三星Galaxy A16 4G 评测 - 低于 180 欧元的 OLED 显示屏智能手机
OLED适合我们这些人。
你几乎买不到比三星Galaxy A16 4G 更便宜的彩色 OLED 显示屏智能手机了。制造商承诺长期更新，但与前代产品相比变化不大。Galaxy A16 4G 还值得一看吗？Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
判决
三星Galaxy A16 4G 以其经济实惠的价格提供了出人意料的优质制造质量，并以令人印象深刻的六年软件更新而脱颖而出，成为一个可靠的长期选择。
值得注意的是，该版本不支持 5G，但作为交换，它的价格低于Galaxy A16 5G。尽管价格较低，但它采用了相同的外壳设计、明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏和高达 25 瓦的快速充电支持--这在这个价位的产品中是相当慷慨的。不过，它不含充电器，必须单独购买。
Galaxy A16 4G 配备了超广角摄像头，这在同价位手机中并不多见，但它更适合随手抓拍，而非高质量摄影。
快速的内部存储是一个值得欢迎的功能，AMOLED 屏幕在进行相应配置后可提供准确的色彩。不过，用户应注意在亮度较低时可能会出现 PWM 闪烁。
在执行日常任务时，该机的性能一般都比较稳定，只是偶尔会出现延迟或卡顿现象。
总体而言，对于不需要 5G 连接的预算有限的买家来说，三星Galaxy A16 4G 是一个不错的选择。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在测试期间，三星Galaxy A16 4G 的价格已经大幅下降，许多零售商都有售。
例如，亚马逊（amazon.de）上已经有售，价格不到135 欧元。
规格
外壳和功能 - 时尚塑料
三星经济实惠的Galaxy A16 4G 采用了简单的塑料外壳和磨砂表面。尽管材质一般，但由于采用了柔和的圆角设计和细腻的丝质光泽，其设计仍不失优雅。它有黑色、白色和粉绿色可供选择。
与 Galaxy A15 4GGalaxy A16 的设计略有变化，现在配备了更大的 6.7 英寸显示屏。值得庆幸的是，重量保持不变，仍为 200 克。就价格而言，该机的制造质量非常出色--坚固、耐用、抗弯曲或抗压。
我们的测试机型配备了 4GB 内存和 128GB 内部存储空间。8 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间的高配置机型售价也要高出约 50 欧元。
虽然这款手机不支持 eSIM 卡，但它通过两个 nano-SIM 卡插槽提供双 SIM 卡功能。其中一个插槽可以换成 microSD 卡，存储容量最高可扩展至 1.5 TB。在测试中，microSD 读卡器表现出色，使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡时速度很快。
此外还配备了 NFC 功能，可实现移动支付和电子身份证功能。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A15 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A16 4G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G15 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信和操作 - WiFi 5 存在问题
Galaxy A16 4G 支持最快的无线标准 WiFi 5。不过，在测试过程中，我们发现偶尔会出现速度下降的情况，即使重启测试、更新手机和重启路由器后，这种情况依然存在。
移动连接仅限于 LTE，但支持的频段足够宽泛，可在中欧各地可靠使用。
触摸屏反应灵敏、准确，包括边角部分。指纹传感器集成在电源按钮上，快速、可靠，提供了便捷的解锁体验。
软件和可持续性 - 长期更新承诺
Galaxy A16 4G 仍然搭载Android 14 和 OneUI 6.1，在测试时还没有更新到Android 15，这有点令人失望。好的一面是，三星承诺提供六次主要的Android 更新和六年的安全补丁--这在这个价位的手机中实属罕见。
包装完全不使用塑料，使用不含矿物油的油墨印刷。据三星公司称，生产该手机会产生 34.3 千克的二氧化碳排放量，预计在设备的平均使用期限内总排放量约为 41 千克。这些都是很好的环保指标，使其成为具有环保意识的买家的可靠选择。不过，三星没有提供有关手机制造材料的任何细节。
相机 - 即使是超广角相机
三星还采用了前代产品的相机系统 Galaxy A15的相机系统：主摄像头采用了 5000 万像素镜头，在光线充足的情况下拍摄出的照片在同价位机型中还算不错。但在细节方面，清晰度和细节的多样性还有待提高。
超广角摄像头在这个价位的手机中比较少见，但分辨率只有 500 万像素，显示的周围环境图像比较粗糙，有时还比较模糊。
移动图像最高可达到 1080p 和 30 fps，启动前可在超广角镜头和主摄像头之间进行选择。
前置摄像头的分辨率为 1300 万像素。图像整体看起来相当清晰，也能很好地放大。不过，即使在光线良好的情况下，暗处的细节也无法辨认。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightUltraweitwinkelkamera
显示屏 - 90 Hz AMOLED
在 200 欧元以下的智能手机中采用 90 Hz AMOLED 显示屏并不多见，但三星Galaxy A16 4G 却做到了这一点。在我们的测试中，屏幕的峰值亮度达到了 733 cd/m²，尽管还达不到理想的 HDR 性能，但对于户外可见度来说已经绰绰有余。
虽然我们使用 CalMAN 软件和分光光度计进行了测量，发现有轻微的绿色色调，但色彩准确度总体良好。
一个不足之处是，当屏幕设置为低亮度时，在 90 Hz 左右会出现 PWM 闪烁。虽然这与刷新率相匹配，但对于对闪烁敏感的用户来说，仍可能造成问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 729 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
109.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.057
| Samsung Galaxy A16 4G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A15 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G15 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi 14C IPS, 1640x720, 6.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 16% | 12% | -3% | -21% | |
| Brightness middle | 729 | 731 0% | 739 1% | 468 -36% | 422 -42% |
| Brightness | 716 | 711 -1% | 741 3% | 452 -37% | 401 -44% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 93 -2% | 97 2% | 86 -9% | 89 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.14 | 2.31 26% | 2.6 17% | 2.07 34% | 3.21 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.24 | 3.51 17% | 3.8 10% | 6.38 -50% | 6.29 -48% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 1.7 53% | 2.2 39% | 0.8 78% | 2.9 19% |
| Gamma | 2.057 107% | 2.091 105% | 2.04 108% | 2.202 100% | 2.382 92% |
| CCT | 6441 101% | 6424 101% | 6327 103% | 6607 98% | 6338 103% |
| Contrast | 1560 | 1407 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 89.9 Hz Amplitude: 14 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 89.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 89.9 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8508 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在调整亮度设置的同时，以固定的变焦水平进行了一系列测量。
在最低亮度下，振幅曲线看似平坦，但这只是由于图表的缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最低亮度下的振幅放大图，清晰地显示了 PWM 闪烁模式。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命--强劲动力和快速充电
三星为Galaxy A16 4G 配备了联发科 Helio G99-这是一款较老的 SoC，但对于一款经济型设备来说，它的性能依然出色。
这一选择得到了回报：Galaxy A16 4G 的性能与价格相当。虽然偶尔仍会出现卡顿和短时延迟，但出现的频率比这个价位的典型产品要低。
在持续负载情况下，机箱会明显发热，最高温度可达 44.3 °C。在 3DMark 压力测试中，我们观察到性能适度下降了约 7%，这表明存在轻微的热节流现象。
单声道扬声器在最大音量时也很吃力，声音刺耳且不平衡。在中等音量下，音效尚可接受，但仍以高音为主。与许多三星手机一样，该机对蓝牙编解码器的支持有限，因此值得检查一下你的无线耳机或扬声器是否兼容，以获得最佳音质。
尽管Galaxy A16 4G 的尺寸比前代产品更大，但它仍保留了与 A15 4G 相同的 5,000 毫安时电池。 Galaxy A15 4G.因此，电池续航时间保持相似--在标准亮度下进行的 Wi-Fi 浏览测试中，续航时间约为 15 小时。支持高达 25 瓦的充电功率，这在同价位产品中算是很快的了。充满电仅需不到两个小时。
| Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Samsung Galaxy A15 | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | Motorola Moto G15 | Xiaomi Redmi 14C | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | -44% | -66% | -65% | -17% | 85% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 942.8 | 967.8 3% | 529.46 -44% | 287.7 -69% | 300.9 -68% | 728 ? -23% | 2032 ? 116% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 710.8 | 488.5 -31% | 273.75 -61% | 228.5 -68% | 193.1 -73% | 526 ? -26% | 1648 ? 132% |
| Random Read 4KB | 208.8 | 233.2 12% | 206.73 -1% | 65.2 -69% | 88.6 -58% | 192.1 ? -8% | 282 ? 35% |
| Random Write 4KB | 208.1 | 229.6 10% | 62.47 -70% | 87.4 -58% | 78.9 -62% | 184.5 ? -11% | 325 ? 56% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
| Motorola Moto G15 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G15 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Samsung Galaxy A16 4G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Samsung Galaxy A16 4G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A15 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G15 5200 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5160 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 1% | -9% | 0% | 8% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1630 | 1622 0% | 2072 27% | 1785 10% | |
| H.264 | 1419 | 1446 2% | 1123 -21% | 1187 -16% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 903 | 885 -2% | 745 -17% | 1018 13% | 976 8% |
| Load | 349 | 358 3% | 265 -24% | 329 -6% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
高品质的 OLED 显示屏、吸引人的外壳设计和稳定的性能--这些都是在这个价位上很少能找到的引人注目的功能。
三星Galaxy A16 4G 的价格非常实惠，是一款经济实惠的全能手机。
Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
- 04/19/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: Mögliche Alternativen im Vergleich
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 71.6%  | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $137.47 List Price: 179€ | 200 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED |
2. 80% v7 (old)  | Samsung Galaxy A15 Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $4.99 Milomdoi 3 Pack Screen Prote... 2. $5.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 3. $5.94 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... List Price: 190€ | 200 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" 2340x1080 396 PPI Super AMOLED |
3. 73.1%  | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G Samsung Exynos 1330 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $203.99 List Price: 200€ | 200 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED |
4. 72.3%  | Motorola Moto G15 Mediatek Helio G81 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC | Amazon: $149.99 List Price: 150€ | 190 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.72" 2400x1080 392 PPI IPS |
5. 70.7%  | Xiaomi Redmi 14C Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC | Amazon: $119.99 List Price: 150€ | 211 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.88" 1640x720 260 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
