柯达 Ektra 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
OnePlus 3T | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL |
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 428 cd/m²
Contrast: 652:1 (Black: 0.64 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.17
Kodak Ektra IPS, 1920x1080, 5" | Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | LG V10 Quantum-IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 49% | 34% | 3% | 47% | |
Brightness middle | 417 | 582 40% | 658 58% | 421 1% | 450 8% |
Brightness | 419 | 563 34% | 633 51% | 430 3% | 431 3% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 91 8% | 93 11% | 84 0% | 93 11% |
Black Level * | 0.64 | 0.38 41% | 0.66 -3% | 0.22 66% | |
Contrast | 652 | 1532 135% | 997 53% | 2045 214% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8 | 4.4 45% | 4.9 39% | 7.1 11% | 5.18 35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.9 | 7.4 43% | 9.1 29% | 15.3 -19% | 10.39 19% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.6 | 4.8 44% | 5.8 33% | 6.8 21% | 6.94 19% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.2 100% | 2.26 97% | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 8952 73% | 6175 105% | 7840 83% | 7866 83% | 8091 80% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 77.78 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.44 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.6 ms rise | |
↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
63.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise | |
↘ 37.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 |
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 | |
Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 | |
Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Kodak Ektra | |
Huawei P9 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3T | |
LG V10 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Kodak Ektra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 43.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 3T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.07 / 0.18 Watt |
Idle | 0.93 / 2.23 / 2.34 Watt |
Load |
4.8 / 8.46 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Kodak Ektra 3000 mAh | Huawei P9 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | LG V10 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 17% | 18% | 2% | -0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.93 | 0.77 17% | 0.83 11% | 0.61 34% | 0.67 28% |
Idle Average * | 2.23 | 2.36 -6% | 2.11 5% | 1.77 21% | 1.94 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.34 | 2.37 -1% | 2.12 9% | 1.81 23% | 2.1 10% |
Load Average * | 4.8 | 3.09 36% | 3.41 29% | 6.67 -39% | 6.53 -36% |
Load Maximum * | 8.46 | 5.35 37% | 5.46 35% | 10.98 -30% | 9.93 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
Kodak Ektra 3000 mAh | Huawei P9 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh | LG V10 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 9% | 68% | 19% | -15% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 467 | 569 22% | 797 71% | 494 6% | 353 -24% |
Load | 214 | 206 -4% | 352 64% | 282 32% | 203 -5% |
Reader / Idle | 1514 | 1502 | 1423 | 1697 | |
H.264 | 568 | 905 | 810 | 539 |
Pros
Cons
柯达Ektra在众多产品中有它的一个位置:那些希望他们的设备特立独行并欣赏复古的相机设计的人会喜欢这台手机。皮质相机外壳是一个很合适它的配件。但这台手机在好看之外还有什么优点嘛?它的性能出色,有着一些很有趣的附加软件,坚固的外壳以及相对出色的声音质量。再者,前置相机的成像质量出色。
但柯达 Ektra并不令人激动。问题在于,其内置的主摄像头相较于同等价位的产品来说缺少亮点功能,甚至都不能拍出值得称赞的照片。屏幕以及电池续航也不能使我们满意。
一款为摄影而生的智能手机仅配备平庸的摄像头?柯达 Ektra在它最重要的方面犯了错误,同时配备了一块低亮度,低对比度的屏幕,以及不足的电池续航。这个备受尊敬的品牌并不会因此重生。
总之,在这个价格区间中有很多明显更好的选择,其中不乏更具性价比的设备。柯达Ektra只是其品牌的粉丝仅用于快拍的最佳选择。想要一款配备有良好摄像头的手机的用户应该去看看我们关于最佳拍照手机的对比。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Kodak Ektra
- 01/24/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer