Durabook R8评测：全球首款配备英特尔12代处理器的无风扇耐用平板电脑
Durabook专注于坚固耐用的笔记本电脑和平板电脑，专为制造业、执法部门、野外研究、政府机构和传统办公空间以外的其他行业等苛刻环境而设计。最新的机型是完全坚固耐用的Durabook R8，它是同尺寸产品中首批采用无风扇设计的第12代Alder Lake-U处理器的机型之一。
我们的测试机采用酷睿i5-1230U、8GB焊接LPDDR4x-2133内存和128GB固态硬盘。其他SKU有奔腾8500、酷睿i7-1250U、16GB内存或1TB固态硬盘，但所有选项都配备相同的8英寸1280 x 800分辨率触摸屏。
Durabook R8的替代产品包括其他坚固耐用的平板电脑，如宏碁Enduro T1,戴尔Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme或松下Toughbook FZ-G2.
更多 Durabook 评论：
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79.6 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Durabook R8 Tablet i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 856 g | 20.6 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
v (old) | Acer Enduro T1 ET108-11A A9001 | 499 g | 10.9 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | ||
| 79.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300 | 320 g | 9 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 83.9 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme i5-1240U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 23.9 mm | 12.00" | 1920x1200 | |
v (old) | 10 / 2021 | Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 i5-10310U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 28 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 |
外壳 - 耐用耐用本
机箱通过了MIL-STD 810H、MIL-STD 461G和IP66认证，可抵御各种环境因素。尝试扭转平板电脑的四角或按压屏幕中央，不会产生明显的吱吱嘎嘎声或翘曲，给人的第一印象非常稳固。
完全坚固的规格无疑增加了设计的重量和厚度。例如，与竞争对手宏碁Enduro T1相比，尽管我们的Durabook都采用8英寸触摸屏，但其厚度和重量几乎是后者的两倍。
连接性 - 支持 Thunderbolt 4
有些端口是所有型号的标准配置，有些端口则需要额外付费，包括USB-A、千兆RJ-45、RS232或条码阅读器。
两个USB-C端口中的一个支持Thunderbolt 4，可连接各种兼容的外部设备。但是，只有一个端口支持Power Delivery。如右图所示，由于端口过于密集，一些较粗的USB-C电缆或适配器可能会部分阻挡其他端口的访问。
SD读卡器 - MicroSD卡会卡住
与大多数其他笔记本电脑和平板电脑的读卡器相比，集成SD卡读卡器的弹簧释放装置非常薄弱。我们的MicroSD测试卡会被卡住，需要用镊子小心取出。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme (AV Pro V60) | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet (AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) (Angelbird V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme (AV Pro V60) | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet (AV Pro V60) | |
通讯
英特尔AX211标配Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.3连接。传输速率稳定，没有任何问题。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Acer Enduro T1 ET108-11A A9001 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Acer Enduro T1 ET108-11A A9001 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
网络摄像头
前置200万像素摄像头为标准配置，后置800万像素带闪光灯的摄像头为可选升级配置。图像质量比笔记本电脑的网络摄像头更清晰，但视频质量仅限于1080p和30 FPS，尽管传感器的分辨率更高。
维护
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括一支无源手写笔和一条腕绳。可选配件范围广泛，如带有额外端口的专用扩展坞底座、更大容量的备用电池、电池充电托架、智能卡读卡器、不同类型的交流适配器，以及更多，详见。.
标配三年意外损坏保修。
显示屏 - 800尼特明亮触摸屏
制造商宣传的最大亮度为800尼特，我们可以通过自己的独立测量确认这一点。对比度也相当可观，略高于1000:1，与大多数消费类笔记本电脑的显示屏相似。遗憾的是，显示屏的其他方面表现平平，包括有限的色彩覆盖范围、一般的响应时间和有些颗粒的像素。如果您的工作要求图像和小文本尽可能清晰，那么Durabook R8可能不适合您。
多点触摸屏可在用于手指输入的电容模式和用于手套或手写笔输入的电阻模式之间切换。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 943.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1110:1 (Black: 0.85 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.35 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 5.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
53.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
77.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
51.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.65
| Durabook R8 Tablet Digital Flat Panel, IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Acer Enduro T1 ET108-11A A9001 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme Sharp LQ120N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 12" | Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 InfoVision M133NWFD R1, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 27% | 1% | |||
| Display P3 Coverage | 51.5 | 66.2 29% | 52.1 1% | ||
| sRGB Coverage | 77.4 | 96.1 24% | 78.5 1% | ||
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 53.1 | 68.4 29% | 53.8 1% | ||
| Response Times | -20% | -34% | 12% | -51% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32.4 ? | 33.6 ? -4% | 29.2 ? 10% | 28.4 ? 12% | 54.4 ? -68% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 21.9 ? | 29.6 ? -35% | 39 ? -78% | 19.4 ? 11% | 34.4 ? -57% |
| PWM Frequency | 300 ? | 211.9 ? -29% | |||
| Screen | 2% | 17% | 47% | 38% | |
| Brightness middle | 943.7 | 350 -63% | 410 -57% | 1326.7 41% | 1078.6 14% |
| Brightness | 870 | 353 -59% | 380 -56% | 1193 37% | 1056 21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 92 8% | 86 1% | 82 -4% | 90 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.85 | 0.21 75% | 0.16 81% | 0.85 -0% | 0.48 44% |
| Contrast | 1110 | 1667 50% | 2563 131% | 1561 41% | 2247 102% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.35 | 5.68 11% | 4.6 28% | 1.06 83% | 4.18 34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.86 | 10.51 -19% | 9.03 -2% | 3.78 57% | 6.2 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.1 | 0.71 86% | 1.95 62% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 6.3 9% | 6.3 9% | 1.5 78% | 4.8 30% |
| Gamma | 2.65 83% | 2.12 104% | 2.519 87% | 2.19 100% | 2.05 107% |
| CCT | 6956 93% | 7390 88% | 7707 84% | 6804 96% | 7565 86% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-3% | -9% /
7% | 29% /
37% | -4% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
默认色温偏冷。由于上述面板色域有限，使用我们的X-Rite色度计校准显示屏不会带来明显改善。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 300 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 300 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 300 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
脉宽调制或300赫兹的闪烁出现在所有亮度等级上，最高可达99%。
由于采用了超亮显示屏，在阴凉处的室外可视性极佳。在较亮的环境下，眩光仍会遮住颜色，成为一个问题。
性能 - 英特尔12代超频版
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前，我们将Windows设置为性能模式。
按顶部的 "P "按钮可启动控制中心菜单，用于调整平板电脑的不同方面，如电池充电行为、按键操作和手套/手指触摸屏模式。
处理器
我们的评测机采用了相同的 酷睿i5-1230U处理器 戴尔XPS 13 9315和XPS 9315二合一.不幸的是，为了最大限度地提高稳定性，该处理器的性能明显不足。单线程和多线程性能分别比上述戴尔系统中的相同处理器慢25%和60%。因此，整体性能更接近于三年前的第10代 酷睿i5-10310U.
很难说如果用户升级到酷睿i7-1250U因为我们的酷睿i5-1230U比预期的要慢。不过，酷睿i7 SKU很可能也会超频。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
| HP Envy x360 13-bf0013dx | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U | |
| Dell Latitude 7330 Rugged Extreme | |
| Dynabook Satellite Pro C50D-B-115 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 -2! | |
| Acer Enduro T1 ET108-11A A9001 -12! | |
| Chuwi LapBook Plus -6! | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) -12! | |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U (2344 - 6360, n=3) | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U (11867 - 31714, n=3) | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U (772 - 1711, n=3) | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U (30824 - 52533, n=3) | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U (2269 - 3947, n=3) | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U (6379 - 15896, n=3) | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U (18011 - 31941, n=3) | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U (229 - 495, n=3) | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U (1328 - 3305, n=3) | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U (17516 - 37042, n=3) | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
系统性能
PCMark结果与旧款 松下Toughbook FZ-G2因为我们设备的处理器已经降频，运行起来与Toughbook更为相似。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4001 - 4943, n=3) | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8348 - 10139, n=3) | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5735 - 6692, n=3) | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (3632 - 4833, n=3) | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1117 - 1383, n=3) | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1187 - 1356, n=3) | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1095 - 1469, n=3) | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (990 - 1224, n=3) | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4001 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Tablet (32539 - 68769, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U (32539 - 60944, n=3) | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Tablet (31342 - 124555, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U (31342 - 60435, n=3) | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U (33224 - 65665, n=3) | |
| Average of class Tablet (33224 - 62397, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1230U (104.3 - 105.3, n=3) | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.4 - 110, n=5, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
LatencyMon显示，在打开主页的多个浏览器标签页时会出现DPC问题。此外，在以60 FPS播放4K视频时也会出现问题，因为我们在长达一分钟的测试视频中记录到195个丢帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
可移动 128 GB NVMe SSD可拆卸式128GB NVMe SSD的读写速度分别高达1100MB/s和240MB/s。写入速度明显较慢，但对目标用户来说应该不是问题。容量更大的256GB、512GB或1TB选项预计性能会更快。
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme | |
| Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
图形性能比相同的 Iris Xe 80 EUs图形性能比 XPS 13 9315 中相同的 Iris Xe 80 EUs 图形处理器慢 30% 至 40%，部分原因是 CPU 低频和单通道内存较慢。尽管如此，整体性能仍然比更老的 UHD Graphics 620快约40%至50%。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3624 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9072 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1574 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 630 points | |
Help | ||
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 30.2 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 62.9 | 41.7 | 19.6 | 13.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 12.1 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 26.2 | 21.8 | 20.1 |
排放 - 无风扇设计
温度
由于主板和电池组的位置，平板电脑右半部分的表面温度高于左半部分。当运行苛刻的负载时，背面温度可高达54摄氏度，而基于Android ，背面温度仅为40摄氏度。 宏碁Enduro T1.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
| Durabook R8 Tablet Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Acer Enduro T1 ET108-11A A9001 | Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300 | Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme Intel Core i5-1240U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 Intel Core i5-10310U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 7% | 29% | 9% | 19% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 38.2 | 37.8 1% | 28.6 25% | 32.6 15% | 37.4 2% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 49.6 | 39.4 21% | 30.1 39% | 40.2 19% | 36.6 26% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32.2 | 32.8 -2% | 23.1 28% | 30.6 5% | 25.6 20% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33.4 | 31.2 7% | 25.1 25% | 35 -5% | 24 28% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动Prime95压力后的最初几秒钟内，CPU将提升至1.8 GHz、67 C和15 W，然后下降并稳定在400 MHz、59 C和7 W。 戴尔XPS 13 9315的CPU性能相比明显偏低，这也解释了上述CPU性能部分的基准测试结果低于预期的原因。
电池电量性能保持不变。
| CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 44 |
| Prime95 压力 | 0.4 | -- | 59 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 0.4 | 100 | 60 |
| Witcher 3 压力 | ~0.6 | ~700 | 58 |
扬声器
低音弱在意料之中，但最大音量可能会更大，仅为 75 dB(A)，而 Acer Enduro T1 为 88 dB(A)。 宏碁 Enduro T1.Durabook R8的扬声器朝向后方，这对用户来说不是最佳选择。
Durabook R8 Tablet audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 每瓦高性能
耗电量
以最低亮度设置在桌面上闲置时，功耗可低至3瓦；如果将亮度调至最大，则功耗可高达近7瓦。
尽管处理器性能几乎相同，但在较重负载下的整体功耗约为旧款Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2的一半。因此，用户仍然可以从较新的酷睿i5-1230U更高的每瓦性能中获益。
我们可以测量到，65瓦的小型交流适配器（约10.5 x 4.5 x 3厘米）的最大功耗为30瓦。
| Off / Standby |   0.18 / 0.59 Watt |
| Idle |  2.8 / 6.3 / 10.3 Watt |
| Load |
19 / 30.1 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Durabook R8 Tablet i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Silicon Power SP128GIMEA3K5EV0, IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Acer Enduro T1 ET108-11A A9001 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme i5-1240U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1200, 12" | Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 i5-10310U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KIOXIA KBG4AZNV512G M.2 2280 OPAL, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 73% | 71% | -102% | -65% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.8 | 1.1 61% | 1.7 39% | 6.5 -132% | 3.5 -25% |
| Idle Average * | 6.3 | 2.2 65% | 1.9 70% | 8.9 -41% | 8.1 -29% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.3 | 2.2 79% | 2.4 77% | 14.3 -39% | 8.2 20% |
| Load Average * | 19 | 3.6 81% | 3 84% | 44.9 -136% | 34.7 -83% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 15.5 | 43.2 -179% | 31.8 -105% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 30.1 | 6.7 78% | 3.9 87% | 54.8 -82% | 79.7 -165% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
可拆卸的27Wh电池组的实际无线局域网运行时间仅为5.5小时。用户可以升级到更大更重的电池组，也可以一次携带多个电池组，以便交换使用，但电池续航时间仍然令人失望。
27Wh电池组从空充到满的充电时间约为2小时，充电速度相对较慢。
| Durabook R8 Tablet i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 27.4 Wh | Acer Enduro T1 ET108-11A A9001 Wh | Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, Wh | Dell Latitude 7230 Rugged Extreme i5-1240U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 72 Wh | Panasonic Toughbook FZ-G2 i5-10310U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 193% | 191% | 144% | 110% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 319 | 936 193% | 929 191% | 779 144% | 670 110% |
| Reader / Idle | 2223 | ||||
| H.264 | 998 | ||||
| Load | 229 | 216 |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 强劲的设计，但也有一些恼人之处
Durabook R8的最大优势在于其无风扇设计、多样化的配置选项以及对Thunderbolt 4的支持。这是一个不常见的功能组合，可能会吸引某些类别或专业人士。我们尤其喜欢从后部轻松访问固态硬盘、无线局域网和广域网模块的设计。
不过，无风扇设计也有一些常见的注意事项。CPU性能大幅下降，表面温度会变得很高，尤其是背面。这并不是说平板电脑的速度很慢，但不要指望它能像配备相同处理器的笔记本电脑一样快。
您需要Durabook R8主要是因为它的无风扇设计、易用性和广泛的外设支持。其他方面，如电池续航时间和色彩，还可以做得更好。
有几个小方面可以在未来的改版中加以改进。例如，MicroSD读卡器的弹出机构需要更坚固、更可靠。扬声器可以朝向正面，而不是背面，这样会更有用。紧凑的USB-C接口可以加宽，以减少拥挤。可以移除专有的AC桶式端口，改用通用的USB-C充电。最后，默认电池组的电池寿命可以更长，PWM应该减少或取消。
价格和供货情况
用户可直接从制造商处获取Durabook R8平板电脑的报价，。.
Durabook R8 Tablet
- 07/12/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
