惠普 EliteBook 725 G4 (A12-9800B, 全高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7270 | |
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET | |
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7270 | |
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET | |
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET (jseb) | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET (jseb) |
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 329 cd/m²
Contrast: 1732:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.69 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.23 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
46% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
50.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
49.16% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
HP EliteBook 725 G4 IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA TN LED, 1366x768, 12.5" | HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 12 E7270 IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | -9% | 37% | -19% | -9% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 49.16 | 47.15 -4% | 44.45 -10% | 67.9 38% | 39.7 -19% | 44.71 -9% |
sRGB Coverage | 72.3 | 71 -2% | 65.5 -9% | 98 36% | 59.2 -18% | 66.1 -9% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 50.8 | 48.71 -4% | 46.04 -9% | 69.8 37% | 41.07 -19% | 46.23 -9% |
Response Times | -3% | 9% | -3% | -1% | 9% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47 ? | 50 ? -6% | 35 ? 26% | 42 ? 11% | 38.4 ? 18% | 32.8 ? 30% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 24 ? -0% | 26 ? -8% | 28 ? -17% | 28.8 ? -20% | 27.2 ? -13% |
PWM Frequency | 217 ? | |||||
Screen | -85% | -56% | -29% | -73% | -49% | |
Brightness middle | 329 | 241 -27% | 326 -1% | 300 -9% | 353 7% | 337 2% |
Brightness | 310 | 240 -23% | 304 -2% | 280 -10% | 334 8% | 322 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 83 -6% | 81 -8% | 87 -1% | 91 3% | 91 3% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.54 -184% | 0.29 -53% | 0.31 -63% | 0.47 -147% | 0.32 -68% |
Contrast | 1732 | 446 -74% | 1124 -35% | 968 -44% | 751 -57% | 1053 -39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.69 | 8.04 -199% | 6.49 -141% | 4.9 -82% | 7.79 -190% | 5.71 -112% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.47 | 13.9 -211% | 15.95 -257% | 8.91 -99% | 15.19 -240% | 15.39 -244% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.23 | 9.52 -125% | 6.16 -46% | 6.69 -58% | 7.38 -74% | 5.15 -22% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.42 91% | 2.32 95% | 2.33 94% | 2.43 91% | 2.38 92% |
CCT | 6011 108% | 11362 57% | 7575 86% | 6487 100% | 6158 106% | 6881 94% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 46 | 45.03 -2% | 42 -9% | 63 37% | 37.72 -18% | 42.38 -8% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 72 | 71.12 -1% | 65 -10% | 98 36% | 58.87 -18% | 65.62 -9% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -30% /
-58% | -19% /
-38% | 2% /
-13% | -31% /
-52% | -16% /
-34% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) | |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 |
PCMark 7 Score | 4143 points | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2665 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3313 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3885 points | |
Help |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ512G8NY | Dell Latitude 12 E7270 Liteon L8H-256V2G | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE Liteonit LCH-512V2S | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -96% | 101% | -8% | 26% | 12% | |
Read Seq | 1963 | 125.3 -94% | 1315 -33% | 518 -74% | 498.4 -75% | 499.6 -75% |
Write Seq | 1409 | 124.3 -91% | 594 -58% | 423.3 -70% | 286.7 -80% | 403 -71% |
Read 512 | 949 | 40.95 -96% | 661 -30% | 414.8 -56% | 322.9 -66% | |
Write 512 | 890 | 57.6 -94% | 594 -33% | 379.9 -57% | 372.4 -58% | |
Read 4k | 29.75 | 0.495 -98% | 42.87 44% | 21.17 -29% | 24.89 -16% | 27.22 -9% |
Write 4k | 47.35 | 1.13 -98% | 151.6 220% | 86.3 82% | 88 86% | 83.6 77% |
Read 4k QD32 | 139.7 | 1.129 -99% | 568 307% | 227.3 63% | 280.5 101% | 316.5 127% |
Write 4k QD32 | 100.2 | 1.133 -99% | 491.7 391% | 174.7 74% | 241.9 141% | 273.1 173% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 5635 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1753 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 39764 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3955 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 866 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 442 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 338 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 54.9 | 29.8 | 20.9 | 10.7 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 46.8 | 35.8 | 22.7 | 7.8 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 28.7 | 20.7 | 13.7 | 5.1 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 21.7 | 14.7 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 14 | 9.2 | ||
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 12 | 11 | ||
Just Cause 3 (2015) | 16 | 13.2 | ||
The Division (2016) | 17.4 | 10.6 | ||
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 16.9 | 11.7 | ||
Dishonored 2 (2016) | 11 | 8.8 | ||
Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 31.9 | 12.2 | ||
For Honor (2017) | 20.6 | 7.1 | ||
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 11.9 | 5.3 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 30.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 31.7 / 34.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) | HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Pro A10-8700B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620 | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Latitude 12 E7270 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -5% | -2% | -13% | 2% | -0% | |
off / environment * | 30.4 | 28.9 5% | 30.7 -1% | 31.2 -3% | 28.9 5% | 29 5% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 30.5 -0% | 30.7 -1% | 31.2 -3% | 28.9 5% | 29 5% |
Idle Average * | 30.4 | 30.5 -0% | 30.7 -1% | 31.2 -3% | 28.9 5% | 29 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.4 | 30.5 -0% | 30.7 -1% | 31.2 -3% | 28.9 5% | 29 5% |
Load Average * | 31.7 | 38.2 -21% | 35.3 -11% | 43.3 -37% | 31.3 1% | 35.1 -11% |
Load Maximum * | 34.4 | 38.4 -12% | 33.7 2% | 43.3 -26% | 37.6 -9% | 37.8 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.7 °C / 80.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.6 °C / 2.8 F).
HP EliteBook 725 G4 PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) | HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Pro A10-8700B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620 | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Latitude 12 E7270 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -38% | -7% | -4% | -35% | -35% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 36.5 | 42.8 -17% | 37 -1% | 40.6 -11% | 44.3 -21% | 47.5 -30% |
Maximum Bottom * | 34.1 | 54.3 -59% | 38.9 -14% | 37 -9% | 52.6 -54% | 43.6 -28% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.8 | 33.2 -34% | 26.3 -6% | 24.5 1% | 32.3 -30% | 34.9 -41% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.8 | 36.5 -41% | 27 -5% | 24.9 3% | 35.1 -36% | 35.9 -39% |
* ... smaller is better
HP EliteBook 725 G4 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.66 / 1.3 Watt |
Idle | 4.5 / 6.3 / 8.3 Watt |
Load |
27.6 / 34.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP EliteBook 725 G4 PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) | HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Pro A10-8700B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620 | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Latitude 12 E7270 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -35% | 19% | -11% | 7% | 5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.5 | 5.4 -20% | 2.7 40% | 3.2 29% | 3.8 16% | 3.5 22% |
Idle Average * | 6.3 | 7.5 -19% | 4.8 24% | 7.8 -24% | 6.7 -6% | 5.5 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.3 | 13 -57% | 6.6 20% | 8.7 -5% | 7.2 13% | 6.7 19% |
Load Average * | 27.6 | 41.2 -49% | 28.5 -3% | 42.2 -53% | 27.2 1% | 28.9 -5% |
Load Maximum * | 34.5 | 44.7 -30% | 29 16% | 35.7 -3% | 30.2 12% | 42.1 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
HP EliteBook 725 G4 PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), 49 Wh | HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Pro A10-8700B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 44 Wh | HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 49 Wh | Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 52 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 E7270 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 46 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 49.2 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -26% | 66% | -9% | 36% | 20% | 14% | 56% | |
Reader / Idle | 700 | 553 -21% | 1346 92% | 1050 50% | 953 36% | |||
H.264 | 344 | 258 -25% | 532 55% | 466 35% | 483 40% | 512 49% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 380 | 281 -26% | 566 49% | 345 -9% | 508 34% | 501 32% | 566 49% | 501 32% |
Load | 123 | 83 -33% | 205 67% | 153 24% | 92 -25% | 66 -46% | 231 88% |
Pros
Cons
Elitebook 725 G4可以简单地说成是Elitebook 820 G4的“缩水版”。这两台设备在外观上几乎别无二致。725 G4同样搭配了高品质机身和优秀的键盘。它们的价位差别来自相对较便宜(性能也较低)的AMD处理器。
我们测试机型的APU处理器相比它的英特尔姊妹机型明显低出不少。不过,这块APU具备足够的性能满足办公和上网流量所需。作为补偿的是,AMD处理器的集成显卡优于英特尔处理器的表现。
Elitebook 725 G4适合对处理器性能和电池续航需求不高的用户考虑。
这台笔记本电脑在各种使用情况下都几乎不会变热,同时大部分时间都十分安静。但是一旦它的风扇开始运转,它就会发出一种时断时续的呜呜声,在这个问题上它也和姊妹机型完全相同,这完全不应该出现在这个价位的产品中。特别是725 G3和820 G3前代机型中就存在同样的问题。
一块极速的NVMe固态硬盘保证了系统的流畅运行。打开这台笔记本电脑的底盖可以更换这块固态硬盘。惠普为这台Elitebook搭配了一块整体表现不错的IPS屏幕。它的亮度、对比度都较高,可视角度也很广,出厂状态就具备不错的色彩还原准确度。
另外,我们的测试机搭载了LTE模组。因此,它可以方便地通过移动网络连接互联网。这台设备的电池续航也十分优秀,不过仍然明显落后于姊妹机型,需要尽可能长的电池续航的用户应该考虑Elite 820 G4。这个机型可以得到长达3年的质保。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
HP EliteBook 725 G4
- 03/20/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck