Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar大象手机Elephone Soldier评测
Elephone Soldier
Processor
Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T 10 x 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A72 / A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 534 PPI, 电容触摸屏, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB
, 118 GB free
Weight
251 g, Power Supply: 65 g
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Elephone Soldier | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Elephone Soldier | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
Elephone Soldier; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø263 (259-265)
Elephone Soldier; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø332 (316-340)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 568 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 531 cd/m² Minimum: 23.96 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 542 cd/m²
Contrast: 797:1 (Black: 0.68 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
| Elephone Soldier IPS, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Blackview BV5800 Pro IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Poptel P9000 Max LCD IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Doogee S55 IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Crosscall Action-X3 IPS, 1280x800, 5" | Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -57% | -43% | -41% | -19% | -41% | |
| Brightness middle | 542 | 587 8% | 406 -25% | 573 6% | 417 -23% | 445 -18% |
| Brightness | 531 | 571 8% | 397 -25% | 568 7% | 425 -20% | 437 -18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 90 2% | 85 -3% | 91 3% | 88 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.68 | 0.33 51% | 0.38 44% | 0.91 -34% | 0.29 57% | 0.67 1% |
| Contrast | 797 | 1779 123% | 1068 34% | 630 -21% | 1438 80% | 664 -17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 9.3 -145% | 6.7 -76% | 6.96 -83% | 7.12 -87% | 6.5 -71% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7 | 17.9 -156% | 13.8 -97% | 12.14 -73% | 10.19 -46% | 10.6 -51% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 12.6 -350% | 8.5 -204% | 6.3 -125% | 6.1 -118% | 7.2 -157% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.14 103% | 2.21 100% | 1.87 118% | 2.687 82% | 2.53 87% |
| CCT | 6971 93% | 11049 59% | 8858 73% | 7606 85% | 7687 85% | 8274 79% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 54.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Geekbench 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v7 | AnTuTu v6 | BaseMark OS II | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Elephone Soldier | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Elephone Soldier | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Elephone Soldier | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Elephone Soldier | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Elephone Soldier | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Elephone Soldier | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Elephone Soldier | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Elephone Soldier | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Elephone Soldier | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Elephone Soldier | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Elephone Soldier | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max | |
| Doogee S55 | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Elephone Soldier | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| Elephone Soldier (Chrome 70) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58) | |
| Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68) | |
| Doogee S55 (Chrome 67) | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68) | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Elephone Soldier (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68) | |
| Doogee S55 (Chrome 67) | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58) | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Blackview BV5800 Pro | |
| Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68) | |
| Doogee S55 (Chrome 67) | |
| Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58) | |
| Elephone Soldier (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Elephone Soldier | Blackview BV5800 Pro | Poptel P9000 Max | Doogee S55 | Crosscall Action-X3 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -37% | -14% | -26% | -11% | -29% | 70% | 1046% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 246.7 | 236 -4% | 269.4 9% | 268.1 9% | 264.7 7% | 181.6 -26% | 283 ? 15% | 1838 ? 645% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 172.2 | 86.6 -50% | 129.6 -25% | 97.1 -44% | 139.3 -19% | 73.6 -57% | 194.6 ? 13% | 1430 ? 730% |
| Random Read 4KB | 61 | 13.97 -77% | 35.1 -42% | 28.86 -53% | 47 -23% | 21.8 -64% | 82.7 ? 36% | 278 ? 356% |
| Random Write 4KB | 12.14 | 9.43 -22% | 11.23 -7% | 13.17 8% | 8.4 -31% | 11.9 -2% | 55.1 ? 354% | 310 ? 2454% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 72.3 ? | 80.6 ? 11% | 72.9 ? 1% | 73.7 2% | 84.1 ? 16% | 69 ? -5% | 78.1 ? 8% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 67.9 ? | 14.67 ? -78% | 53.2 ? -22% | 14.11 -79% | 56.2 ? -17% | 55.7 ? -18% | 61.8 ? -9% |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Elephone Soldier audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Crosscall Action-X3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0 / 0.09 Watt |
| Idle |  2.6 / 2.77 / 2.9 Watt |
| Load |
6.34 / 6.77 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Elephone Soldier 5000 mAh | Blackview BV5800 Pro 5580 mAh | Poptel P9000 Max 9000 mAh | Doogee S55 5500 mAh | Crosscall Action-X3 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 2800 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | 45% | -44% | 18% | 41% | 0% | 23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 0.87 67% | 0.92 65% | 2.3 12% | 1.1 58% | 0.56 78% | 2.6 ? -0% | 0.895 ? 66% |
| Idle Average * | 2.77 | 1.64 41% | 1.9 31% | 3.5 -26% | 1.9 31% | 1.57 43% | 2.77 ? -0% | 1.447 ? 48% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.9 | 1.68 42% | 2.19 24% | 5.9 -103% | 2.9 -0% | 1.68 42% | 2.9 ? -0% | 1.608 ? 45% |
| Load Average * | 6.34 | 5.79 9% | 3.1 51% | 8.7 -37% | 4.8 24% | 4.6 27% | 6.34 ? -0% | 6.41 ? -1% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.77 | 11.85 -75% | 3.12 54% | 11.2 -65% | 8.4 -24% | 5.92 13% | 6.77 ? -0% | 9.61 ? -42% |
* ... smaller is better
| Elephone Soldier 5000 mAh | Blackview BV5800 Pro 5580 mAh | Poptel P9000 Max 9000 mAh | Doogee S55 5500 mAh | Crosscall Action-X3 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 2800 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 493 | 780 58% | 1346 173% | 844 71% | 843 71% | 668 35% |
Pros
+ IP68认证
+ 系统性能优秀
+ 外置物理指南针
+ 丰富的传感器
Cons
- 缺少可以利用其传感器的应用
- 续航差
- 过热降频
- 指纹识别器没有用
Elephone Soldier是一个矛盾体。它提供了良好的性能以及充足的存储空间，这台手机外壳坚固，屏幕亮度高，适合室外使用，但是我们测评的这台设备的面板间有着不均匀的间隙，这使得我们对它的IP68认证表示怀疑。除此之外，它的大电池并没有掩盖不理想的续航成绩，而且Soldier上的许多传感器都需要下载第三方应用才能使用。
“Elephone Soldier是一台性能良好的智能手机，它引人注目的设计给我们留下了深刻的印象。不过，这台手机有着相当大的缺点，比如糟糕的续航。”、
Soldier是一款不同寻常的智能手机，在相机和指南针中配备有奇特的画中画模式。不过，它低于平均的续航时间和不那么可信的IP68评级使我们质疑它作为一台户外手机的可靠性。
Elephone Soldier
-
10/16/2019 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
