微星 GL62 6QF 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
|
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 216 cd/m²
Contrast: 450:1 (Black: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 10.91 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
84.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 CMN N156HGE-EAL (CMN15D2) | Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV Sharp LQ156D1JW02D | Asus G501VW-FY081T Samsung 156HL01-104 | Gigabyte P55K v5 Name: AU Optronics B156HAN01.2, ID: AUO12ED | SCHENKER XMG A516 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F) | HP Omen 15-ax007ng LGD0519 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 6% | -14% | -16% | -23% | -36% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 85.8 | 86.2 0% | 66.8 -22% | 65.9 -23% | 64.7 -25% | 59.9 -30% 40.34 -53% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 100 0% | 97.3 -3% | 91 -9% | 83.2 -17% | 85.9 -14% 60.3 -40% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84.1 | 99.5 18% | 68.6 -18% | 60.8 -28% | 61.6 -27% 41.73 -50% | |
Response Times | -8% | -55% | -7% | 1% | -32% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 ? | 49 ? -14% | 50 ? -16% | 37.2 ? 13% | 41 ? 5% | 55 ? -28% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 25 ? -9% | 39 ? -70% | 29.2 ? -27% | 24 ? -4% | 31 ? -35% |
PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 1000 ? 0% | 200 ? -80% | |||
Screen | 57% | 43% | 30% | 39% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 216 | 303 40% | 341 58% | 274.9 27% | 312 44% | 214 -1% |
Brightness | 202 | 291 44% | 312 54% | 259 28% | 303 50% | 203 0% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 83 0% | 83 0% | 72 -13% | 92 11% | 79 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.48 | 0.22 54% | 0.32 33% | 0.367 24% | 0.3 37% | 0.28 42% |
Contrast | 450 | 1377 206% | 1066 137% | 749 66% | 1040 131% | 764 70% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.98 | 3.47 65% | 4.23 58% | 3.39 66% | 5.11 49% | 6.04 39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.12 | 6.79 60% | 8.02 53% | 5.76 66% | 8.96 48% | 12 30% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10.91 | 1.17 89% | 4.69 57% | 4.21 61% | 4.41 60% | 5.91 46% |
Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.35 94% | 2.53 87% | 2.18 101% | 2.5 88% | 2.44 90% |
CCT | 13185 49% | 6658 98% | 7549 86% | 6069 107% | 6789 96% | 7362 88% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 75 | 86 15% | 63 -16% | 59.2 -21% | 55 -27% | 38 -49% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 0% | 97 -3% | 90.9 -9% | 83 -17% | 60 -40% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 18% /
36% | -9% /
14% | 2% /
18% | 6% /
21% | -18% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz | ≤ 80 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
SCHENKER XMG A516 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG A516 | |
Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG A516 | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
SCHENKER XMG A516 | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV |
PCMark 7 Score | 5666 points | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3603 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4375 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4951 points | |
Help |
PCMark 7 - Score | |
SCHENKER XMG A516 | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY | Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV Lite-On CV1-8B512 M.2 512 GB | Asus G501VW-FY081T Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP | Gigabyte P55K v5 SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122 | SCHENKER XMG A516 Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe | HP Omen 15-ax007ng Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 1% | -46% | -5% | 166% | -8% | |
Seq Read | 509 | 514 1% | 504 -1% | 467.6 -8% | 2005 294% | 478.3 -6% |
Seq Write | 429.6 | 424.8 -1% | 126.9 -70% | 360.4 -16% | 916 113% | 161 -63% |
4K Read | 20.31 | 21.75 7% | 13.87 -32% | 25.09 24% | 48.47 139% | 29.31 44% |
4K Write | 82.9 | 67.9 -18% | 30.66 -63% | 46.73 -44% | 136.8 65% | 73.3 -12% |
Score Total | 742 | 859 16% | 269 -64% | 868 17% | 2356 218% | 704 -5% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 5178 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 64476 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16887 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3954 points | |
Help |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | |
SCHENKER XMG A516 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
SCHENKER XMG A516 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance | |
SCHENKER XMG A516 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
SCHENKER XMG A516 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Gigabyte P55K v5 | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11 | |
SCHENKER XMG A516 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FIFA 16 (2015) | 177.8 | 145 | 103 | |
Anno 2205 (2015) | 100.7 | 62.5 | 28.7 | 11.2 |
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) | 50.6 | 46.8 | 29.6 | 5.2 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 162.7 | 111 | 57.5 | 45.7 |
XCOM 2 (2016) | 66.1 | 32.1 | 20.1 | 8.7 |
Hitman 2016 (2016) | 46.5 | 46 | 28.2 | 27.4 |
Need for Speed 2016 (2016) | 70.7 | 67.4 | 40 | 28.4 |
Doom (2016) | 69.4 | 57.2 | 33.6 | 28.4 |
Overwatch (2016) | 184.9 | 142.3 | 69.1 | 39.7 |
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 96.2 | 61.8 | 30 | 24.3 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 35 / 36 / 37 dB(A) |
DVD |
| 39 / dB(A) |
Load |
| 41 / 46 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ | Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ | Asus G501VW-FY081T GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ | Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ | SCHENKER XMG A516 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ | HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | 4% | 4% | 5% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 31.3 -4% | 31.2 -4% | 29 3% | 30 -0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 35 | 31.2 11% | 32.1 8% | 32 9% | 31 11% | 32 9% |
Idle Average * | 36 | 31.2 13% | 32.1 11% | 33 8% | 32 11% | 33 8% |
Idle Maximum * | 37 | 36.2 2% | 32.1 13% | 33 11% | 38 -3% | 36 3% |
Load Average * | 41 | 45.3 -10% | 43.3 -6% | 41 -0% | 40 2% | 43 -5% |
Load Maximum * | 46 | 47.3 -3% | 44.3 4% | 50 -9% | 45 2% | 49 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.1 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-14 °C / -25.2 F).
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ | Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ | Asus G501VW-FY081T GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ | Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ | SCHENKER XMG A516 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ | HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -8% | 6% | 5% | -24% | -5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49.1 | 50.1 -2% | 41 16% | 52.6 -7% | 52.4 -7% | 48.5 1% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.4 | 56.2 -29% | 48.2 -11% | 50.2 -16% | 53.1 -22% | 59 -36% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.2 | 28.3 3% | 26.4 10% | 22.6 23% | 39.3 -35% | 28.7 2% |
Idle Bottom * | 29.6 | 31.1 -5% | 26.7 10% | 23.4 21% | 39.5 -33% | 25.7 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Off / Standby | 0.5 / 0.9 Watt |
Idle | 10 / 14 / 19 Watt |
Load |
82 / 118 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ | Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ | Asus G501VW-FY081T GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ | Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ | SCHENKER XMG A516 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ | HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 4% | 21% | 2% | -12% | 11% | |
Idle Minimum * | 10 | 8.9 11% | 6.9 31% | 10.1 -1% | 11 -10% | 7 30% |
Idle Average * | 14 | 13.9 1% | 10.7 24% | 13.3 5% | 15 -7% | 11 21% |
Idle Maximum * | 19 | 15.6 18% | 13.2 31% | 15.4 19% | 22 -16% | 19 -0% |
Load Average * | 82 | 89 -9% | 82 -0% | 75.8 8% | 75 9% | 79 4% |
Load Maximum * | 118 | 118 -0% | 94 20% | 144 -22% | 160 -36% | 119 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 41.4 Wh | Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV 52 Wh | Asus G501VW-FY081T 60 Wh | Gigabyte P55K v5 63 Wh | SCHENKER XMG A516 62 Wh | HP Omen 15-ax007ng 61.5 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 33% | 60% | 49% | 44% | 47% | |
Reader / Idle | 339 | 530 56% | 610 80% | 502 48% | 390 15% | 467 38% |
WiFi v1.3 | 158 | 218 38% | 330 109% | 295 87% | 272 72% | |
Load | 71 | 75 6% | 64 -10% | 79 11% | 123 73% | 93 31% |
H.264 | 231 | 303 | 262 | 244 |
Pros
Cons
第一眼看上去,GL62-6QFi781H11可能像是低价版的高端微星游戏本。实际上它的性能表现让人几乎无可挑剔。四核处理器,GTX 960M显卡和固态硬盘:对于1100欧元(约8133人民币)来说十分奢侈。
不过,这台15寸设备在于GE62的对比中几乎毫无胜算。微星不仅没有为它搭配USB 3.1第二代接口,同时去掉了金属机身和键盘背光。它最大的弱点还是昏暗的TN屏幕。这也限制了GL62的整体得分。
对价格比较敏感的游戏玩家可以考虑配置相近的Omen 15 (79%)。这台来自惠普的机型没有搭配USB 3.1接口,但是采用了IPS屏幕,在许多方面都更加优秀。华硕 G501VW和Acer V15 Nitro分别得到了更高的84和85%总分。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
- 06/26/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Glaser