联想 E31-80 (6200U, 高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Connectivity
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 (jseb) | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H (jseb) | |
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 (jseb) | |
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H (jseb) |
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 234 cd/m²
Contrast: 433:1 (Black: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 13 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.35% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.78
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE TN LED, 1366x768, 13.3" | Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE TN, 1366x768, 13.3" | Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H TN LED, 1366x768, 13.3" | Asus X302UV-FN016T TN LED, 1366x768, 13.3" | Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 32% | 20% | 30% | 64% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 37.35 | 49.25 32% | 44.72 20% | 48.37 30% | 64.6 73% | 38.55 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 56.2 | 73.5 31% | 67.3 20% | 72.6 29% | 87.3 55% | 57.8 3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 38.58 | 50.9 32% | 46.2 20% | 49.98 30% | 63.8 65% | 39.85 3% |
Response Times | 11% | -2% | 9% | 14% | 1% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 44.4 ? -1% | 39 ? 11% | 42 ? 5% | 34 ? 23% | 42.4 ? 4% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 20.4 ? 22% | 30 ? -15% | 23 ? 12% | 25 ? 4% | 26.4 ? -2% |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 1000 ? | 50 ? | |||
Screen | 7% | 3% | 25% | 35% | 32% | |
Brightness middle | 234 | 206 -12% | 255 9% | 218 -7% | 295 26% | 253 8% |
Brightness | 222 | 200 -10% | 232 5% | 210 -5% | 283 27% | 249 12% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 84 -3% | 82 -6% | 88 1% | 88 1% | 92 6% |
Black Level * | 0.54 | 0.6 -11% | 0.52 4% | 0.5 7% | 0.65 -20% | 0.32 41% |
Contrast | 433 | 343 -21% | 490 13% | 436 1% | 454 5% | 791 83% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 12.09 | 9.2 24% | 13.12 -9% | 3.89 68% | 4 67% | 5.28 56% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.25 | 14.8 27% | 22.98 -13% | 7.11 65% | 7.26 64% | 13.66 33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13 | 10.94 16% | 15.01 -15% | 4.9 62% | 3.38 74% | 3.8 71% |
Gamma | 2.78 79% | 2.76 80% | 2.41 91% | 2.41 91% | 2.38 92% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 15562 42% | 13282 49% | 24382 27% | 7860 83% | 6520 100% | 6646 98% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 46.92 30% | 43 19% | 46 28% | 57 58% | 36.7 2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56 | 73.36 31% | 68 21% | 73 30% | 85 52% | 57.6 3% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 17% /
12% | 7% /
6% | 21% /
24% | 38% /
38% | 12% /
22% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise | |
↘ 19 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3393 points | |
Help |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive | Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0 | Asus X302UV-FN016T Hynix HFS128G3MND | Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 Phison S10C-512G | HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -89% | -91% | -36% | 8% | -18% | |
Read Seq | 522 | 116.4 -78% | 105.1 -80% | 428.2 -18% | 522 0% | 505 -3% |
Write Seq | 457.4 | 120.7 -74% | 103.1 -77% | 178.6 -61% | 384.4 -16% | 328.9 -28% |
Read 512 | 398.1 | 37.01 -91% | 33.89 -91% | 282.6 -29% | 412 3% | 313.6 -21% |
Write 512 | 303.6 | 73.1 -76% | 49.7 -84% | 179.1 -41% | 395.5 30% | 301 -1% |
Read 4k | 35.05 | 0.507 -99% | 0.386 -99% | 6.559 -81% | 34.07 -3% | 21.69 -38% |
Write 4k | 88 | 4.156 -95% | 1.095 -99% | 71.2 -19% | 100.9 15% | 80.4 -9% |
Read 4k QD32 | 299.7 | 0.967 -100% | 0.91 -100% | 253 -16% | 316.3 6% | 132.2 -56% |
Write 4k QD32 | 229.8 | 0.652 -100% | 1.149 -99% | 174 -24% | 286.4 25% | 258.8 13% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1348 points | |
Help |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 35.4 | 21.1 | 17.2 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 31.8 / 31.8 / 31.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 35.7 / 34.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+2.3 °C / 4.1 F).
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.47 / 0.48 Watt |
Idle | 5.6 / 6.8 / 7.5 Watt |
Load |
26.9 / 26.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA | |
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234 | |
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE |
Pros
Cons
联想为E31-80搭配了一颗Skylake架构酷睿i5处理器。它为办公和上网浏览提供了绰绰有余的性能。相比Broadwell架构的E31-70系列机型,Skylake机型的性能仅仅略高。它的处理器对电池续航的影响反而更大。
Skylake架构处理器明显改进了这台设备的电池续航时间。
这台笔记本电脑在运行中可以保持安静,且不会过热。一块固态硬盘保证了迅捷的系统响应。用户也可以打开机身自行升级更换固态硬盘。它搭配的键盘质量优秀,可以适合长时间文字输入用途。
和很多笔记本电脑一样,E31-80的最大弱点在于屏幕品质。联想为它搭配的是一块低亮度、低对比度、可视角度很窄的屏幕。它的屏幕明显无法得到任何称赞。同时这台设备仅仅一年的质保期也让我们略感不满。对于一款今年的新机型我们期待至少有两年的质保。同时,它也没有提供USB-C接口。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
- 04/19/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck