Doogee Fire 6 评测--价格实惠、坚固耐用的智能手机中的热像仪和坚固耐用性
不适合追求速度的人。
在价格方面,Doogee Fire 6 定位中端,同时提供 10-Ah 大容量电池、热成像摄像头和防粗暴操作保护。它的 SoC 不仅很奇特,而且速度很慢。在此了解这款坚固耐用的智能手机还能提供什么及其弱点。Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论--薄弱的 SoC 拖慢了 Doogee Fire 6 的运行速度
Doogee Fire 6 的建议零售价约为 400 欧元(约合人民币 417 元),定位中端,核心功能包括特别坚固的外壳、大容量电池和集成热成像摄像头。如果仅从这些方面来看,这款坚固耐用的智能手机的性价比还是不错的,不过它在其他方面的表现就比较弱了。
摄像头性能微弱,不仅来自 UNISOC 的集成 SoC 已经老化,而且速度也很慢。同时,可持续性也不是 Fire 6 的重点,它在各方面都显示出这方面的不足。尽管电池容量大、续航时间长,但无法快速充电。在连接方面,无线局域网速度较慢,而且不支持 5G。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Doogee Fire 6 Unisoc T7200 (T606) ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $7.35 for Doogee Fire 6 Power (6.5... 2. $7.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 3. $6.52 for Doogee Fire 6 Power Case... List Price: 400€ | 348 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.56" 1612x720 269 PPI IPS | |
Doogee V Max Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7050 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP4 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $7.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $14.99 Vaxson Privacy Screen Protec... 3. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Camera Lens Pro... List Price: 599€ | 539 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.58" 2408x1080 401 PPI IPS | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $138.95 Samsung Electronics Galaxy 4... 2. $42.99 OtterBox Universe Series Cas... 3. $6.85 beukei (3 Pack) Designed for... List Price: 359€ | 240 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" 2408x1080 400 PPI PLS | |
Oukitel WP35 MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB eMMC | Amazon: 1. $6.72 Pusiikeer 2 PACK for Oukitel... 2. $3.97 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 3. $16.00 UNIDOPRO Flat Design 60W USB... List Price: 285€ | 360 g | 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash | 6.60" 2408x1080 400 PPI IPS |
Doogee Fire 6 是为那些正在寻找一款耐用的智能手机的用户而设计的,它具有较长的电池续航时间和热成像摄像头。它配备了谷歌Android 14,提供双 SIM 卡和 microSD 卡插槽。不过,它不支持 5G。
通过我们的测试,看看 Fire 6 能否说服我们。
规格Doogee Fire 6
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例与设备 - Doogee Fire 6 符合 MIL-STD-810H 的部分要求
拿在手上,Doogee Fire 6 给人留下了非常坚实的印象,同时也带来了 348 克(约 12.3 盎司)的重量。它不仅具有 IP68 和 IP69K 防水防尘标准,还能抗压和蒸汽清洗。这款坚固耐用的智能手机还具有符合 MIL-STD-810H 标准的防跌落保护,尽管 Doogee 还没有明确说明具体的保护程度。
在我们的拷贝测试中,USB 端口的速度并不是特别快。在我们的标准配置(三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘装在华硕 ROG Strix Arion 机箱中)中,它无法为固态硬盘提供足够的电力,因此我们不得不使用一个 三星便携式固态硬盘 T7来代替。
值得肯定的一点是,Fire 6 可以通过 microSD 卡扩展存储空间,不过在使用 Angelbird AV Pro V60 参考卡进行拷贝测试时,插槽的速度并不是特别快。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Oukitel WP35 (Angelbird V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Doogee Fire 6 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Doogee V Max Plus (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信和操作 - 良好的指纹识别功能和迟缓的触摸屏
Dooogee Fire 6 不支持现代通信标准。在移动通信方面,它提供了频段覆盖稳定的 LTE;在无线局域网方面,提供了 Wi-Fi 5。尽管在与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器的测试中连接稳定,但速度并不是特别快。
这款智能手机提供完整的双卡双待功能,支持两张 Nano-SIM 卡,但不支持 eSIM 卡。虽然语音质量不错,但没有噪音抑制功能。
指纹传感器集成在电源键上,识别率非常高,速度也很快。通过前置摄像头还可以进行人脸识别,但只有在光线良好的条件下才能令人满意地工作,而且安全性也较差。ERM 振动电机功能强大,但也非常松散。
在我们的测试中,电容式触摸屏的反应速度经常比较迟钝,尤其是在显示屏的上部区域。在这种情况下,只有长时间用力触摸该区域才会有帮助。我们无法断定这只是我们测试机的故障,还是该智能手机整个系列的问题。
Networking | |
Doogee Fire 6 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Oukitel WP35 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
软件和可持续性 -Android 14,几乎没有任何更新
在可持续发展方面,Doogee 还有很多工作要做。这已经从包装开始了,它的包装完全由收缩塑料薄膜覆盖,里面也只有塑料嵌体。既没有关于使用可回收材料的说明,也没有可持续发展报告。此外,也没有规定用户可以自行维修智能手机的部件。
谷歌Android 14 被用作操作系统,没有臃肿的软件。Doogee 没有提供任何有关更新的详细说明。当我们询问时,得到的答案是最长一年。
摄像头 - Doogee Fire 6 配备热成像摄像头
虽然 Doogee Fire 6 的前置摄像头名义上提供了令人满意的分辨率,但拍摄的照片并不特别细腻。但更令人讨厌的是色彩还原。在我们的示例图片中,灰色的毛衣呈现出绿色的色调。
智能手机背面装有 50 百万像素主传感器和热成像摄像头。主摄像头的成像效果显得有些模糊,变焦质量也不尽如人意。不过,对于较简单的记录任务来说,它肯定还是够用的。
Fire 6 的红外热像仪性能不错。不过,与我们的红外测温仪相比,显示的表面温度偏差约为 4 °C(7 °F),有时较高,有时较低。
主摄像头可录制 30 FPS 的全高清视频,前置摄像头可录制 30 FPS 的 720p 视频,热成像摄像头可录制 24 FPS 的 960 x 720 像素视频。没有明显的图像稳定功能。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main CameraMain Camera5x ZoomLow-Light显示屏 - Fire 6 不含 PWM 的 IPS 面板
Doogee Fire 6 的 IPS 显示屏刷新率为 90 Hz,不支持 HDR。但由于亮度较低,后者并不是问题。亮度分布均匀,不过对比度可能会更清晰一些。
值得肯定的是,最低亮度较低,而且不支持 PWM。尽管我们在最低亮度下仍能测量到一些高频闪烁,但这根本不会导致任何问题。
在我们使用 Calman 进行的测试中,色彩还原出现了一些偏差,覆盖的色彩空间较小,但这在日常使用中并不十分明显。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 435 cd/m²
Contrast: 837:1 (Black: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.86
Doogee Fire 6 IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Doogee V Max Plus IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Oukitel WP35 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 21% | 19% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 435 | 552 27% | 600 38% | 552 27% |
Brightness | 429 | 539 26% | 561 31% | 549 28% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 90 -3% | 89 -4% | 94 1% |
Black Level * | 0.52 | 0.23 56% | 0.57 -10% | 0.42 19% |
Contrast | 837 | 2400 187% | 1053 26% | 1314 57% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7 | 6.7 4% | 5.07 28% | 7.22 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.1 | 12.1 -0% | 8.1 33% | 13.09 -8% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 14 -126% | 5.7 8% | 10.1 -63% |
Gamma | 2.86 77% | 0.27 815% | 2.249 98% | 1.785 123% |
CCT | 7407 88% | 7499 87% | 8162 80% | 9036 72% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 36520 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 36520 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 36520 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8698 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
35.76 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.7 ms rise | |
↘ 16.06 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
52.91 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.5 ms rise | |
↘ 26.41 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
性能、排放和电池寿命
Doogee Fire 6 采用了 Unisoc T606(实际标号为 T7200),可使用 6 GB 内存。在这一点上,SoC 已经使用了五年之久,这一点很明显,因为系统有时会出现一些卡顿和抖动。
表面温度在任何时候都没有问题,我们在负载情况下也没有遇到任何节流现象。扬声器的音量可能会非常大,在这种情况下,高音会非常突出,也会产生一些失真。但在中等音量下,声音重现效果还是不错的。
Doogee Fire 6 的电池续航能力非常出色。在我们的 WLAN 测试中,10,400 毫安时的大容量电池实现了超过 33 小时的续航时间。待机期间,这款 Doogee 智能手机也非常省电:如果你把它忘在抽屉里一周,电池电量仅会减少 20%。另一方面,最好是通宵充电,因为在我们的测试中,充满电需要 5 小时 55 分钟(2 小时 19 分钟后才充满 50%)。
Antutu v10 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=109, last 2 years) | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Doogee Fire 6 | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (221540 - 290675, n=7) |
CrossMark - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=166, last 2 years) | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Doogee Fire 6 | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (339 - 376, n=6) |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 4619, n=42, last 2 years) | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 1501, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Doogee Fire 6 | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) () | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Doogee Fire 6 | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) () | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Doogee Fire 6 | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) () |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Oukitel WP35 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Oukitel WP35 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Doogee V Max Plus |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Doogee V Max Plus |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Oukitel WP35 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Oukitel WP35 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Oukitel WP35 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Oukitel WP35 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Oukitel WP35 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Oukitel WP35 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Oukitel WP35 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Oukitel WP35 | |
Doogee Fire 6 |
Doogee Fire 6 | Doogee V Max Plus | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | Oukitel WP35 | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 42% | -26% | -80% | -9% | 52% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 976.73 | 1860.16 90% | 488.2 -50% | 292 -70% | 889 ? -9% | 1886 ? 93% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 883.37 | 1611.59 82% | 501 -43% | 149.5 -83% | 700 ? -21% | 1474 ? 67% |
Random Read 4KB | 203.11 | 239.64 18% | 212 4% | 61.7 -70% | 227 ? 12% | 278 ? 37% |
Random Write 4KB | 286.2 | 225.34 -21% | 240.2 -16% | 9.4 -97% | 239 ? -16% | 312 ? 9% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark | |
Doogee Fire 6 | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Oukitel WP35 | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Doogee Fire 6 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
Doogee Fire 6 | |
Doogee V Max Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
Oukitel WP35 |
笔记本检查总体评价
如果你正在寻找一款续航时间长、配备热成像摄像头的智能手机,那么 Doogee Fire 6 一定会让你满意。但考虑到市场建议零售价,尤其是性能和摄像头质量本可以做得更好。
Doogee Fire 6
- 12/23/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.