Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Doogee Fire 6 评测--价格实惠、坚固耐用的智能手机中的热像仪和坚固耐用性

不适合追求速度的人。

在价格方面,Doogee Fire 6 定位中端,同时提供 10-Ah 大容量电池、热成像摄像头和防粗暴操作保护。它的 SoC 不仅很奇特,而且速度很慢。在此了解这款坚固耐用的智能手机还能提供什么及其弱点。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Rugged Smartphone Touchscreen

结论--薄弱的 SoC 拖慢了 Doogee Fire 6 的运行速度

Doogee Fire 6 的建议零售价约为 400 欧元(约合人民币 417 元),定位中端,核心功能包括特别坚固的外壳、大容量电池和集成热成像摄像头。如果仅从这些方面来看,这款坚固耐用的智能手机的性价比还是不错的,不过它在其他方面的表现就比较弱了。

摄像头性能微弱,不仅来自 UNISOC 的集成 SoC 已经老化,而且速度也很慢。同时,可持续性也不是 Fire 6 的重点,它在各方面都显示出这方面的不足。尽管电池容量大、续航时间长,但无法快速充电。在连接方面,无线局域网速度较慢,而且不支持 5G。

Pros

+ 坚固耐用,通过高 IP 认证
+ 热像仪
+ 电池寿命长
+ 可扩展存储

Cons

- 只有交流无线局域网和 LTE
- SoC 速度慢
- 显示屏暗淡
- 摄像头较弱
- 触摸屏不完美

价格和供应情况

Doogee Fire 6 可直接从制造商商店购买。而且定期还会有一些额外的返利活动,使其价格已经低于原建议零售价。在测试期间,亚马逊上的价格更加实惠。

Amazon Logo
$7.35
for Doogee Fire 6 Power (6.56") Case, with 2 PCS Tempered Glass Screen Protector, Slim & Anti-Scratch for Doogee Fire 6 Power Case - Black
  • $7.95
    Mr.Shield Screen Protector compatible with DOOGEE Fire 6 / Fire 6 Power [Tempered Glass] [3-Pack] [Japan Glass with 9H Hardness]
  • $6.52
    for Doogee Fire 6 Power Case + 2 Pack Tempered Glass Screen Protector, WXPPJ Full Body Protection Shockproof Case, Ultra-Thin Soft Silicone Phone Case for Doogee Fire 6 Power (6.56") - Transparent

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
67.7%
Doogee Fire 6
Doogee Fire 6
Unisoc T7200 (T606) ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $7.35
for Doogee Fire 6 Power (6.5...
2. $7.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
3. $6.52
for Doogee Fire 6 Power Case...
List Price: 400€
348 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.56"
1612x720
269 PPI
IPS
2.
73.3%
Doogee V Max Plus
Doogee V Max Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP4 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $7.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $14.99
Vaxson Privacy Screen Protec...
3. $12.98
Puccy 2 Pack Camera Lens Pro...
List Price: 599€
539 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.58"
2408x1080
401 PPI
IPS
3.
79.1% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $138.95
Samsung Electronics Galaxy 4...
2. $42.99
OtterBox Universe Series Cas...
3. $6.85
beukei (3 Pack) Designed for...
List Price: 359€
240 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"
2408x1080
400 PPI
PLS
4.
79.6% v7 (old)
Oukitel WP35
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $6.72
Pusiikeer 2 PACK for Oukitel...
2. $3.97
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
3. $16.00
UNIDOPRO Flat Design 60W USB...
List Price: 285€
360 g256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash6.60"
2408x1080
400 PPI
IPS

Doogee Fire 6 是为那些正在寻找一款耐用的智能手机的用户而设计的,它具有较长的电池续航时间和热成像摄像头。它配备了谷歌Android 14,提供双 SIM 卡和 microSD 卡插槽。不过,它不支持 5G。

通过我们的测试,看看 Fire 6 能否说服我们。

规格Doogee Fire 6

Doogee Fire 6 (Fire 6 Series)
Processor
Unisoc T7200 (T606) 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.56 inch 20.15:9, 1612 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, 7 points multi touch, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 236 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Gyro, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28A, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15.8 x 174 x 81.2
Battery
10400 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8); Camera2 API Level: Limited
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: OnScreen, Charger, USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, LC3, Opus | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1C), Galileo (E1) | HDR: not supported | DRM Widevine L1 | IP68 / IP69K | USB Copy Test: 21.30 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported file systems for external storage: FAT32, exFAT | SAR Body: 1.455 W/kg, Head SAR: 0.164 W/kg | max. charging speed: 18 W (wired), fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
348 g, Power Supply: 76 g
Price
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

案例与设备 - Doogee Fire 6 符合 MIL-STD-810H 的部分要求

拿在手上,Doogee Fire 6 给人留下了非常坚实的印象,同时也带来了 348 克(约 12.3 盎司)的重量。它不仅具有 IP68 和 IP69K 防水防尘标准,还能抗压和蒸汽清洗。这款坚固耐用的智能手机还具有符合 MIL-STD-810H 标准的防跌落保护,尽管 Doogee 还没有明确说明具体的保护程度。

在我们的拷贝测试中,USB 端口的速度并不是特别快。在我们的标准配置(三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘装在华硕 ROG Strix Arion 机箱中)中,它无法为固态硬盘提供足够的电力,因此我们不得不使用一个 三星便携式固态硬盘 T7来代替。

值得肯定的一点是,Fire 6 可以通过 microSD 卡扩展存储空间,不过在使用 Angelbird AV Pro V60 参考卡进行拷贝测试时,插槽的速度并不是特别快。

尺寸比较

178.5 mm 83.1 mm 26.3 mm 539 g174 mm 81.2 mm 15.8 mm 348 g172.2 mm 81 mm 15.3 mm 360 g169 mm 80.1 mm 10.2 mm 240 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (Angelbird V60)
38.6 MB/s +252%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (Angelbird V60)
33.5 MB/s +205%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=83, last 2 years)
29.6 MB/s +170%
Doogee Fire 6
Unisoc T7200 (T606) (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
10.97 MB/s
Doogee V Max Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
9.82 MB/s -10%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Doogee Fire 6 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø31.3 (22.2-38.9)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.8 (30.7-47.5)
Doogee Fire 6 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø58.6 (32.8-70.7)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø70.4 (34.2-81.8)

通信和操作 - 良好的指纹识别功能和迟缓的触摸屏

Dooogee Fire 6 不支持现代通信标准。在移动通信方面,它提供了频段覆盖稳定的 LTE;在无线局域网方面,提供了 Wi-Fi 5。尽管在与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器的测试中连接稳定,但速度并不是特别快。

这款智能手机提供完整的双卡双待功能,支持两张 Nano-SIM 卡,但不支持 eSIM 卡。虽然语音质量不错,但没有噪音抑制功能。

指纹传感器集成在电源键上,识别率非常高,速度也很快。通过前置摄像头还可以进行人脸识别,但只有在光线良好的条件下才能令人满意地工作,而且安全性也较差。ERM 振动电机功能强大,但也非常松散。

在我们的测试中,电容式触摸屏的反应速度经常比较迟钝,尤其是在显示屏的上部区域。在这种情况下,只有长时间用力触摸该区域才会有帮助。我们无法断定这只是我们测试机的故障,还是该智能手机整个系列的问题。

Networking
Doogee Fire 6
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
362 (min: 327) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
342 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼43%
Doogee V Max Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
952 (min: 923) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
790 (min: 737) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
335 (min: 319) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
325 (min: 301) MBit/s ∼41%
Oukitel WP35
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
329 (min: 317) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
303 (min: 253) MBit/s ∼38%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
351 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
327 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼41%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
723 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
708 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼90%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Doogee Fire 6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø362 (327-375)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø335 (319-348)
Doogee Fire 6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø342 (320-348)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø325 (301-339)

软件和可持续性 -Android 14,几乎没有任何更新

在可持续发展方面,Doogee 还有很多工作要做。这已经从包装开始了,它的包装完全由收缩塑料薄膜覆盖,里面也只有塑料嵌体。既没有关于使用可回收材料的说明,也没有可持续发展报告。此外,也没有规定用户可以自行维修智能手机的部件。

谷歌Android 14 被用作操作系统,没有臃肿的软件。Doogee 没有提供任何有关更新的详细说明。当我们询问时,得到的答案是最长一年。

摄像头 - Doogee Fire 6 配备热成像摄像头

使用 Doogee Fire 6 自拍
自拍
消防 6 热像仪的记录
热像仪

虽然 Doogee Fire 6 的前置摄像头名义上提供了令人满意的分辨率,但拍摄的照片并不特别细腻。但更令人讨厌的是色彩还原。在我们的示例图片中,灰色的毛衣呈现出绿色的色调。

智能手机背面装有 50 百万像素主传感器和热成像摄像头。主摄像头的成像效果显得有些模糊,变焦质量也不尽如人意。不过,对于较简单的记录任务来说,它肯定还是够用的。

Fire 6 的红外热像仪性能不错。不过,与我们的红外测温仪相比,显示的表面温度偏差约为 4 °C(7 °F),有时较高,有时较低。

主摄像头可录制 30 FPS 的全高清视频,前置摄像头可录制 30 FPS 的 720p 视频,热成像摄像头可录制 24 FPS 的 960 x 720 像素视频。没有明显的图像稳定功能。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main CameraMain Camera5x ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
9.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Doogee Fire 6: 7.85 ∆E min: 3.58 - max: 13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
53.1 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
43 ∆E
59.3 ∆E
52 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
62.5 ∆E
61.3 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
74.4 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
88.4 ∆E
69.5 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Doogee Fire 6: 44.66 ∆E min: 9.92 - max: 88.37 ∆E

显示屏 - Fire 6 不含 PWM 的 IPS 面板

子像素网格
子像素网格

Doogee Fire 6 的 IPS 显示屏刷新率为 90 Hz,不支持 HDR。但由于亮度较低,后者并不是问题。亮度分布均匀,不过对比度可能会更清晰一些。

值得肯定的是,最低亮度较低,而且不支持 PWM。尽管我们在最低亮度下仍能测量到一些高频闪烁,但这根本不会导致任何问题。

在我们使用 Calman 进行的测试中,色彩还原出现了一些偏差,覆盖的色彩空间较小,但这在日常使用中并不十分明显。

432
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 448 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 429.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.74 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 435 cd/m²
Contrast: 837:1 (Black: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.86
Doogee Fire 6
IPS, 1612x720, 6.6"
Doogee V Max Plus
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Oukitel WP35
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Screen
21%
19%
7%
Brightness middle
435
552
27%
600
38%
552
27%
Brightness
429
539
26%
561
31%
549
28%
Brightness Distribution
93
90
-3%
89
-4%
94
1%
Black Level *
0.52
0.23
56%
0.57
-10%
0.42
19%
Contrast
837
2400
187%
1053
26%
1314
57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7
6.7
4%
5.07
28%
7.22
-3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
12.1
12.1
-0%
8.1
33%
13.09
-8%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.2
14
-126%
5.7
8%
10.1
-63%
Gamma
2.86 77%
0.27 815%
2.249 98%
1.785 123%
CCT
7407 88%
7499 87%
8162 80%
9036 72%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 36520 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 36520 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 36520 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8698 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

灰度(对比度模式:自动,色彩模式:暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(对比度模式:自动,色彩模式:暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩(对比度模式:自动,色彩模式:暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩(对比度模式:自动,色彩模式:暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(对比度模式:自动,色彩模式:暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(对比度模式:自动,色彩模式:暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(对比度模式:自动,色彩模式:暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(对比度模式:自动,色彩模式:暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
35.76 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.7 ms rise
↘ 16.06 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.91 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.5 ms rise
↘ 26.41 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).
Doogee Fire 6 户外
户外活动
Doogee Fire 6 的视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能、排放和电池寿命

Doogee Fire 6 采用了 Unisoc T606(实际标号为 T7200),可使用 6 GB 内存。在这一点上,SoC 已经使用了五年之久,这一点很明显,因为系统有时会出现一些卡顿和抖动。

表面温度在任何时候都没有问题,我们在负载情况下也没有遇到任何节流现象。扬声器的音量可能会非常大,在这种情况下,高音会非常突出,也会产生一些失真。但在中等音量下,声音重现效果还是不错的。

Doogee Fire 6 的电池续航能力非常出色。在我们的 WLAN 测试中,10,400 毫安时的大容量电池实现了超过 33 小时的续航时间。待机期间,这款 Doogee 智能手机也非常省电:如果你把它忘在抽屉里一周,电池电量仅会减少 20%。另一方面,最好是通宵充电,因为在我们的测试中,充满电需要 5 小时 55 分钟(2 小时 19 分钟后才充满 50%)。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=177, last 2 years)
1488 Points +280%
Doogee V Max Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 16384
959 Points +145%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
692 Points +77%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
678 Points +73%
Doogee Fire 6
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
392 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606)
  (368 - 392, n=12)
377 Points -4%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=177, last 2 years)
4173 Points +204%
Doogee V Max Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 16384
2517 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1911 Points +39%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1858 Points +35%
Doogee Fire 6
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1374 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606)
  (1285 - 1482, n=12)
1364 Points -1%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=109, last 2 years)
1301966 Points +348%
Doogee V Max Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 16384
604738 Points +108%
Doogee Fire 6
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
290675 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606)
  (221540 - 290675, n=7)
245262 Points -16%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=198, last 2 years)
13213 Points +62%
Doogee V Max Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 16384
12478 Points +53%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8629 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8482 Points +4%
Doogee Fire 6
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
8162 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606)
  (6637 - 8303, n=20)
7379 Points -10%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=166, last 2 years)
924 Points +146%
Doogee V Max Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 16384
706 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
524 Points +39%
Doogee Fire 6
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
376 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606)
  (339 - 376, n=6)
354 Points -6%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=42, last 2 years)
784 Points
Doogee V Max Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 16384
Points
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=16, last 2 years)
423 Points +228%
Doogee Fire 6
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
129 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606)
  ()
129 Points 0%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=16, last 2 years)
966 Points +600%
Doogee Fire 6
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
138 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606)
  ()
138 Points 0%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=16, last 2 years)
1674 Points +1031%
Doogee Fire 6
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
148 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606)
  ()
148 Points 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=212, last 2 years)
38666 Points +182%
Doogee V Max Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 16384
37214 Points +172%
Oukitel WP35
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
22330 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
22114 Points +61%
Doogee Fire 6
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
13705 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606)
  (2228 - 13705, n=15)
11490 Points -16%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2202 Points +416%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1208 Points +183%
Oukitel WP35
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
1207 Points +183%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
427 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2197 Points +410%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1230 Points +185%
Oukitel WP35
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
1228 Points +185%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
431 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
234 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
220 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4279 Points +60%
Oukitel WP35
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
3324 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3283 Points +23%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2678 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4340 Points +420%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2344 Points +181%
Oukitel WP35
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
2314 Points +177%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
834 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4326 Points +339%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2503 Points +154%
Oukitel WP35
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
2482 Points +152%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
985 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps +161%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
50 fps +52%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
108 fps +391%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
62 fps +182%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps +112%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps +40%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
67 fps +379%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
39 fps +179%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps +106%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 fps +22%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps +400%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps +191%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +106%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12 fps +24%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.7 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +391%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps +183%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.3 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +158%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.5 fps +37%
Oukitel WP35
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
8.4 fps +35%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.2 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps +426%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5.7 fps +200%
Oukitel WP35
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
5.7 fps +200%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1.9 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps +156%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps +44%
Oukitel WP35
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
13 fps +44%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +432%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps +219%
Oukitel WP35
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
15 fps +219%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.3 fps +412%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2.4 fps +186%
Oukitel WP35
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
2.4 fps +186%
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
0.84 fps
Doogee Fire 6Doogee V Max PlusSamsung Galaxy XCover 7Oukitel WP35Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
42%
-26%
-80%
-9%
52%
Sequential Read 256KB
976.73
1860.16
90%
488.2
-50%
292
-70%
Sequential Write 256KB
883.37
1611.59
82%
501
-43%
149.5
-83%
700 ?(369 - 913, n=33)
-21%
Random Read 4KB
203.11
239.64
18%
212
4%
61.7
-70%
Random Write 4KB
286.2
225.34
-21%
240.2
-16%
9.4
-97%
Max. Load
 43.7 °C41.6 °C35.3 °C 
 42.8 °C41 °C34.6 °C 
 40.7 °C38 °C33.1 °C 
Maximum: 43.7 °C
Average: 39 °C
32.5 °C36.1 °C38.2 °C
32.8 °C35.1 °C37.3 °C
31.9 °C34.5 °C37.8 °C
Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 35.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Doogee Fire 6
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
99 % ∼99%
Doogee V Max Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
99.3 % ∼100%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
99.4 % ∼100%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
96.9 % ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
99.6 % ∼100%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
99.3 % ∼100%
Oukitel WP35
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
99.5 % ∼100%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
97.9 % ∼98%
01234567Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.04 (2.03-2.04)
Doogee Fire 6 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø2.59 (2.58-2.61)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6100+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.36 (7.34-7.37)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203139.9252739.8312343.54022.946.45036.343.76321.646801743.510017.646.312515.748.616016.949.220015.250.825013.75331514.256.540013.259.350014.566.563014.369.580014.171.4100013.576.9125014.977.516001277.5200012.478.8250012.279.6315012.783.3400013.588.8500013.386.863001472.2800013.568.21000013.668.51250013.868.51600013.760.1SPL25.693.7N0.791.2median 13.7median 69.5Delta0.79.937.637.737.636.130.728.833.42938.433.124.525.616.521.715.821.313.13014.638.38.642.97.849.67.254.78.561.210.163.910.962.610.971.712.672.89.174.49.67710.172.610.868.512.77013.271.715.27114.375.215.372.116.165.116.363.917.259.524.984.30.658.9median 12.6median 65.12.99.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDoogee Fire 6Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Doogee Fire 6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 131)
33h 13min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Doogee Fire 6
10400 mAh
1993 min
Doogee V Max Plus
22000 mAh
3244 min
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7
4050 mAh
803 min
Oukitel WP35
11000 mAh
1659 min

笔记本检查总体评价

如果你正在寻找一款续航时间长、配备热成像摄像头的智能手机,那么 Doogee Fire 6 一定会让你满意。但考虑到市场建议零售价,尤其是性能和摄像头质量本可以做得更好。

Doogee Fire 6 - 12/23/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
64 / 75 → 86%
Pointing Device
71%
Connectivity
41 / 69 → 59%
Weight
86%
Battery
97%
Display
73%
Games Performance
1 / 55 → 3%
Application Performance
45 / 85 → 53%
AI Performance
7%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
71 / 90 → 78%
Camera
48%
Average
48%
68%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
0%
Power Use
91.7%
Repairability
20%
Software Updates
0%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 18.6%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Doogee Fire 6 评测--价格实惠、坚固耐用的智能手机中的热像仪和坚固耐用性
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-01- 8 (Update: 2025-01- 8)