Fairphone 4智能手机评测--注重环保的5G手机
Possible competitors in comparison
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.5 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Fairphone 4 SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619 | 225 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.30" | 2340x1080 | |
76.5 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2019 | Fairphone 3 SD 632, Adreno 506 | 189 g | 5.65" | 2160x1080 | ||
79.1 % v7 (old) | mobilcom-debitel rephone Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 208 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2340x1080 | ||
80.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2021 | Nokia X20 SD 480, Adreno 619 | 220 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能 - 模块化,但有点笨重
一部现代智能手机由数百个部件组成,其中大多数部件需要的原材料并不容易得到。尽管如此,大多数设备在几年甚至几个月后就被扔进了垃圾桶,因为它们坏了或者需要一个新的智能手机。
Fairphone希望改变这种状况,并一直使其手机尽可能易于维修,尽可能公平地购买原材料,并希望改善整个生产链中的工人条件。该制造商的最新设备被称为Fairphone 4,应该是结合了现代功能和可持续性。
要检查这些承诺,买方可以在网站上获得关于每部手机的全面报告,或相信最新的Fairphone 4或制造商拥有的许多可持续性印章,其中包括Blue Angel或iFixit的9.3/10的可修复性。.
由于采用了普通的十字螺丝和最简单的设计,备件可以快速和容易地更换,电池也可以很容易地拆下和更换。这带来的缺点是,Fairphone 4的结构不能像其他手机那样纤细,而且重量也相当高,为225克(约7.9盎司)。
机箱是由铝制成的,而可拆卸的橡胶背壳是由再生塑料制成的。在这里,你可以选择是否要灰色、纯绿色或带有明显彩色回收塑料片的绿色。额外的背盖可以从制造商那里购买,价格略低于20欧元(约23美元)。外壳根据IP54进行保护,所以灰尘不能造成任何损害,水溅也不能。
128GB大容量存储/6GB内存或256GB存储/8GB内存可作为选项。较小的型号价格为580欧元(约合人民币654元),装备较好的型号为650欧元(约合人民币733元)。充电线和充电器必须单独购买。当然,Fairphone 4比这里的中上层绝对便宜的产品要贵一些,但你至少可以得到5年的长期保修。
SD卡读卡器是独立的,用我们的参考卡Angelbird V60可以达到正常的传输速率。只能插入物理SIM卡,但也可以使用eSIM。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Fairphone 4 (Angelbird V60) | |
mobilcom-debitel rephone (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 根据要求,也可以不使用谷歌。
用于移动支付服务和其他应用的NFC也在其中。很好的是,Fairphone安装了一个快速的USB-C 3.1端口,加快了数据传输,还可以作为显示器连接的DisplayPort。
Fairphone 4还配备了WiFi 5,因此在互联网上速度很快。与前代产品相比,在速度和连接的稳定性方面可以看到明显的进步。现在的移动互联网也是最新的:一些频率支持5G,也有足够数量的4G频段,因此智能手机可以经常在国外使用。
Android 11是预装的,制造商承诺从2022年底开始至少有5年的更新。在测试时,最新的安全补丁是2021年12月的,因此仍然是相当最新的。有Widevin-L1认证,因此流媒体服务也可以在高清状态下使用。
如果你想拥有一部没有谷歌服务的Fairphone,你可以下载特别调整的 /e/OS下载或从e.Foundation购买预装了/e/OS的Fairphonehttps://esolutions.shop/.
触摸屏可以顺利操作,指纹传感器被集成在右侧的待机按钮中。它也能可靠地工作,并迅速解锁设备。你可以选择是否要先按下按钮来激活指纹传感器,或者是否要一直激活它。始终开启的模式显然更方便,但如果你不小心用另一个手指触摸待机按钮,传感器的反应非常敏感。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
mobilcom-debitel rephone | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia X20 | |
Fairphone 3 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Fairphone 4 | |
mobilcom-debitel rephone | |
Nokia X20 | |
Fairphone 3 |
照相机 - Fairphone中的高质量4800万像素照相机
Fairphone 4的主摄像头分辨率为4800万像素,但默认只拍摄1200万像素的照片。作为回报,4个像素合二为一,可以实现更高的出光率。然而,如果需要,也可以用全分辨率记录照片。
主摄像头的照片在细节上看起来也相当清晰,显示出相当干净的图像。然而,低光照情况不是该相机的优势。
Fairphone 4也有一个高分辨率的广角镜头。这也可以产生体面的照片,但你不应该把它们放大太多;它们在细节上相当不准确。两个摄像头之间的混合变焦是可能的。如果你喜欢,你也可以用这台相机拍摄微距照片。
视频可以用30帧/秒的4K视频或60帧/秒的1080p视频进行录制。录像效果很好,但在亮度变化时,智能手机的动作有点突兀。自动对焦可以快速而准确地完成工作。广角摄像头不能用于预装应用程序中的视频。
前面有一个2500万像素的摄像头,但仔细观察,其照片看起来很不干净。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low LightWide-angle camera显示 - 无PWM与环境电话
全高清IPS屏幕具有该级别的典型亮度,但在这方面无法跟上OLED屏幕。然而,对于偶尔的户外使用,它应该是足够的。
在我们的测量中,黑值相当高,这导致对比度下降到1000:1以下,颜色看起来不再那么明亮。
我们没有注意到PWM的闪烁,在可调节的颜色模式 "自然 "中,颜色被合理准确地呈现,但OLED屏幕在这里也是领先的。在灰阶中可以看到略带褐色的偏色。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 513 cd/m²
Contrast: 950:1 (Black: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.321
Fairphone 4 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Fairphone 3 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | mobilcom-debitel rephone IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Nokia X20 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -7% | 20% | 24% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46 ? | 57.6 ? -25% | 31 ? 33% | 43 ? 7% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 26.8 ? 11% | 28 ? 7% | 18 ? 40% |
PWM Frequency | 22320 ? | |||
Screen | -55% | -46% | -26% | |
Brightness middle | 513 | 511 0% | 503 -2% | 646 26% |
Brightness | 492 | 489 -1% | 471 -4% | 617 25% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 92 5% | 88 0% | 89 1% |
Black Level * | 0.54 | 0.48 11% | 0.3 44% | 0.7 -30% |
Contrast | 950 | 1065 12% | 1677 77% | 923 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.96 | 7.4 -150% | 8.54 -189% | 5.71 -93% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.55 | 14.2 -156% | 13.32 -140% | 8.9 -60% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 9.5 -164% | 9 -150% | 6.2 -72% |
Gamma | 2.321 95% | 2.21 100% | 1.869 118% | 2.122 104% |
CCT | 6032 108% | 9381 69% | 8942 73% | 8256 79% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -31% /
-46% | -13% /
-32% | -1% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 25 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 速度快,但也很温暖
芯片 高通骁龙750G 5G被用作SoC。它提供了良好的中端性能。当然也有来自小米或OnePlus的设备,它们以更少的钱提供更多的动力,但又不注重可持续性。
Fairphone 4的功率绝对足以满足日常使用,即使在使用更复杂的应用程序时也是如此。与之相比 公平电话3或其他可持续发展的手机相比,Fairphone 4要快得多。由于采用了UFS 2.1,该设备在存储速度方面可以令人信服。
在较长的负载下,测试设备会显著升温。我们在机箱上测量到最高47.7℃(约118°F)。这已经非常明显了,虽然还不至于让人不愉快。然而,我们也是在室温下测量的;在非常热的环境中,该设备的外部实际上可能变得太热。
可持续发展的智能手机中包括立体声扬声器,但它们听起来有点薄。至少,高音部分没有令人不快的过度强调。用户可以通过USB-C或蓝牙连接外部音频设备,并支持目前所有的aptX编解码器。
在我们的WLAN测试中,3,905 mAh的电池持续了13:24小时。这并不是一个糟糕的运行时间,特别是由于你可以通过更换可拆卸的电池将运行时间延长一倍。相比之下 公平电话3,后继者的运行时间也明显更长。然而,其他可持续发展的手机提供稍大的电池,因此甚至更多的耐力。
智能手机可以用最大20瓦的功率充电,但你必须自己提供充电器和充电线;它们不包括在交货范围内。充电最多可以在100分钟内完成。
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (632 - 658, n=9) | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia X20 | |
mobilcom-debitel rephone | |
Fairphone 3 | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=173, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (1792 - 2009, n=9) | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia X20 | |
mobilcom-debitel rephone | |
Fairphone 3 |
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years) | |
mobilcom-debitel rephone | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (7498 - 9800, n=5) | |
Fairphone 4 |
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (7.1 - 33, n=9) | |
Nokia X20 | |
mobilcom-debitel rephone | |
Fairphone 3 | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (17 - 20, n=9) | |
Nokia X20 | |
mobilcom-debitel rephone | |
Fairphone 3 | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (6.7 - 21, n=9) | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Nokia X20 | |
mobilcom-debitel rephone | |
Fairphone 3 | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Fairphone 4 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (3.3 - 7.6, n=9) | |
Nokia X20 | |
mobilcom-debitel rephone | |
Fairphone 3 |
Fairphone 4 | Fairphone 3 | mobilcom-debitel rephone | Nokia X20 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -68% | -49% | 15% | -1% | 206% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 917 | 132.9 -86% | 308 -66% | 489.3 -47% | 760 ? -17% | 1834 ? 100% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 214.8 | 130.1 -39% | 190 -12% | 462.7 115% | 297 ? 38% | 1426 ? 564% |
Random Read 4KB | 158.5 | 71.3 -55% | 105.8 -33% | 165.4 4% | 152.9 ? -4% | 278 ? 75% |
Random Write 4KB | 168.7 | 16.96 -90% | 22.9 -86% | 144.6 -14% | 131.6 ? -22% | 310 ? 84% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Fairphone 4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia X20 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Fairphone 4 3905 mAh | Fairphone 3 3000 mAh | mobilcom-debitel rephone 4500 mAh | Nokia X20 4470 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||
WiFi Websurfing | 804 | 662 -18% | 898 12% | 879 9% | 982 ? 22% |
Pros
Cons
结论--可持续的说服力
Fairphone 4在许多方面实现了模块化、公平、可持续的智能手机概念的现代化。当然,它的外壳并不像目前的高端智能手机那样纤细别致,当然也有600欧元左右(约676美元)的更强大的手机。
然而,我们在测试中得到的印象是,Fairphone在高质量的外观、适合日常使用的性能、体面的相机和手机的可持续发展概念之间做到了很好的折中。这包括螺丝和易于更换的部件,公平的生产条件,可理解的环境平衡,以及关于无谷歌的自由选择Android 。
同样令人高兴的是,制造商自信地避免了DRM认证、更新时间或USB-C端口的小绊脚石,并在所有领域提供良好的设备。与社区的密切联系在这里无疑是有帮助的。
Fairphone 4是一款现代的、装备精良的智能手机,以其模块化和可持续的概念而令人信服。
如果你想在购买智能手机时有一个比较平静的良心,如果包括电池在内的可更换组件对你来说很重要,如果你仍然不想没有5G、快速Wi-Fi和高性能等现代功能,你将在Fairphone 4中得到一个良好的整体包装。
一个更便宜的选择是 遥控器但它在欧洲以外的地方几乎没有供应。诺基亚也试图通过较长的更新周期和较少的配件变得更加可持续,并提供了一个新的设备,即 诺基亚X20一款更便宜,但也不容易维修的智能手机。
Fairphone 4
-
01/29/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt