微星 GT72VR 6RD Dominator Pro 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Brand: MSI

更高性能，更冷静运行。 如果机身尺寸不是问题的话，那么GT72VR和GTX 1060显卡可以说是绝配。它的表面温度和风扇噪音对于游戏本来说都十分“内敛”。

Allen Ngo (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 09/17/2016 🇺🇸 🇪🇸 ...

Gaming Geforce Windows Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of CUKUSA

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US (GT72VR Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1404 MHz, RAM: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 372.70

Memory

32 GB

, DDR4-2134, 1300 MHz, 15-15-15-36, Dual-Channel

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Storage

SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, 1024 GB

, 第二块硬盘: 2 TB Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD

Soundcard

Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

7 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机，麦克风，音频输入，音频输出（7.1 模拟 + S/PDIF）, Card Reader: SD 读卡器

Networking

Qualcomm/Atheros e2400 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Optical drive

HT-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 48 x 428 x 294

Battery

83 Wh, 7500 mAh, 9 芯

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 2.1 Dynaudio (Nahimic Audio Enhancer) , Keyboard: Steelseries 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 清洁布，质保卡，系统恢复信息，快速开始说明, Dragon Center, MSI True Color, SCM, Killer Network Manager, Nahimic 2, SteelSeries Engine 3, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

3.794 kg, Power Supply: 1.09 kg

Price

1600 USD

Links

MSI homepage
MSI notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Asus G752VS-XB78K MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Asus G701VO-CS74K Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG EVGA SC17 DIN A4 ❌

Rear: Mini DisplayPort 1.2, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1, HDMI 1.4, Gigabit Ethernet, AC adapter

Left: 4x USB 3.0, Mic-in, SPDIF, Line-in, Line-out

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US	136.5 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG	78 MB/s -43%
MSI GS73VR 6RF	23.8 MB/s -83%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US	195.2 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG	88 MB/s -55%
MSI GS73VR 6RF	27.6 MB/s -86%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	539 MBit/s +2%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	531 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	550 MBit/s
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	511 MBit/s -7%


337.5 cd/m²	355.1 cd/m²	349 cd/m²
340.5 cd/m²	351.7 cd/m²	337.8 cd/m²
323.3 cd/m²	325.8 cd/m²	325.9 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LGD046E tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 355.1 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 338.5 cd/m² Minimum: 17.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 351.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 951:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.71 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.46 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2)

	MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160	MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3", 1920x1080	Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Asus G701VO-CS74K IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display		34%	29%	-1%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	67.6	86.9 29%	91.2 35%	66.9 -1%	68.8 2%
sRGB Coverage	86.2	100 16%	100 16%	85.2 -1%	87.7 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	63	99.4 58%	84.9 35%	62.3 -1%	64.1 2%
Response Times		1%	49%	4%	8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	34.4 ?(14.8, 19.6)	37 ?(13, 24) -8%	26 ?(12, 14) 24%	38 ?(14, 24) -10%	29.2 ?(11.6, 17.6) 15%
Response Time Black / White *	26.4 ?(4.4, 22)	24 ?(5, 19) 9%	6.8 ?(4.2, 2.6) 74%	22 ?(4, 18) 17%	26.4 ?(5.2, 21.2) -0%
PWM Frequency
Screen		7%	-43%	0%	-6%
Brightness middle	351.7	336 -4%	314 -11%	328 -7%	368.1 5%
Brightness	339	320 -6%	294 -13%	317 -6%	349 3%
Brightness Distribution	91	88 -3%	89 -2%	88 -3%	86 -5%
Black Level *	0.37	0.25 32%	0.23 38%	0.3 19%	0.365 1%
Contrast	951	1344 41%	1365 44%	1093 15%	1008 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.71	3.61 3%	9.74 -163%	3.74 -1%	4.16 -12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.48	6.02 29%	15.71 -85%	8.97 -6%	8.7 -3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.46	4.78 -94%	9.58 -289%	2.67 -9%	3.86 -57%
Gamma	2.29 ^96%	2.32 ^95%	2.5 ^88%	2.41 ^91%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	6849 ^95%	6185 ^105%	11854 ^55%	6861 ^95%	6892 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	56.6	88 55%	76 34%	56 -1%	57.6 2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	86.1	100 16%	100 16%	85 -1%	87.6 2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		14% / 12%	12% / -16%	1% / 0%	1% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.4 ms rise
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	166 Points +19%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	149 Points +7%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	144 Points +4%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	139 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	125 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	865 Points +29%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	719 Points +7%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	707 Points +6%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	669 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	490 Points -27%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	1.91 Points +20%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.7 Points +7%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	1.68 Points +6%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.59 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	1.46 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	9.56 Points +29%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	7.96 Points +8%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	7.76 Points +5%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.4 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	5.29 Points -29%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	26150 Points +30%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	21681 Points +8%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	21022 Points +5%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20059 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	14329 Points -29%
Rendering Single 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	6487 Points +28%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	5671 Points +12%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	5567 Points +10%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5055 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	4999 Points -1%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	323 s * -39%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	233.1 s *
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	224.6 s * +4%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	206.3 s * +11%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	178.5 s * +23%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	636 s *
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	574 s * +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	569 s * +11%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	559 s * +12%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	498.3 s * +22%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

9497

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20059

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5055

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

61.6 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.4 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.59 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

89.8 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

669 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

139 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5575 Points +23%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)	5034 Points +11%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4551 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	4060 Points -11%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5778 Points +18%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)	5186 Points +6%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4906 Points
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	8531 Points +24%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	6871 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	2303 Points -66%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4551 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		6871 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4906 points
Help

	MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)	Asus G752VS-XB78K Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Asus G701VO-CS74K 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-4%	319%	194%	283%
Read Seq	469.8	529 13%	3285 599%	1718 266%	3067 553%
Write Seq	435.2	338.5 -22%	2560 488%	1305 200%	2434 459%
Read 512	312.6	288.9 -8%	1775 468%	1250 300%	1582 406%
Write 512	367.3	319.2 -13%	2327 534%	1438 292%	2255 514%
Read 4k	28.21	23.1 -18%	52.2 85%	44.42 57%	47.25 67%
Write 4k	59	99.4 68%	153.1 159%	154.4 162%	110.7 88%
Read 4k QD32	339.7	147.5 -57%	627 85%	744 119%	584 72%
Write 4k QD32	225.6	236.9 5%	527 134%	578 156%	463.3 105%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122

Sequential Read: 469.8 MB/s

Sequential Write: 435.2 MB/s

512K Read: 312.6 MB/s

512K Write: 367.3 MB/s

4K Read: 28.21 MB/s

4K Write: 59 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 339.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 225.6 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	17498 Points +46%
Aorus X7 Pro v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK	14231 Points +19%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	11957 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	9608 Points -20%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7321 Points -39%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	4361 Points -64%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	5541 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	4623 Points -17%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	3517 Points -37%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	2038 Points -63%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	4067 Points +57%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	2592 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	2299 Points -11%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	989 Points -62%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	23586 Points +85%
Aorus X7 Pro v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK	19252 Points +51%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	12731 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	12472 Points -2%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	9824 Points -23%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5289 Points -58%
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	10000 Points +20%
Aorus X7 Pro v5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK	8622 Points +3%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	8343 Points 0%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	8338 Points
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7952 Points -5%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5515 Points -34%

3DMark 11 Performance		11371 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		118421 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		24051 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9878 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		5206 points
Help

... in comparison

	high	ultra
Guild Wars 2 (2012)		52.9
BioShock Infinite (2013)		105.5
Metro: Last Light (2013)		82.1
Thief (2014)		72.4
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)	85	62
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)		60
Fallout 4 (2015)		71.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)		63.5
Doom (2016)		96.5
Overwatch (2016)		106.3

Noise Level

Idle		30.8 / 30.8 / 32 dB(A)
Load		37.2 / 51.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A)

	MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)	Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
Noise		-3%	-2%	-2%	-3%
off / environment *	28.6	28.9 -1%	30 -5%	30 -5%	29.1 -2%
Idle Minimum *	30.8	32.4 -5%	32 -4%	31 -1%	29.1 6%
Idle Average *	30.8	32.4 -5%	33 -7%	32 -4%	31.9 -4%
Idle Maximum *	32	32.4 -1%	35 -9%	33 -3%	31.9 -0%
Load Average *	37.2	39.4 -6%	35 6%	40 -8%	46 -24%
Load Maximum *	51.5	52 -1%	49 5%	47 9%	47.5 8%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


32 °C	37.4 °C	30.4 °C
29 °C	35 °C	28.2 °C
24.6 °C	23.6 °C	24.6 °C

Maximum: 37.4 °C
Average: 29.4 °C


52 °C	39.4 °C	54 °C
24 °C	26.6 °C	27.2 °C
23.4 °C	24.4 °C	24.8 °C

Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 32.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.2 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.4 °C / 77.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+3.5 °C / 6.3 F).

MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.52 / 1.47 Watt
Idle	24.4 / 26.6 / 36.4 Watt
Load	117 / 163.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus G701VO-CS74K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption		-6%	-19%	-4%	-14%
Idle Minimum *	24.4	22.3 9%	31 -27%	24 2%	28.2 -16%
Idle Average *	26.6	27.3 -3%	35 -32%	31 -17%	32 -20%
Idle Maximum *	36.4	30 18%	40 -10%	36 1%	32.6 10%
Load Average *	117	152.2 -30%	106 9%	94 20%	162.2 -39%
Load Maximum *	163.6	204.2 -25%	218 -33%	204 -25%	173.5 -6%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		5h 23min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 41min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 33min

	MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 83 Wh	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 83 Wh	MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.2 Wh	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh	Asus G701VO-CS74K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 93 Wh
Battery Runtime		-2%	-13%	-6%	-13%
Reader / Idle	323	322 0%	290 -10%	311 -4%	242 -25%
WiFi v1.3	221	224 1%	206 -7%	210 -5%	202 -9%
Load	93	86 -8%	72 -23%	84 -10%	89 -4%

Pros

+ 游戏中不错的表面和核心温度

+ 舒适安静的SteelSeries背光键盘

+ 易于维护，可升级显卡

+ 游戏中相对安静

+ 坚固的机身

Cons

- 不支持显卡切换，Thunderbolt 3和NVMe

- 我们测试机有屏幕背光漏光问题

- 相对较短的电池续航

- 无可编程按键

- 风扇一直开启

In review: MSI GT72VR Dominator 6RD. Test model provided by CUKUSA

GT72的机身可能有些过时，不过它的硬件配置和实用性却不容小觑。它的冷却系统可以应对相比GTX 1060更加高功耗的显卡，因此GT72VR 6RD相比其它同样搭配这块帕斯卡显卡的机型它更加安静清凉。结合独一无二的120赫兹／5毫秒刷新率，和4K超高清选项，在对比之中它十分值得推荐选择。

这台设备的王牌是可更换的显卡。对于游戏玩家来说，升级GTX 1060到GTX 1070的可能性会让GT72VR 6RD十分有吸引力。维护也相比同类华硕设备更加方便，接近于准系统的水平，用户可以考虑选择入门级的GT72VR SKU（甚至是较老的GT72），以后当GTX 1060无法满足需要时再升级显卡。

我们也希望它能够提供更好的屏幕质量控制。我们目前接触到的两台GT72VR测试机都有不太均匀的边框或屏幕漏光问题。我们建议用户在购买后立刻检查它的屏幕质量。

尽管它的新机型GT73VR已经推出，GT72VR系列由于采用MXM 3.0b接口和易于维护将会有举足轻重的地位。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US - 2016-09-15 09/15/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis

80 / 98 → 81%

Keyboard

81%

Pointing Device

81%

Connectivity

74 / 81 → 91%

Weight

51 / 10-66 → 73%

Battery

73%

Display

88%

Games Performance

93%

Application Performance

90%

Temperature

91 / 95 → 95%

Noise

81 / 90 → 90%

Audio

90%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Average

78%

87%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5238 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 微星 GT72VR 6RD Dominator Pro 笔记本电脑简短评测

Allen Ngo, 2016-09-17 (Update: 2020-06- 8)