诺基亚G11 Plus评测--廉价4G手机中的好相机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77.2 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Nokia G11 Plus T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1 | 192 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.52" | 1600x720 | |
| 77 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Nokia G11 T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1 | 190 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 79 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Motorola Moto G13 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 183.5 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 75.9 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 201 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 |
外壳和设备 - 坚固的塑料
与 诺基亚G11与诺基亚G11一样，该机采用了质量上乘、设计精美的塑料外壳，带有轻微的波纹图案和简洁的材质过渡。这款手机比前代产品重2克，体积略大，但屏幕也略大。
IP52认证是该机的一项新功能，它至少保证了对粗糙污垢和溅水的防护。这款手机的结构非常稳定，但在受压或扭动时会发出轻微的吱吱声。有灰色和蓝色两种颜色可供选择。
诺基亚G11 Plus可选配3GB内存和32GB大容量存储空间或4GB内存和64GB大容量存储空间。在中欧地区，目前几乎只能买到存储空间较小的版本，价格约为150欧元。
遗憾的是，该机没有用于非接触式支付的NFC功能，但除了两个SIM卡插槽外，还有一个microSD插槽。在我们使用参考microSD卡Angelbird V60进行的测试中，读卡器的传输速率处于较低水平。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia G11 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Nokia G11 Plus (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 诺基亚手机中稳定的无线局域网
目前最快的无线局域网标准是WiFi 5，诺基亚G11 Plus的传输速率通常在300-350 MBit/s左右。在我们使用华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000路由器进行的测试中，传输速率非常稳定。
G11 Plus仍然不支持5G，但这对于这样一款廉价手机来说并不罕见。4G频率也不多，所以当您进一步旅行时，应该检查手机是否可以连接到目的地国家的网络。在我们的测试中，诺基亚G11 Plus在短时间的移动信号测试中被证明是相当可靠的，尽管它没有达到高端手机的接收强度。
诺基亚承诺为G11 Plus提供两次主要的操作系统更新和三年的安全补丁，这一点非常好。不过，Android 13的更新已经发布，因此之后可能只会提供Android 14。一如既往，诺基亚的Android ，但你不得不忍受一些广告应用程序。得益于Widevine L1，流媒体内容也可以高清观看。
同样，90 Hz的屏幕使操作更加流畅，尽管缓慢的SoC有时会产生卡顿。与诺基亚G11相比，指纹传感器移到了背面。 诺基亚G11与诺基亚G11相比，该机的指纹传感器被移至机身背面，但仍能完美工作，只是解锁时需要短暂等待。面部识别仅基于2D图像，因此很容易受到操纵，正如我们已经报道的那样。 已经报道过.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Nokia G11 | |
摄像头 - 大幅升级
诺基亚G11 Plus配备了5000万像素的新主摄像头，但作为回报，诺基亚G11仍配备的200万像素微距镜头被取消。这并不是一个很大的损失，因为它的分辨率太低，几乎不能有意义地使用。剩下的200万像素摄像头本应为人像照片提供深度信息，但也几乎没有增加任何价值。实际上，诺基亚G11 Plus只有一个摄像头可用于拍照。
该摄像头可拍摄5,000万像素的照片，但只能在特殊模式下拍摄；默认情况下使用1/4的分辨率，并为此创建更大的像素。虽然拍摄植物的照片看起来还不错，细节清晰度和动态效果对于这样一款廉价手机来说还算合格，但拍摄周围环境的照片时却出现了奇怪的黄色雾气。不过，对于这样一款廉价手机而言，细节显示仍然不错。在弱光环境下，清晰度明显下降，在暗处几乎无法辨认出任何东西。
视频最高可录制1080p和30帧/秒。亮度调节很快，但有明显的渐变。自动对焦时不时需要一点时间，直到再次产生清晰的图像。
前置摄像头分辨率为800万像素。即使在光线良好的情况下，自拍照在放大后看起来也有点暗淡和颗粒感。此外，在暗处也无法拍摄。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLowLight
显示屏 - 几乎没有亮度
诺基亚G11 Plus的IPS屏幕分辨率为1,600 x 720像素，这在同类产品中是很常见的，但其屏幕分辨率却只有1,600 x 720像素。 三星Galaxy A14 LTE显示全高清也是可能的。遗憾的是，诺基亚并没有安装特别亮的屏幕。在我们使用分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的测试中，它甚至没有达到400 cd/m²。因此，室外使用可能会很困难，尤其是在明亮的日子里。
即使在很低的亮度下，我们也没有注意到 PWM，但却明显偏蓝，导致色彩还原不准确。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 395 cd/m²
Contrast: 1317:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 8.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.639
| Nokia G11 Plus IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Nokia G11 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto G13 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -29% | -29% | 27% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47.7 ? | 48 ? -1% | 48.5 ? -2% | 35.55 ? 25% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 21.8 ? | 34 ? -56% | 33.8 ? -55% | 15.68 ? 28% |
| PWM Frequency | 343500 | |||
| Screen | -2% | 24% | -23% | |
| Brightness middle | 395 | 502 27% | 555 41% | 465 18% |
| Brightness | 385 | 486 26% | 553 44% | 439 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 89 -5% | 93 -1% | 89 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.53 -77% | 0.29 3% | 0.47 -57% |
| Contrast | 1317 | 947 -28% | 1914 45% | 989 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.21 | 5.73 8% | 5.17 17% | 8.5 -37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.61 | 8.72 18% | 10.61 -0% | 15.8 -49% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.3 | 6.8 18% | 4.5 46% | 11.8 -42% |
| Gamma | 2.639 83% | 2.352 94% | 2.131 103% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7999 81% | 8800 74% | 7380 88% | 10757 60% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-7% | -3% /
14% | 2% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 日常使用中出现卡顿
产品 Unisoc T606已经作为SoC安装在 诺基亚G11因此，两者的性能水平相似也就不足为奇了。与同价位手机相比，该机的性能相当低，在浏览菜单时已经出现卡顿，即使是简单的应用程序也需要很长时间才能加载。
这也是由于在存储方面仅使用了慢速eMMC闪存，这在同价位产品中是正常的。
在较长的加载时间下，手机会明显发热：我们测得的温度高达48.5 °C。这一点非常明显。SoC在重负载时也会略有节流：在3DMark压力测试中，我们测得的性能仍为开始时的95.4%。
诺基亚G11 Plus背面有一个单声道扬声器，一个小塑料旋钮可以防止手机完全平放在桌面上并覆盖扬声器。不过，在柔软的表面上仍会出现这种情况。
扬声器可以发出相当大的声音，但听起来高音很重，分辨力不强，几乎听不到单个乐器的声音。3.5毫米音频接口可用于连接外部音频设备或蓝牙，可使用最必要的编解码器。通过aptX HD和LDAC，还可以实现更高质量的音频传输。
诺基亚G11 Plus的充电功率仅为10瓦，而之前的诺基亚G11支持18瓦特。由于5,000毫安时的电池容量与前代产品几乎一样大，因此充满电所需的时间要长得多，即长达3小时。在我们的Wi-Fi电池测试中，G11 Plus的续航时间为17:18小时，可以轻松满足一天的工作、学习或大学生活。如果不经常使用手机，第二天的电量也是足够的。
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (2228 - 13455, n=14) | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | Nokia G11 | Motorola Moto G13 | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -19% | 19% | -12% | -45% | 448% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 270.6 | 252.7 -7% | 281.1 4% | 298.69 10% | 242 ? -11% | 1887 ? 597% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 196 | 187.6 -4% | 244.7 25% | 200.17 2% | 100.5 ? -49% | 1471 ? 651% |
| Random Read 4KB | 81.5 | 48.2 -41% | 99.4 22% | 55.9 -31% | 43.2 ? -47% | 278 ? 241% |
| Random Write 4KB | 77.1 | 59 -23% | 94.9 23% | 55.86 -28% | 22.4 ? -71% | 311 ? 303% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
发言人
Nokia G11 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
Pros
Cons
评价 - 相机和软件更新令人信服
诺基亚G11 Plus的主摄像头比上一代产品更好，屏幕也稍大一些。在其他方面，诺基亚G11 Plus与诺基亚G11相比没有任何变化。 诺基亚G11但也有一些缺点：电池容量略小，在运行时间方面几乎没有任何变化。更令人讨厌的是充电速度更慢和屏幕更暗。
我们喜欢这款手机的定期更新，实际上每月都有更新，而且应该持续到2026年。对于这样一款廉价手机来说，这是一件好事。手机壳很漂亮，非常坚固，甚至具有基本的防水功能。我们还喜欢纯净的Android 、稳定的WLAN连接和可靠的指纹传感器。
在性能方面，您不能对这个价位的手机抱有太高的期望，扬声器也只是权宜之计。至少最重要的蓝牙编解码器是可用的，因此您也可以顺利连接更高品质的耳机。
诺基亚G11 Plus拥有同价位手机中不错的摄像头，但在充电功率和屏幕亮度方面有所欠缺。
如果摄像头不是那么重要，您也可以选择 诺基亚G11会更省钱。三星 三星Galaxy A14屏幕分辨率更高。
价格和供货情况
在测试期间，诺基亚G11 Plus在美国亚马逊等互联网零售商的售价约为330美元。
Nokia G11 Plus
- 07/13/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
