Notebookcheck Logo

三星 Galaxy A3 (2016) 智能手机简短评测

质感。 前代机型的独特之处在于一体式的铝合金机身。三星现在为它加入了更多的玻璃元素。这款中端智能手机的屏幕也有了改变:它现在分辨率更高,尺寸也更大。这会是成功的整体策略吗?
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 (Galaxy Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7578 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memory
1536 MB 
Display
4.70 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel, 电容式, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.7 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机插口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 128 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速传感器,近距传感器,计步器,陀螺仪,指南针, WiFi Direct, DLNA, MirrorLink, USB-OTG, nano-SIM
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM 四频 (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G 四频 (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B40) Cat.4 (最大 150 Mbit/s 下载 & 50 Mbit/s 上传), 身体辐射值: 0.492 W/kg, 头部辐射值: 0.621 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.4 x 134.5 x 65.2
Battery
9 Wh, 2300 mAh
Operating System
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (自动对焦 f/1.9, 1080p 视频拍摄 @ 30 FPS)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (定焦 f/1.9, 1080p 视频拍摄 @ 30 FPS
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道,位于底部边缘, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器,数据线,入耳式耳机,卡槽工具, Microsoft Office, Galaxy apps, MyGalaxy, Smart Manager, Samsung KNOX, S-Voice, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
131 g, Power Supply: 57 g
Price
329 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Samsung Galaxy A3 front
Samsung Galaxy A3 front
Samsung Galaxy A3 card slot
Samsung Galaxy A3 card slot
Samsung Galaxy A3 front
Samsung Galaxy A3 front
Samsung Galaxy A3 front
Samsung Galaxy A3 back
Samsung Galaxy A3 macro
Samsung Galaxy A3 power supply
142.1 mm 72.4 mm 11.6 mm 155 g143 mm 70.6 mm 7.7 mm 133 g142 mm 72.5 mm 8.1 mm 145 g141.9 mm 68.1 mm 5.1 mm 98 g140 mm 69 mm 6.9 mm 138 g134.5 mm 65.2 mm 7.4 mm 131 g130.1 mm 65.5 mm 6.9 mm 110 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Garmin Edge 500 - Route
Garmin Edge 500 - Route
Garmin Edge 500 - Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - Section
Garmin Edge 500 - Section
Samsung Galaxy A3 - Route
Samsung Galaxy A3 - Route
Samsung Galaxy A3 - Underpass
Samsung Galaxy A3 - Underpass
Samsung Galaxy A3 - Section
Samsung Galaxy A3 - Section
Camera software: Auto mode
Camera software: Auto mode
Camera software: Pro mode
Camera software: Pro mode
Camera software: Mode options
Camera software: Mode options

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Samsung Galaxy A3 - Test picture
Samsung Galaxy A3 - Test picture
427
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 427 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 394.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.13 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 386 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.34 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.12
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
1280x720 px 4.71'' (AMOLED)
Samsung Galaxy A3
940x540 px px 4.5'' (AMOLED)
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1280x720 px 5.0'' (IPS)
OnePlus X
1920x1080 px 5.0'' (AMOLED)
Huawei P8 lite
1280x720 px 5.0'' (IPS)
Wiko Highway Pure
1280x720 px 4.8'' (AMOLED)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
1920x1080 px 5.1'' (AMOLED)
Screen
-47%
-84%
-203%
-143%
-203%
-59%
Brightness middle
386
434
12%
418
8%
312
-19%
365
-5%
298
-23%
334
-13%
Brightness
394
433
10%
407
3%
314
-20%
353
-10%
298
-24%
341
-13%
Brightness Distribution
88
96
9%
95
8%
91
3%
93
6%
96
9%
91
3%
Black Level *
0.49
0.42
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.11
2.98
-168%
3.92
-253%
6.28
-466%
5.2
-368%
6.81
-514%
2.84
-156%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.35
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.34
2.68
-100%
3.81
-184%
8.24
-515%
5.85
-337%
7.53
-462%
2.91
-117%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.44 90%
2.27 97%
2.12 104%
2.17 101%
2.15 102%
2.01 109%
CCT
6441 101%
6603 98%
7361 88%
8145 80%
7252 90%
8348 78%
6432 101%
Contrast
853
869
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
70.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.25

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score
OnePlus X
40256 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
37854 Points +19%
Huawei P8 lite
34247 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
31762 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
23242 Points -27%
Wiko Highway Pure
21063 Points -34%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3330 Points +51%
OnePlus X
2570 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
2201 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1563 Points -29%
Wiko Highway Pure
1429 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A3
1409 Points -36%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
OnePlus X
913 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
721 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
703 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
528 Points -25%
Wiko Highway Pure
482 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy A3
474 Points -33%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei P8 lite
2754 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1561 Points
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Huawei P8 lite
588 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
526 Points
Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread
OnePlus X
634 MFLOPS +164%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
247.7 MFLOPS +3%
Wiko Highway Pure
240 MFLOPS 0%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
240 MFLOPS
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
207.7 MFLOPS -13%
Single Thread
OnePlus X
425.5 MFLOPS +371%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
117.1 MFLOPS +30%
Wiko Highway Pure
105 MFLOPS +16%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
95.6 MFLOPS +6%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
90.4 MFLOPS
BaseMark OS II
Web
OnePlus X
843 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
756 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
733 Points -3%
Wiko Highway Pure
637 Points -16%
Huawei P8 lite
616 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
484 Points -36%
Graphics
OnePlus X
1975 Points +376%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
488 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
415 Points
Wiko Highway Pure
324 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
315 Points -24%
Huawei P8 lite
303 Points -27%
Memory
Huawei P8 lite
816 Points +84%
OnePlus X
662 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
569 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
443 Points
Wiko Highway Pure
434 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
394 Points -11%
System
OnePlus X
2225 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
2095 Points +52%
Huawei P8 lite
1467 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
1380 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1166 Points -16%
Wiko Highway Pure
1030 Points -25%
Overall
OnePlus X
1252 Points +89%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
808 Points +22%
Huawei P8 lite
687 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
662 Points
Wiko Highway Pure
551 Points -17%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
515 Points -22%
Smartbench 2012
Gaming Index
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4368 points
OnePlus X
4069 points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A3
3862 points -12%
Huawei P8 lite
3753 points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3500 points -20%
Wiko Highway Pure
3295 points -25%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3234 points -26%
Productivity Index
OnePlus X
9286 points +63%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
6719 points +18%
Wiko Highway Pure
6307 points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A3
6034 points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
5706 points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
4962 points -13%
Huawei P8 lite
2941 points -48%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
OnePlus X
4450 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4134 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4051 Points
Huawei P8 lite
3717 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3701 Points -9%
Wiko Highway Pure
3216 Points -21%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
OnePlus X
23 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
20 fps
Huawei P8 lite
15.3 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
14 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy A3
13 fps -35%
Wiko Highway Pure
10 fps -50%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
9.5 fps -52%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus X
21 fps +75%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
14 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
12 fps
Huawei P8 lite
9.9 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy A3
5.3 fps -56%
Wiko Highway Pure
5.3 fps -56%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.3 fps -56%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
OnePlus X
10 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
8.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A3
6.4 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4.8 fps -43%
Wiko Highway Pure
4.2 fps -50%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3.7 fps -56%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus X
8.6 fps +110%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4.8 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy A3
1.8 fps -56%
Wiko Highway Pure
1.8 fps -56%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1.7 fps -59%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
OnePlus X
15051 Points +108%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
8030 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
7229 Points
Huawei P8 lite
5629 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A3
4505 Points -38%
Wiko Highway Pure
4440 Points -39%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
4402 Points -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
OnePlus X
14541 Points +123%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
7536 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
6522 Points
Huawei P8 lite
5167 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A3
3939 Points -40%
Wiko Highway Pure
3872 Points -41%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3789 Points -42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
OnePlus X
17156 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
11653 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
10424 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
10148 Points -13%
Wiko Highway Pure
9152 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A3
9071 Points -22%
Huawei P8 lite
8206 Points -30%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4449 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
3937 Points
Huawei P8 lite
3676 Points -7%
Wiko Highway Pure
2230 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy A3
2207 Points -44%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
2135 Points -46%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
5090 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
4585 Points
Huawei P8 lite
4138 Points -10%
Wiko Highway Pure
2679 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A3
2646 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
2580 Points -44%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
10827 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
10270 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
9544 Points -12%
Wiko Highway Pure
8877 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A3
8700 Points -20%
Huawei P8 lite
7399 Points -32%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Samsung Exynos 7578, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite HiSilicon Kirin 620, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko Highway Pure Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus X
4810 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3627 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
3566 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3296 Points
Wiko Highway Pure
2864 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3
2782 Points
Huawei P8 lite
2483 Points
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score
Huawei P8 lite
1986 ms *
Wiko Highway Pure
1639 ms *
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1573 ms *
OnePlus X
1509 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
1413 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A3
1330 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
735 ms *
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei P8 lite
15866 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A3
13998 ms *
Wiko Highway Pure
13234 ms *
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
11843 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
11796 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
11603 ms *
OnePlus X
7264 ms *
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
OnePlus X
85 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
68 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
64 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
52 Points
Huawei P8 lite
47 Points
Wiko Highway Pure
46 Points
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score
OnePlus X
5328 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3765 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
3499 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3125 Points
Wiko Highway Pure
2852 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3
2832 Points
Huawei P8 lite
2352 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus X
28 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
23.1 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
22.1 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
20.83 Points

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB
OnePlus X
14.22 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
11.07 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
10.27 MB/s
Huawei P8 lite
8.32 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A3
6 MB/s
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.11 MB/s
Wiko Highway Pure
5 MB/s
Random Read 4KB
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
22.79 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
22.57 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
21.92 MB/s
Huawei P8 lite
18.46 MB/s
OnePlus X
16.31 MB/s
Wiko Highway Pure
14 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A3
11 MB/s
Sequential Write 256KB
Samsung Galaxy A3
71 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
57.9 MB/s
Huawei P8 lite
52.8 MB/s
OnePlus X
49.31 MB/s
Wiko Highway Pure
39 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
27.27 MB/s
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
22.33 MB/s
Sequential Read 256KB
OnePlus X
235.5 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
215.9 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
168.8 MB/s
Huawei P8 lite
139.5 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A3
132 MB/s
Wiko Highway Pure
132 MB/s
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
131.4 MB/s
BaseMark OS II - Memory
Huawei P8 lite
816 Points
OnePlus X
662 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
569 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
443 Points
Wiko Highway Pure
434 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
394 Points
Max. Load
 34.7 °C33.4 °C31.5 °C 
 34.5 °C32.9 °C31.2 °C 
 33.7 °C32.6 °C31 °C 
Maximum: 34.7 °C
Average: 32.8 °C
31.3 °C32.5 °C33 °C
31.3 °C32.4 °C32.8 °C
30.5 °C31.1 °C31.6 °C
Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 31.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.6 °C | Room Temperature 22.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.15 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.96 / 1.39 / 1.45 Watt
Load midlight 2.65 / 3.51 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 58min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 28min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 16min
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A3
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P8 lite
Mali-450 MP4, Kirin 620, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Wiko Highway Pure
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-36%
-25%
-29%
-53%
-41%
-9%
Reader / Idle
1978
1080
-45%
1364
-31%
968
-51%
715
-64%
1235
-38%
1615
-18%
H.264
863
602
-30%
677
-22%
514
-40%
369
-57%
465
-46%
773
-10%
WiFi v1.3
628
526
-16%
549
-13%
351
-44%
472
-25%
546
-13%
Load
376
256
-32%
264
-30%
339
-10%
194
-48%
164
-56%
402
7%
WiFi
568

Pros

+ 非常优秀的机身品质
+ 出色的屏幕
+ 优秀的通话功能
+ 准确的触控屏幕
+ 低发热
+ micro-SD卡槽
+ 支持NFC和USB-OTG
+ 不错的扬声器
+ 很长的电池续航

Cons

- 相机的暗光表现
- 无提示LED灯
- 不支持5GHz无线网络
- 不支持Miracast或MHL
- 机身较滑
- 不可更换电池
In review: Samsung Galaxy A3 (SM-A310F). Review sample courtesy of Samsung Germany.
In review: Samsung Galaxy A3 (SM-A310F). Review sample courtesy of Samsung Germany.

三星的Galaxy A3更新带来了诸多优势。首先它坚固的高品质机身凭借弧形玻璃边缘和金属边框让我们心动不已。而这个设计的缺点则是不可更换的电池和很滑的后盖。

不过,它在技术参数上也有亮点。出色的屏幕,16GB的闪存可通过micro-SD卡扩展,而它的电池续航时间也让人十分满意。这都是许多用户所重视的智能手机特质。尽管它支持NFC,不过遗憾的是无线网络模组只支持2.4频段。三星的最新四核处理器没有刷新任何记录,不过它为Galaxy A3带来了适合日常使用的性能。与此形成对比的是,它搭配的相机模组让我们五味杂陈。尽管在光线好的时候它的成像锐利清晰,但只要光线稍弱它就会让用户失望。缓慢又不准确的自动对焦则时不时会让照片欠曝。

三星推出了一款高品质的中端智能手机,它的出色屏幕和超长电池续航让人无话可说。

和Galaxy A3价位相近,屏幕尺寸相当的其它设备几乎没有。如果可以接受更大的屏幕,用户可以考虑售价略高的Galaxy S5,它在我们的测试中得到了87%的更好分数。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里 

Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 - 02/29/2016 v5 (old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis
93%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
45 / 60 → 74%
Weight
94%
Battery
94%
Display
91%
Games Performance
14 / 63 → 21%
Application Performance
32 / 70 → 46%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
65%
Average
72%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星 Galaxy A3 (2016) 智能手机简短评测
Andreas Kilian, 2016-03- 6 (Update: 2016-03- 6)