微星 GE72 7RE Apache Pro 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: MSI GE72 7RE-046
Brand: MSI

入门级游戏体验。 微星GE72的2017更新版由于几个原因而十分有趣。首先，英特尔最新架构处理器酷睿i7-7700HQ首次亮相。另外，它搭配了英伟达的最新中高端GTX 1050 Ti显卡。我们对这台17寸机型的游戏性能进行了详尽测试。

Florian Glaser, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 01/10/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of MSI Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI GE72 7RE-046 (GE72 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1493 MHz, RAM: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 373.06, Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, 单通道, 2个内存槽1个已占用, 最大支持 32 GB

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 全高清, 120 Hz, glossy: no

Mainboard

HM175

Storage

Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, 256 GB

, 固态硬盘 + HGST Travelstar HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB 机械硬盘 @ 7200 rpm. 插槽: 1x m.2 Typ 2280 (可选 NVMe/PCIe) & 1x 2,5 寸

Soundcard

Realtek ALC899 @ High Definition Audio-Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机 (S/PDIF)，麦克风, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC

Networking

Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Optical drive

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 32 x 420 x 288

Battery

51.4 Wh, 4730 mAh Lithium-Ion, 6 芯

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清 (720p @ 30 fps)

Additional features

Speakers: 4.1 Dynaudio (Nahimic Audio Enhancer), Keyboard: 孤岛式，SteelSeries, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器：150瓦，配件：快速开始说明，质保卡，恢复指南, 软件: CyberLink PowerDVD 12, Killer Performance Suite, Magix Suite, MS Office 365 试用版, Norton Security 试用版, XSplit Gamecaster 1年使用期, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.98 kg, Power Supply: 516 g

Price

1550 EUR

Links

MSI homepage
MSI notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X7 v6	78 MB/s +200%
HP Omen 17-w110ng	76 MB/s +192%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D	72.6 MB/s +179%
MSI GE72 7RE-046	26 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF	23.8 MB/s -8%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Omen 17-w110ng	87 MB/s +211%
Aorus X7 v6	87 MB/s +211%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D	84.6 MB/s +202%
MSI GE72 7RE-046	28 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF	27.6 MB/s -1%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Aorus X7 v6 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	554 MBit/s +88%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	529 MBit/s +80%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	294 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	676 MBit/s +96%
Aorus X7 v6 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	496 MBit/s +44%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	345 MBit/s


217 cd/m²	251 cd/m²	226 cd/m²
225 cd/m²	253 cd/m²	228 cd/m²
218 cd/m²	231 cd/m²	217 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 253 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 229.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 253 cd/m²
Contrast: 1054:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
76% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
85.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI GE72 7RE-046 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080	Aorus X7 v6 B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), 2560x1440	HP Omen 17-w110ng LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080	MSI GS73VR 6RF 1920x1080	Asus GL702VM-GC102D LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080
Display		-26%	-24%	-1%	-24%
Display P3 Coverage	90.7	60.9 -33%	66.6 -27%	90 -1%	65.1 -28%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	84.2 -16%	84.1 -16%	99.9 0%	83.5 -16%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	85.2	61.2 -28%	61.5 -28%	83.6 -2%	61.1 -28%
Response Times		-13%	-102%	-6%	-99%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	27 ?(13, 14)	31 ?(11, 20) -15%	37 ?(13, 24) -37%	28 ?(13.2, 14.8) -4%	38 ?(12, 26) -41%
Response Time Black / White *	9 ?(6, 3)	10 ?(3, 7) -11%	24 ?(4, 20) -167%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) -7%	23 ?(5, 18) -156%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-18%	10%	20%	-16%
Brightness middle	253	343 36%	362 43%	337.2 33%	326 29%
Brightness	230	312 36%	342 49%	315 37%	312 36%
Brightness Distribution	86	80 -7%	87 1%	86 0%	91 6%
Black Level *	0.24	0.5 -108%	0.31 -29%	0.308 -28%	0.5 -108%
Contrast	1054	686 -35%	1168 11%	1095 4%	652 -38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.01	7.33 -46%	4.5 10%	2.96 41%	6.3 -26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.4	10.79 -4%	9.31 10%	5.45 48%	11.69 -12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.26	7.6 -5%	3.48 52%	2.57 65%	7.37 -2%
Gamma	2.09 ^105%	2.19 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.25 ^98%	2.37 ^93%
CCT	6329 ^103%	9024 ^72%	6144 ^106%	7114 ^91%	7116 ^91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	76	55 -28%	55 -28%	74.3 -2%	55 -28%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	84 -16%	84 -16%	100 0%	83 -17%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-19% / -19%	-39% / -11%	4% / 12%	-46% / -29%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	170 Points +17%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points +2%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	145 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	134 Points -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	134 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	807 Points +10%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	732 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	679 Points -7%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	678 Points -7%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	671 Points -8%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.93 Points +17%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.69 Points +2%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.65 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.5 Points -9%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.5 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	8.88 Points +10%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.1 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.47 Points -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.47 Points -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.41 Points -9%

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

10841

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.65 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

8.1 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

63.8 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

145 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

732 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

108.3 fps

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 7 Score		5810 points
Help

... in comparison

PCMark 7 - Score
Aorus X7 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5946 Points +2%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	5810 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	5556 Points -4%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	4114 Points -29%

	MSI GE72 7RE-046 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	Aorus X7 v6 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	HP Omen 17-w110ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	MSI GS73VR 6RF SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	Asus GL702VM-GC102D HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		124%	49%	-37%	-86%
Read Seq	540	1499 178%	1156 114%	334.3 -38%	134.6 -75%
Write Seq	495.7	1411 185%	294.9 -41%	319 -36%	130.6 -74%
Read 4k	22.7	44.33 95%	42.7 88%	20.3 -11%	0.602 -97%
Write 4k	112.9	155.5 38%	153.3 36%	42.51 -62%	1.146 -99%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY

Sequential Read: 540 MB/s

Sequential Write: 495.7 MB/s

512K Read: 455.1 MB/s

512K Write: 481.4 MB/s

4K Read: 22.7 MB/s

4K Write: 112.9 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 372.5 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 212.9 MB/s

3DMark Vantage P Result		30690 points
3DMark 11 Performance		9269 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		69304 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		20933 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		6959 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark | 3DMark 11 | Unigine Heaven 4.0

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X7 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	17068 Points +111%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	15806 Points +95%
MSI GS73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11506 Points +42%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11311 Points +40%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	8086 Points
1280x720 Sky Diver Graphics
Aorus X7 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	55278 Points +103%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	53469 Points +97%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	37413 Points +38%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	27202 Points

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus X7 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	23591 Points +132%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	20656 Points +103%
MSI GS73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14904 Points +46%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14317 Points +41%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	10186 Points

Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11
Aorus X7 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	109.1 fps +125%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	103.1 (24.3^min - 206.9^max) fps +113%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	48.5 fps

Battlefield 1
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Aorus X7 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	124 fps +144%
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	110.1 fps +117%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	79 fps +56%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	50.8 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Aorus X7 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	136 fps +140%
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	118.9 fps +110%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	87.4 fps +54%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	56.7 fps

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
Dirt Rally (2015)			93.4	65.7		57.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)			48.7	26.9		17.6
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)			60	41		19
Mad Max (2015)			89.7	82.7		28.6
Anno 2205 (2015)			63.7	20.6		24
Fallout 4 (2015)			56	46.2		18.5
Star Wars Battlefront (2015)			72.4	62.7		22.4
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015)			47.8	23.5		17.1
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)			92.2	74.4		28.4
Just Cause 3 (2015)			58.9	52.7		22.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)			47.4	39.7		17.6
XCOM 2 (2016)			37.7	19		10.3
Far Cry Primal (2016)			53	40		17
The Division (2016)			45	34.9		16.6
Hitman 2016 (2016)			38.4	36.6		16.3
Need for Speed 2016 (2016)			60.4	46.4		21.3
Doom (2016)			68.3	63.8		21.2
Overwatch (2016)			118	71		38.3
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)			50.3	45.1		16.2
No Man's Sky (2016)			44.6	22		18.1
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)			38.3	19.7		12.3
FIFA 17 (2016)			130	128		66.1
Mafia 3 (2016)			28.7			9.8
Battlefield 1 (2016)			56.7	50.8		19.8
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)			130	117		59.7
Titanfall 2 (2016)			62	56.2		18.7
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016)			67.4	58.8		27.4
Dishonored 2 (2016)			48.7	39.6		18.2
Watch Dogs 2 (2016)			42.4	26.6		14.4
Resident Evil 7 (2017)			64.5	24.3
For Honor (2017)		66 ()	62 ()	45 ()
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)	106	46.1	40.3	9.8
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017)	105	50.2	27.9	23
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017)	112	46.6	29.8	25.8		0
Rocket League (2017)			158			61
Dirt 4 (2017)			74.2	39.2
Team Fortress 2 (2017)				105		74.4
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)		54.1	45.2
F1 2017 (2017)			66	40		16
Ark Survival Evolved (2017)	89	31.6	21.8
FIFA 18 (2017)				149		62.3
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)	121	62	43	29		12
The Evil Within 2 (2017)	61.8	36.1	32.9	31		2
ELEX (2017)	102	52.2	41.9	31	19.6	6.6
Destiny 2 (2017)	116	65.5	62.1	51.1	26.1	17.8
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017)	77	45	38	28	20	4
Call of Duty WWII (2017)	191	129	67.8	42.4	30.8	18.9
Need for Speed Payback (2017)	115	66	54.7	50.9	30.3	9.7
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)	135	75	65	43	19.5	5.7
Fortnite (2018)			61	45.1	28.8	8.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	74	37.1	23.4
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)	107	49.5	40.5	28	16.9	6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	77.3	69.9	61.2			45.3
Far Cry 5 (2018)	95	47	43	39	25	12
The Crew 2 (2018)			51	44.1
Monster Hunter World (2018)	93	41.2	35.5	27.9
F1 2018 (2018)	146	81	62	37	28	15
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	97	38	31	25	17	8
FIFA 19 (2018)	192	169	157	150		51.3
Forza Horizon 4 (2018)	122	62	55	40
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018)	77	41	31	17
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018)				35.5		10.2
Hitman 2 (2018)	55.6	39	29.7	23.6
Fallout 76 (2018)			48.4	45.3

Noise Level

Idle		34 / 35 / 36 dB(A)
DVD		40 / dB(A)
Load		41 / 49 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	Aorus X7 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	MSI GS73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Asus GL702VM-GC102D GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Noise		-4%	-1%	2%	6%
off / environment *	30	30 -0%	30 -0%	28.4 5%	30.5 -2%
Idle Minimum *	34	33 3%	33 3%	31.9 6%	31.4 8%
Idle Average *	35	35 -0%	34 3%	32 9%	31.4 10%
Idle Maximum *	36	40 -11%	35 3%	34 6%	31.5 12%
Load Average *	41	43 -5%	45 -10%	47 -15%	40.9 -0%
Load Maximum *	49	54 -10%	52 -6%	49.4 -1%	46.2 6%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


45.4 °C	44.8 °C	39 °C
45.1 °C	45.8 °C	38.6 °C
40.3 °C	39.8 °C	28.1 °C

Maximum: 45.8 °C
Average: 40.8 °C


34.7 °C	38.4 °C	45.2 °C
30.5 °C	37.5 °C	40.4 °C
24.7 °C	30.2 °C	36.6 °C

Maximum: 45.2 °C
Average: 35.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47.4 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.3 °C / 104.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.4 °C / -20.5 F).

	MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	Aorus X7 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	MSI GS73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Asus GL702VM-GC102D GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Heat		-3%	-2%	-7%	-8%
Maximum Upper Side *	45.8	47.5 -4%	45 2%	50.8 -11%	53.1 -16%
Maximum Bottom *	45.2	54.5 -21%	54.3 -20%	60 -33%	44.9 1%
Idle Upper Side *	31.7	28.6 10%	29.6 7%	27.4 14%	32.9 -4%
Idle Bottom *	29.9	28.8 4%	28.6 4%	28.8 4%	33.4 -12%

* ... smaller is better

MSI GE72 7RE-046 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus GL702VM-GC102D audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.2 / 0.8 Watt
Idle	14 / 20 / 25 Watt
Load	82 / 135 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC 940

	MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	Aorus X7 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	MSI GS73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Asus GL702VM-GC102D GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Power Consumption		-67%	-28%	-44%	-3%
Idle Minimum *	14	29 -107%	19 -36%	22.6 -61%	15.6 -11%
Idle Average *	20	31 -55%	25 -25%	32.7 -64%	20.2 -1%
Idle Maximum *	25	38 -52%	31 -24%	32.8 -31%	21.4 14%
Load Average *	82	111 -35%	90 -10%	114.7 -40%	90 -10%
Load Maximum *	135	253 -87%	193 -43%	167.9 -24%	147 -9%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		3h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		3h 15min

	MSI GE72 7RE-046 51.4 Wh	Aorus X7 v6 94 Wh	HP Omen 17-w110ng 95 Wh	MSI GS73VR 6RF 65 Wh	Asus GL702VM-GC102D 76 Wh
Battery Runtime		-1%	27%	16%	35%
H.264	195		233 19%		262 34%
WiFi v1.3	184	182 -1%	247 34%	213 16%	250 36%

Pros

+ Dragon Center with many features (e.g. fan control)

+ top modern hardware thanks to Kaby Lake und Pascal

+ highly configurable keyboard light

+ Optimus graphics switch

+ 120 Hz panel

+ SSD plus HDD

Cons

- display frame poorly fixed in the test model

- strange behavior of the CPU clock rate

- card reader at USB 2.0 level

- GPU throttling under full load

- no Thunderbolt 3

- poor battery

In review: MSI GE72 7RE Apache Pro. Test model provided by MSI Germany.

尽管GE72 7RE缺少一个虚拟实境的认证标签，它仍然可以被视作一台游戏笔记本电脑。英伟达的最新GeForce GTX 1050 Ti显卡提供了充足的性能，可以在1,920 x 1,080像素分辨率和高设置下提供不错的帧率。

当分辨率提高到3K和4K时，它的性能将会明显下降，要求较高的游戏将会无法流畅运行。用户需要考虑增加预算购置搭配GTX 1060的机型。长远来看，6GB的显存相比4GB的设备会有更长的寿命，而不需要增加太多的预算。

我们认为英特尔的Kaby Lake架构表现平平，在处理器性能上只有很小的提升。

正在实惠型多媒体笔记本电脑和高端游戏本间犹豫不定的用户可能会对GE72 7RE十分满意。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

MSI GE72 7RE-046 - 2016-12-28 12/28/2016 v6 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis

74 / 98 → 75%

Keyboard

81%

Pointing Device

78%

Connectivity

57 / 81 → 71%

Weight

57 / 10-66 → 83%

Battery

69%

Display

83%

Games Performance

90%

Application Performance

91%

Temperature

87 / 95 → 91%

Noise

70 / 90 → 78%

Audio

75%

Average

76%

82%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 微星 GE72 7RE Apache Pro 笔记本电脑简短评测

Florian Glaser, 2017-01-10 (Update: 2017-01-11)