Notebookcheck Logo

惠普 Elite x3 平板手机 (包含 Lap Dock) 简短评测

商务健将。 惠普是唯一提供Windows 10 手机高级设备的制造商,主要针对企业级客户。除了很大的屏幕外,用户还能获得强大的电池容量,还有一个坚固的机身,它可以使用惠普的Workspace运行x86程序。
Convertible / 2-in-1 Desktop Phablet Security Smartphone Touchscreen Business
HP Elite x3 (ElitePad Series)
Processor
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 530, Core: 624 MHz
Memory
4 GB 
, LPDDR4
Display
5.96 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 493 PPI, 电容触控, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 4, Anti-reflective coating, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 耳麦合一 (3.5 mm), Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: distance, pressure, hall, position, acceleration, and G sensors, digital compass, BeiDou, Miracast, Wi-Fi Direct
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260AN (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (bands: 8, 2, 1, 4), LTE Cat. 6 (bands: 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 161.8 x 83.5
Battery
15.98 Wh, 4150 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.85 V, max. 64 g, one cell, wireless charging (Qi standard), Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 33 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 500 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (plus 2.4 MP Iris camera)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2x 0.6 W Bang & Olufsen speaker, charger, USB cable, documentation, HP Work Space, HP All-in-One Remote, HP Device Hub, Continuum, 24 Months Warranty, USB Type-C, iris scanner, IP67, MIL-STD 810G, fanless
Weight
195 g, Power Supply: 101 g
Price
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

161.8 mm 83.5 mm 7.8 mm 195 g159.5 mm 73.4 mm 8.1 mm 172 g158.2 mm 77.9 mm 7.3 mm 188 g156.9 mm 78.9 mm 7.9 mm 192 g155.3 mm 75.3 mm 5.19 mm 136 g151.9 mm 78.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g148.9 mm 71.9 mm 7.9 mm 163 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
1) HP Lap Dock 2) HP Elite x3
255
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
256
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with HP Lap Dock
Maximum: 268 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 256.8 cd/m² Minimum: 7.68 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 268 cd/m²
Contrast: 1072:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.12
357
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with HP Elite x3
Maximum: 357 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 336.4 cd/m² Minimum: 11.47 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 333 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.12

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 357.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 357.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 357.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
115867 Points
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points +7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
94122 Points -19%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points +12%
LG G6
151751 Points +31%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points +43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
26.42 fps
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps +127%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps -29%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps +101%
LG G6
46 fps +74%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.7 fps +118%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps +120%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
47.19 fps
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps +70%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps -43%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps +63%
LG G6
75 fps +59%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
92 fps +95%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps +120%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps
LG G6
27 fps
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps
LG G6
38 fps
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
16.09 fps
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps +74%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps -7%
LG G6
16 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps +158%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps +43%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
34.02 fps
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps -29%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps -21%
LG G6
29 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps +23%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
1499 Points
Huawei Mate 9
2772 Points +85%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points +57%
LG G6
2496 Points +67%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points +107%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points +120%
System (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
1384 Points
Huawei Mate 9
3616 Points +161%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points +146%
LG G6
3646 Points +163%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points +376%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points +284%
Memory (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
2003 Points
Huawei Mate 9
3850 Points +92%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points -3%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points +9%
LG G6
1930 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points +57%
Graphics (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
3974 Points
Huawei Mate 9
3939 Points -1%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points -49%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points +9%
LG G6
5138 Points +29%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points +54%
Web (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
458 Points
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points +135%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points +83%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points +109%
LG G6
1073 Points +134%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points +237%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points +154%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
8664 Points
Huawei Mate 9
11897 Points +37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
8059 Points -7%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points -10%
LG G6
9113 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
26053 Points +201%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
14050 Points +62%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
130 Points
Huawei Mate 9
152 Points +17%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
113 Points -13%
Lenovo Moto Z
112 Points -14%
LG G6
122 Points -6%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
204 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
154 Points +18%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
4398 ms *
Huawei Mate 9
2734 ms * +38%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
5553 ms * -26%
Lenovo Moto Z
3155 ms * +28%
LG G6
2464 ms * +44%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1103 ms * +75%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2237 ms * +49%

Legend

 
HP Elite x3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 44 °C37.8 °C35.1 °C 
 37.6 °C37.9 °C34.8 °C 
 37 °C36.9 °C34.2 °C 
Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 37.3 °C
34.2 °C35.5 °C37.1 °C
33.9 °C35.5 °C37.3 °C
33.2 °C35.3 °C36.1 °C
Maximum: 37.3 °C
Average: 35.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.42525.436.93125.327.74032.928.95033.632.16331.631.38028.428.51002724.712520.830.51602237.520021.343.525020.847.331521.252.740019.458.350019.563.663017.768.580017.971.1100017.872125017.374.7160017.474.8200016.773.8250017.272.9315018.266.3400017.962500017.657.5630017.761.2800017.861.71000017.9601250018.156.91600018.256.8SPL3082.5N1.347.8median 17.9median 61.2Delta1.411.331.635.725.424.825.324.932.925.633.635.131.630.128.423.32724.820.828.72235.521.343.320.849.321.253.719.455.119.56017.763.317.961.917.863.517.367.117.461.116.77017.272.618.274.117.976.217.675.717.773.917.871.517.972.518.166.718.254.13083.91.353.7median 17.9median 63.31.410.726.428.426.42826.72825.828.725.829.133.229.126.12626.123.925.523.927.724.727.733.426.933.441.53741.540.320.240.343.720.243.745.521.845.547224752.822.252.860.121.860.166.517.266.569.217.869.271.619.871.669.919.169.96815.46869.515.669.56614.96671.514.771.571.214.271.272.21472.271.213.971.26713.86758.913.958.952.413.952.454.713.754.781.529.581.549.91.349.9median 66median 17.2median 6610.13.810.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Elite x3Huawei Mate 9Apple iPhone 7 Plus
HP Elite x3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Mate 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.27 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.86 / 1.46 / 1.59 Watt
Load midlight 8.1 / 9.35 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Elite x3
4150 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Power Consumption
-90%
-4%
31%
11%
-4%
29%
Idle Minimum *
0.86
2.85
-231%
0.78
9%
0.68
21%
0.62
28%
0.77
10%
0.66
23%
Idle Average *
1.46
2.95
-102%
2.13
-46%
1.13
23%
1.43
2%
2.04
-40%
1.01
31%
Idle Maximum *
1.59
3.26
-105%
2.17
-36%
1.16
27%
1.48
7%
2.24
-41%
1.09
31%
Load Average *
8.1
8.92
-10%
6.32
22%
4.69
42%
5.52
32%
4.69
42%
3.97
51%
Load Maximum *
9.35
9.39
-0%
6.49
31%
5.24
44%
10.47
-12%
8.66
7%
8.34
11%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
36h 45min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 05min
HP Elite x3
4150 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-22%
23%
23%
13%
21%
7%
Reader / Idle
2205
1078
-51%
1538
-30%
1565
-29%
1835
-17%
1789
-19%
1371
-38%
H.264
760
611
-20%
947
25%
742
-2%
813
7%
779
3%
724
-5%
WiFi v1.3
422
369
-13%
758
80%
736
74%
587
39%
692
64%
407
-4%
Load
185
179
-3%
219
18%
275
49%
225
22%
252
36%
320
73%

Pros

+ 快速系统芯片
+ 优秀的语音质量,主动减噪
+ 坚固的外壳
+ 大屏显示
+ 可扩展存储
+ USB 3.1与DisplayPort / HDMI
+ 虹膜和指纹传感器
+ 强大的商业野心
+ 大容量电池

Cons

- 在负载下增加功耗
- 屏幕闪烁
In the test: HP Elite x3. Test unit provided by HP Germany.
In the test: HP Elite x3. Test unit provided by HP Germany.

惠普Elite x3是一款大屏平板手机,惠普将其宣传为平板电脑不是没有理由。作为成功的商务工具,它结合了功能强大的设计和功能。它针对卫生部门,物流业,POS业,工业而设计,为那些主要需要轻松访问其数据,并希望尽可能使用少的移动设备的工作人员而制造。

对于后者,惠普Elite x3做得非常好,因为它不仅可以用作智能手机,而且还可以作为一个功能有限的笔记本。在测试过程中,将其用作笔记本电脑的想法并不完全令人信服。显示屏幕相当暗,色彩再现可以更好。但是,我们喜欢将Elite x3变成多功能演示工具的附加端口。Lap Dock中的大容量电池也是一个加分项。

惠普Elite x3是一个以强大的硬件为基础的平板手机,代表了许多企业领域的、成功业务解决方案。

惠普Elite x3没有任何真正的缺点,因为它将全面的安全功能与相对安全的移动平台——Windows 10 Mobile相结合。对于大众消费领域,该操作系统不是很实用,而中型企业和大型企业很容易将设备集成到现有的IT基础设施中进行管理。此外,它还经常提供安全更新。但即使对于小企业和个体经营者来说,惠普也可以通过Workspace为云计算而作为一个比较实惠的入门,这样就不需要购买和维护更多的硬件。这是由各种服务和保修产品折中选择。起步价大约是 790 英镑

然而,作为一个大众消费产品,我们只能为核心Windows粉丝们,推荐这款机器。

注:本文是基于完整评测减版本,阅读完整的英文评测

HP Elite x3 - 06/02/2017 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
75 / 75 → 99%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
64 / 60 → 100%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
80%
Games Performance
52 / 63 → 83%
Application Performance
53 / 70 → 75%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 84%
Camera
72%
Average
79%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普 Elite x3 平板手机 (包含 Lap Dock) 简短评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-06-17 (Update: 2017-06-25)