惠普 Envy 13-ad006ng (i7-7500U, MX150) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP Envy 13-ad006ng
Brand: HP

为游戏而生的惠普 XPS 13。一个配备GeForce MX150显卡和金属机身的紧凑型13.3英寸超极本？听起来似乎不错。在我们的综合评论更新中，将尝试通过对比MX150和酷睿 i7-7500U的方式，来确定HP Envy 13的优缺点。

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Kagnfei Zheng), Published 11/11/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Ultrabook Windows Laptop / Notebook Kaby Lake Geforce

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Envy 13-ad006ng (Envy 13-ad Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-7500U 2 x 2.7 - 3.5 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1671 MHz, RAM: 1252 MHz, 381.99, Optimus

Memory

7.9 GB

, DDR3L-1866, Dual-Channel, soldered on

Display

13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, BOE070E, IPS LED, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, 256 GB

, PCIe NVMe M.2 2280 SSD

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm Audio-Kombo-Port, Card Reader: micro SD

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 14 x 305 x 216

Battery

51 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Keyboard: 6排孤岛式键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, DropBox, HP JumpStar Apps, HP Support Assistant, HP Sure Connect, McAfee LiveSafe, Microsoft Office Trial, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.3 kg, Power Supply: 295 g

Price

1199 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB HP Envy 13-ad006ng Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U	159 MB/s +121%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	72 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB	68.1 MB/s -5%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U	190.6 MB/s +138%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB	88 MB/s +10%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	80 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Envy 13-ad006ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	682 MBit/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	614 MBit/s -10%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	538 MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	618 MBit/s +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	608 MBit/s +11%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	547 MBit/s


268 cd/m²	278 cd/m²	274 cd/m²
260 cd/m²	281 cd/m²	268 cd/m²
234 cd/m²	256 cd/m²	253 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE070E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 281 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 263.6 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 281 cd/m²
Contrast: 1222:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.63 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.85

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Envy 13-ad006ng BOE070E, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	HP Envy 13-ad065nr LG Philips LGD0576, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF), , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP AU Optronics AUO272D, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung LTN133HL09-M01, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display		-3%	-21%	-3%	-8%	6%
Display P3 Coverage	66.8	65.5 -2%	48.94 -27%	65.3 -2%	64.2 -4%	66 -1%
sRGB Coverage	86.3	83.8 -3%	73.3 -15%	82.9 -4%	65.3 -24%	95.5 11%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	63.1	61.3 -3%	50.5 -20%	60.6 -4%	65.3 3%	67.8 7%
Response Times		331%	14%	8%	-11%	-27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	48 ?(23, 25)	28 ?(14, 14) 42%	32.8 ?(16, 16.8) 32%	45 ?(12, 33) 6%	40 ?(12, 28) 17%	49 ?(20, 29) -2%
Response Time Black / White *	32 ?(17, 15)	22.4 ?(12.4, 10) 30%	33.2 ?(10.8, 22.4) -4%	29 ?(6, 23) 9%	22 ?(5, 17) 31%	27 ?(8, 19) 16%
PWM Frequency	1000 ?(90)	10200 ?(100) 920%			200 ?(20) -80%	50 ?(30) -95%
Screen		-4%	4%	4%	6%	18%
Brightness middle	281	290 3%	351.2 25%	343 22%	358 27%	347 23%
Brightness	264	270 2%	325 23%	306 16%	347 31%	334 27%
Brightness Distribution	83	78 -6%	89 7%	81 -2%	87 5%	80 -4%
Black Level *	0.23	0.32 -39%	0.195 15%	0.3 -30%	0.26 -13%	0.27 -17%
Contrast	1222	906 -26%	1801 47%	1143 -6%	1377 13%	1285 5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.83	4.8 1%	7.4 -53%	4.73 2%	5.22 -8%	3.29 32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.89	11.2 -26%	9.08 -2%	9.05 -2%	9.19 -3%	4.69 47%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.63	2.8 58%	6.71 -1%	3.29 50%	6.69 -1%	3.62 45%
Gamma	1.85 ^119%	2.19 ^100%	2.74 ^80%	2.36 ^93%	2.35 ^94%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6794 ^96%	6382 ^102%	7222 ^90%	6437 ^101%	6745 ^96%	7307 ^89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	56	54.9 -2%	50.48 -10%	54 -4%	59 5%	62 11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	86	83.5 -3%	73.31 -15%	83 -3%	91 6%	95 10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		108% / 59%	-1% / 0%	3% / 3%	-4% / 0%	-1% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23 ms rise
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1000 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U	167 Points +15%
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP Intel Core i7-7500U	146 Points +1%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng Intel Core i7-7500U	145 Points
HP Envy 13-ad065nr Intel Core i5-7200U	125 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U	118 Points -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Intel Core i7-7500U	110 Points -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U Intel Core i7-8550U	603 Points +71%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng Intel Core i7-7500U	353 Points
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP Intel Core i7-7500U	346 Points -2%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr Intel Core i5-7200U	314 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Intel Core i5-6200U	294 Points -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Intel Core i7-7500U	293 Points -17%

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

81.4 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

353 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

145 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8 | PCMark 10

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	3980 Points +5%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng GeForce MX150, i7-7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	3773 Points
HP Envy 13-ad065nr HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006	3760 Points 0%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	3432 Points -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	3147 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	3144 Points -17%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	4990 Points +2%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng GeForce MX150, i7-7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	4900 Points
HP Envy 13-ad065nr HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006	4669 Points -5%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	4436 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	4274 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	4184 Points -15%

PCMark 10 - Score
HP Envy 13-ad006ng GeForce MX150, i7-7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	3282 Points
HP Envy 13-ad065nr HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006	3273 Points 0%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3773 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4900 points
PCMark 10 Score		3282 points
Help

	HP Envy 13-ad006ng Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	HP Envy 13-ad065nr SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006	Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		193%	40%	14%
Read Seq	1019	1577 55%	1209 19%	489.4 -52%
Write Seq	195.4	1472 653%	314 61%	431.6 121%
Read 512	735	1165 59%		356.7 -51%
Write 512	172.3	1244 622%		389.1 126%
Read 4k	34.5	54.8 59%	43.4 26%	26.68 -23%
Write 4k	109.4	121.5 11%	153.4 40%	88.7 -19%
Read 4k QD32	494.6	407.5 -18%	487.6 -1%	246.3 -50%
Write 4k QD32	161.3	321.4 99%	312.2 94%	251.5 56%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6					-26%	12%
Write 4K	155.7				57.5 -63%	121.5 -22%
Read 4K	26.5				29.34 11%	24.92 -6%
Write Seq	312.3				342.5 10%	345 10%
Read Seq	928				503 -46%	1313 41%
Write 4K Q32T1	208.7				160.3 -23%	346.1 66%
Read 4K Q32T1	478.8				285.7 -40%	389.4 -19%
Write Seq Q32T1	305.1				330.8 8%	334.7 10%
Read Seq Q32T1	1601				552 -66%	1840 15%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		193% / 193%	40% / 40%	14% / 14%	-26% / -26%	12% / 12%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK

Sequential Read: 1019 MB/s

Sequential Write: 195.4 MB/s

512K Read: 735 MB/s

512K Write: 172.3 MB/s

4K Read: 34.5 MB/s

4K Write: 109.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 494.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 161.3 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Envy 13-ad006ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-7500U	3459 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	2447 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2417 Points -30%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	1810 Points -48%
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1649 Points -52%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1474 Points -57%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Envy 13-ad006ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-7500U	17750 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	13075 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	12078 Points -32%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	9511 Points -46%
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	9364 Points -47%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	7854 Points -56%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Envy 13-ad006ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-7500U	2841 Points
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2091 Points -26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	1940 Points -32%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	1158 Points -59%
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1120 Points -61%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	939 Points -67%

3DMark 11 Performance		3588 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		9800 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		2528 points
Help

... in comparison

The Witcher 3 ultra

The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite

The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	77.3 fps +180%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng GeForce MX150, i7-7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	27.64 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	22.4 fps -19%
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	17.1 fps -38%

BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset
HP Envy 13-ad006ng GeForce MX150, i7-7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	79 fps
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	57.1 fps -28%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	31.1 fps -61%
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	29.1 fps -63%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006	26.3 fps -67%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	173.9	94	79	29.72
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)	46.46	38.73	27.87	9.9
The Witcher 3 (2015)	45.13	27.64	14.47	9
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	60	34.06	17

Noise Level

Idle		30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB(A)
Load		37.3 / 34.2 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


30.5 °C	41.6 °C	35.3 °C
28.6 °C	41 °C	38 °C
26 °C	25 °C	29.3 °C

Maximum: 41.6 °C
Average: 32.8 °C


21.6 °C	33.4 °C	29.8 °C
28.2 °C	28.7 °C	27.2 °C
27.5 °C	27.6 °C	26.3 °C

Maximum: 33.4 °C
Average: 27.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 36 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


23 °C	23 °C	23 °C
21.9 °C	23.1 °C	22.4 °C
21.6 °C	21 °C	22.6 °C

Maximum: 23.1 °C
Average: 22.4 °C


23.8 °C	23.3 °C	24.1 °C
23.1 °C	22.9 °C	23.1 °C
22.5 °C	22.2 °C	22.4 °C

Maximum: 24.1 °C
Average: 23 °C

Power Supply (max.) 27.5 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


32.7 °C	41.3 °C	37.7 °C
33.3 °C	42.7 °C	39.6 °C
28.6 °C	28.4 °C	30.6 °C

Maximum: 42.7 °C
Average: 35 °C


31.7 °C	33.3 °C	30.3 °C
33.1 °C	29.4 °C	28 °C
28.6 °C	29.1 °C	27.3 °C

Maximum: 33.3 °C
Average: 30.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.3 °C | Room Temperature 22.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.4 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).

HP Envy 13-ad006ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.46 / 0.52 Watt
Idle	2.8 / 5.8 / 7.7 Watt
Load	48 / 48 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Envy 13-ad006ng i7-7500U, GeForce MX150, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3"	HP Envy 13-ad065nr i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IGZO IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3"	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Power Consumption		17%	-10%	2%	0%	-10%
Idle Minimum *	2.8	2.8 -0%	3.6 -29%	3.5 -25%	4.1 -46%	4 -43%
Idle Average *	5.8	5.8 -0%	7.4 -28%	6.6 -14%	5.8 -0%	6.6 -14%
Idle Maximum *	7.7	6.4 17%	8.7 -13%	7.5 3%	6 22%	7.4 4%
Load Average *	48	31.3 35%	43 10%	34.7 28%	42.5 11%	41.7 13%
Witcher 3 ultra *	35
Load Maximum *	48	31.7 34%	42 12%	39.6 17%	41.4 14%	52.4 -9%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		19h 58min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge)		7h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 58min

	HP Envy 13-ad006ng i7-7500U, GeForce MX150, 51 Wh	HP Envy 13-ad065nr i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53.6 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 46 Wh	Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh	Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 40 Wh
Battery Runtime		22%	-35%	-0%	17%	-22%
Reader / Idle	1198	1487 24%	468 -61%	966 -19%	1108 -8%	718 -40%
H.264	476			416 -13%		423 -11%
WiFi v1.3	425	570 34%	338 -20%	577 36%	589 39%	389 -8%
Load	118	127 8%	89 -25%	112 -5%	143 21%	83 -30%

Pros

+ 高档的金属外观设计

+ 得益于窄边框的精致设计

+ 即使在负载下，风扇噪音也可以接受

+ MX150采用高度便携式设计

+ 掌托和底部始终保持凉爽

Cons

- 显示亮度只是平均水平

- 没有哑光显示的选项

- 没有HDMI，SD读卡器或雷电接口

- 鼠标按键有咔咔声

- 长时间的负荷会导致节流

In review: HP Envy 13, courtesy of HP Germany.

惠普 Envy 13的设计目标是：能和惠普 XPS 13 匹敌，且具有吸引力的13.3英寸主流超极本——价格也是。但从这一点上来说，Envy略显失色。

有一点是 XPS 13 所没有的：专用显卡。这是惠普的明显优点。毕竟 MX150 会是用户购买该机的一大理由。Envy在很多方面都做的很好：产品质量很好，得益于窄边框设计，外观紧凑而具有吸引力。冷却系统非常强劲，特别是在达到一定的发热和噪声水平时候。显示屏有它的缺点，但是，客观上，它看起来非常棒，显示锐利，对比清晰。

与其他极品对比，它的屏幕亮度不算出众。更可惜的是，它不配备哑光屏幕选择。这将影响户外的使用。作为一个小型笔记本，这实在是个问题。儿接口的选择上，该机也欠佳：我们会希望它支持HDMI，全尺寸SD卡插槽，和雷电3。惠普 13-ad065nr的触控板不是很让人满意，因为玻璃质感的鼠标键，会有咔咔声。而高性能系统的另一个潜在缺点，是在压力测试过程中发生热节流。当然，在正常使用的情况下，节流也可能发生。

有时候，原本的会更好：我们没有足够的理由推荐用户购买惠普 Envy 13，而不是戴尔 XPS13.

即便有些缺点，Envy 13不能说是一个差的笔电。除了略便宜的价格，和人专用的显卡，我们没有发现它更多的闪光点。当考虑物理接口、很显示屏亮度以及电池续航能力时，戴尔 XPS更为高端而且表现更好。而且它也拥有酷睿 i7-8550U 处理器。因此，我们不推荐购买Envy 13。那些喜欢Envy 13的用户，应该寻找拥有最新硬件配置的机器。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP Envy 13-ad006ng - 10/17/2017 v6 ^(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis

85 / 98 → 87%

Keyboard

71%

Pointing Device

81%

Connectivity

58 / 80 → 72%

Weight

71 / 35-78 → 85%