亚马逊 Fire Tablet 简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Amazon Fire Tablet | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Amazon Fire Tablet |
|
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 325 cd/m²
Contrast: 850:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 1.99
Amazon Fire Tablet IPS, 1024x600, 7" | Amazon Fire Kids Edition Late 2015 IPS, 1024x600, 7" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 IPS, 1280x800, 7" | Acer Iconia One 8 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Xiaomi MiPad 2 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -16% | 15% | 26% | 30% | 24% | |
Brightness middle | 323 | 337 4% | 358 11% | 367 14% | 425 32% | 460 42% |
Brightness | 299 | 313 5% | 344 15% | 338 13% | 402 34% | 445 49% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 84 1% | 92 11% | 83 0% | 91 10% | 90 8% |
Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.63 -66% | 0.37 3% | 0.31 18% | 0.4 -5% | 0.45 -18% |
Contrast | 850 | 535 -37% | 968 14% | 1184 39% | 1063 25% | 1022 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.3 | 8.47 9% | 5.3 43% | 4.1 56% | 4.98 46% | 6.2 33% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.6 | 20.2 -15% | 6.61 62% | 10.5 40% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.8 | 9.98 -28% | 4.7 40% | 4.38 44% | 5.2 33% | 6.5 17% |
Gamma | 1.99 111% | 2.33 94% | 2.44 90% | 2.33 94% | 2.65 83% | 2.33 94% |
CCT | 7736 84% | 6902 94% | 7222 90% | 6394 102% | 7249 90% | 8056 81% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 27 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
199 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 132 ms rise | |
↘ 67 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Amazon Fire Tablet | |
Amazon Fire Kids Edition Late 2015 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Amazon Fire Tablet | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Amazon Fire Tablet |
Geekbench 3 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Acer Iconia One 8 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Acer Iconia One 8 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Acer Iconia One 8 | |
Amazon Fire Tablet | |
Amazon Fire Kids Edition Late 2015 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Acer Iconia One 8 | |
Amazon Fire Tablet | |
Amazon Fire Kids Edition Late 2015 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Acer Iconia One 8 | |
Amazon Fire Kids Edition Late 2015 | |
Amazon Fire Tablet | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Acer Iconia One 8 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen | |
Acer Iconia One 8 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Amazon Fire Tablet | |
Amazon Fire Kids Edition Late 2015 | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Amazon Fire Tablet | |
Amazon Fire Kids Edition Late 2015 | |
Acer Iconia One 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Acer Iconia One 8 | |
Amazon Fire Tablet | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Acer Iconia One 8 | |
Amazon Fire Kids Edition Late 2015 | |
Amazon Fire Tablet | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Amazon Fire Kids Edition Late 2015 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
Amazon Fire Tablet | |
Acer Iconia One 8 | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Amazon Fire Kids Edition Late 2015 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
Amazon Fire Tablet |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Amazon Fire Tablet audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.08 / 0.28 Watt |
Idle | 1.12 / 3.06 / 3.31 Watt |
Load |
4.44 / 5.09 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Amazon Fire Tablet 2980 mAh | Amazon Fire Kids Edition Late 2015 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 4000 mAh | Acer Iconia One 8 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | -19% | -3% | -98% | -40% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.12 | 1.12 -0% | 1.91 -71% | 0.8 29% | 3.33 -197% | 1.51 -35% |
Idle Average * | 3.06 | 3.06 -0% | 3.59 -17% | 3.1 -1% | 5.01 -64% | 3.64 -19% |
Idle Maximum * | 3.31 | 3.31 -0% | 4.06 -23% | 3.3 -0% | 5.19 -57% | 3.68 -11% |
Load Average * | 4.44 | 4.85 -9% | 4.29 3% | 5.1 -15% | 8.32 -87% | 6.95 -57% |
Load Maximum * | 5.09 | 5.41 -6% | 4.31 15% | 6.5 -28% | 9.33 -83% | 9.11 -79% |
* ... smaller is better
Amazon Fire Tablet 2980 mAh | Amazon Fire Kids Edition Late 2015 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 4000 mAh | Acer Iconia One 8 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 428 | 490 14% | 619 45% | 742 73% | 421 -2% | 546 28% |
Pros
Cons
考虑到 Fire Tablet (2015) 的售价,它的确有着一些它自己的优点,整体的制造工艺是出色的,IPS屏幕有着出色的可视角度,其色彩准确度也是可以接受的。此外,其售价也是超级的低。电池续航能力够用,尽管其他的入门级平板比Kindle有着更好的续航能力,有些还超出许多。
除了上述优点之外,仍有一些不足之处:相机模组仅为中低端型号,单声道扬声器音量偏小以及Soc并不能在基准跑分与日常使用中取得优异的表现。从它的功能配置上很明显就能看出它的价格。
对于廉价Fire Table(2015)来说,缩水是必要的。在入门级平板当中,它还是值得考虑的。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Amazon Fire Tablet
- 01/09/2017 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich