惠普 Envy x360 15t-w200 变形本简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Describe the case: size, weight. compare to others
SD Card Reader
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 204.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1009:1 (Black: 0.203 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.86 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
43.31% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 BOE0679 , IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Chi Mey CHMN15D3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 AU Optronics B156HW01 V0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | -12% | -2% | 41% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 43.31 | 41.84 -3% | 38.04 -12% | 42.58 -2% | 62.8 45% |
sRGB Coverage | 65 | 62.7 -4% | 57.1 -12% | 63.9 -2% | 88.2 36% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.75 | 43.25 -3% | 39.3 -12% | 43.99 -2% | 63.9 43% |
Response Times | 23% | 25% | 8% | 22% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56 ? | 30.8 ? 45% | 42 ? 25% | 43.2 ? 23% | 32.8 ? 41% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 22 ? 24% | 22 ? 24% | 30.8 ? -7% | 28 ? 3% |
PWM Frequency | 201.6 | 200 ? -1% | |||
Screen | 6% | 1% | 5% | 3% | |
Brightness middle | 204.9 | 225 10% | 266 30% | 254 24% | 298 45% |
Brightness | 190 | 210 11% | 249 31% | 230 21% | 295 55% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 85 4% | 85 4% | 86 5% | 88 7% |
Black Level * | 0.203 | 0.22 -8% | 0.26 -28% | 0.26 -28% | 0.57 -181% |
Contrast | 1009 | 1023 1% | 1023 1% | 977 -3% | 523 -48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 4.13 12% | 4.98 -6% | 4.23 10% | 4.43 6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.03 | 9.36 -4% | 11.82 -31% | 9.5 -5% | 6.62 27% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.86 | 2.53 34% | 2.68 31% | 2.87 26% | 2.45 37% |
Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.6 85% | 2.27 97% | 2.35 94% | 2.45 90% |
CCT | 6834 95% | 6360 102% | 6583 99% | 5965 109% | 6326 103% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 41 | 39.8 -3% | 36 -12% | 40.35 -2% | 57.2 40% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 64 | 62.5 -2% | 57 -11% | 63.48 -1% | 87.8 37% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
7% | 5% /
1% | 4% /
4% | 22% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise | |
↘ 33.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 201.6 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 201.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 201.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3236 points | |
Help |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 WDC Slim WD10SPCX-24HWST1 | HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0 | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 | Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK Liteonit CV3-DE256 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 7% | 8595% | 9131% | 8601% | |
Read Seq | 104.3 | 106.9 2% | 458.6 340% | 487 367% | 475.6 356% |
Write Seq | 104.2 | 106 2% | 270 159% | 450.7 333% | 425 308% |
Read 512 | 31.86 | 33.01 4% | 397.4 1147% | 384.5 1107% | 258.4 711% |
Write 512 | 48.09 | 51.2 6% | 242 403% | 356.3 641% | 318.9 563% |
Read 4k | 0.352 | 0.373 6% | 19.88 5548% | 27.05 7585% | 35.48 9980% |
Write 4k | 1.048 | 1.097 5% | 86.7 8173% | 63.7 5978% | 93 8774% |
Read 4k QD32 | 0.801 | 1.029 28% | 275.3 34270% | 281.5 35044% | 281.2 35006% |
Write 4k QD32 | 1.05 | 1.055 0% | 197.6 18719% | 232 21995% | 138.7 13110% |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 11671 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2286 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 42360 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6639 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1340 points | |
Help |
Batman: Arkham Knight | |
1280x720 Low / Off AF:Trilinear (sort by value) | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 | |
1366x768 Normal / Off AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 | |
1920x1080 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x (sort by value) | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 |
Metro: Last Light | |
1024x768 Low (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
1366x768 Medium (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
1366x768 High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value) | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK |
BioShock Infinite | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value) | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
1366x768 High Preset (sort by value) | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value) | |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 63 | 46 | 46 | 13 |
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 43 | 34 | 21 | |
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 27 | 23 | 11 |
CPU Clock (GHz) | GPU Clock (MHz) | Average CPU Temperature (°C) | Average GPU Temperature (°C) | |
Prime95 Stress | 3.2 | - | 60 | - |
FurMark Stress | - | 1019 | - | 59 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 0.4 | 1019 | 59 | 57 |
Emissions
Noise Level
Idle |
| 33.8 / 33.9 / 34.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36 / 44 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-24HWST1 | HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0 | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 | Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | 3% | 9% | 8% | |
off / environment * | 30.2 | 28.9 4% | 31.2 -3% | 29 4% | 29.5 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 33.8 | 29.6 12% | 32.8 3% | 29 14% | 29.5 13% |
Idle Average * | 33.9 | 29.6 13% | 32.8 3% | 29 14% | 29.5 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 34.2 | 30.2 12% | 33.8 1% | 29 15% | 29.6 13% |
Load Average * | 36 | 39 -8% | 36.3 -1% | 35.9 -0% | 38.1 -6% |
Load Maximum * | 44 | 39.9 9% | 36.3 17% | 41 7% | 38.2 13% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.2 °C / 73.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+4.9 °C / 8.8 F).
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Frequency Comparison (Checkbox selectable!)
Graph 1: Pink Noise 100% Vol.; Graph 2: Audio off
Energy Management
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.5 Watt |
Idle | 5 / 8.3 / 7.8 Watt |
Load |
28.8 / 49.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-24HWST1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 6200U, HD Graphics 520, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK 6200U, Radeon R7 M460, Liteonit CV3-DE256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 5% | 9% | -6% | -34% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5 | 4.3 14% | 4.34 13% | 4 20% | 6.5 -30% |
Idle Average * | 8.3 | 8.2 1% | 7.5 10% | 7.5 10% | 13.3 -60% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.8 | 9 -15% | 8.4 -8% | 8.1 -4% | 15.1 -94% |
Load Average * | 28.8 | 29.8 -3% | 30.4 -6% | 40.8 -42% | 30.8 -7% |
Load Maximum * | 49.7 | 36.4 27% | 32.5 35% | 57.3 -15% | 38.5 23% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 48 Wh | HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK 6200U, Radeon R7 M460, 35 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 25% | -11% | 11% | 24% | |
Reader / Idle | 635 | 449 -29% | 730 15% | 705 11% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 320 | 401 25% | 299 -7% | 335 5% | 431 35% |
Load | 89 | 93 4% | 100 12% | 113 27% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
博而不精。惠普Envy x360 15t-w200似乎停滞在2014年; 它想接过全能变形本的接力棒,却忽视了一个个问题:它是一个15.6英寸而且重量超过5磅的设备,几乎不能打破5小时上网续航的极限。 无论是在然而照明条件下,它的昏暗和沉闷的高反光液晶触摸屏,都让人感到痛苦;更严重的是,由于铰链的问题,点击屏幕会感受到明显的反弹。 同时,由于低功耗的5400 RPM机械硬盘,它无法与许多搭载快捷的固态硬盘的同价位设备匹敌。 并且后续的升级不像其他设备那样容易,因为想触及可更换部件(包括上诉的机械硬盘),你需要大量的拆卸工作。
博而不精。惠普Envy x360 15t-w200似乎停滞在2014年。
在优势面上,它是一个设法保持冰冷的设备,不会产生明显噪声(很大程度上由于一个非常保守的固件TDP limitation);它的外壳设计得坚固并且相对有吸引力,尽管是采用了混合金属和塑料的结构。此外,GPU性能似乎没有任何程度的吃紧,即使在持续负载下,仍然保持稳定的时钟速率。然而,这些少数的优秀特质,依旧被上述大量的缺点所掩盖。
对真正优秀的变形本感兴趣的用户,(在预算允许的情况下)可以考虑高端产品HP Spectre x360;或者在深思后,选择牺牲多功能的常规笔记本。后者存在更多的选择。 毕竟,身处2016年,是不是时候认清现实?我们真的需要将的15英寸笔记本折叠成为一个平板电脑?
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
-
12/16/2016 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein