Average * | 30 | 31 -3% | 25.5 15% | 27 10% | 31 -3% | 26 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 40 | 34 15% | 37.1 7% | 31 22% | 33 17% | 27.4 31% |
Load Average * | 47 | 44 6% | 39.2 17% | 49 -4% | 45 4% | 46.6 1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 48.5 -1% | 50.5 -5% | 49 -2% | 48 -0% | |
Load Maximum * | 51 | 49 4% | 51.8 -2% | 51 -0% | 50 2% | 49.3 3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
与竞争对手相比,温度发展也很平均。在FurMark和Prime95工具的压力测试中,机箱分别加热到50℃(约122°F)(顶部)和55℃(约131°F)(底部)。在我们的TheWitcher 3测试中,结果也是类似的。因此,如果可能的话,你不应该把设备放在你的膝盖上玩游戏。整个机箱在闲置时保持令人愉快的冷却。大部分的表面都保持在30°C(约86°F)以下。
下面的屏幕截图显示了组件在负载下的表现。不错:CPU和GPU都没有超过80 °C (~176 °F)。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 8% | -3% | -3% | 1% | -11% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 38.9 22% | 43.4 13% | 51 -2% | 49 2% | 46.7 7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 55 | 34.6 37% | 48.2 12% | 56 -2% | 48 13% | 55.9 -2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31 | 34.4 -11% | 35.2 -14% | 29 6% | 31 -0% | 37.1 -20% |
Idle Bottom * | 30 | 34.4 -15% | 37 -23% | 34 -13% | 33 -10% | 38.1 -27% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
我们将内置2.0系统的音质描述为体面的,尽管低音和最大音量还有待改进,这是笔记本电脑的典型特征。
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
能源消耗
功耗相当不显眼。考虑到所提供的性能,10至25瓦的空闲消耗和101至217瓦的负载是合理的,而且它们也符合Nvidia的竞争。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 2.5 Watt |
Idle | 10 / 18 / 25 Watt |
Load |
101 / 217 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 5% | -4% | 18% | 7% | 13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 10 | 12.1 -21% | 11.2 -12% | 10 -0% | 4 60% | 10.2 -2% |
Idle Average * | 18 | 13 28% | 16.4 9% | 12 33% | 9 50% | 12.8 29% |
Idle Maximum * | 25 | 14.7 41% | 29.4 -18% | 17 32% | 36 -44% | 15 40% |
Load Average * | 101 | 90.3 11% | 106.2 -5% | 108 -7% | 130 -29% | 130 -29% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 187 | 200 -7% | 189 -1% | 123 34% | 174 7% | 137 27% |
Load Maximum * | 217 | 263.4 -21% | 213.6 2% | 182 16% | 227 -5% | 184 15% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption during The Witcher 3
电池寿命
微星为Delta 15配备了一个4芯的电池。82Wh是相当多的,但华硕的竞争笔记本的电池容量甚至更高,达到90Wh。为了确定实际的运行时间,我们在15英寸笔记本上执行了我们的浏览器脚本(在中等亮度下使用Wi-Fi访问各种网站)。微星笔记本电脑在一次充电的情况下持续了大约8个小时,这是一个可敬的速度。
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M, 82 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 36% | -6% | 8% | -2% | 51% | |
Reader / Idle | 664 | 963 45% | 668 1% | 728 10% | 1043 57% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 474 | 553 17% | 440 -7% | 564 19% | 441 -7% | 685 45% |
Load | 96 | 139 45% | 85 -11% | 90 -6% | 100 4% | 145 51% |
H.264 | 809 |
Pros
Cons
判决书
在已经很好地迎合了CPU市场之后,AMD现在也在移动高端显卡领域的舞池中做出了令人印象深刻的回归。除了相当差的光线追踪性能,微星Delta 15的亮点,Radeon RX 6700M
,几乎在各方面都令人印象深刻。GeForce RTX 3070 ,它只有8GB而不是10GB的VRAM,终于找到了一个同等的对手。这两款显卡通常会正面交锋,AMD有时会领先,而Nvidia有时会领先。根据最新信息,这两款笔记本电脑之间几乎没有任何价格差异。
通过Delta 15,微星为RX 6700M创造了一个良好的首发设备。
是的,一些显示参数可以更好一点(例如亮度和对比度)。是的,端口配置不是特别全面(没有读卡器,没有RJ45端口,没有Thunderbolt)。否则,这款15英寸的笔记本绝对不需要在竞争中退缩。时尚的外壳看起来很优雅,容纳了坚实的输入设备。
此外,82Wh的电池在设备没有连接到电源插座时提供了很好的运行时间。由于其重量低,结构薄,Delta 15也很容易运输。声音质量和冷却系统都很一般。
寻找更多性能的AMD粉丝应该考虑华硕ROG Strix G15 G513QY,配备Radeon RX 6800M 。
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
- 10/13/2021 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser