微星 GE72VR 6RF Apache Pro 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 |
MSI Dragon Center
MSI Dragon Dashboard
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 270 cd/m²
Contrast: 1038:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.46 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
83.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080 | Asus GL702VM-GC102D LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080 | MSI GS73VR 6RF 1920x1080 | Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 LP173WF4-SPD1, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17-w110ng LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160 | Aorus X7 v6 B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), 2560x1440 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -24% | 0% | -23% | 5% | -25% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 90.2 | 65.1 -28% | 90 0% | 66.6 -26% | 86.9 -4% | 60.9 -32% | |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 83.5 -16% | 99.9 0% | 84.1 -16% | 100 0% | 84.2 -16% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 83.9 | 61.1 -27% | 83.6 0% | 61.5 -27% | 99.4 18% | 61.2 -27% | |
Response Times | -112% | -10% | -96% | -116% | -116% | -18% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28 ? | 38 ? -36% | 28 ? -0% | 29 ? -4% | 37 ? -32% | 37 ? -32% | 31 ? -11% |
Response Time Black / White * | 8 ? | 23 ? -188% | 9.6 ? -20% | 23 ? -188% | 24 ? -200% | 24 ? -200% | 10 ? -25% |
PWM Frequency | |||||||
Screen | -42% | 8% | -24% | -7% | 6% | -44% | |
Brightness middle | 270 | 326 21% | 337.2 25% | 390 44% | 362 34% | 336 24% | 343 27% |
Brightness | 254 | 312 23% | 315 24% | 355 40% | 342 35% | 320 26% | 312 23% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 86 0% | 79 -8% | 87 1% | 88 2% | 80 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.5 -92% | 0.308 -18% | 0.39 -50% | 0.31 -19% | 0.25 4% | 0.5 -92% |
Contrast | 1038 | 652 -37% | 1095 5% | 1000 -4% | 1168 13% | 1344 29% | 686 -34% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.33 | 6.3 -89% | 2.96 11% | 5.9 -77% | 4.5 -35% | 3.61 -8% | 7.33 -120% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.07 | 11.69 -93% | 5.45 10% | 9.89 -63% | 9.31 -53% | 6.02 1% | 10.79 -78% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.46 | 7.37 -113% | 2.57 26% | 6.17 -78% | 3.48 -1% | 4.78 -38% | 7.6 -120% |
Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.37 93% | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.32 95% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 7419 88% | 7116 91% | 7114 91% | 6955 93% | 6144 106% | 6185 105% | 9024 72% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 75 | 55 -27% | 74.3 -1% | 55 -27% | 55 -27% | 88 17% | 55 -27% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 83 -17% | 100 0% | 84 -16% | 84 -16% | 100 0% | 84 -16% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -59% /
-48% | -1% /
4% | -60% /
-36% | -49% /
-25% | -35% /
-11% | -29% /
-37% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 - Score | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Storage Score v2 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF |
PCMark Vantage Result | 20205 points | |
PCMark 7 Score | 5809 points | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3985 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4933 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4831 points | |
Help |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | Asus GL702VM-GC102D HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | MSI GS73VR 6RF SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122 | Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH | HP Omen 17-w110ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Aorus X7 v6 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -86% | -18% | 35% | 65% | 197% | |
Read Seq | 510 | 134.6 -74% | 334.3 -34% | 513 1% | 1156 127% | 1499 194% |
Write Seq | 274.6 | 130.6 -52% | 319 16% | 483.7 76% | 294.9 7% | 1411 414% |
Read 512 | 427.2 | 44.85 -90% | 242.3 -43% | 452.4 6% | 616 44% | 966 126% |
Write 512 | 247.2 | 63.3 -74% | 254.4 3% | 404.2 64% | 294.7 19% | 1103 346% |
Read 4k | 21.23 | 0.602 -97% | 20.3 -4% | 37.48 77% | 42.7 101% | 44.33 109% |
Write 4k | 86.8 | 1.146 -99% | 42.51 -51% | 91.4 5% | 153.3 77% | 155.5 79% |
Read 4k QD32 | 335.4 | 1.106 -100% | 251.6 -25% | 364.4 9% | 600 79% | 696 108% |
Write 4k QD32 | 178.1 | 1.186 -99% | 167.1 -6% | 250.9 41% | 295.3 66% | 531 198% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D |
3DMark 03 Standard | 87152 points | |
3DMark 05 Standard | 23823 points | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 25697 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 33893 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 12474 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 81901 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22892 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9704 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 5118 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3648 points | |
Help |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided | |
1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS AF:8x | |
Aorus X7 v6 | |
Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D |
BioShock Infinite | |
1366x768 High Preset | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 |
low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 181.3 | 175.9 | 159.5 | 98 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 177 | 135.9 | 66.2 | 37.2 | 24.7 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 180 | 132.4 | 71.3 | 58.8 | 23.7 |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 113.9 | 100.3 | 57.1 | 30.1 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 34 / 35 / 36 dB(A) |
DVD |
| 41 / dB(A) |
Load |
| 40 / 51 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31 dB(A) |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | 2% | 0% | -1% | -2% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 31 | 30.5 2% | 28.4 8% | 31.2 -1% | 30 3% | 31 -0% | 30 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 34 | 31.4 8% | 31.9 6% | 31.2 8% | 33 3% | 33 3% | 33 3% |
Idle Average * | 35 | 31.4 10% | 32 9% | 32.6 7% | 34 3% | 34 3% | 35 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 36 | 31.5 12% | 34 6% | 34.75 3% | 35 3% | 40 -11% | 40 -11% |
Load Average * | 40 | 40.9 -2% | 47 -18% | 47.8 -20% | 45 -13% | 44 -10% | 43 -8% |
Load Maximum * | 51 | 46.2 9% | 49.4 3% | 49.7 3% | 52 -2% | 50 2% | 54 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.6 °C / 106.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.7 °C / -22.9 F).
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -5% | -4% | -2% | 1% | 4% | 0% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 48.8 | 53.1 -9% | 50.8 -4% | 53.3 -9% | 45 8% | 42.6 13% | 47.5 3% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48.2 | 44.9 7% | 60 -24% | 50 -4% | 54.3 -13% | 44.9 7% | 54.5 -13% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30.1 | 32.9 -9% | 27.4 9% | 30.3 -1% | 29.6 2% | 33.1 -10% | 28.6 5% |
Idle Bottom * | 30.4 | 33.4 -10% | 28.8 5% | 28 8% | 28.6 6% | 28.9 5% | 28.8 5% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.4 / 1 Watt |
Idle | 13 / 20 / 26 Watt |
Load |
83 / 169 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 |
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 0% | -40% | -10% | -22% | -60% | -62% | |
Idle Minimum * | 13 | 15.6 -20% | 22.6 -74% | 14 -8% | 19 -46% | 25 -92% | 29 -123% |
Idle Average * | 20 | 20.2 -1% | 32.7 -64% | 20 -0% | 25 -25% | 35 -75% | 31 -55% |
Idle Maximum * | 26 | 21.4 18% | 32.8 -26% | 23.8 8% | 31 -19% | 46 -77% | 38 -46% |
Load Average * | 83 | 90 -8% | 114.7 -38% | 103 -24% | 90 -8% | 103 -24% | 111 -34% |
Load Maximum * | 169 | 147 13% | 167.9 1% | 212 -25% | 193 -14% | 223 -32% | 253 -50% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 51 Wh | Asus GL702VM-GC102D 76 Wh | MSI GS73VR 6RF 65 Wh | Medion Erazer X7849 MD 60292 60 Wh | HP Omen 17-w110ng 95 Wh | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 88 Wh | Aorus X7 v6 94 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 90% | 65% | -3% | 112% | 69% | 28% | |
Reader / Idle | 196 | 353 80% | 353 80% | 163 -17% | 432 120% | 278 42% | |
H.264 | 140 | 262 87% | 233 66% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 142 | 250 76% | 213 50% | 91 -36% | 247 74% | 200 41% | 182 28% |
Load | 40 | 87 118% | 66 65% | 57 43% | 115 188% | 89 123% |
Pros
Cons
微星设计了许多高端设备。不过并不是每个人都愿意在笔记本电脑上花费超过2000欧元(约14688人民币)。GE72VR是这家生产商推出的一台中高端机型,我们的测试型号市场价约1750欧元(约12852人民币)。不过,这个型号的性价比并不算出色,因为在同价位范围内的惠普 Omen (帕萨卡)搭配了更快的GeForce GTX 1070显卡。这台17寸笔记本电脑的主要优势在于雅致纤薄的机身设计和工艺品质。同样不能不提的还有120赫兹高刷新率屏幕,尽管是TN面板,这块屏幕的实际表现十分不错。其他的特点还有背光键盘和实用的微星Dragon Center软件。
选择GE72VR的用户将拥有足够的性能享受到流畅的游戏体验。对细节的关注和丰富的功能让这台设备更加全面。另外,不少游戏玩家将会十分喜欢它的120赫兹屏幕。
除了优势之外,我们对它也有一些不满。例如,它较小的触控版让多指触控手势变得难以使用。另外,它的电池续航也有些说不过去。生产商应该考虑在未来机型中增加电池容量,让它可以适合更多用途。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
- 12/29/2016 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade