EA Sports FC 24》技术评测：笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试

新名字，老问题。

尽管 EA 已被多个国家认定违反了赌博法，但足球模拟游戏《FC》（前身为《FIFA》）仍然享有一定的知名度。在这篇评测中，我们将看看 2024 版的图形要求。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/17/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Laptop / Notebook Desktop Gamecheck

本次评测使用的笔记本

现在，我们使用这些笔记本电脑进行游戏基准测试。点击图片访问相应的产品页面。本文末尾列出了所有其他测试系统（塔式电脑、迷你电脑等）。

技术方面

对于今年的表现分析，我们可以简单地重复使用我们写过的关于上一届国际足联.EA 最新版足球电子游戏继承了该系列游戏一贯的优点和缺点。虽然特写镜头、回放等看起来相当不错和逼真（但也耗费了更多的性能），但寒霜引擎在比赛中默认视角下的运行仍然明显低于其潜力，导致视觉效果平平。这里可能还有很大的改进空间。尽管这有助于保持相当低的硬件要求。

游戏的控制同样需要改进。鼠标和键盘的操作仍然相当糟糕--尤其是菜单，再次变得非常复杂，需要不必要的点击才能浏览。此外，即使您选择的是 Steam 版本，强制安装的 EA 应用程序和 EA anticheat 程序仍会带来一些问题。例如，启动游戏感觉就像要花很长时间，而且时不时还会收到莫名其妙的错误信息。此外，在测试过程中，我们还发现在加载本身就非常大气、制作精良的视频时，经常会出现卡顿现象，而且无论使用何种硬件和设置，都会出现这种情况。

再来看图形菜单：游戏中完全可以访问图形菜单，就像《FIFA 23》中的图形菜单一样。遗憾的是，那些期待着大量选项的玩家要失望了。除了渲染质量，你能自定义的其他质量选项只有剪辑、草地和人群。此外，还有启用或禁用帧速率上限、VSync 和动态分辨率的选项。当然，你也可以在图形菜单中调整分辨率和显示模式。开发人员决定不加入 DLSS 等现代功能或任何有用的预设。个别设置的对比图片也同样找不到，但至少提供了书面说明。此外，更改某些设置后还需要重新启动游戏，这一点也不太理想。

基准

与往年一样，我们使用拜仁慕尼黑和多特蒙德之间的一场开球比赛作为基准（比赛设置：夏季，下午 4 点，天气晴朗）。半场比赛设定为 6 分钟，我们使用 CapFrameX 记录了至少 4 分钟的比赛表现（大约相当于 40 秒）。由于重播的 FPS 数较低，我们避免或跳过了重播。由于足球模拟游戏对 GPU 的要求并不高，因此在中等分辨率和设置下，性能较强的显卡可能会受到 CPU 的限制。

▶ load Youtube video

成果

全高清（1,920 x 1,080）

虽然 iGPU 在 720p 和最低设置下运行许多游戏时都会遇到困难，但它们通常足以在全高清下处理 FC 24。例如 Radeon 680M在此分辨率下，当细节设置为中等或更高时（我们通常建议在此游戏中使用），FPS 仅略低于 60。不过，我们在游戏过程中经常会遇到奇怪的卡顿现象，图像渲染看起来也不是很干净。

EA Sports FC 24
1920x1080 Low Preset 1920x1080 Medium Preset 1920x1080 High Preset 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	312 (152.9^min, 225^P0.1, 244^P1) fps ∼100% 263 (107.2^min, 130.2^P0.1, 201^P1) fps ∼100% 262 (113.1^min, 132.3^P0.1, 202^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	254 (87.2^min, 144.4^P0.1, 181^P1) fps ∼81% 220 (30.2^min, 87^P0.1, 153.6^P1) fps ∼84% 211 (68.3^min, 89.1^P0.1, 151.3^P1) fps ∼81%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 17 E23	219 (60.4^min, 152.9^P0.1, 169.7^P1) fps ∼70% 179.3 (44.9^min, 81^P0.1, 138.5^P1) fps ∼68% 171.3 (71.2^min, 82^P0.1, 130.7^P1) fps ∼65%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	216 (111.9^min, 128^P0.1, 164.4^P1) fps ∼69% 177.9 (36.1^min, 72.6^P0.1, 126.7^P1) fps ∼68% 167.2 (2.72^min, 75.9^P0.1, 120.3^P1) fps ∼64%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	231 (83.4^min, 161.2^P0.1, 184.1^P1) fps ∼74% 194.3 (4.14^min, 62.3^P0.1, 143^P1) fps ∼74% 182.8 (49.6^min, 86.9^P0.1, 138.9^P1) fps ∼70%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-55	154 (79.4^min, 100.8^P0.1, 115.6^P1) fps ∼49% 134.2 (45.1^min, 60.7^P0.1, 89.4^P1) fps ∼51% 129.7 (33.3^min, 56.2^P0.1, 96.1^P1) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	192.7 (107.7^min, 138.6^P0.1, 148.9^P1) fps ∼62% 162.3 (33.8^min, 68.1^P0.1, 118.6^P1) fps ∼62% 150.1 (27.4^min, 69.5^P0.1, 105^P1) fps ∼57%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	179.2 (26.5^min, 92.9^P0.1, 121.9^P1) fps ∼57% 149.4 (37^min, 51.6^P0.1, 98.7^P1) fps ∼57% 137.8 (22.4^min, 46.8^P0.1, 72.6^P1) fps ∼53%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Focus 15 E23	163.8 (86.8^min, 119.7^P0.1, 139.3^P1) fps ∼53% 144 (50.2^min, 63.5^P0.1, 111.7^P1) fps ∼55% 132.5 (42^min, 54.9^P0.1, 76^P1) fps ∼51%
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS Asus ROG Zephyrus G14	181.5 (93.1^min, 122.2^P0.1, 139.6^P1) fps ∼100% 162.4 (58.9^min, 100.6^P0.1, 125.6^P1) fps ∼52% 138.4 (46.8^min, 56.5^P0.1, 104.1^P1) fps ∼53% 126.2 (24.5^min, 51.7^P0.1, 96.5^P1) fps ∼48%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro	107.8 (71.7^min, 84.4^P0.1, 92.4^P1) fps ∼59% 98.4 (25^min, 65.2^P0.1, 79.9^P1) fps ∼32% 78.2 (42.4^min, 43.5^P0.1, 52.3^P1) fps ∼30% 71.9 (23.6^min, 41.4^P0.1, 60.2^P1) fps ∼27%
AMD Radeon 680M, R9 6900HS Asus ROG Zephyrus G14	80.3 (25.7^min, 27.8^P0.1, 36.1^P1) fps ∼44% 57.9 (13.7^min, 19^P0.1, 23.3^P1) fps ∼19% 42 (12.4^min, 12.5^P0.1, 17.1^P1) fps ∼16% 39.5 (5.97^min, 7.1^P0.1, 12.6^P1) fps ∼15%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

中端显卡就能满足您以 QHD 高清体验游戏的需要。例如 GeForce RTX 4050就足以在 1440p 和最高设置下输出约 100 FPS。

EA Sports FC 24
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	261 (97.7^min, 124^P0.1, 196.5^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	203 (76.4^min, 82.8^P0.1, 132^P1) fps ∼78%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 17 E23	167.6 (37.4^min, 72.7^P0.1, 126.7^P1) fps ∼64%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	163.4 (4.3^min, 21.5^P0.1, 98.5^P1) fps ∼63%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	151.7 (27.1^min, 65.9^P0.1, 112.1^P1) fps ∼58%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	138.4 (38.6^min, 58.7^P0.1, 107.5^P1) fps ∼53%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-55	129.2 (32.6^min, 60.2^P0.1, 80.5^P1) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	121 (30.1^min, 42.9^P0.1, 71.6^P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Focus 15 E23	100.9 (29.4^min, 42.3^P0.1, 58.9^P1) fps ∼39%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro	51.7 (32.4^min, 33.8^P0.1, 42.6^P1) fps ∼20%

超高清（3,840 x 2,160）

在 4K 下运行游戏并不一定需要高端 GPU。即使是之前提到的 RTX 4050 也有足够的能力在 4K 和超高设置下接近 60 FPS。

EA Sports FC 24
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	188 (90.5^min, 107.3^P0.1, 145.7^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	166.9 (60.3^min, 75.4^P0.1, 121.8^P1) fps ∼89%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 17 E23	153.2 (35.2^min, 49.8^P0.1, 106.2^P1) fps ∼81%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	125.2 (25.7^min, 57.6^P0.1, 94.7^P1) fps ∼67%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	97.8 (43.7^min, 47.3^P0.1, 77^P1) fps ∼52%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	82.4 (31.6^min, 34.9^P0.1, 61.7^P1) fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-55	81.8 (32.4^min, 36.7^P0.1, 62.2^P1) fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	70.7 (39.3^min, 42.6^P0.1, 58.2^P1) fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Focus 15 E23	56.8 (21^min, 27.3^P0.1, 39.9^P1) fps ∼30%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro	26.8 (15.4^min, 15.5^P0.1, 17.1^P1) fps ∼14%

备注

由于游戏测试非常耗时，而且经常受到安装或激活限制，因此在发布本文时，我们只能为您提供部分基准测试结果。我们将在未来几天或几周内添加更多显卡。

Overview

All test systems

笔记本	显卡	处理器	内存
XMG Neo 17 E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 @175 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Focus 15 E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 @140 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
华硕 ROG Strix Scar 17	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-12900H	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Acer Predator Helios 300	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti @150 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-12700H	2 x 8 GB DDR5
华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14	AMD Radeon RX 6800S (8 GB GDDR6) & AMD Radeon 680M	AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2 x 16 GB DDR5

塔式电脑	显卡	处理器	内存
定制 I / 华硕 ROG Strix Z790-F / G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900K	2 x 24 GB DDR5
定制 II	PalitGeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC (24 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 FE (24 GB GDDR6X) MSIGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Suprim X (8 GB GDDR6X) NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti (8GB GDDR6X) Nvidia Titan RTX (24GB GDDR6)GDDR6) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (8GB GDDR6) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super(8 GB GDDR6) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super (6GB GDDR6) PNY GeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5) KFA2 GeForce G TX 1650 Super (4 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 7600 (8 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 7600 (8GBDDR6)GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (16GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6800 (16GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (12GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (12GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD RadeonRX 6600 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700(8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (6GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X	2 x 16 GB DDR5

Mini-PC	显卡	处理器	内存
Minisforum NUCXi7	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 @125 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 8 GB DDR4
Minisforum HX99G	AMD Radeon RX 6600M @100 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673	Intel Arc A730M	Intel Core i7-12650H	2 x 8 GB DDR4
Minisforum UM790 Pro	AMD Radeon 780M	AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2 x 32 GB DDR5

4K 显示器	操作系统	Nvidia 驱动程序	AMD 驱动程序
技嘉 M32U	Windows 11	ForceWare 537.58	Adrenalin 23.10.1

Editor of the original article: Zhiwei Zhuang - Translator - 178 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 463597 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > EA Sports FC 24》技术评测：笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试

Florian Glaser, 2023-10-17 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > EA Sports FC 24 (2023)
Pos	Model	low 1920x1080 Low Preset	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset	high 1920x1080 High Preset	ultra 1920x1080 Ultra Preset	QHD 2560x1440 Ultra Preset	4K 3840x2160 Ultra Preset
1	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	391ⁿ²	328.5ⁿ²	274.5ⁿ²	272ⁿ²	271ⁿ²	252ⁿ²
4	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080		312	263	262	261	188
7	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT		254	220	211	203	166.9
10	AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT	412	299	360	254	220	143.9
11	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		219	179.3	171.3	167.6	153.2
13	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	374	318	264	264	248	157.7
21	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		216	177.9	167.2	163.4	125.2
30	AMD Radeon RX 6800	366	322	263	225	193.8	124
31	AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT	395	345	274	246	199.1	127.2
32	NVIDIA Titan RTX	338	292	247	228	178.7	109.5
33	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	358	318	262	246	190	116.6
36	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		231	194.3	174.55ⁿ²	151.7	97.8
38	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		192.7	162.3	150.1	138.4	82.4
42	AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT	323	287	243	207	170.9	98.9
44	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT	315	284	235	198.3	166.7	97.8
45	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	194.2	174.2	148.6	148.35ⁿ²	129.85ⁿ²	79.95ⁿ²
46	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	310	280	230	193.6	148.2	90.6
47	Intel Arc A770	221	201	161.3	152.5	123	77
49	AMD Radeon RX 7600	304	274	215	180.4	144.7	87.8
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >EA Sports FC 24
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
51	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		154	134.2	129.7	129.2	81.8
54	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	198.3	179.2ⁿ³	149.4ⁿ³	137.8ⁿ³	119.25ⁿ²	70.7
59	AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT	280	253	198	165.8	128.8	75.1
63	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	249	199.3	161.7	151.4	129	79.5
65	AMD Radeon RX 6800S	181.5	162.4	138.4	126.2
66*	AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT	202	172.2	142.7	128.3	105.3	68.7
67	Intel Arc A750	191.8	176.2	136.5	127.2	105.7	67.7
77	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	205	184.1	153.4	136.2	105.5	66.6
81	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	254	230	185.1	170.8	131.3	76.5
85	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	285	250	195.7	173	139.7	88.1
91	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU				125.6	101	58.2
93	AMD Radeon RX 7600S		183	153.3	131.3	103.7	64.6
100	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	217	199.1	167.7	146.9	111.5	67.4
101*	Intel Arc A770M					116.9
102	AMD Radeon RX 6600	249	222	173.9	147.4	112.6	67
106	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	247	218	183.4	157.1	120.4	75.6
137	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)	239	210	168.7	146.3	113.8	71.8
145	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	180.8	164	141.7	120.8	89.2	18.8
147	AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT	161.4	145.7	101.3	55.7	44.2	28.8
148	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)	170.7	151.7	124.8	101.3	77.8	46.4
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >EA Sports FC 24
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
149	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU		163.8	144	132.5	100.9	56.8
152*	Intel Arc A730M				121.8
157	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile				93.9
163	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)	166.9	156.7	130	107.2	77.9	23.8
166	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)	157.3	144	114.6	103.5	65.8	7.5
174	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU				73.2
195	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile				66.8
197	AMD Radeon RX 5500M		82.7	65.9	62.3
207	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile				43.2
213	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile				58
256*	AMD Radeon 780M	104.5ⁿ²	94ⁿ²	75.6ⁿ²	56.25ⁿ²	51.7	26.8
264	AMD Radeon 680M	80.3	57.9	42	39.5
270*	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	58	57.3	56.4	55.9
296*	AMD Radeon 760M				47.9
332	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	43.6
333	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	32.4
350	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	22.9
353	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	34.6
398*	Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	23.9
399*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	30.3	26.9	20.3
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >EA Sports FC 24
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
438*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	24.1
449*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	34
534*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	32.1
608	Intel UHD Graphics 630	13.1
610*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	10.7
692*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 3	13.8

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.