惠普 EliteBook 850 G4 (酷睿 i5, 全高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET
Brand: HP

有典型缺点的机器。 惠普更新了EliteBooks，以获取商业用户和大型企业采购经理的芳心。我们的评测将揭示EliteBook 850 G4是否能成功，还是惠普再次偷工减料，就像他们对该机前代所做的那样。

Benjamin Herzig, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 04/09/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET (EliteBook 850 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4-2133, 1 of 2 slots in use, 32 GB max.

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO35ED, TN LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, 256 GB

, 2280 PCIe NVMe SSD

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口 (输入/输出), Card Reader: 3合1 SD 卡读卡器, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 20.8 x 383.6 x 257.7

Battery

51 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 6 排巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, Discover HP Tpuchpoint Manager, HP Client Security Manager, HP Device Access Manager, HP Documentation, HP Sure Connect, HP Velocity, HP Workwise, Microsoft Office 365 Trial, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

1.883 kg, Power Supply: 324 g

Price

1437 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size comparison

HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE DIN A4 ❌

Right side: USB Type-C Gen1, DisplayPort, SD-card slot, 3.5-mm audio jack, USB 3.0 Type-A, Ethernet, DockingPort, SIM-card slot, power adapter

Left side: Kensington lock, VGA, USB 3.0 Type-A, SmartCard Reader

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 15 E5570	155 MB/s +112%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757	74 MB/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE	73.6 MB/s +1%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET	73.2 MB/s
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B	68.1 MB/s -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE	89.5 MB/s +5%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET	85.4 MB/s
Fujitsu LifeBook U757	82.6 MB/s -3%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	561 MBit/s +7%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	523 MBit/s
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	522 MBit/s 0%
iperf3 receive AX12
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	660 MBit/s +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	639 MBit/s +9%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	588 MBit/s


342 cd/m²	338 cd/m²	338 cd/m²
332 cd/m²	338 cd/m²	327 cd/m²
348 cd/m²	345 cd/m²	364 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AUO35ED tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 364 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 341.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 336 cd/m²
Contrast: 417:1 (Black: 0.81 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 13.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
53.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET AUO35ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE N156HCA-EAA, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Fujitsu LifeBook U757 LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B LG Philips LGD04D5 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell Latitude 15 E5570 LG Philips 156WHU, , 1366x768, 15.6"	HP EliteBook 850 G3 AU Optronics, , 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		-22%	8%	9%	-28%	-5%
Display P3 Coverage	56.8	44.08 -22%	65.8 16%	66.6 17%	40.48 -29%	54.2 -5%
sRGB Coverage	83.7	65.6 -22%	84.8 1%	85.7 2%	60.9 -27%	79.3 -5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	58.7	45.66 -22%	62 6%	62.8 7%	41.82 -29%	56 -5%
Response Times		4316%	-25%	-23%	-39%	-26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	47.2 ?(26.8, 20.4)	41.6 ?(22, 19.6) 12%	36 ?(17.2, 18.8) 24%	38 ?(14, 24) 19%	47 ?(22, 25) -0%	46.4 ?(22.4, 24) 2%
Response Time Black / White *	15.2 ?(10, 5.2)	20.8 ?(6.8, 14) -37%	26.4 ?(15.6, 10.8) -74%	25 ?(6, 19) -64%	27 ?(10, 17) -78%	27.2 ?(9.2, 18) -79%
PWM Frequency	199.2 ?(50)	26040 ?(40) 12972%				200 ?(50) 0%
Screen		31%	40%	20%	-5%	7%
Brightness middle	338	262 -22%	313 -7%	308 -9%	228 -33%	290 -14%
Brightness	341	245 -28%	294 -14%	319 -6%	236 -31%	287 -16%
Brightness Distribution	90	89 -1%	84 -7%	71 -21%	90 0%	85 -6%
Black Level *	0.81	0.24 70%	0.27 67%	0.61 25%	0.56 31%	0.54 33%
Contrast	417	1092 162%	1159 178%	505 21%	407 -2%	537 29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	10.9	4.5 59%	4.5 59%	4.51 59%	10.02 8%	9.7 11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	18.7	10.5 44%	10.5 44%	10.19 46%	15.93 15%	14.39 23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	13.3	3.5 74%	4 70%	2.91 78%	10.66 20%	10.83 19%
Gamma	2.11 ^104%	2.32 ^95%	2.24 ^98%	2.4 ^92%	2.48 ^89%	2.91 ^76%
CCT	16030 ^41%	6524 ^100%	6387 ^102%	6740 ^96%	11800 ^55%	12761 ^51%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	53.8	42.04 -22%	55.3 3%	56 4%	39 -28%	51.15 -5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	83.4	65.4 -22%	84.74 2%	86 3%	61 -27%	78.96 -5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		1442% / 825%	8% / 25%	2% / 12%	-24% / -14%	-8% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 26.8 ms rise
47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

199.2 Hz

≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 199.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 199.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook 850 G3 Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points +3%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel Core i5-7200U	128 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Core i5-7200U	128 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Core i5-7200U	126 Points
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel Core i5-6300U	124 Points -2%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B Intel Core i5-6200U	78 Points -38%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Core i5-7200U	330 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Core i5-7200U	330 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 850 G3 Intel Core i7-6500U	322 Points -2%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel Core i5-6300U	310 Points -6%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B Intel Core i5-6200U	219 Points -34%

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

38.24 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

330 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

126 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	3542 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3523 Points -1%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	3475 Points -2%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	3320 Points -6%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP	3282 Points -7%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4606 Points +6%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	4467 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	4330 Points
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP	4301 Points -1%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3542 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4330 points
Help

	HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		75%	-13%	-32%	-44%
Read Seq	1245	1318 6%	509 -59%	479.1 -62%	474.7 -62%
Write Seq	298.6	1166 290%	488.4 64%	333.1 12%	155 -48%
Read 512	673	933 39%	414.3 -38%	418 -38%	393.6 -42%
Write 512	298.8	860 188%	321.7 8%	320.5 7%	119.7 -60%
Read 4k	41.79	56.6 35%	36.43 -13%	25.66 -39%	34 -19%
Write 4k	138.4	130.6 -6%	88.4 -36%	64.7 -53%	96.6 -30%
Read 4k QD32	495	510 3%	402.8 -19%	226.2 -54%	383.3 -23%
Write 4k QD32	297.5	426.4 43%	256.7 -14%	211.4 -29%	100.2 -66%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256

Sequential Read: 1245 MB/s

Sequential Write: 298.6 MB/s

512K Read: 673 MB/s

512K Write: 298.8 MB/s

4K Read: 41.79 MB/s

4K Write: 138.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 495 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 297.5 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1431 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1417 Points
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1347 Points -5%
HP EliteBook 850 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1327 Points -6%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1309 Points -8%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	1296 Points -9%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	7030 Points +3%
Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	6963 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	6840 Points
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	6586 Points -4%
HP EliteBook 850 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	6303 Points -8%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	822 Points +4%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	792 Points
HP EliteBook 850 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	786 Points -1%
Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	762 Points -4%

3DMark 11 Performance		1534 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5666 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		748 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high
BioShock Infinite (2013)	42.4	24.2	20.5
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)	21.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	17.7

Noise Level

Idle		29 / 29 / 29 dB(A)
Load		31 / 33.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


31.2 °C	35.7 °C	35.2 °C
28.7 °C	34 °C	37 °C
23.7 °C	24.3 °C	24.8 °C

Maximum: 37 °C
Average: 30.5 °C


41.1 °C	40.1 °C	31.3 °C
37.5 °C	37.1 °C	30.9 °C
27.8 °C	28.1 °C	25.1 °C

Maximum: 41.1 °C
Average: 33.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 34.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.8 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.8 °C / 76.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+2.9 °C / 5.3 F).

HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.56 / 0.65 Watt
Idle	3.58 / 5.97 / 6.81 Watt
Load	29.4 / 39.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, TN LED, 1920x1080	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, IPS, 1920x1080	Fujitsu LifeBook U757 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, IPS LED, 1920x1080	Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B 6200U, HD Graphics 520, IPS, 1920x1080	Dell Latitude 15 E5570 6300U, HD Graphics 520, TN LED, 1366x768	HP EliteBook 850 G3 6500U, HD Graphics 520, TN LED, 1920x1080
Power Consumption		-14%	-9%	-51%	-10%	-20%
Idle Minimum *	3.58	3.6 -1%	3.96 -11%	6.6 -84%	4.5 -26%	5 -40%
Idle Average *	5.97	7.7 -29%	7.74 -30%	10.4 -74%	7.6 -27%	7.8 -31%
Idle Maximum *	6.81	8.2 -20%	8.64 -27%	12.7 -86%	8.7 -28%	8.4 -23%
Load Average *	29.4	30.8 -5%	28.8 2%	36 -22%	28.5 3%	28.8 2%
Load Maximum *	39.7	46.1 -16%	32 19%	35 12%	29.2 26%	43 -8%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		18h 01min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge)		8h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 37min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 40min

	HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh	Fujitsu LifeBook U757 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh	Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh	Dell Latitude 15 E5570 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 62 Wh	HP EliteBook 850 G3 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 46 Wh
Battery Runtime		3%	-17%	-16%	4%	-20%
Reader / Idle	1081	1167 8%		840 -22%	1231 14%	915 -15%
H.264	637	587 -8%			571 -10%	430 -32%
WiFi v1.3	530	454 -14%	440 -17%	512 -3%	632 19%	417 -21%
Load	160	201 26%		123 -23%	151 -6%	142 -11%

Pros

+ 高品质坚固的外壳

+ 几乎算是运行良好的输入设备

+ 非常冰冷和安静

+ 节能，电池续航长

+ 三年保修

+ 表现不俗

Cons

- 难以接受的TN面板，并且闪烁

- 没有雷电3接口

- 维护困难

- 比较贵

In review: HP EliteBook 850 G4. Review unit courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

总的来说EliteBook 850 G4是难免令人沮丧。虽然惠普使用此设备配备了正确的配件，但仍然令人失望。外壳坚固而且制作精良，输入设备是不错（虽然不完美），散热出色，电池续航也非常好，考虑到电池容量。总而言之，除了雷电3的缺乏，难以维护和价格高之外，还没有太多的缺点。

不幸的是，所有这一切惠普传统上的高端商务本特质，都被劣质的TN显示屏幕所掩盖。毕竟，该机价格在稍微超过1400欧元（约合1491美元）的区间里，即使是在你以1700欧元（约1811美元）获取最高配置机，它的显示效果也是一样的。是的，屏幕是是明亮的，但除此之外，它显示了您可以从TN面板中预期的所有“质量”。笔记本电脑规格表中列出，在德国尚不能获得超高清IPS选项。

惠普采用了所有正确的配件......除了一个：EliteBook 850 G4的TN面板，它搞砸了原本可以非常好的印象。

但除这就是为什么尽管它的所有功能和质量都不错，我们还是不能推荐EliteBook 850 G4的原因。如果是在五年前，这是一个完全不同的情况：当时几乎所有的商业笔记本电脑配备了类似的显示器。然而，惠普似乎是唯一没有获得备忘录的人。如今，TN面板在价格相同的笔记本电脑中全部消失。其主要竞争对手在其高端业务设备中提供全高清IPS面板。就连ThinkPad T570相当差劲的IPS面板都击败了EliteBook的劣质TN面板，更不用说其他高品质的IPS面板，例如富士通 Lifebook U757。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET - 03/25/2017 v6 ^(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis

88 / 98 → 89%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

87%

Connectivity

57 / 80 → 71%

Weight

64 / 20-67 → 94%

Battery

92%

Display

77%

Games Performance

55 / 68 → 81%

Application Performance

87 / 92 → 95%

Temperature

94%

Noise

98%

Audio

64%

Camera

27 / 85 → 32%

Average

75%

86%

Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 EliteBook 850 G4 (酷睿 i5, 全高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Benjamin Herzig, 2017-04- 9 (Update: 2017-04-16)