亚马逊 Fire HD 8 (2017) 平板电脑简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 419 cd/m²
Contrast: 1074:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 10.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.6
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Xiaomi MiPad 2 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 10% | 17% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle | 419 | 363 -13% | 425 1% | 460 10% |
| Brightness | 412 | 348 -16% | 402 -2% | 445 8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 90 -1% | 91 0% | 90 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.26 33% | 0.4 -3% | 0.45 -15% |
| Contrast | 1074 | 1396 30% | 1063 -1% | 1022 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.5 | 5.8 32% | 4.98 41% | 6.2 27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.8 | 17.8 -29% | 6.61 52% | 10.5 24% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10.3 | 5.5 47% | 5.2 50% | 6.5 37% |
| Gamma | 2.6 85% | 2.24 98% | 2.65 83% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 6216 105% | 7388 88% | 7249 90% | 8056 81% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
* ... smaller is better
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A | Xiaomi MiPad 2 | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -14% | 12% | 69% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 159.1 | 158.4 0% | 147.9 -7% | 249.7 57% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 47.23 | 45.71 -3% | 56.4 19% | 117.2 148% |
| Random Read 4KB | 21.55 | 21.96 2% | 24.42 13% | 32.04 49% |
| Random Write 4KB | 11.51 | 8.35 -27% | 13.96 21% | 31.35 172% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 51.1 | 35.2 -31% | 61.7 21% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 34.15 | 24.9 -27% | 23.52 -31% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.04 / 0.18 Watt |
| Idle |  0.99 / 2.74 / 2.83 Watt |
| Load |
4.51 / 5.69 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 mAh | Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A 4000 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -3% | -110% | -46% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.99 | 1.32 -33% | 3.33 -236% | 1.51 -53% |
| Idle Average * | 2.74 | 2.71 1% | 5.01 -83% | 3.64 -33% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.83 | 2.83 -0% | 5.19 -83% | 3.68 -30% |
| Load Average * | 4.51 | 4.24 6% | 8.32 -84% | 6.95 -54% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.69 | 5.01 12% | 9.33 -64% | 9.11 -60% |
* ... smaller is better
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 mAh | Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A 4000 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -30% | -45% | -32% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2032 | 1305 -36% | 1110 -45% | |
| H.264 | 744 | 624 -16% | 583 -22% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 770 | 472 -39% | 421 -45% | 546 -29% |
| Load | 393 | 287 -27% | 268 -32% |
Pros
Cons
与它的7寸和10寸师兄师弟以及前代机型相似的是，亚马逊Fire HD 8 (2017)提供了难以置信的性价比。
搭配一块8寸1280x800像素IPS屏幕，一颗MediaTek MT8163四核处理器，和16或32GB闪存，Fire HD提供了日常使用所需的性能。尽管大部分竞争对手在性能上不占劣势，但售价也都相比更高。在80美元到125美元之间，这台品质优秀的平板电脑可以带给用户长电池续航和不错的立体声音响效果。
已经拥有前代机型的用户，可以考虑跳过这个最新版本。除了一些较小的改进（支持更大容量的microSD卡，稍快的显卡）之外，它的变化并不大。
另一方面，这台平板电脑也有它受到限制的地方，其中比较重要的可能是它的配套亚马逊系列服务。谷歌的Play Store并没有得到官方支持，安装它将会破坏质保。如果你愿意在亚马逊的世界中生活的话，Fire HD 8 (2017)将是个完美的设备。
它的其他弱点包括过时很久的安卓5.1.1操作系统，缺少GPS和移动网络支持，以及差到你需要睁一只眼闭一只眼才可能勉强接受的相机。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
- 07/07/2017 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Price comparison
