三星 Galaxy A3 (2016) 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 386 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.34 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.12
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 1280x720 px 4.71'' (AMOLED) | Samsung Galaxy A3 940x540 px px 4.5'' (AMOLED) | Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 1280x720 px 5.0'' (IPS) | OnePlus X 1920x1080 px 5.0'' (AMOLED) | Huawei P8 lite 1280x720 px 5.0'' (IPS) | Wiko Highway Pure 1280x720 px 4.8'' (AMOLED) | Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo 1920x1080 px 5.1'' (AMOLED) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -47% | -84% | -203% | -143% | -203% | -59% | |
Brightness middle | 386 | 434 12% | 418 8% | 312 -19% | 365 -5% | 298 -23% | 334 -13% |
Brightness | 394 | 433 10% | 407 3% | 314 -20% | 353 -10% | 298 -24% | 341 -13% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 96 9% | 95 8% | 91 3% | 93 6% | 96 9% | 91 3% |
Black Level * | 0.49 | 0.42 | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.11 | 2.98 -168% | 3.92 -253% | 6.28 -466% | 5.2 -368% | 6.81 -514% | 2.84 -156% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.35 | ||||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.34 | 2.68 -100% | 3.81 -184% | 8.24 -515% | 5.85 -337% | 7.53 -462% | 2.91 -117% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.44 90% | 2.27 97% | 2.12 104% | 2.17 101% | 2.15 102% | 2.01 109% |
CCT | 6441 101% | 6603 98% | 7361 88% | 8145 80% | 7252 90% | 8348 78% | 6432 101% |
Contrast | 853 | 869 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 70.86 | ||||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.25 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
Wiko Highway Pure |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
Wiko Highway Pure | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
Wiko Highway Pure | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
Wiko Highway Pure |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 | |
Wiko Highway Pure | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 | |
Wiko Highway Pure | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
Wiko Highway Pure | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 | |
Wiko Highway Pure | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
Wiko Highway Pure | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 | |
Huawei P8 lite |
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
Wiko Highway Pure | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 | |
Wiko Highway Pure | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
OnePlus X |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
Wiko Highway Pure |
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
Wiko Highway Pure | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 | |
Huawei P8 lite |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
* ... smaller is better
BaseMark OS II - Memory | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
OnePlus X | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 | |
Wiko Highway Pure | |
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Off / Standby | 0 / 0.15 Watt |
Idle | 0.96 / 1.39 / 1.45 Watt |
Load |
2.65 / 3.51 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy A3 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei P8 lite Mali-450 MP4, Kirin 620, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Wiko Highway Pure Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -36% | -25% | -29% | -53% | -41% | -9% | |
Reader / Idle | 1978 | 1080 -45% | 1364 -31% | 968 -51% | 715 -64% | 1235 -38% | 1615 -18% |
H.264 | 863 | 602 -30% | 677 -22% | 514 -40% | 369 -57% | 465 -46% | 773 -10% |
WiFi v1.3 | 628 | 526 -16% | 549 -13% | 351 -44% | 472 -25% | 546 -13% | |
Load | 376 | 256 -32% | 264 -30% | 339 -10% | 194 -48% | 164 -56% | 402 7% |
WiFi | 568 |
Pros
Cons
三星的Galaxy A3更新带来了诸多优势。首先它坚固的高品质机身凭借弧形玻璃边缘和金属边框让我们心动不已。而这个设计的缺点则是不可更换的电池和很滑的后盖。
不过,它在技术参数上也有亮点。出色的屏幕,16GB的闪存可通过micro-SD卡扩展,而它的电池续航时间也让人十分满意。这都是许多用户所重视的智能手机特质。尽管它支持NFC,不过遗憾的是无线网络模组只支持2.4频段。三星的最新四核处理器没有刷新任何记录,不过它为Galaxy A3带来了适合日常使用的性能。与此形成对比的是,它搭配的相机模组让我们五味杂陈。尽管在光线好的时候它的成像锐利清晰,但只要光线稍弱它就会让用户失望。缓慢又不准确的自动对焦则时不时会让照片欠曝。
三星推出了一款高品质的中端智能手机,它的出色屏幕和超长电池续航让人无话可说。
和Galaxy A3价位相近,屏幕尺寸相当的其它设备几乎没有。如果可以接受更大的屏幕,用户可以考虑售价略高的Galaxy S5,它在我们的测试中得到了87%的更好分数。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
- 02/29/2016 v5 (old)
Andreas Kilian